فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

Indonesian Defence Policy Under Jokowi Administration: Continuity or New Direction?

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 Associate Professor of International Relations,University Muhammadiyah, Yogyakarta, , Indonesia
2 Associate Professor of International Relations, University Muhammadiyah, Yogyakarta, , Indonesia
چکیده
Since the beginning, Indonesia’s foreign policy has adhered to the “free-active” principle. Nevertheless, the facts demonstrate that during President Sukarno’s administration, Indonesia’s foreign policy was considered to be leaning left and close to communist countries. During the Suharto era, Indonesia, on the other hand, grew closer to the West, specifically the United States and its allies. The succession of post-Suharto leadership, from Habibie, Abdurrahman Wahid, and Megawati to Yudhoyono, major countries particularly the United States, continues to influence the pattern of Indonesia’s foreign policy. This pattern of foreign policy appears to have also had an effect on Indonesia’s defence posture and orientation. The question that should be addressed is: to what extent do great powers influence Indonesia’s defence policy during Jokowi administration? In the midst of various issues ranging from the maritime fulcrum, the sink the vessels’ policy, the issue of purchasing Russian-made fighter aircraft, the Sukhoi Su-35, and China’s Belt and Road initiative projects, have triggered reactions from neighbouring countries and major powers. Using a historical explanatory approach, this article argues that Indonesia’s defence strategy has been influenced by great powers since its foundation. Furthermore, despite Jokowi’s efforts to show that Indonesia is an independent and neutral country it remains under the influence of great powers.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Indonesian Defence Policy Under Jokowi Administration: Continuity or New Direction?

نویسندگان English

Ali Maksum 1
Surwandono Surwandono 2
1 Associate Professor of International Relations,University Muhammadiyah, Yogyakarta, , Indonesia
2 Associate Professor of International Relations, University Muhammadiyah, Yogyakarta, , Indonesia
چکیده English

Since the beginning, Indonesia’s foreign policy has adhered to the “free-active” principle. Nevertheless, the facts demonstrate that during President Sukarno’s administration, Indonesia’s foreign policy was considered to be leaning left and close to communist countries. During the Suharto era, Indonesia, on the other hand, grew closer to the West, specifically the United States and its allies. The succession of post-Suharto leadership, from Habibie, Abdurrahman Wahid, and Megawati to Yudhoyono, major countries particularly the United States, continues to influence the pattern of Indonesia’s foreign policy. This pattern of foreign policy appears to have also had an effect on Indonesia’s defence posture and orientation. The question that should be addressed is: to what extent do great powers influence Indonesia’s defence policy during Jokowi administration? In the midst of various issues ranging from the maritime fulcrum, the sink the vessels’ policy, the issue of purchasing Russian-made fighter aircraft, the Sukhoi Su-35, and China’s Belt and Road initiative projects, have triggered reactions from neighbouring countries and major powers. Using a historical explanatory approach, this article argues that Indonesia’s defence strategy has been influenced by great powers since its foundation. Furthermore, despite Jokowi’s efforts to show that Indonesia is an independent and neutral country it remains under the influence of great powers.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Jokowi
Defence
Policy
Military Equipment
  1. Aliabbas, A. (2013). New TNI leadership and the defense budget. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/08/23/new-tni-leadership-and -defense-budget.html.
  2. Arif, M.Q.A. (2015). Behind the Gun of Densus 88: Understanding U.S. Government Behavior under Crisis Situation. Journal of Integrative International Relations, 1(1), 15–26.
  3. Arya, D; Agnes, A. (2019). Indonesia slams Vietnam for disrupting arrests. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/seasia/2019/02/27/ri-slams-vietnam-for-disrupting-arrests.html.
  4. Barton, G. (2018). How Indonesia’s counter-terrorism force has become a model for the region. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/how-indonesias-counter-terrorism-force-has-become-a-model-for-the-region-97368.
  5. Baylis, J; Wirtz, J.J; Gray, C.S. (2016). Strategy in the Contemporary World: An Introduction to Strategic Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Biscop, S. (2017). Powers, great, smart and not so smart. Global Affairs, 3(4–5), 321–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2017.1443259.
  7. Bjola, C; Manor, I. (2018). Revisiting Putnam’s two-level game theory in the digital age: Domestic digital diplomacy and the Iran nuclear deal. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1476 836.
  8. Boediwardhana, W. (2014). TNI shows off in front of SBY, Jokowi during anniversary. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/ 10/08/tni-shows-front-sby-jokowi-during-anniversary.html.
