فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

سناریوهای فراروی مناسبات هیدروپلیتیک ایران و افغانستان از منظر درهم‎تنیدگی مقیاس‎ها

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دکتری جغرافیای سیاسی، گروه جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.
2 دانشیار جغرافیای سیاسی، گروه جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.
3 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیای سیاسی، گروه جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
مناسبات هیدروپلیتیک متاثر از درهم‌تندگی مقیاس‌ها و به تبع بازیگران و کنشگران با اهداف و منافع ناهمسان قرار دارد. امنیت آب شرق ایران به شدت در پیوند با رودهایی است که از افغانستان سرچشمه می‌گیرند. در چند دهه گذشته رویکرد دولت‌های حاکم بر افغانستان، محدودسازی آب رودهای این کشور بوده است. پژوهش کاربردیِ حاضر با هدف ارائه سناریوهای فراروی مناسبات هیدروپلیتیک ایران و افغانستان از منظر درهم‌تنیدگی مقیاس‌ها نگارش یافته است. داده‌های مورد نیاز پژوهش با استفاده از روش‌های کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی؛ گردآوری و با بهره‌گیری از نرم‌افزارهای Micmac و Scenario Wizard تحلیل شده‌اند. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان دادند در بُعد بازیگران؛ مقیاس ملی و متغیر نقش دولت افغانستان در رعایت حقابه ایران و در بُعد عواملِ تاثیرگذار؛ مقیاس جهانی و متغیر تغییر اقلیم، تاثیرگذارترین مقیاس و متغیر هستند. نتایج پژوهش نشان دادند هر چند سناریو وضعیت بحرانی در مناسبات هیدروپلیتیک ایران و افغانستان بر دیگر سناریوهای ممکن از منظر در هم‌تنیدگی مقیاس‌ها برتری دارد، اما ظرفیت‌های لازم در هر دو دولت وجود دارند تا بتوانند از گسترش دامنه بحران بکاهند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Scenarios of Hydro-Political Relations between Iran and Afghanistan from the Perspective of Scale Intertwinement

نویسندگان English

Zakeyeh Aftabi 1
Morad Kaviani Rad 2
Khodadad Vatankhah 3
1 PhD in Political Geography, Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor of Political Geography, Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Ph.D. Student of Political Geography, Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended Abstract     
Introduction
Geographical scales mutually influence the hydro-political relations between Iran and Afghanistan, complicating the management of shared water resources. Despite various studies, no research has simultaneously examined the roles of both actors and factors influencing these relations from the perspective of scale intertwinement. This study focuses on local, national, regional, and global scales to identify key actors and factors and to present probable future scenarios for the water relations between the two countries. It addresses these questions:

Who are the key actors in Iran-Afghanistan hydro-political relations at each geographical scale, and which actor is most influential?
What are the main factors affecting these relations at each scale, and which factor has the greatest impact?
What is the most likely future scenario for Iran-Afghanistan hydro-political relations from the scale intertwinement viewpoint?

The findings first identify the major actors and factors across scales. Then, they outline possible future scenarios. Understanding these helps policymakers create better strategies for managing water relations with Afghanistan.
 
Methodology
This applied mixed-methods study was conducted in several stages. Initially, influential variables (actors and factors) across different geographical scales were identified through library research and ranked using the FBMW, FSOARA, and FCOPRAS models. The Micmac software was then used to validate and determine the key variables by comparing its results with those models. After defining various scenarios for these key variables, a cross-impact questionnaire was developed and given to experts who rated the interactions between scenarios. The collected data were analyzed using Scenario Wizard to identify the most likely future scenario of hydro-political relations between Iran and Afghanistan from the perspective of scale intertwinement.
 
