ژئوپلیتیک و توسعه طلبی ارضی آلمان نازی: تأثیر اندیشه‌های کارل هاس‌هوفر بر هیتلر

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کاندیدای دکتری جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار تاریخ، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

ارتباط تاریخی میان دانش ژئوپلیتیک و رژیم آلمان نازی باعث شد تا این رشته در سال‌های پس از جنگ جهانی دوم مدت‌ها مورد بی‌توجهی قرارگرفته و از محافل آکادمیک حذف شود، این مقاله با هدف بررسی رابطه میان ژئوپلیتیک و آلمان نازی به مطالعه چگونگی نفوذ اندیشه‌های کارل هاس‌هوفر بر هیتلر پرداخته و تاثیر آن بر سیاست خارجی رایش سوم و همچنین توجیهات علمی توسعه‌طلبی ارضی نازی‌ها را با روش توصیفی–تحلیلی ارزیابی می‌کند. یافته‌های این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد هاس‌هوفر با توسعه مفاهیمی هم‌چون فضای حیاتی، اوتارکی، مرزهای سیال و ابرمنطقه‌ها در تحولات منتهی به جنگ جهانی دوم تأثیرگذار بود که از جمله می‌توان به پیمان ضدکمینترن، کنفرانس مونیخ، الحاق چکسلواکی و حمله به لهستان اشاره کرد، با این حال در آثار انگلیسی زبان منتشر شده نسبت به میزان تأثیر هاس‌هوفر و نقش دانش ژئوپلیتیک در تحولات جنگ جهانی دوم اغراق و سیاه نمایی صورت پذیرفته است، در حالی‌که هاس‌هوفر در سال‌های جنگ اختلافاتی با نازی‌ها داشت و حمله به شوروی نیز مخالف نظریات وی بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Geopolitics and Territorial Expansionism in Nazi Germany: The influence of Haushofer Ideas on Hitler

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Nader Nourbakhsh 1
  • Farajolah Ahmadi 2
1 PhD Student in Political Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of History, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract     
Introduction
The events that took place on the eve of World War II in Europe were all a reflection of Nazi Germany's territorial expansionist policies. These were rooted in events after the Weimar Republic and even before World War I. However, the role of a German professor, Karl Haushofer, the prominent geopolitician of the Nazi regime which is also known as the father of German geopolitics (Geopolitik), is remarkable. His action led geopolitics to be recognized as a Nazi science and forgotten after the second world war. This paper aims to answer whether German geopolitics as a Nazi-backed science was responsible for the events leading up to World War II and German territorial expansion? Moreover, to what extent Karl Haushofer influenced Hitler and the policies of the Nazi regime?
 
Methodology
The research method is descriptive-analytic, and the research was conducted using a library research method. In this regard, it has been tried to evaluate new references about Haushofer s life and his connection with the Nazis.
 
 
Findings
Karl Haushofer began teaching geopolitics in the early 1920s; He met Hitler through one of his students, Rudolf Hess. He also regularly visited Hitler and Hess during prison to educate them. In these sessions, Haushofer taught them philosophies of Nietzsche and Marx and military topics presented by Bismarck and Clausewitz as well as political geography of Ratzel and Kjellén, including his own works, like Dai Nihon. He believed that Germany could only stand on her fits by thinking geopolitically. Researchers suggest that Hitler learned about concepts such as territory, borders, living space (Lebensraum) from Haushofer. This can be traced in his book Mein Kamp, which played an essential role in Nazi Germany foreign policy in following years.
  Haushofer's Lebensraum idea considered a nation's right and duty to provide space and resources for its people. Accordingly, the difference in the rate of population growth would be one of the factors causing friction between the states in international relations, and therefore the task of a strong state is to expand its territory at the expense of occupation of a weak country. Haushofer has also published the Journal for Geopolitics (Zeitschrift für Geopolitik), whose publication after 1933 raised to more than 700,000 copies a year. It is estimated that in particular, it spread the message of the need for new space for the country's territorial expansion for millions of Germans.
The main practical result of Haushofer's geopolitics was the 1938 Munich conference. It was the first time that theory had been put into practice; he called the Munich Conference an important day in the history of geopolitics. He played a major role in the anti-Comintern treaty with Japan and also supported the militarization of the Rhineland. He additionally welcomed the Non-aggression treaty between the Soviet Union and Germany, calling the attack on Poland a "heroic act" and finally played a significant task in the alliance of Berlin and Tokyo.
 