  9. Borneo Post. (2015). Sinking of Malaysian fishing vessel by Indonesian authorities. Borneo Post. https://www.theborneopost.com/2015/01/10/sinking-of-malaysian-fishing-vessel-by-indonesian-authorities./
  10. Cabinet Secretariat. (2016). Indonesian Sends a Note of Protest against China in South China Sea Fishing Dispute. Office of Cabinet Secretariat. https:// setkab.go.id/en/indonesian-sends-a-note-of-protest-against-china-in-south-china-sea-fishing-dispute/.
  11. Connelly, A.L. (2016). Indonesia in the South China Sea: Going it alone. In Lowy Institute Analyses. Sydney NSW: Lowy Institute for International Policy.
  12. Desch, M.C. (1998). Culture Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies. International Security, 23(1), 141–170.
  13. Di Floristella, A.P. (2015). Theories on ASEAN Security. In A. P. di Floristella (Ed.), The ASEAN Regional Security Partnership: Strengths and Limits of a Cooperative System (pp. 20–52). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/ 1057/9781137488596_2.
  14. Dupont, A. (2003). The Kopassus Dilemma: Should Australia Re-engage? Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 10(1), 19–26. http://www.jstor. org/stable/43199726.
  15. Easter, D. (2017). Western Intelligence and Covert Soviet Military Aid to Indonesia During the 1962 West New Guinea Crisis BT - Perspectives on Military Intelligence from the First World War to Mali: Between Learning and Law. In F. Baudet, E. Braat, J. van Woensel, & A. Wever (Eds.), Perspectives on Military Intelligence from the First World War to Mali (pp. 77–95). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-183-8_4.
  16. Firmansyah, T. (2019). Jaga Rahasia Anggaran Kemenhan, Pengamat: Prabowo Cerdas [Keep defence budget details, commentator: Prabowo clever]. Republika. https://nasional.republika.co.id/berita/q0wdij377/jaga-rahasia-angg-aran-kemenhan -pengamat-prabowo-cerdas.
  17. Gady, F.S. (2016). Indonesia Receives First Batch of New German-made Main Battle Tanks. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2016/05/indonesia-receives-first-batch-of-new-german-made-main-battle-tanks./
  18. Gorbiano, M.I. (2020). Government turns to domestic industry to modernize defense sector. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost. com/news/2020 /04/29/government-turns-to-domestic-industry-to-modernize-defense-sector. Html.
  19. Gouda, F; Brocades Zaalberg, T. (2002). American Visions of the Netherlands East Indies/Indonesia: US Foreign Policy and Indonesian Nationalism, 1920-1949. Amsterdam University Press. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/ id/a4939983-086d-451c-b162-c324ec5a02cf/340274.pdf.
  20. Green, M.J. (2023). Foreign Policy and Defense. In R. J. Pekkanen, S. R. Reed, & D. M. Smith (Eds.), Japan Decides 2021: The Japanese General Election (pp. 347–359). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-031-11324-6_23.
  21. Hakim, S; Suharto. (2019). Indonesia, South Korea ink agreement to build three more submarines. Antara. https://en.antaranews.com/news/128303/ indonesia-south-korea-ink-agreement-to-build-three-more-submarines.
  22. Harding, B; Natalegawa, A. (2018). Enhancing the U.S.-Indonesia Strategic Partnership. In CSIS Series. Jakarta: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
  23. Haripin, M; Anindya, C.R; Priamarizki, A. (2020). The politics of counter-terrorism in post-authoritarian states: Indonesia’s experience, 1998–2018. Defense & Security Analysis, 36(3), 275–299. https://doi.org/10. 1080/147517 98.2020. 1790807.
  24. Hatta, M. (1953). Indonesia’s Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs, 31(3), 441–452.
  25. Hill, D.T. (2010). Indonesia’s Exiled Left as the Cold War Thaws. RIMA: Review of Indonesia and Malaysia Affairs, 44(1), 21–51.
  26. Inkiriwang, F.W. (2020). The dynamic of the US–Indonesia defence relations: the ‘IMET ban’ period. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1712327.
  27. Jones, M. (2002). U.S. Relations with Indonesia, the Kennedy-Johnson Transition, and the Vietnam Connection, 1963–1965. Diplomatic History, 26(2), 249–281. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24914308.
  28. Kaufman, R.G. (1994). A Two-Level Interaction: Structure, Stable Liberal Democracy, and U.S. Grand Strategy. Security Studies, 3(4), 678–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419409347568.
  29. Krieger, Z; Roth, A.I. (2007). Nuclear Weapons in Neo-Realist Theory. International Studies Review, 9(3), 369–384. http://www.jstor.org/stable/
  30. Laksmana, E.A. (2019). Reshuffling the Deck? Military Corporatism, Promotional Logjams and Post-Authoritarian Civil-Military Relations in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49(5), 806–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019. 1613556.