Result and Discussion
The research findings showed that in the dimension of actors, the national scale and the role of the Afghan government in respecting Iran’s water rights were identified as the most influential scale and actor. The key factors impacting the hydro-political relations between Iran and Afghanistan from the perspective of scale intertwinement included the necessity of developing Afghanistan’s agricultural economy, meeting the water needs of Afghanistan’s growing population, the poor management and consumption patterns of water resources in the Helmand River basin, Afghanistan’s transit and trade dependence on landlocked Iran, and climate change.
Conclusion
The future situation of hydro-political relations between Iran and Afghanistan from the perspective of scale intertwinement is critical. As a solution, the research proposes addressing the shortcomings of both countries through their mutual and complementary cooperation in linking hydro-political and geopolitical approaches.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Hydropolitics
Scale Intertwinement
Futures Studies
Iran and Afghanistan
  1. Aftabi, Z; Kaviani Rad, M; Kardan Moghadam, H. (2023). Explaining the Future Scenarios of the Hydro Political Relations of the Border Rivers of Iran and Iraq. Water and Irrigation Management, 13(2), 487-507. /10,22059JWIM.2023.351144.1032. [In Persian]
  2. Amini, A; Jafari, H; Malekmohammadi, B; Nasrabadi, T. (2021). Transboundary Water Resources Conflict Analysis Using Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: A Case Study—Harirud River. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc., 1720517, 1 ـ12- https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1720517.
  1. Araghchi, S.A. (2015). Hydro Diplomacy: From Conflict to Cooperation. World Politics, 3(4), 91-119.‏
  2. Arfa, A; Ayyoubzadeh, S.A; Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H; Mianabadi, H. (2025). Transboundary hydropolitical conflicts and their impact on river morphology and environmental degradation in the Hirmand Basin, West Asia. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 2754. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024845011.
  3. Ban, Y; Tang, Q; Liu, X; Li, X; Ren, Y; Deng, H…; Leng, G. (2025). Intensification of water scarcity threatens future food security in northwestern China. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 58, 102177.‏ https://doi.org/1016/j.ejrh.2025.102177.
  4. Conker, A (2014). “An Enhanced Notion of Power for Inter-State and Transnational Hydropolitics: An Analysis of Turkish-Syrian Water Relations and the Ilısu Dam Conflict between the Opponents and Proponents of the Dam.” University of East Anglia.
  5. Dombrowsky, I. (2009). Revisiting the potential for benefit sharing in the management of transboundary Rivers. Water Policy, 11(2), 125-140.‏ https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2009.020.
  6. Guo, L; Wei, J; Zhang, K; Tian, F. (2021). Building a methodological framework and toolkit for news media dataset tracking of conflict and cooperation dynamics on Transboundary Rivers. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2021, 1-21.‏ https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1165-2022.
  7. Hafeznia Mohammad Reza; Kaviani Rad, Morad (2021). Philosophy of Political Geography, third edition. Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  8. Hafeznia, Mohammad Reza; Kaviani Rad, Morad (2022). principles of state Governance (Political Management of National Space). Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  9. Hajihosseini M; Hajihosseini, H; Morid, S; Delavar, M; Booij, M.J. (2020). Impacts of land use changes & climate variability on transboundary Hirmand River using SWAT. Journal of Water & Climate Change, 11(4), 1695 ـ1711 https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2019.100.
  10. Kaviani Rad, M. (2019). Hydropolitics: strains and approaches, first edition, Tehran, Research Institute of Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  11. Kaviani Rad, M; Tak Rosta, M; Aftabi, Z. (2023). Explaining the Future Scenarios of Hydro Political Relations between Iran & Afghanistan in Common Water Resources with Emphasis on the Hirmand River. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 9(4), 47/10,22059 2024.96180. [In Perisian]
  12. Likun, A; Suhail, M; Khan, M.N; Ravshanov, A.X; Marufdjan, U. (2025). Integrated spatio-temporal and environmental modelling of water scarcity in Saudi Arabia using shared socioeconomic pathways. Environmental Challenges, 19, 101151.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101151.
