فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

The Nexus of Identity and Stability under Consensus Democracy “The Case of Iraq”

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
Saif Al-Imarah 1
Abdul Muein Abadi 2
1 PhD Student in Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities at the University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.
2 PhD in Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities at the University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.
10.22034/igq.2024.448704.1856
چکیده
The relationship between Identity and stability occupies the core of consensus democracy philosophy, as this governance model is designed to ultimately realise stability by addressing societal fragmentation in divided societies. In Iraq, this relationship shapes a complicated trajectory, mainly because the society moved fast from identity politics (transition) to issues politics (post-transition), which turned the consensus democracy itself that succeeded in realising stability in the transition by functioning well in addressing identity-related crises paradoxically into a driver for instability in the post-transition, for its dysfunctionality beyond the identity sphere. This article argues that this dysfunctionality is primarily linked to flaws of Arend Lijphart’s theory of consensus democracy more than problems stemming from the Iraqi context. It reviews and analyses the existing literature on the nexus of identity and stability under consensus democracy, taking Iraq as a case study. As a review article, this research uses the qualitative method; its data are collected from secondary sources. It found that the philosophy of consensus democracy is designed to primarily meet transition demands, which makes rapid societal transformation beyond transition raise bottom-up pressures expressed in new demands that this democracy cannot accommodate, creating a growing gap between the post-transitional social dynamics and the transitional politics, which generates chronic instability. Further research is needed on stabilisation mechanisms in post-transition, as most studies of consensus democracy focus on stability in transition.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Consensus
Dysfunctionality
Identity
Stability
Transition

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Nexus of Identity and Stability under Consensus Democracy “The Case of Iraq”

نویسندگان English

Saif Al-Imarah 1
Abdul Muein Abadi 2
1 PhD Student in Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities at the University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.
2 PhD in Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities at the University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.
چکیده English

