تحلیل ژئوپلیتیکی روابط ایران و ترکیه در دوره حزب عدالت و توسعه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار جغرافیای سیاسی دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

2 استاد جغرافیای سیاسی دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار جغرافیای سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد، واحد علوم تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

4 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیای سیاسی دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

ایران و ترکیه به عنوان دو کشور دارای نظام معنایی و علایق خاص و سلسله منافع مشترک و برخی تضادها هستند. عوامل گوناگونی بر روابط این دو کشور تأثیر می‌گذارد که سبب ایجاد نوساناتی در روابط دوجانبه آنها می‌شود. آنچه در این پژوهش مد نظر قرار داد بررسی روابط ژئوپلیتیکی ایران و ترکیه و فراز و فرودهای آن در دوره حزب عدالت توسعه است.روش تحقیق به صورت توصیفی-تحلیلی و بر مبنای رویکرد واقع‌گرایی ژئوپلیتیکی است. علاوه بر این جهت تجزیه و تحلیل یافته­های تحقیق از روش AHP بهره گرفته شده است. یافته­های پژوهش نشان می­دهد روابط ژئوپلیتیکی در این دوره تحت تاثیر سه عامل رقابت، تعارض و همکاری قرار داشته است. می­توان بیان نمود که ایران و ترکیه در سطح منطقه­ای علاوه بر همکاری­های گسترده در زمینه انرژی و پرونده هسته­ای به عنوان رقیب یکدیگر مطرح هستند و هر یک در تلاش برای رسیدن به اهداف و منافع ملی خود در قالب مطرح شدن به عنوان قدرت سطح یک در منطقه غرب آسیا هستند. در نهایت نتایج تحقیق نشان می­دهد که با استفاده از الگوهای تعارض، همکاری و رقابت می­توان سیاست خارجی متناسب با شرایط را تدوین نمود و از طریق تدوین سیاست­های صحیح در راستای رسیدن به اهداف و منافع ملی گام برداشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Geopolitical Analysis of Iran-Turkey Relations in the AKP Period from the Perspective of Geopolitical Realism

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ataallah Abdi 1
  • Yadollah Karimipour 2
  • Abdolreza Faraji rad 3
  • Zahra Saee 4
1 Assistant Professor of Political Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor of political geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Geography, Islamic Azad University, Research and Sciences Branch, Tehran, Iran
4 Ph.D. Candidate in Political Geography, kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Iran and Turkey are the two most important players in the Middle East and the Islamic world with a long-standing relationship with each other. With the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, Turkey was formed from the remains of the Ottoman Turks as a modern nation. In this new era, Iran-Turkey relations entered a new phase. With the advent of the Islamic Revolution, relations between Turkey and Iran were on the ups and downs. With the rise of Islamists led by Najmuddin Arbakan in the early nineties, relations between Iran and Turkey became very close. Relations fluctuated from 1995 to 2002, when secular power restored. But with the victory of the Islamist Justice and Development Party (AKP) Iran-Turkey relations entered a new phase in their history. In the new era and with the AKP's particular attention to its neighbors, particularly Iran. Many experts, meanwhile, believe that realistic theories provide the best explanation of the relationships and equations in the area. One application of this theory is its use to explain the balance of power in the region and efforts to maintain or change it by regional and international actors. In the discussion of the balance of powers in the region, we will also see how in support of specific hegemony in order to prevent another hegemony. The point is, of course, that this does not mean that they intend to limit their power or their goals for the sake of the system, but rather they seek to maximize their power or security, but in such a way that a balanced distribution of power among them also takes place. This study, using a realistic approach, tries to investigate the geopolitical trend of this period of Iranian-Turkish relations and to identify and analyze the aforementioned factors and areas.