Discussion
Haushofer representation has always been evil and exaggerated in the Allied countries. In the United States, for example, Haushofer was considered the mastermind of Nazi Germany, many of whom at the time thought that scientists at his institute were formulating strategies for expanding Nazism. However, according to the documents, despite his influence, Haushofer’s relationship with the Nazis was not always friendly, and in some cases, there were signs of conflict. Contrary to the claim of Life magazine in 1939, Haushofer was not a Nazi scholar, and there was much diversity of viewpoints, including with his emphasis on geographic or spatial relationships—while Hitler, whose racist view of the world formed his geopolitical strategy. Haushofer believed some low-educated Nazi leaders did not even really understand his geopolitical ideas; more importantly, he thought Germany had to support the non-aggression treaty with the Soviet Union. Based on Pan-region theory, he believed a separate sphere of influence for Germany and the united states.  The German invasion of the Soviet Union and the declaration of war on the United States were in fact contrary to Haushofer’s ideas. Although the Allies have exaggerated the role of Haushofer in this regard, the Third Reich was not based solely on his ideas, and many other factors were involved.
Conclusions
The findings of this study show that although Haushofer played a notable role in the development of German geopolitics, he was not responsible for the Nazi crimes, as it was examined Haushofer ‘s major impacts and contributions were during the 1930s. Moreover, at least in the final three years of the world war II, he did not collaborate with the Nazis, Haushofer ‘s influence actually stopped following Hess’s flight to Scotland in 1941. So many of the allied narratives have been exaggerated about his role, leading to decades of decline in geopolitics in academia in the following decades. However, Haushofer’s impact on the scientific justification of Nazi Germany’s policies, especially through the radio provided to millions of audiences, on the one hand, and dozens of books and articles dealing with concepts such as the living space needed by Germany, and most importantly educating Hitler on the other hand ultimately transforms Haushofer into a historically controversial figure, with scholars disagreeing on the extent of his responsibility for his Nazi actions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • German Geopolitics
  • Karl Haushofer
  • Hitler
  • Nazi Germany
  • World War II
  1. Barnes, T; Abrahamsson, C. (2014). Tangled complicities and moral strug- gles: The Haushofers, father and son, and the spaces of Nazi geopolitics, Journal of Historical Geography. Doi: 47. 10.1016/j.jhg. 2014.10.002.
  2. Bassin M. (1987). Race contra space: the conflict between German Geopolitik and National Socialism, Political Geography Quarterly,Vol 6 115-134 https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-9827(87)90002-4.
  3. Biddle W. (2012). Dark Side of the Moon: Wernher von Braun, the Third Reich, and the Space Race, New York.
  4. Blouet, B. W. (1987). Halford Mackinder: A Biography, College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
  5. Brodersen, A (1978). Albrecht Haushofer 1903-1945, in: A. Haushofer, Moabit Sonnets, trans. M. D. Herter Norton, New York.
  6. Darabadi, P (2014). Geopolitics and World War II , Newtimes.az Analytical Information Portal http://newtimes.az/en/geopolitics/3015.
  7. Dorj, H.; Tabatabai, S. (2019). Ukraine's Geopolitical Role in the New American and Russian Confrontation,. Geopolitics Quarterly, 15(54), 1-30. [In Persian]     
  8. Edoardo, B (2008). Geopolitical Maps: A Sketch History of a Neglected Trend in Cartography, Geopolitics, 13:2, 278-308 https://doi.org/10.1080 /14650040801991522.
  9. Facinghistory (2019). Facing History and Ourselves website: https://www .facinghistory.org/resource-library/image/growth-nazi-germany.
  10. Fettweis, C. (2015). On Heartlands and Chessboards: Classical Geopolitics, Then and Now. Orbis. 59. 10.1016/j.orbis.2015.02.005. https://doi.org/10. 1016/ j.orbis.2015.02.005.
  11. Fischer, A. (2013). Haushofer, Karl Ernst, in: D. Coetzee, L.W. Eysturli (Eds), Philosophers of War: The Evolution of History’s Greatest Military Thinkers, Volume 2, Santa Barbara.
  12. Flint, C (2006). An Introduction to Geopolitics, London: Routledge.
  13. Gottman, J (1942). “The Background of Geopolitics,” Military Affairs, Vol. 6, No. 4.