The relationship between Identity and stability occupies the core of consensus democracy philosophy, as this governance model is designed to ultimately realise stability by addressing societal fragmentation in divided societies. In Iraq, this relationship shapes a complicated trajectory, mainly because the society moved fast from identity politics (transition) to issues politics (post-transition), which turned the consensus democracy itself that succeeded in realising stability in the transition by functioning well in addressing identity-related crises paradoxically into a driver for instability in the post-transition, for its dysfunctionality beyond the identity sphere. This article argues that this dysfunctionality is primarily linked to flaws of Arend Lijphart’s theory of consensus democracy more than problems stemming from the Iraqi context. It reviews and analyses the existing literature on the nexus of identity and stability under consensus democracy, taking Iraq as a case study. As a review article, this research uses the qualitative method; its data are collected from secondary sources. It found that the philosophy of consensus democracy is designed to primarily meet transition demands, which makes rapid societal transformation beyond transition raise bottom-up pressures expressed in new demands that this democracy cannot accommodate, creating a growing gap between the post-transitional social dynamics and the transitional politics, which generates chronic instability. Further research is needed on stabilisation mechanisms in post-transition, as most studies of consensus democracy focus on stability in transition.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Consensus
Dysfunctionality
Identity
Stability
Transition
  1. Abulatif, Edurador. (2015). The Limitations of the Consociational Arrangements in Iraq. Ethnopolitics, 5 (38), 1-22.
  2. Abulatif, Eduardo. (2020). Revisiting the Semi-consociational Model: Democratic Failure in Pre-war Lebanon and Post-invasion Iraq. International Political Science Review, 41(1), 108-123.
  3. Ali, Zahra. (2021). From Recognition to Redistribution? Protest Movement in Iraq in the Age of ‘New Civil Society’. Journal of Intervention and State Building, 15 (4), 528-542.
  4. Anderson, Liam. (2012). Federal Solutions to Ethnic Problems: Accommodating Diversity. London: Routledge.
  5. Baizidi, Rahim. (2024). Sectarian Model of Power Distribution and Political Efficiency in Governmental Structure of Iraq and Lebanon. Geopolitics Quarterly, 19 (4), 45-66.
  6. Barry, Barry. (1975). Review article: Political Accommodation and Consociational Democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 5(04), 477-505.
  7. Bax, Erik. (1990). Modernisation and Cleavage in Dutch society: A study of long-term economic and social change. Aldershot: Avebury.
  8. Bogaards, Matthijs. (2019). Iraq’s Constitution of 2005: the Case against Consociationalism ‘Light’. Ethnopolitics, 20 (7), 1-17.
  9. Dekker, Paul; Ester, Peter. (1996). Depillarization, Deconfessionalization, and De-ideologization: Empirical trends in Dutch society 1958-1992. Review of Religious Research, 37(4), 325-341.
  10. Dixon, Paul. (2011). Is Consociational Theory the Answer to Global Conflict? From the Netherlands to Northern Ireland and Iraq, Political Studies Review, 9 (3), 22-309.
  11. Dodge, Toby. (2020). Iraq’s Informal Consociationalism and its Problems. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 20 (2), 145–152.
  12. Dodge, Toby; Mansour, Renad. (2020). Sectarianization and Desectarianization in the Struggle for Iraq’s Political Field. The Review of Faith and International Affairs, 18 (1), 58-69.
  13. Dodge, Toby; Mansour, Renad. (2021). Politically sanctioned corruption and barriers to reform in Iraq. Chatham House Research Paper, 17.
  14. Dodge, Toby. (2021). The failure of peacebuilding in Iraq: The role of consociationalism and political settlements. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 15(4), 1-16.
  15. Dodge, Toby. (2023). Iraq, Consociationalism and the Incoherence of the State. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 30 (1), 1-18.
  16. Haji, Omar. (2020). Aldymqratya Altwafiqua Fi Iraq Baad 2003: Tahadyat Wfras [Consensus Democracy in Iraq after 2003: opportunities and challenges]. Published Master Thesis. Northern Cyprus: Near East University. [In Arabic]
  17. Habib, Camilia. (2009). Consociationalism and the Continuous Crisis in the Lebanese system. Beirut: Majd.
  18. Haddad, Hamzeh. (2019). The Diminishing Relevance of the Sunni-Shi‘a Divide. In religion, violence, and the state in Iraq, Pp 47-54. USA: Pomeps studies.
  19. Haddad, Hamzeh. (2022). Path to Government Formation in Iraq: How Violence and Elite Sectarianism Lead to Consensus Governments. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
  20. Haghi, Moslem; Jouybari, Mohammad; Khoee, Ehasn. (2022). The Impact of Identity Crisis in Iraq (post-Saddam) on the Islamic Republic of Iran Foreign Policy Orientation. Geopolitics Quarterly, 17 (4), 231-262.
  21. Hay, Emily. (2014). Internationalized Constitutions and Peacebuilding. Leiden Journal of International Law, 27(1), 141–168.
  22. Horowitz, Donald. (1985). Ethnic Groups in Conflict. USA: University of California Press.
  23. Horowitz, Donald. (2014). Ethnic Power Sharing: Three Big Problems. Journal of Democracy, 25 (2), 5-20.
  24. Ibrahim, Abdulfatah. (2013). Munabah Alfikar ldimqrati bain lnadhirya Waltatbeek fi Altajrabah al-Iraqia [Sources of Democracy Thought in Iraq Theoretically and Practically in the Iraqi experiment]. Iraq: Markaz Al-Rabita Lldirasat Walbhouth Waltotheeq. [In Arabic]
  25. Iaad, Sameer. (2013). Aldimqratya Altwafqya [Consensus Democracy]. Majalat Alhikmah Lldirasat Alphilsaphia, 16 (3), 285-268. [In Arabic]
  26. Jabar, Falah. (2018). The Iraqi Protest Movement: From Identity Politics to Issue Politics. LSE Middle East Centre Paper Series, No. 25.
  27. Jarstad, Anna. (2008a). Dilemmas of war-to-democracy transitions: theories and concepts. In Jarstad, A. and Sisk, T. (eds), From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding, PP.17-36, Cambridge University Press