Research Methodology
The research is descriptive-analytic, and tries to explain the relations between Iran and Turkey based on the theory of geopolitical realism in the AKP era. In the present study, the factors affecting the conflicts, competitions and cooperation between Iran and Turkey during the period of AKP were extracted from library and documentary data and in order to determine the weight of the factors ECHP is used. The matrices were designed as a questionnaire and provided to four scholars in the field of science and three scholars related to the researcher's presence to respond. The software Expert Chase is used to analyze the data.
Research findings
Research findings showed that areas of geopolitical competition between Iran and Turkey are as follows: Competition in Iranian and Turkish Self-Orientation; Competition in the Islamic and Iranian Islamic Model; Competition for leadership in the Islamic world, Iran-Turkey Competition in Syria; Iran-Turkey Competition in Iraq; Competition in the defense of Islam and Hamas. Also, areas of Geopolitical Conflict between Iran and Turkey are as follows: Hydro-politic Conflicts; Conflicts in the economic field; Pan-Turkism Conflicts; Shiite-Sunni Conflict; Conflicts in the field of diplomatic interactions; Conflicts over expanding the area of influence. Also, areas of geopolitical cooperation between Iran and Turkey are as follows: Cooperation on the Kurdish issue; Cooperation in the field of energy; Collaborating on the Nuclear Case; Security Cooperation.
Conclusion
The findings of the study indicated that among the factors affecting Iran-Turkey relations, competitive factors such as competition over Syria, Iraq and the sphere of influence are the most important. On the other hand, factors such as cooperation in the nuclear case and cooperation in the field of energy can be effective factors in the dependence of Iran and Turkey over time. In fact, Iranian-Turkish relation is in the context of current geographical and geopolitical realities. This context reflects the type of relations between the two countries, depending on its conditions and characteristics at any time and situation. Normally, Iran and Turkey are in a state of competition and cooperation. The two countries cooperate in economic cooperation, transit of goods and passengers, security cooperation on the issue of Kurdish separatism, but in cases such as the expansion of influence in geopolitical areas around, Islamic world leadership, religious competition, neighboring markets compete with each other. Today's situation is also highlighted by neo-Ottoman policy in Turkish foreign policy and efforts to expand Turkish influence in the historical territory of the Ottoman Empire in areas such as North Africa, Shamat, Iraq and the Caucasus, as well as Iran's attempt to converge countries such as Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen. It has involved the two countries in a proxy war and has sometimes led to sharp positions by the two countries against each other. This is exacerbated when other regional and transnational powers also play a role in the two countries' relations, which could lead to escalation of tensions between the two countries. Therefore, it can be said that in line with the geopolitical requirements, the relations between the two countries will flow in a range of cooperation and competition, but with the entry of non-geopolitical elements such as ideology and the interference of regional and transnational powers towards them the tension will be increased.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Geopolitics
  • Realism
  • Iran
  • Turkey
  • AHP
  1. Ahmadian, ghodrat, Farhad, Karamian, Reza Karam. (2016). The Identity and Foreign Policy of the Middle East in Iran and Turkey in Syria, Global Politics, 5(4). [In Persian]
  2. Ahmadipour, Zahra, Lashkari, Ehsan. (2015). The Geographical Philosophy of Continuing Competition in Post-Cold War International Relations, Geographical Research Quarterly, 29(3). [In Persian]
  3. Ahmadipour, Zahra, Mousavi Shafaie, Masoud, Pordast, Zahra (2019). Analysis of Iran-Turkey competition in the Syrian crisis, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 3 [In Persian]
  4. Ahmadipour, Zahra, Bidar, Mohammad Taher (2015). The Impact of US Strategy on the Transformations of Iraqi Kurdistan From 1971 to 2014, Geopolitical Quarterly, Fourteenth Year, No. 2, Summer 2015. [In Persian]
  5. Afzali, Rasool and Afshin Motaghi. (2013). A Geopolitical Study of Moderate Islamism in Turkish Foreign Policy from 1995 to 2011, with a Constructivist Approach, Journal of Foreign Relations, 3(4):PP 175-202. [In Persian]
  6. Azgandi, Alireza. (2010). Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran: Ghooms Publications.
  7. Atimes (2017) "Turkey and the Rohingyas: Erdogan as global Muslim leader" online at: http://www.atimes.com/article/turkey-rohingyas-erdogan-global-muslim-leader/.[ In Persian]
  8. Aras, B. (2009). "The Davutoglu Era in Turkish Foreign Policy", Insight Turkey, 11(3).
  9. AKP, Turkish Foreign Policy Quarterly, December  Winrow, Gareth M. (2004), "Turkey and East-West Gas Transportation Corridor", Turkish Studies, 5(2).
