فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

Is Iran's Approach to Missile Technology a Deterrent Mechanism or a Severe Threat to Regional and Supra-Regional Security?

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 Political Sciences & I.R., Near East University, Nicosia, North Cyprus.
2 Prof, Final International University, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Nicosia, North Cyprus.
چکیده
Maintaining security, dealing with threats, and having military power to realize these things are the main concerns of countries that have security concerns. Therefore, strengthening internal power and improving the level of defense is one of the basic priorities of the government's policies. As a country with geostrategic, geopolitical and geoeconomic positions, Iran is facing important security challenges at the national, regional, and transnational levels, especially after the Islamic Revolution of 1979. The country has been at the heart of US political considerations due to Iran's political approach as a regional power in the Middle East. Iran has continuously faced serious challenges, especially from the US and Israel, and as a result, it has paid special attention to preventing possible threats from overcoming the dangers. For the national security of the country, Iranian policy makers have identified threats to national security and are trying to take measures to avoid risks. The development of military technology is defined as a key deterrent mechanism against security threats.
This article analyzes the impact of the evolution of missile technology on Iran's defense-security strategy. The descriptive and analytical method is used in this article and the geopolitical and geostrategic threats against Iran are discussed. Next, Iran's defense strategy and defense policy are analyzed, then defense diplomacy and deterrence strategy are examined. The main purpose of the article is to explain Iran's goals in developing missile technology. This technology aims to create a deterrent mechanism against threats to regional and extra-regional security.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Is Iran's Approach to Missile Technology a Deterrent Mechanism or a Severe Threat to Regional and Supra-Regional Security?

نویسندگان English

Ghadir Golkarian 1
Hüseyin Işıksal 2
1 Political Sciences & I.R., Near East University, Nicosia, North Cyprus.
2 Prof, Final International University, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Nicosia, North Cyprus.
چکیده English