  14. Granieri R. J. (2015). What is Geopolitics and Why Does It Matter? Foreign Policy Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2015.08.003.
  15. Hafeznia, M. (2007). A new Concept of the Heartland, Geopolitics Quarterly, 3(8), 1-5. [In Persian]   
  16. Hafeznia, M. (2014). A New Approach to the History of Political Geography in the World, Geopolitics Quarterly, 10(33), 1-36. [In Persian]
  17. Hafeznia, M. (2011). Principles and Concepts of Geopolitics, Mashhad: Papoli Publications. [In Persian]
  18. Herwig, H. (1999). Geopolitik: Haushofer, Hitler and lebensraum, Journal of Strategic Studies, 22:2-3, 218-241, DOI: 10.1080/01402399908437762.
  19. Herwig, H. (2010). The daemon of geopolitics: Karl Haushofer, Rudolf Hess, and Adolf Hitler, http://www.usafa.edu/df/dfh/docs/Harmon53.pdf.
  20. Hitler, A (1926). Mein Kampf, Volume 2, chapter 14, Eastern orientations or Eastern policy, http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/.
  21. Jacobsen, H.A (1979). Karl Haushofer: Leben und Werk. 2 vols. (= Schriften des Bundesarchivs 24) Harald Boldt Verlag, Boppard.
  22. Karami, A.; Mousavi, S. (2019). Geopolitical Elements and Components of Trump Foreign Policy against Islamic Republic of Iran. Geopolitics Quarterly, 15(55), 156-181. [In Persian]     
  23. Kershaw (1998). Hitler, 1889-1936: Hubris: London
  24. Kitsikis, D. (2017). The Difficulty of Being a Geo Politician and a World Historian. Arts & Humanities Open Access Journal.  https://doi.org/10.154 06/ahoaj.2017.01.00001.
  25. Mavric, B. (2017). Political Geography into Geopolitics – The Geopolitics of Decline, ILIRIA International Review – Vol 7, No 2 DOI: 10.21113/iir .v7i2.321.
  26. McNamara, P. (2005). A Catholic Cold War: Edmond S. Walsh, S.J. and the Politics of American Anticommunism, New York.
  27. Mirheydar, D (2010). Tracing Readings of a Political Geographer During the Past Five Decades. Mashhad: Papoli Publications. [In Persian]
  28. Mirheydar, D.; Hamidinia, H. (2006). Methodology and Concepts in Political Geography and International Relation: A Comparative Study, Geopolitics Quarterly, 2(3), 1-41. [In Persian]     
  29. Murphy, D. T. (1997). The Heroic Earth: Geopolitical Thought in Weimar Germany, 1918-1933, Kent, OH.
  30. Natter W.(2003). Geopolitics in Germany, 1919-1945: Karl Haushofer and the Zeitschrift für Geopolitik, in: J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, G. Toal (Eds), The Companion to Political Geography, Oxford, 187-203.
  31. Norton D. H. (1968). Karl Haushofer and the German Academy, Central European History 1 80-99.
  32. O'Loughlin, J; Vander Wusten, H (1990). The Political Geography of Panregions. Housing Studies . 80. 10.2307/215894.
  33. Paterson, J. H. (1987). 'German Geopolitics Reassessed', Political Geog- raphy Quarterly 6/2 pp. 107–114; DOI: 10.1016/0260-9827(87)90001-2.
  34.  Rahimi, H.; Hafeznia, M.; Ezzati, E.; Agnew, J. (2019). Determining the Status of Applied Recommendations in Geopolitical Theories of Classical Period, Geopolitics Quarterly, 15(55), 1-24. [In Persian]     
  35. Ratzel, F (1897). Politische Geographie (Munich: R. Oldenbourg).
  36. Saha, R (2020). Revisiting the Borders of Geopolitics. The geopolitics, https://thegeopolitics.com/revisiting-the-borders-of-geopolitics/.
  37. Said Ali, A.M  (2019). The Return of Geopolitics, The Cairo review, https://www.thecairoreview.com/essays/the-return-of-geopolitics/.
  38. Schone, M (1997). Media Circus: All Hitler All the Time http://www.salon. com/1997/05/08/media_90.
  39. Smith, W. D. (1980). Friedrich Ratzel and the origins of Lebensraum, German Studies Review 3, 51-68.
  40. Suppan, A (2019). "Hitler's Occupation of Czechoslovakia". Hitler–Beneš–Tito: National Conflicts, World Wars, Genocides, Expulsions, and Divided Remembrance in East-Central and Southeastern Europe, 1848–2018. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press. pp. 373–402. doi:10.2307/ j.ctvvh867x.13. ISBN 978-3-7001-8410-2. JSTOR j.ctvvh867x.
  41. Third Reich (2019). “Germany and its Lebensraum,” Young American Republic, accessed December 22, 2019,http://projects.leadr.msu.edu/ youngamerica/ items/show/158.
  42. Thorndike, J. (1939). Geopolitics: the lurid career of a scientific system which a Briton invented, the Germans used and Americans need to study, Life Magazine 16th December, 106-115.
  43. Walsh, E. A. (1948). (S.J.), Total Power: A Footnote to History, New York.

Wildman, S. (2017). German Neo-nazis Are Planning To Rally Outside Berlin Saturday https://www.vox.com/world/2017/8/17/16162138/neo-nazis-spandau-berlin-rudolf-hess-30th-anniversary-death-rally-weeken