فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

تحلیل نقش عوامل پیشرو و موانعِ شکل‌‌گیری سازمان منطقه‌ای خلیج‌فارس

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیای سیاسی، گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی،دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد، ایران.
2 دانشیار جغرافیای سیاسی، گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد، ایران.
3 استادیار برنامه‌ریزی شهری، گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد، ایران.
4 دانشیار گروه جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
منطقۀ ژئوپلیتیک خلیج‌فارس با وجود زمینه‌های مشترک متعدد، تاکنون در فرایند منطقه‌گرایی موفق عمل نکرده است. این پژوهش با روش توصیفی- تحلیلی، به دنبال بررسی و ارزیابی مهمترین عوامل پیشرو و موانع شکل‌گیری سازمان منطقه‌ای خلیج‌فارس است. در بخش مطالعه کتابخانه‌ای، مهمترین عوامل و زمینه‌های همگرایی و واگرایی گردآوری و سپس با استفاده از روش «کدگذاری و مقوله‌بندی» غربال شد و در نهایت در قالب عوامل پیشران و بازدارنده و در پنج بُعد اقتصادی، سیاسی، دفاعی- امنیتی، سرزمینی و فرهنگی- اجتماعی طبقه‌بندی شد. در مرحلۀ بعد پرسشنامه‌ای تنظیم و با ترجمه به زبان عربی و انگلیسی در اختیار صاحب‌نظران همه کشورهای منطقه قرار گرفت. جهت ارزیابی وزن و اهمیت عوامل پیشران و بازدارنده در تشکیل سازمان منطقه‌ای خلیج‌فارس، از روش معادلات ساختاری PLS استفاده شد. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد، در عوامل پیشران، بُعد دفاعی- امنیتی و فرهنگی- اجتماعی بیشترین تأثیر و بُعد سیاسی کمترین تأثیر و در بین عوامل بازدارنده، بُعد سرزمینی و بُعد فرهنگی- اجتماعی بیشترین چالش و بُعد اقتصادی کمترین چالش را داشته‌اند. همچنین در مجموع ابعاد پنجگانه و در متغیرهای پیشرو، متغیرهای «همکاری‌های دفاعی- امنیتی بین کشورهای منطقه»، «اسلام به عنوان دین مشترک»، «پیوستگی سرزمینی کشورهای منطقه»، «تأسیس نهادهای اقتصادی منطقه‌ای» و «وجود اهداف و منافع مشترک سیاسی» بیشترین تأثیر را داشته‌اند. در بین موانع شکل‌گیری سازمان منطقه‌ای خلیج‌فارس نیز، مهمترین موانع شامل «اختلاف مرزی و سرزمینی»، «فعالیت نهادها و سازمان‌های دینی»، «وجود دکترین‌های دفاعی-امنیتی متعارض»، «نوع نگرش و مناسبات با رژیم صهیونیستی» و در نهایت«فقدان هم‌تکمیلی اقتصادی» می‌باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Analysis of the Role of Leading Factors and Obstacles to the Formation of a Regional Organization in the Persian Gulf

نویسندگان English

Zahra Nasimi 1
Seyyed Hadi Zarghani 2
Omid Ali Kharazmi 3
Hossein Rabiee 4
1 PhD Student in Political Geography, Department of Geography, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Associate Professor in Political Geography, Department of Geography, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor in Geography and Urban Planning, Department of Geography, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
4 Associate Professor in Political Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended abstract 
Introduction
The geopolitical region of the Persian Gulf includes eight countries that are connected by territorial proximity and various cultural, social, economic, defense, and security aspects. Despite these commonalities and the Persian Gulf's significant role in the global economic system, the regionalization process has been weak, with no regional organization featuring the comprehensive participation of all countries in the area emerging thus far.
Methodology
This research adopts a descriptive-analytical approach, utilizing credible library and field resources to examine the key drivers and obstacles to forming a regional organization in the Persian Gulf. During the library research phase, the most prominent integration and disintegration factors were gathered and assessed using the "coding and categorization" method. These factors were ultimately classified into 22 driving and 18 restraining elements across five dimensions: economic, political, defense-security, territorial, and cultural-social. A questionnaire was then developed and distributed to experts across all countries in the region, translated into Arabic and English. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) structural equation modeling method was applied to evaluate the weight and significance of the driving and restraining factors in establishing a regional organization in the Persian Gulf.