  31. Lande, E. (2018). Between Offensive and Defensive Realism – The Japanese Abe Government’s Security Policy toward China. Asian Security, 14(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2017.1323882.
  32. Layne, C. (1993). The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise. International Security, 17(4), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539020.
  33. Liliansa, D. (2020). The Necessity of Indonesia’s Measures to Sink Vessels for IUU Fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zone. Asian Journal of International Law, 10(1), 125–157. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251319000183.
  34. Liow, J.C. (2005). The Politics of Indonesia-Malaysia Relations: One Kin, Two Nations. London: Routledge Curzon.
  35. Lobell, S.E. (2017). Structural Realism/Offensive and Defensive Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/978019084013 .304.
  36. Lowry, B. (1993). Indonesian defence policy and the Indonesian armed forces. Canberra: The Australian National University.
  37. Mank, R. (2020). Canada’s quixotic foreign policy in the shifting global landscape. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 26(1), 92–98. https://doi.org/ 1080/11926422.2019.1659838.
  38. Mearsheimer, J.J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.
  39. Meierding, E; Sigman, R. (2021). Understanding the Mechanisms of International Influence in an Era of Great Power Competition. Journal of Global Security Studies, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogab011.
  40. Meyer, P.K; Nurmandi, A; Agustiyara, A. (2019). Indonesia’s swift securitization of the Natuna Islands how Jakarta countered China’s claims in the South China Sea. Asian Journal of Political Science, 27(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2019.1590724.
  41. Mohamadi, H; zarghami, E; Valizadeh, (2019). Analysis of the reasons for focusing the US strategy towards Asia-Pacific. Geopolitics Quarterly, 15(54), 173–195. https://journal.iag.ir/article_69794.html.
  42. Monavari, S.A; Mohammad Sharifi, M. (2017). Defensive Realism and the Logic of NATO’s Existence after September 11. Geopolitics Quarterly, 13(47), 176–202. https://journal.iag.ir/article_55811.html.
  43. Morgan, P.M. (2006). International Security: Problems and Solutions. Washington, D.C.: C.Q. Press.
  44. Mousavi, S; Ghaffari, M; Shariati, (2021). Geopolitical Consequences of Expanding China-Turkey Relations on Iran (Case Study: Interconnecting “Middle Corridor” and “Belt and Road” Project). Geopolitics Quarterly, 17(62), 119–148. https://journal.iag.ir/article_108562.html.
  45. Murphy, A.M. (2010). US Rapprochement with Indonesia: From Problem State to Partner. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 32(3), 362–387. http://www.jstor. org/stable/25798864.
  46. Murphy, A.M. (2017). Great Power Rivalries, Domestic Politics and Southeast Asian Foreign Policy: Exploring the Linkages. Asian Security, 13(3), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2017.1354566.
  47. Negara, S.D; Suryadinata, L. (2018). Indonesia and China’s Belt and Road Initiatives: Perspectives, Issues and Prospects. In Trends in Southeast Asia no. 11. Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute.
  48. O’Brien, A. (2005). The U.S.-Indonesian Military Relationship. In Backgrounder. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/back- grounder/us- indonesian-military-relationship.
  49. Parameswaran, P. (2015). Explaining Indonesia’s ‘Sink The Vessels’ Policy Under Jokowi. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2015/01/explaining-indonesias-sink-the-vessels-policy-under-jokowi/.
  50. (2011). Operation Trikora— Indonesia’s takeover of west new guinea. Air Power Development Centre Bulletin, 150.
  51. Permal, S. (2005). US-Indonesia Military and Naval Ties. Maritime Studies, 2005(145), 21–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07266472.2005.10878798.
  52. Platje, W. (2001). Dutch Sigint and the Conflict with Indonesia 1950-62. Intelligence and National Security, 16(1), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/
  53. Pournajafi, V.S; Shariati, S. (2015). The Strategic Capacity of Iran in the Peaceful Rise Doctrine of China. Geopolitics Quarterly, 11(39), 139–169. https://journal.iag .ir/article_55825.html.
  54. Putnam, R.D. (1988). Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460. http://www.jstor. org/stable/2706785.
  55. Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814.
  56. Salna, K; Aditya, A. (2020). Trump threat spurred Indonesia to drop Russia, China arms deals. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/ 2020/03/13/trump-threat-spurred-indonesia-to-drop-russia-china-arms-deals. Html.
  57. Schulze, K.E. (2017). The “ethnic” in Indonesia’s communal conflicts: violence in Ambon, Poso, and Sambas. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(12), 2096–2114. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1277030.