  10. Abdollah Khani, Ali (2004). Security Theories: An Introduction to Designing a National Security Doctrine (I), Tehran: Institute for Contemporary Studies and Research, Tehran Abroad, 2004, Volume I. [In Persian]
  11. Absentee, Mohammad Reza. (2015). The Political Economy of Iran-Turkey Relations During the Rule of the AKP, Foreign Policy Quarterly, 3(2). [In Persian]
  12. Babali, T(2012/ March), "The Role of Energy in Turkey’s Relations with Russia and Iran", Paper Prepared for an International Workshop 'The Turkey, Russia, Iran Nexus: Economic and Energy Dimensions, organized by TEPAV: Ankara
  13. Brooks, Steve & Wohlforth, Bill (2008) World out of balance, International Relations and Challenge of American Primacy, Prinseton
  14. Cohen, J.A., (1991).  International Low and the water politicsv of Euphrates, Journal of International Low and Politics, 24, 1991
  15. Coser, Lewis A (1956). The Functions of Social Conflict, New York: The Free Press
  16. Çandar, Cengiz (2016). "Has Turkey’s Regional Power Grab Come to an End?", Al Monitor, January 7, available at: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/ 2016/01/turkey-saudi-arabia-ankara-try-reclaim-regional-supremacy.html.
  17. CBoI (2013). "Iran Central Bank Annual Review Report 2011-2012". Cetinguelc, Mehmet (2016/ Februrary 8), "How Turkey's Foreign Policy May Have Lost it $25 Billion in Trade with Iran", available at: http://www.almonitor.com/pulse/ originals/2016/02/turkey-iran-trade-deal-prove-hugedisappointment.html
  18. Dougherty, James E. and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff (1981). Contending Theories of International Relations, Longman Higher Education.
  19. Davutoglu, Ahmet, (2001). Stratejik Derinlik, Istanbul, Kure Yayınları. Erdogan, Recep Tayyip, (2011), “Seçim Sonrası Başbakan'ın Balkon Konuşması,” in En Son Habar, 2013/5/4, Retrieved from: http://www.ensonhaber.com/secim-sonrasi-basbakanin-balkon-konusmasi-2011-06-12.html.
  20. Danforth, Nick (2016). "Turkey’s New Maps Are Reclaiming the Ottoman Empire", Foreign Policy, October 23, available at: http://foreignpolicy.com/ 2016/10/23/turkeys-religious-nationalists-want-ottoman-borders-iraq-erdogan/.
  21. Islami, Massoud, Shams Abadi, Jamshid (2019). Failure factors of Iraqi Kurdistan's separation referendum, Geopolitics Quarterly14(3). [In Persian]
  22. Falah, mercy of Allah. (2013). Turkey's Strategic Goals and Challenges in Syrian Developments. [In Persian]
  23. Fuller, Graham. (1995). Qibla Alam, Iranian Geopolitics, Translated by Abbas Mokhbar, Center Publishing.
  24. Farhi, David. (2004). Political system and government in Islam, Tehran: Humanities textbooks organization. [In Persian]
  25. flections on EU–Turkey Relations. in Seçil Paçacı Elitok and Thomas Straubhaar (eds.). Turkey, Migrationand the EU: Potentials, Challenges and Idiz, Selim, “The ‘Sunnification’ of Turkish Foreign Policy,” Turkey Pulse, Al-Monitor.