Results and Discussion
This research aims to investigate and evaluate the key driving factors and obstacles to forming the Persian Gulf Regional Organization. The establishment of any regional entity involves various contexts, obstacles, and challenges. Security stands out as the foremost concern for governments, and defense-security cooperation emerges as a primary area of collaboration that can foster security for all countries in the region.
Cultural and social characteristics, particularly religion and ethnicity, also play a vital role in promoting convergence among regional nations. Geographical coherence is often considered a foundational factor in the formation of regional organizations. The experience of creating regional organizations like the European Union demonstrates that economic cooperation often serves as the initial catalyst for regionalism, with economic factors significantly influencing the establishment of such organizations.  Political components, including shared interests, goals, values, and political aspirations, contribute positively to the potential for a regional organization. However, the formation of these organizations also encounters fundamental challenges. Territorial issues, particularly disputes over borders, are significant obstacles to regional integration. Cultural and social factors can serve dual roles, promoting both convergence and divergence. The ideological nature of political systems, coupled with the influential role of religious leaders, can intensify cultural differences, leading to increased fragmentation. In the defense-security realm, conflicting security doctrines and an arms race among regional countries further complicate the potential for collaboration. Lastly, the diversity of political systems and ongoing disputes among countries in the region present serious challenges to the formation of a cohesive regional organization.
Conclusion
The research findings reveal that within the driving factors, the defense-security and cultural-social dimensions exert the most significant influence on the formation of a regional organization in the Persian Gulf, while the political dimension has the least impact. Conversely, among the deterring factors, the territorial and cultural-social dimensions present the greatest challenges, with the economic dimension posing the fewest obstacles to establishing a regional organization. Overall, across the five domains and among the leading variables, key factors impacting regional integration include defense-security cooperation among regional countries, Islam as a shared religion among the nations, territorial contiguity and geographical connectedness, the establishment of regional economic institutions like a customs union, and the existence of shared political goals, values, and interests. On the other hand, the most significant obstacles to forming a regional organization in the Persian Gulf are border and territorial disputes, the activities of religious and jurisprudential institutions within the countries, conflicting defense and security doctrines, the nature of relations between regional countries and the Zionist regime, and the lack of economic complementarity.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Regionalism
Convergence
Divergence
Regional Organization
Persian Gulf
  1. Abolhassan Shirazi, H; Akhund Mehrizi, M. (2007). The Position of Energy Resources in Persian Gulf Security and American Security, Considering Participatory Security Model, Political Science Journal, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 187-211. [In Persian]
  2. Ahmadi Kerch, S.A; Najafi, S. (2019). Prioritizing divergence factors in relations between Iran and the Persian Gulf countries, Political Science Research Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3, Summer 2019, pp. 7-31.
  3. Akhbari, M. (2009). Regional Security Arrangements in the Persian Gulf, Unavoidable Necessity, Proceedings of the National Conference on the Status of the Persian Gulf in Strategic World Developments, Tehran: Institute of Geography and Cartography of Gitaology. [In Persian]
  4. Alibabaei, Gh. (1993). Culture of International Relations, Tehran: Bureau of Political and International Studies. [In Persian]
  5. Anderson, J. (1995). "The State of the (European) Union", World Politics, Vol.47, No.1.
  6. Arayesh, H; Salari Sardari, F; Noori, M. (2019). Regional Convergence Challenges in the Persian Gulf, Journal of Cultural and Political Studies of the Persian Gulf, pp. 111-95.
  7. Bosco, A. (1992). The Federalist Project and Resistance in Continental Europe. In Andrea Bosco, ed., The Federal Idea: The History of Federalism Since 1945, Vol .II. London and New York: Lothian Foundotion Press.
  8. Checkel, J. (2001). "Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change", International Organization, Vol. 55.
  9. Checkel, J. (2006). Constructivist Approaches to European Integration, Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo, Arena seminar, Tuesday 9 May.
  10. Checkel, J. ed. (2005). International Institution and socialization in Europe, special Issue of International Organization, vol. 59, No.4.
  11. Christiansen, T; and et al. eds. (2001). The Social Construction of Europe. London: Sage.
  12. Christiansen, T; and et al., eds. (1999). Sepcial Issue on Social Constructivism, European Journal of Public Policy.
  13. Dehghani Firoozabadi, J. (1995). The Evolution of European Political Cooperation: A Theoretical Perspective: Brussels: VUB Press.