Maintaining security, dealing with threats, and having military power to realize these things are the main concerns of countries that have security concerns. Therefore, strengthening internal power and improving the level of defense is one of the basic priorities of the government's policies. As a country with geostrategic, geopolitical and geoeconomic positions, Iran is facing important security challenges at the national, regional, and transnational levels, especially after the Islamic Revolution of 1979. The country has been at the heart of US political considerations due to Iran's political approach as a regional power in the Middle East. Iran has continuously faced serious challenges, especially from the US and Israel, and as a result, it has paid special attention to preventing possible threats from overcoming the dangers. For the national security of the country, Iranian policy makers have identified threats to national security and are trying to take measures to avoid risks. The development of military technology is defined as a key deterrent mechanism against security threats.
This article analyzes the impact of the evolution of missile technology on Iran's defense-security strategy. The descriptive and analytical method is used in this article and the geopolitical and geostrategic threats against Iran are discussed. Next, Iran's defense strategy and defense policy are analyzed, then defense diplomacy and deterrence strategy are examined. The main purpose of the article is to explain Iran's goals in developing missile technology. This technology aims to create a deterrent mechanism against threats to regional and extra-regional security.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Iran
Supra-Regional Security
Deterrent Mechanism
Defense-Military Strategy
Security Threats
Missile Technology
Security Challenges
  1. Adamsky, D; Sadjadpour, K; Gramont, D.D (2011). The War Over Containing Iran: Can a Nuclear Iran Be Stopped? Retrieved 11 23, 2020, from Http://foreignaffairs.com: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/iran/ 2011-02-20/war-over-containing-iran.
  2. Araghchi, S.A; Beik, A (2018). The effect of geopolitical, economic factors of the Caspian Sea on the formulation of the defense strategy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal Scientific of Strategic Defense Studies, 16(72), 99-124.
  3. Arghavani, F; Pirankhou, S (2016). Development of missile technology and defense strategy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Scientific Research Journal of Strategy, 26(83), 51-74.
  4. Azghandi, A (2016). Peace and War: Current Military and Strategic Issues (9 ed.). Tehran: SAMT Publisher.
  5. Bagheri Dolatabadi, A (2013). The role of deterrence in Iran's military strategy. Journal Science of Defense Policy, 85(22), 37-87.
  6. Broad, J.W; Sanger, E.D (2008). http://www.nytimes.com. Retrieved 12 21, 2020, from irandebate.org: https://www.irandebate.org/news/403/iran-said-have-nuclear-fuel-one-weapon.
  7. Collins, J.M (1973). Principles and Practices; Grand Strategy. London: Naval Institute Press.
  8. Cordesman, A (2014). Iran's Rocket and Missile Forces and Strategic Options. CSIS. Washington: Rowman & Littlefield. Retrieved from https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/ publication/141218_Cordesman_IranRocketMissileForces_Web.pdf.
  9. Cordesman, A.H; Modell, S; Lin, A; Peacock, M (2014). Iran's Rocket and Missile Forces and Strategic Options. In A. H. Cordesman, Iran Rocket and Missile Forces (pp. 1-220). Washington DC, Washington DC, USA: CSIS. Retrieved 10 22, 2020, from https://csis-website-prod.s3. Amazonaws. com/ s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/141007_Iran_Rocket_Missile_ forces.pdf.
  10. Cordesman, H.A (2018). The Crisis in Iran: What Now? Washington DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies (CISIS). Retrieved 4 2, 2021, from https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/ publication/ 180112_The_Crisis_Iran.pdf?436140qcZULx2.FP2LQLcbaW0c4ZC5Y.
  11. Cox, M (2002). American power before and after September 11: dizzy with success? Royal Institute of International Affairs, 78(2), 261-276. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3095681.
  12. Dalia, D. K; Nader, A; Roshan, P (2011). Israel and Iran, A Dangerous Rivalry. RAND. Arlington, USA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved 7 23, 2020, from http://www.rand.org/publications/permissions.html.
  13. Eia; Administration, U.E (2018). https://www.eia.gov/international/ overview/country/IRN. Retrieved 4 11, 2021, from https://www.eia.gov: https://www.eia.gov/international/overview/country/IRN.
  14. Eisenstadt, M (2011). The Strategic Culture of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Operational and Policy Implications. (A. Tarzi, Ed.) Middle East Studies (1), 35-62.
  15. Eisenstadt, M (2015). The Strategic Culture of the Islamic Republic of Iran; Religion, Expediency, and Soft Power in an Era of Disruptive Change. Retrieved 09 27, 2020, from https://www.washingtoninstitute.org: https:// washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/strategic-culture-islamic-republ- ic-iran-religion-expediency-and-soft-power-era.
  16. Enegerer, H (2009). Security Economics: Definition and Capacity. Economics of Security Working Paper, 5, 7.
  17. (2020). Retrieved 1 4, 2021, from www.farsnews.ir: http://fna.ir/
  18. Gheysari, N; Khezri, E (2016). The defense policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran; Check macro documents. Journal of the Islamic Revolution Approach, 37(10), 57-74. Retrieved from http://www.rahyaft. Info/ issue_ 5513_5514.html? Lang=en.
  19. Governors, B. O (2009). Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council Resolutions 1737(2006), 1747 (2007), 1803 (2008), and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran. IAEA Board. Vienna: www.iaea.org. Retrieved 12 27, 10, from http://www. iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Board/2008/gov2008-38.pdf.
  20. Haghshenass, F (2008). Middle East Transparent. Retrieved 12 04, 2020, from http://www.middleeasttransparent.com: https://www. Middleeast Tran-parent.com/IMG/pdf/PolicyFocus87.pdf.
  21. Işıksal, H; Golkarian, G (2019). The Unresolved Problem of the Middle East: Iran's Nuclear Energy Policy from Khatami to Rouhani. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 8(2), 416-432. Doi: 10.7596/taksad. v8i2.2002.
  22. Jahanshahi, A; Nabizadeh, B; Panahi, B (2019). Defense Strategies of the Islamic Republic of Iran with Emphasis on the Role of Geopolitical Factors to Promote Security and Sustainable Development of Northeastern Border Areas. Scientific Journal of Defense policy, 27(107), 87-124.
  23. Lennon, T. A (2008). Application of soft power. In The Epicenter of Crisis. London, UK: MIT Press.
  24. Lider, J (1983). Military Theory: Concept, Structure, Problems. California, U.S.: Gower.
  25. Louis Rene Beres. (2018). Looking Beyond System: Exploring the "Trump Factor" in Israel's Strategic Choices. Infinity Journal, 6(1), 24-31. Retrieved 12 24, 2020, from https://www.militarystrategymagazine.com/_read/volume -6-issue-1/26/#zoom=z.
  26. Maher, N (2020). Balancing deterrence: Iran- Israel relations in a turbulent. Review of Economics and Political Sciences, 3(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1108/REPS-06-2019-0085.
  27. McAllister Linn, B (2001). Transforming Defense. (C. C. Crane, Ed.) Texas, U.S.: Strategic Studies Institute.
  28. Menashri, D (2007). Iran's Regional Policy: Between Radicalism and Pragmatism. Journal of International Affairs, 60(2), 153-167. Retrieved 7 13, 2020, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/24357976.
  29. Mistry, D (2007). Arms Control Association. Retrieved 11 17, 2020, from https://www.armscontrol.org: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2007-10/ iran-nuclear-briefs/european-missile-defense-assessing-iranpercentageE2 percentage80percentage99s-icbm-capabilities.
  30. Motaghi, E (2006). Defense-security diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran against. Scientific Journal of Defense Strategy, 14(4), 35-44.
  31. Murray, J.D; Viotti, R.P (1994). The Defense Policies of Nations: A Comparative Study (3 ed.). (L. Diamond, Ed.) Baltimore, Maryland, US: John Hopkins University Press.
  32. Negha-e Irani. (2003). Retrieved 12 07, 2020, from https://farsi.khamenei.ir: https://farsi.khamenei.ir/special?id=4133.
  33. Olson, A.E (2016). Iran's Path Dependent Military Doctrine. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 63-94.
  34. Sadjadpour, K (2008). Reading Khamenei: The World View of Iran's Most Powerful Leader. Washington D.C, USA. Retrieved 8 13, 2020, from https://carnegieendowment.org/2008/03/10/reading-khamenei-world-view-of-iran-s-most-powerful-leader-pub-19975.
  35. Taghavi Asl, A (2000). New Geopolitics of Iran: from Kazakhstan to Georgia (2 Ed.). Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Printing, and Publishing Center.
  36. Zohdi, Y (2007). Compare defense policy, defense doctrine, defense strategy. Scientific Journal of Strategic Studies, 17(67), 1-25.
دوره 20، شماره 2
تابستان 1403
صفحه 1-19

  • تاریخ دریافت 22 مرداد 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 25 دی 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 06 بهمن 1402