  26. Hafeznia, Mohammad Reza. (2003). The Political Geography of Iran, Khome Publications. [In Persian]
  27. Hafez Nia, Mohammad Reza, Zahra Ahmadi Pour and Chamran Bouyeh. (2013). The Islamic Revolution and the New Geopolitics of Iran, Journal of the Islamic Revolution, 2(5): pp. 23-1. [In Persian]
  28. Hosseini, Seyyed Motahareh, Ebrahimi, Talib, Shah Qala, Safi Allah. (2014). The West's Look at Turkish Foreign Policy During the AKP (2002-2012). Islamic World Studies Quarterly, 1(3). [In Persian]
  29. Jan Parvar, Mohsen, Ghorbani, Arash, Khodadad, Mehdi. (2017). Analyzing the Geopolitical Position of Islamic Iran as a Regional Power Supporter in the World System, Policy Research 4(7): pp. 78-53. [In Persian]
  30. Khalili Nejad Kashkouki, Ruhollah; Dehshiar, Hussein. (2017). Syria Crisis and Turkish National Security, Islamic World Political Research Quarterly, 7(2): pp. 140-10. [In Persian]
  31. Kolaee, Goddess, Goodarzi, Mahnaz. (2016). The Impact of Armenia-Turkey Relations on Armenian-Iranian Relations, Geopolitics Quarterly, 19(1): pp. 70-38. [In Persian]
  32. Gohari Moghaddam, Abu Dharr Maddloo, Ramin. (2016). The Roots of Ottomanism in Turkish Foreign Policy (2002-2015), Strategic Policy Research Quarterly, 5(17), Summer 2016 (consecutive issue 47). [In Persian]
  33. Larijani, Mohammad Javad. (1997). Islamic State and Political Borders, Islamic State Quarterly, Issue 2, Winter. [In Persian]
  34. Lotfi, Mena. (2010). The Gullen Movement; Social Islam with Political Islam of the Taqiyyat, Rasakhoun Website, July 3, 2009, Available at: http://rasekhoon .net/article/print-31704.aspx. [In Persian]
  35. Ghorbani Nejad, Ribaz, Hafez Nia, Mohammad Reza, Ahmadipour, Zahra, Qavam, Abdolali. (2015). Investigating the Concept of Conflict in the Theories of International and Geopolitical Relations, Strategic Quarterly, 20, No. 70. [In Persian]
  36. Guoji, Guanxi (2001). Security Dilemma, Balance of Power, Contemporary International Relations, available at: www.uscc.gov/researchpapers, (accessed on 12/10/2011).
  37. Guzansky, Yoel & Lindenstrauss, Gallia (2011). "Turkey and Iran: The Politics of Strange Bedfellows", Strategic Assessment, Vol. 14, No. 1
  38. Özcan, Nihat Ali & Özdamar, Özgür (2009). Smarter Energy", Insight Turkey, Vol. 12, No. 3. “Iran’s Nuclear Program and Future of U.S.-Iranian Relations", Middle East Policy, 16(1): pp. 121-133.
  39. Öğütçü, Mehmet (2012). "Turkey and Changing Dynamics of World Energy: Towards Cleaner
  40. Motaghi, Afshin and Mustafa Rashidi. (2014). Geopolitical Explanation of Islamist Patterns in the Islamic World from the Perspective of Constructivism, Quarterly Journal of Islamic Revolution Studies, Volume 10, Issue, Fall, pp. 108-91. [In Persian]
  41. Massoudifar, Jalil. (2004). Preserving Iranian-Islamic Culture in the Process of Globalization, Qom: Proceedings of the Conference on Globalization and Religion. [In Persian]
  42. Masoudnia, Hussein, Najafi, Davood. (2012). Turkey's New Foreign Policy and Security Threats to the Islamic Republic of Iran, Afaq Security Quarterly, 3(13), Winter 2011. [In Persian]
  43. Moshirzadeh, Homeyra (2009). Transformation in International Relations Theories, Tehran: Position. [In Persian]
  44. Mohammadi, Hamid Reza, Tahereh Mirzaeipour and Reza Hosseinpour Pouyan. (2013). Hydropolytic Spatial Analysis of the Tigris and Euphrates Basin, Iranian Journal of Geographical Association, New Volume, No. 35. [In Persian]
  45. Mokhtari Hashi, Hossein and Hamid Reza Nosrati. (2011). Energy Security and Geoenergetic Situation of Iran, 6(18): pp. 124-95. [In Persian]
  46. Mokhtari Hashi, Hossein, Mostafa Ghaderi Hajat, (2009). Hydropolitics of the Middle East in Horizon 2025: A Case Study: Tigris and Euphrates Basins, Jordan River Nile Entry, Geopolitics Quarterly, No. 1, Baharf PP 74-36. [In Persian]