  14. Dehghani Firouzabadi, J. (2012). The Evolution of Conflict and Cooperation Theories in International Relations, Political Law Research, Year 5, Number 8. [In Persian]
  15. Dehghani Firouzabadi, J. (2013). Theories of Regional Convergence and International Regimes, Tehran: Entekhab. [In Persian]
  16. Deutsch, K. (1957). Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. Princeton: University press.
  17. Deutsch, K. (1968). The Impact of Communication Upon International Relations Theory. In Abdul Said, ed., Theory of International Relations: The Crisis of Relevance. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  18. Dinan, D. ed. (2000). Encyclopedia of the European Union. Boulder/ London: Lynne Rienner.
  19. Doerty, J; Palatigraph, R. (2005). Conflicting Theories in International Relations, Translated by Vahid Bozorgi, Alireza Tayeb, Tehran: ghoomes. [In Persian]
  20. Ebrahimi, Sh; Amraei, M. (2014). The Problem of Insecurity and Divergence in the Persian Gulf: Theoretical Solutions, Foreign Relations Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 4, Winter 2015, pp. 96-77. [In Persian]
  21. Ebrahimifar, T. (2002).Patterns of Symbolization in the Persian Gulf Region, Tehran: Office of Political and International Studies of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. [In Persian]
  22. Eriksen, E. O; Fossum, J. E. eds. (2003). Europe in Search of its Legitimacy. In E.O. Eriksen, et. al. eds., European Governance, Deliberation and the Quest for Democratisation, Olso: ARENA.
  23. Eriksen, E; Weigard, O. (1997)." Conceptualising Politics: Strategies or Communicative action? Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 20, No.30.
  24. Ethier, W.J. (1998). "The International Commercial System", Essays in International Commercial System, in: http://www.princeton.edu/ ~ies/IES _Essays/E210.pdf.
  25. Faraji Rad, A; Ghorbani Nejad, R; Mehraban, A. (2016). The Impact of Globalization on Strengthening Convergence in Nowruz Cultural Sphere, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 2, Summer 2017. [In Persian]
  26. Farhadi, F (2018). Collective Deterrence and Regional Convergence: A Case Study of West Asian Regional Network, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Tehran, Faculty of Law and Political Science. [In Persian]
  27. Faust, L. (2006). International Middle East Relations, translated by Ahmad Soltaninejad Tehran: Office of Political Studies. [In Persian]
  28. George, S. (1991)."European Political Cooperation: a World Systems Perspective." In Martin Holland, ed., The Future of European Political Cooperation. Essays on Theory and Practice. London: MacMillan.
  29. Ghasemi, H. (1993)."Obstacles to the Growth of Convergence in the Middle East", Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, No. 20, 1994. [In Persian]
  30. Ghavam, S.A. (2005). International Relations: Theories and Approaches, Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
  31. Ghazanfari, A. (2015). Challenges of Convergence in the Persian Gulf, Shahrekord: Moghavemat. [In Persian]
  32. Grieco, J. (1988). Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation, International Organization, vol.42, No.3.
  33. Grieco, J. (1997). 'State Interests and International Rule Trajectories: A Neorealist Interpretation of Maastricht Treaty and European Economic and Monetary Union', Security Studies, vol.5,No.3,P.176-222.
  34. Haas, E. B; Schmitter, P.C. (1964). "Economics and Differential Patterns of Political Integration: Projection about Unity in Latin America", International Organization Vol. 18, Autumn.
  35. Haas, E.B. (1958). The Unifing of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Process (1950-1957). Standford: Standford University Press.
  36. Haas, E.B. (1964). Beyond The Nation - State: Functionalism and International Organization. Standford: Standford University Press.
  37. Habermas, J. (1981). Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.1, Boston: Beacan Press.
  38. Hafeznia, M.R; Kamali, M.R; Rabiei, H; Fateminasab, A. (2021). Geopolitical Factors Affecting Convergence of Collective Security in the Persian Gulf Region, Strategic Defense Studies Quarterly, 19, No. 68, Winter 1400, Article 1, Pages: 28-5. [In Persian]
  39. Hafeznia, M.R; Rabiee, H. (2013). Regional Studies of the Persian Gulf, Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
  40. Hafeznya, M.R (2008). Geopolitical Principles and Concepts, Mashhad: Papoli. [In Persian]
  41. Hafeznya, M.R (2017). Geopolitical Principles and Concepts, Mashhad: Papoli [In Persian]
  42. Harrison, R. (1974).Europe in Question: Theories of Regional Integration, London: Allen and Unwin.
  43. Hashemi, F. (2011). Sustainable Security in the Persian Gulf, Obstacles and Mechanisms, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 136-167. [In Persian]
  44. Hattaneh, Y. (2015). Beyond Regionalism in the Main Debates in the New Political Economy, edited by Anthony Payne, translators Hossein Pourahmadi and Rouhollah Talebi Arani, Tehran: Mokhatab. [In Persian]
  45. Hodges, M. (1987). Integration Theory. In Trevor Taylor. Approaches and Theory in International Relations. London: Longman.