  13. Loodin, N; Warner, J. (2022). A review of hydro-hegemonic dynamics on the transboundary Harirud River Basin: 2001–present. Water, 14(21), 3442.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/w14213442.
  14. Marston, S.A; Jones, J.P; Woodward, K. (2017). Human geography without scale. In Theory and methods (pp. 337-354). Routledge.‏
  15. Mianabadi, H; Ghoreishi, S.Z. (2022). Realism and liberalism paradigms in hydro-political interactions. Geopolitics Quarterly, 18(1), 150-186 20,1001,1,17354331,1401,18,65,6,2.
  16. Mianabadi, H; Ghoreishi, S.Z. (2024). Understanding the complexity of hydropolitical arrangements in the Hirmand transboundary river basin. Journal Of Iranian Water Engineering Research, 2(3), 53-77/10,22034 IJWER. 2023.409040.1040. [In Persian]
  17. Mirheidar, D; Zaki, Y. (2010). The Concept of Geographical Scale and Its Significance in Postmodern Political Geography. Geopolitics Quarterly, 6(17), 5-36.20,1001.1.17354331,1389,6,17,1,7. [In Persian]
  18. Nagheeby, M; Warner, J. (2020). The 150 ـyear itch: Afghanistan ـIran hydropolitics over the Helmand/Hirmand River. Water Alternatives, 15(3), 551-573.http://www.water ـorg.
  19. Nagheeby, M; Warner, J. (2018). The geopolitical overlay of the hydropolitics of the Harirud River Basin. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18, 839-860.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9418-9.
  20. Qian, W; Wu, S; Fang, M; Qian, X. (2025). Water scarcity in Hebei Province, China: A predictive model and analysis of contributing factors. Desalination and Water Treatment, 322, 101136.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2025. 101136.
  21. Scanlon, B.R; Fakhreddine, S; Rateb, A; De Graaf, I; Famiglietti, J; Gleeson, T; Zheng, C. (2023). Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4(2), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00378-6.
  22. Taucare, M; Viguier, B; Figueroa, R; Daniele, L. (2024). The alarming state of Central Chile's groundwater resources: A paradigmatic case of a lasting overexploitation. Science of The Total Environment, 906, 167723.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167723.
  23. Vij, S; Warner, J.F; Mehta, A.S; Barua, A. (2024). Status quo in transboundary waters: Unpacking non-decision making and non-action. Global Environmental Change, 85, 102821. https://doi.org/10.1016/gloenvcha. 2024.102821.
  24. Warner, J. (2012). Three lenses on water war, peace and hegemonic struggle on the Nile. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 4(1-2), 173-193.‏ https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSOC.2012.044672.
  25. Yuan, L; Wu, X; He, W; Kong, Y; Degefu, D.M; Ramsey, T.S. (2023). Using the fuzzy evidential reasoning approach to assess and forecast the water conflict risk in transboundary Rivers: A case study of the Mekong River basin. Journal of Hydrology, 625, 130090.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023. 130090.
  26. Zaki, Y; Talebi, M.S; Badiee Azandehi, M; Yusefi Shatoori, M. (2023). The Role of GAP Project in Hydropolitics of Tigris and Euphrates Rivers Basin. Geopolitics Quarterly, 19(71), 241-272 .20,1001,1,17354331,1402,19,71, 9,4. [In Persian]
  27. Zaki, Yashar; Vali Qolizadeh, Ali (2012). Spatial scales in political geography; Concepts and theories, Tehran University Publications. [In Persian]
  28. Zeitoun, M; Mirumachi, N (2008). Transboundary water interaction I: reconsidering conflict and cooperation. Int. Environ. Agreements Polit. Law Econ. 8, 1 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-008-9083-5.
  29. Zeitoun, M; Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony–a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water policy, 8(5), 435-460.‏ https://doi.org/2166/wp.2006.054.
  30. Zeitoun, M; Mirumachi, N. (2008). Transboundary Water Interaction I: Reconsidering Conflict and Cooperation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(4), 297–316. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10784-008-9083-5.
  31. Zhang, L. (2025). Water Resource Management. In Sustainability Economics (pp. 233-253). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-031-87829-9_11.
دوره 21، شماره 3
پاییز 1404
صفحه 240-264

  • تاریخ دریافت 19 بهمن 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 12 مرداد 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 13 شهریور 1404