  47. Morgentha, Hans J. (2011). Politics among Nations, State Department Publications.
  48. Mousaghi, Ahmad and Alizadeh, Shiva. (2013). Turkey's developmentist foreign policy in the course of the Justice and Development Party; Case of Caucasus, Central Eurasia Studies. 7(2). [In Persian]
  49. Maghroori, R and Ramberg, B eds (1982 ). Globalism vs realism. Boulder, co: westviewpress. [In Persian]
  50. Niakoui, Sidamir and Vida Haji. (2017). The Impact of Arab Middle East Rise on Iran-Turkey Relations Pattern (2017-2011), Journal of International Relations Research, No. 25, Fall, pp. 119-91. [In Persian]
  51. Nahazi, Ghulam Hussein. (2000). Water crisis in the Middle East, Center for Middle East Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  52. Park, Bill (2014). "Turkey-Kurdish Regional Government Relations after the U.S. Withdrawal from Iraq: Putting the Kurds on the Map?", Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press, March
  53. Rezaei, Masoud (2016),."The Problem of Continued Strategic Shift in Turkey’s Foreign Policy", Iran Review, Monday, August 29, available at: http://www.iranreview.org/content/Documents/The-Problem-of-ContinuedStrategic-Shift-in-Turkey-s-Foreign-Policy.htm. [In Persian]
  54. Rohi, Mjid (2018). Geopolitical Analysis of Iran-Turkey Competition Affected by Middle East Developments Since 2011, The Geopolitical Quarterly, 14(1), Spring 2018.
  55. Tremblay, Pinar (2014). Turkish Shiites Fear Growing Hate Crimes, Al Monitor, July 11, available at: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2014/07/ tremblayturkish-shiites-secterian-hate-crime-isis-syria.html.
  56. Shokouhi, Hussein. (1995). Philosophy of Geography, Geology Publishing. [In Persian]
  57. Sadeghi, Sayed Shamsuddin. (1998). Hydropolytic and Water Crisis with Future Challenges in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf, Political-Economic Information, Eleventh Year, No. 116-115, April and May 1997. [In Persian]
  58. Yari, Ehsan, Esfandiari, Mehdi. (2018). American Geopolitical School and the Regional Geopolitical Network of the New Structure of the International System, Journal of Politics, Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, Volume 48, Number 3, Autumn 1977, pp. 833-809. [In Persian]
  59. Yaghoubi Far, Hamed. (2014). The Typology of Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East, Journal of Foreign Policy, 27(4): pp. 987-965. [In Persian]
  60. Yegin, Mehmet and Selim Ozertem, Hasan (2013). "Turkey-Iraq Relations: from Close Partners to Adversaries", Washington DC: The German Marshall Fund of the United States, January 7. [In Persian]
  61. Zanotti, Jim (2012), "Turkey: Background and U.S. Relations", Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs, 8(6).
  62. WTO (2013), "Trade Profiles 2012”.
دوره 17، شماره 61
فروردین 1400
صفحه 19-56
  • تاریخ دریافت: 06 بهمن 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 28 اسفند 1398
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 03 فروردین 1399
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 01 فروردین 1400