  46. Homan, H.A. (2008). Structural equation modeling using LISREL software, Tehran: Organization for the Study and Compilation of Humanities Books of Universities. [In Persian]
  47. Hosseini, S.L. (2013). Regionalism in contemporary international law: opportunities and challenges, Tehran: Khorsandi. [In Persian]
  48. Hout, W. (1993). Capitalism and the Third World: Development, Dependence and the World System. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
  49. https://pgstudies.ir
  50. Hurrell, A. (1995). "Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective", in Louis Fawcett and Andrew Hureell, Regionalism in World politics. Regional or Regionization and International Order, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  51. Hurrell, A. (1995). Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective, in Louis Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell, eds., Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  52. Joergensen, K.E ed. (1997). Reflective Approaches to European Governance, London: MacMillan Press.
  53. Johnston, A. (2001). Treating International Institutions, International Studies, Vol. 45, P.487 515.
  54. Kazemi, S.A.A. (2005). Convergence Theories in International Relations, Tehran: ghoomes. [In Persian]
  55. Keohane, R. (1993).Institional Theory and the Realist Challenge After the Cold War. In Baldwin, Neorealism and Neoliberalism.
  56. Keohane, R; Crage, M. (1992). International Institution. In Hawkesworth & Kogan.
  57. Kim, S. (1992). "Regional Associations: Political." In Mary Hawkesworth and Maurice Kogan, Encyclopedia of Government and Politics. London: Routledge.
  58. Koolaei, E. (2000). Eco and Regional Convergence, Tehran: Center for Scientific Research and Middle East Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  59. Lebow, R.N. (1989). Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crisis Baltimore: Jhons Hopkins University Press.
  60. Lindberg, L. (1966). Integration as a Source of Stress on the European System, International Organization, vol. xx, No.2, Spring.
  61. Mahmoudikia, M. (2019). An Analysis of Why Refusal to Regionalism in Iran-GCC Relations, Middle East Studies Quarterly, Vol. 27, No.2, Summer 1. [In Persian]
  62. Mazey, S. (1992). European Integration. In Mary Hawkeswork and Maurice Kogan, Encyclopedia of Government and Politics. London: Routledge.
  63. Mearsheimer, J. (1990). Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War, International Security. vol. 15,No.4.
  64. Mearsheimer, J. (1995). A Realist Reply, International Security, vol.20, No.1.
  65. Mitrany, D. (1966). A Working Peace System. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.
  66. Mojtahadzadeh, P. (2000). Countries and Borders in the Persian Gulf, Tehran: Ataei. [In Persian]
  67. Mojtahedzadeh, P. (2007). Political Geography and Geographical Policy, Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
  68. Moravcsik, A. (1991). "Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community", International Organization, Vol. us, Vo.10.
  69. Moravcsik, A. (1993). "Preferences and Power in The European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach", Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31. No.4.
  70. Moravcsik, A. (1998). The Choice for Europe: Social Power and State Purpose from Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  71. Mowat, R.C. (1973). Creating the European Community. London: Blandford Press.
  72. Naqibzadeh, S.M. (2021). Explaining the convergence pattern in the structure of the West Asian regional system, 7th International Conference on Political Science, International Relations and Transformation. [In Persian]
  73. Nye, J.S. (1968). International Regionalism, Boston: Little Brown.
  74. Nye, J.S. (1971). Peace in Parts: Integration and Conflict in Regional Organization. Boston: Little Brown.
  75. Omidi, A. (2009). Regionalism in Asia (ASEAN.SAARC & Eco), Tehran: International for Political and International Studies. [In Persian]
  76. Pourahmadi, H; Hosseini Karani, S.R. (2009). Geopolitics of Persian Gulf Oil Countries and Challenges of Economic Globalization, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 102-126. [In Persian]
  77. Rasti, O. (2018). Partitioned Area and its Challenges on Delimitation of Iranian Maritime Boundaries in the North of the Persian Gulf, Geopolitics Quarterly, Year 14, No. 2, pp. 136-167. [In Persian]
  78. Rosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European Integration. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  79. Rouhi, M. (2016). Tragedy of Regionalism in the Middle East (Regulation of Order and Disorder in International Middle East Politics), Tehran: Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  80. Ruggie, J.G (1998). What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo - Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivism Challenge, International Organization, Vol.52, No.4.