  58. Schweller, R.L. (1997). New Realist Research on Alliances: Refining, Not Refuting, Waltz’s Balancing Proposition. American Political Science Review, 91(4), 927–930. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952176.
  59. Schweller, R.L; Priess, D. (1997). A Tale of Two Realisms: Expanding the Institutions Debate. Mershon International Studies Review, 41(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.501997050.
  60. Sebastian, L.C; Chen, J. (2021). Indonesia’s Foreign and Maritime Policies Under Joko Widodo: Domestic and External Determinants. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 8(3), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 23477970211039639.
  61. Sihite, E; Christy, N. (2015). Jokowi Wants Indonesian Diplomats to Facilitate Foreign Investment. Jakarta Globe. https://jakartaglobe.id/context/jokowi-wants-indonesian-diplomats-facilitate-foreign-investment/.
  62. Sindunegoro, K. (1991). Indonesia’s Foreign Policy. Pakistan Horizon, 44(1), 19–26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41394566.
  63. SIPRI for the Media. (2019). Global arms trade: USA increases dominance; arms flows to the Middle East surge, says SIPRI. SIPRI. https:// www. sipri.org/media/press-release/2019/global-arms-trade-usa-increases-dominance -arms-flows-middle-east-surge-says-sipri.
  64. Snyder, G.H. (2002). Mearsheimer’s World-Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security: A Review Essay. International Security, 27(1), 149–173. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3092155.
  65. South China Morning Post. (2020). US sanction threat spurred Indonesia to drop Russia, China weapons deals. South China Morning Post, 14 March. https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/3075238/us-sanction-threat-spurred-indonesia-drop-russia-china?campaign=3075238&module=per- petual_scroll_0&pgtype=article.
  66. Stoll, R.J; Ward, M.D. (1989). Power in World Politics. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Pub.
  67. (2018). Indonesian Army Gets Eight Apache Helicopters. The Jakarta Post, May 17. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2018/05/16/army-gets-eight-apache-helicopters.html
  68. Sukma, R. (1995). The Evolution of Indonesia’s Foreign Policy: An Indonesian View. Asian Survey, 35(3), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645547.
  69. Sukma, R. (1999). Indonesia and China: The Politics of a Troubled Relationship (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
  70. Sukma, R. (2012). Indonesia’s Security Outlook and Defence Policy 2012. In E. Katahara (Ed.), Security Outlook of the Asia Pacific Countries and Its Implications for the Defense Sector (pp. 3–19). Tokyo: The National Institute for Defense Studies.
  71. Taliaferro, J.W. (2000). Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited. International Security, 25(3), 128–161. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/ 2626708.
  72. Tjahjanto, H. (2019). Enhancing Indonesia Deterrence Power with the Mastery of Defense Technology in Industrial Revolution 4.0 Era. 2019 IEEE 6th Asian Conference on Defence Technology (ACDT), xiv–xvi.
  73. Torkameh, A; Hafeznia, M.R; Roumina, E; Ahmadypoor, (2022). A Critical Realist Reading of Critical Geopolitics. Geopolitics Quarterly, 18(65), 1–43. https://journal.iag.ir/article_113025.html.
  74. Trask, T; Clark, M; Bradin, S. (2020). The role of special operations forces in a ‘Great Power Conflict.’ Military Times. https://www.militarytimes.com/ opinion/commentary/2020/05/04/the-role-of-special-operations-forces-in-a-great-power-conflict/.
  75. Waltz, K.N. (1993). The Emerging Structure of International Politics. International Security, 18(2), 44–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539097.
  76. Waltz, K.N. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. 25(1), 5–41.
  77. Weatherbee, D.E. (2014). International Relations in Southeast Asia: The Struggle for Autonomy. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  78. Wezeman, P.D; Djokic, K; George, M; Hussain, Z; Wezeman, S.T. (2024). Trends In International Arms Transfers, 2023 (SIPRI Fact Sheet). https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2024-03/fs_2403_at_2023.pdf.
  79. Wicaksana, I.G.W. (2019). Militarising Counterterrorism in Southeast Asia: Incompatibilities and Implications for ASEAN. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 18, 205–235.
  80. Yusgiantoro, P. (2017). Developing Indonesia’s Basic Defense Forces. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 29(4), 599–612.
  81. Zhou, T. (2014). China and the Thirtieth of September Movement. Indonesia, 98, 29–58.
دوره 20، شماره 4
زمستان 1403
صفحه 237-260

  • تاریخ دریافت 16 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 27 خرداد 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 31 خرداد 1403