  28. Jarstad, Anna. (2008b). Power sharing: Former Enemies in Join Government. In Jarstad, A. and Sisk, T. (eds), From war to democracy: dilemmas of peacebuilding, (pp.105-134), Cambridge University Press.
  29. Alkhudary, Taif. (2023). From Muhasasa to Mawatana: Consociationalism and Identity Transformation within the Protest Movement in Federal Iraq, 2011–2019. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics Journal, 30 (1), 1-19.
  30. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. (2022). Unpacking Federalism in Iraq: Insights from Basra, Ninawa and Sulaymaniyah.
  31. Lijphart, Arend. (1969). Consociational Democracy. World Politics, 21 (2), 207– 225.
  32. Lijbhart, Arend. (1977). Democracy in plural societies: a comparative exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  33. Lijphart, Arend. (1998). South African Democracy: Majoritarian or Consociational? Democratisation, 5 (4), 144-150.
  34. Lijphart, Arend. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  35. Mansour, Renad. (2019). Iraq’s 2018 Government Formation: Unpacking the Friction between Reform and the Status Quo. LSE Middle East Center report.
  36. McCulloch, Allison. (2014). Consociational Settlements in Deeply Divided Societies: The Liberal -Corporate Distinction. Democratisation, 21(3), 501-518.
  37. McCulloch, Allison; McEvoy, Joanne. (2019). Bumps in the Road Ahead: How External Actors Defuse Power-Sharing Crises. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 13 (2): 1-20. DOI: 10.1080/17502977.2018.1526994.
  38. McCulloch, Allison; McEvoy, Joanne. (2020). Understanding Power‐Sharing Performance: A Lifecycle Approach. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 20 (2), 109-116.
  39. McEvoy, Joanne; Abulatif, Eduardo. (2020). Power-Sharing Challenges: from Weak adoptability to Dysfunction in Iraq. Ethnopolitics, 21 (3), 1-20.
  40. McGarry, John. (2019). Classical Consociational Theory and Recent Consociational Performance. Swiss Political Science Review, 25(4), 519–537.
  41. McGarry, John; O'Leary, Brendan. (1995). Explaining Northern Ireland. Oxford: Blackwell.
  42. McGarry, John; O’Leary, Brendan. (2007). Iraq’s Constitution of 2005: Liberal Consociation as Political Prescription, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5 (4), 670–698.
  43. McGarry, John; O’Leary, Brendan. (2009), Argument: Power Shared After the Deaths of Thousands. In R. Taylor (ed.), Consociational Theory: McGarry and O’Leary and the Northern Ireland Conflict, pp 15–84, Routledge.
  44. O’Driscoll, Dylan; Costantini, Irene. (2023). Conflict Mitigation versus Governance: The Case of Consociation in Iraq. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 30 (1), 1-20.
  45. O’Leary, Brendan. (2005). Debating Consociational Politics: Normative and Explanatory Arguments. In S. Noel. (ed.), from power sharing to democracy, (PP: 1-24), McGill-Queen's University Press.
  46. Pirsoul, Nicolas. (2019). Sectarianism and recognition in Iraq from consociationalism to deliberation? Democratic Theory, 6 (1), 49-72.
  47. Qaddour, Jomana. (2022). Iraq's Constitutional Moments and the Institutionalization of Ethno-Sectarianism. Emory International Law Review, 36 (2). 337-385.
  48. Rastgoo, Mohammad; Asadi, Ali Akbar; Shafaee, Syed Masoud. (2018). Geographical Restriction and Interests as a Bulwark against Disintegration of Iraq. Geopolitics Quarterly, 13 (4), 245-279.
  49. Rochtus, Dirk. (2023). Belgium: Civil society and the protection of democracy–the case of Flanders. In Civil Democracy Protection (pp. 147-158), Routledge.
  50. Roeder, Philip; Rothchild, Donald. (2005). Sustainable Peace: Power and Democracy after Civil Wars. New York: Cornell University Press.
  51. Russel, David; Shehadi, Nadim. (2005). Power Sharing and National Reconciliation: The Case of Lebanon. In O’Flynn, L. and Russel, D. (eds), Power Sharing: New Challenges for Divided Societies, (PP138-154), Pluto Press.
  52. Saouli, Adham. (2019). Sectarianism and Political Order in Iraq and Lebanon. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 19 (1), 67-87.
  53. Sisk, Timothy. (2013). Power-sharing in civil war: puzzles of peacemaking and peacebuilding, Civil Wars, 15(1), 7-20.
  54. Schneckener, Ulrich. (2000). Making Power-Sharing Work: Lessons from Successes and Failures in Ethnic Conflict Regulation. Germany. Bremen University.
  55. Alshamary, Marseen. (2023). The New Iraqi Opposition: The anti-establishment movement after the 2021 elections. Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’.
  56. Alshamary, Marseen. (2024). A Scramble for Legitimacy: Iraq’s Political Elites since the October 2019 Protests. Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’.
  57. Smajljaj, Avdi. (2020). Ethnicity Based Democratic Constitutional Structures: the Cases of Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia and Kosovo. Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies, (4), 109-138.
  58. Stewart-Jolley, Victoria. (2021). Iraq’s electoral system Why successive reforms fail to bring change. Research Paper. Chatham House.
  59. Althabhawi, Nabeel; Zhe, Chao; Abidin, Nadia; Al Imari, Mustafa. (2023). Personal Media Restrictions on Freedom of Speech: A Social Contract Theory behind It, Geopolitics Quarterly, 19 (special issue), 119-144.
  60. US State Department. (2022). International Religious Freedom Report for 2022-Iraq. The USA. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor.
  61. Younis, Nussaibah. (2011). Set up to fail: Consociational Political Structures in Post-War Iraq, 2003-2010, Contemporary Arab Affairs, 4 (1), 1-18.
  62. Visser, Reidar. (2012). The Emasculation of Government Ministries in Consociational Democracies: The Case of Iraq. International Journal of Contemporary Iraqi Studies, 6 (2), 231–242.
فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک
دوره 21، شماره 2
تابستان 1404
صفحه 122-147

  • تاریخ دریافت 29 اسفند 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 20 مهر 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 02 آبان 1403