  81. Salimi, H. (2008). Southwest Asia as a region? Capability Analysis of Applying Region to Southwest Asia, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 2, Autumn 2009, pp. 137-116. [In Persian]
  82. Sazmand, B. (2009). Regionalism and Common Identity in Southeast Asia (ASEAN 1996-2008), Tehran: Political and International Affairs Office. [In Persian]
  83. Schimmelfennig, F; Berthold, R. (2006). Theories of European Integration. In Jeremy Richardson, ed., The European Union, London: Routledge, P.73-95.
  84. Schmitter, Ph. (1969). "Three Neo_Functional Hypotheses about International Integration", International Organization, Vol.23, No. 1, Winter.
  85. Seifzadeh, H. (2010). Regional Convergence in Iranian Foreign Policy, Considering Southwest Asia, Foreign Relations Journal of Spring 2010, No. 1. [In Persian]
  86. Shahroei, Sh. (2012). Convergence factors of Persian Gulf countries and ways to strengthen them, B.Sc. Thesis, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. Department of History. [In Persian]
  87. Shokoei, H. (2005). New Ideas in Philosophy of Geography, vol. 1, Third Edition, Tehran: Gitashenasi. [In Persian]
  88. Sinaei, V. (2016). Unfinished Process of Nation-Building State and Growing Persistence of Regional Convergence in the Persian Gulf, Journal of State Research, Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science, Vol. 2, No. 5, 2016, pp. 29-62. [In Persian]
  89. Sjursen, H. (2002). Why expand? the question of legitimacy and justification in the EU's Enlargement Policy: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 110, No.3.
  90. Sjursen, H. (2003). Security and Defense, Oslo: ARENA working Paper, No.100.
  91. Smith, M. (2002). Region and Regionalism, in Brian White, Michael Smith and Richard Little, Issues of World Politics, translated by Seyed Mohammad Kamal Sarvarian, Tehran: Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  92. Snidal, D. (1991). Relative Gains and Patterns of International Cooperation, The American Political Science Review, vol.85, No.3.
  93. Soderbaum, F. (2008). Consolidating Comparative Regionalism: from Euro-Centrism to Global Comparison, paper for the Garnet 2008 Annual Conference, university of Bordeaux 17-19, September.
  94. Taheri Moghaddam, T. (2012). Obstacles to the formation of an inclusive regional organization in the Middle East (1920-2011), M.Sc. Thesis, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Faculty of Law and Political Science. [In Persian]
  95. Taylor, P. (1990). Functionalism: The approach of David Mitrany". In A.J.R. Groom and Paul Taylor, eds., Framework for International Cooperation". London: Pinter, 1990.
  96. Wallerstein, I. (1979). The Capitalist World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  97. Wallerstein, I. (1996). "The Interstate Stucture of the Modern World - System." In K. Booth and M. Zalewski, eds. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  98. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics, London: Addison-Wesley.
  99. Weber, K. (1997). Hierarchy Amidts Anarchy: A Transaction Costs Approach to International Security Cooperation, International Studies Quarterly, vol.41.
  100. Wendt, A. (1987). "The Agent and Structure Problem in International Relations Theory", International Organization, Vol. 41, No.3 (Summer).
  101. Yang, J. (2007). Trends in Regionalism in Asia and its Effects on China and the United States, in Jiman Yang, The Rise of Asian Regionalism and Transformation in the International System (Chinese Thoughts and Scientific Perspectives), Translated by Badralzaman Shahbazi, Tehran: Bureau of Political and International Studies. [In Persian]
  102. Zamani, A; Zamani, M. (2017). Investigating the factors and grounds of convergence in the geopolitical zone of the Persian Gulf, Journal of Cultural and Political Studies, No. 12. [In Persian]
  103. Zarei, B. (2016). Persian Gulf Regional Studies, Tehran: University of Tehran. [In Persian]
  104. Zarei, B; Shahdoosti, H; Zeinivand, A. (2014). Opportunities and challenges of regional convergence in the Persian Gulf، Human Geography Research، 46 ،No. 4 ،Winter 2015، pp. 755-731. [In Persian]
دوره 21، شماره 1
بهار 1404
صفحه 69-111

  • تاریخ دریافت 26 فروردین 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 19 خرداد 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 25 خرداد 1403