Political Time in the Iranian Bio-power: Re-approaching the Tanzimat in the Qajar

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science and International Relations Faculty of Economics and Political Science Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده

Policy developments over time and the dialectic of time and power in modern Iran have a long fluctuating history. There has not been much research on the foundations of political time in Iran. The birth of a new government in Iran within the Tanzimat system coincides with the birth of a new subjectivity that has been determined in the game with the institutions. Contemporary Iranian timescapes is actually the result of tension between the Antiqui and the Moderni, the Old and the New, on the eve of the transition from medieval Iran to Iranian modernity. This temporal-spatial transition is the sphere of dialectical link between Iranian designers of Tajaddod (modernity) and the conservative body of the royal court. This article tries to apply the theoretical tools of comparative historical analysis to state that “time matters” and “time could not be neglected” in Iranian government studies. Genealogical philosophy of time would be the main approach of research. It is well recognized how useful the Foucauldian genealogy and discourse analysis could be for historical sociology and institutionalism. The creative hermeneutic toolbox will also be used in this hybrid approach. Then combined theoretical concepts from the theoreticians of `timescape`, `political time`, `short-term society`, and socio-historical concepts such as `rhizome`, `territorialization` and `bio-politics` would be used in a hermeneutical way. The main contribution is the application of timescape theory and its integration with genealogy and creative hermeneutics on Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Political Time in the Iranian Bio-power: Re-approaching the Tanzimat in the Qajar

نویسنده [English]

  • Reza Najafzadeh
Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science and International Relations Faculty of Economics and Political Science Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Policy developments over time and the dialectic of time and power in modern Iran have a long fluctuating history. There has not been much research on the foundations of political time in Iran. The birth of a new government in Iran within the Tanzimat system coincides with the birth of a new subjectivity that has been determined in the game with the institutions. Contemporary Iranian timescapes is actually the result of tension between the Antiqui and the Moderni, the Old and the New, on the eve of the transition from medieval Iran to Iranian modernity. This temporal-spatial transition is the sphere of dialectical link between Iranian designers of Tajaddod (modernity) and the conservative body of the royal court. This article tries to apply the theoretical tools of comparative historical analysis to state that “time matters” and “time could not be neglected” in Iranian government studies. Genealogical philosophy of time would be the main approach of research. It is well recognized how useful the Foucauldian genealogy and discourse analysis could be for historical sociology and institutionalism. The creative hermeneutic toolbox will also be used in this hybrid approach. Then combined theoretical concepts from the theoreticians of `timescape`, `political time`, `short-term society`, and socio-historical concepts such as `rhizome`, `territorialization` and `bio-politics` would be used in a hermeneutical way. The main contribution is the application of timescape theory and its integration with genealogy and creative hermeneutics on Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • timescape
  • political time
  • Iranian modernity
  • government studies
  • bio-politics
  1. Abbott, A (1990). “Conceptions of time and events in social science methods”, Historical Methods 23(4): 140–151.
  2. Abbott, A (2001). Time Matters: On Theory and Method, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Adam, B (1998). Timescapes of Modernity: The Environment and Invisible Hazards, Routledge.
  4. Adamiyat, F; Natiq, H (1977). Afkar-i ijtima_ i va siyasi va iqtisadi dar athar-i muntashirnashudih-yi dawran-i Qajar, Tehran. [In Persian]
  5. Adamiyt, F (2013). Andishah-yi Taraqqi va Hukumat-i Qanun,'Asr-i Sipahsalar (The Thought of Progress and the Rule of Law of the Sipahalar Era), Tehran, Fourth Edition, Kharazmi, Tehran. [In Persian]
  6. Afary, J (2004). “Armenian Social Democrats, The Democrat Party of Iran, And IRAN-I NAW: A Secret Camaraderie”, in Cronin (ed).
  7. Amanat, A (1997). Pivot of the Universe: Nasir al-Din Shah and the Iranian Monarchy, 1831-1896. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  8. Atabaki, T (2004). “Incommodious Hosts, Invidious Gusts: The life and times of Iranian revolutionaries in the Soviet Union, 1921-39”, in Cronin (ed), p 147-165.
  9. Boroujerdi, M (1996). Iranian Intellectuals and the West: The Tormented Triumph of Nativism. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
  10. Boroujerdi, M (2010). Tarashidam, Parastidam, Shikastam [I Carved, Worshiped and Shattered: Essays on Iranian Politics and Identity]. Tehran: Nashr-e Negah-e Mo`aser. [In Persian]
  11. Browne, E. G. (1893). A Year amongst the Persians, London.
  12. Chaqueri, Cosroe (ed.) (1979), La Social-démocratie en Iran: articles et documents, Florence: Edition Mazdak.
  13. Cronin, S (2008). “Importing Modernity: European Military Missions to Qajar Iran,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 50 1 (2008): 197–226.
  14. Cronin, S (ed) (2004). Reformers and Revolutionaries in Modern Iran: New Perspectives on the Iranian Left, London and New York, RoutledgeCurzon.
  15. Dailami, P (2004). “The First Congress of Peoples of the East and The Iranian Soviet Republic of Gilan, 1920–21”, in Cronin (ed).
  16. Descartes, R (2014). The Wisdom of Nasiriyah (Diakert Book): The First Translation of Discourse on the Method in the Qajar Era, translated by Molla Lalezar Hamedani and French Emile Berne, edited by Faramarz Motamed Dezfuli, Tehran: Iranian History Publication. [In Persian]
  17. Etemad al-Saltanah, M. H. K (1983). Al-Ma'ras wa al-Atha'r, by the efforts of Iraj Afshar, Tehran, Asatir Publication. [In Persian]
  18. Fernand, B (1958). “Histoire et Sciences sociales: La longue durée”, Annales, Année, 13-4, pp. 725-75.
  19. Fernand, B (1980). “History and the Social Sciences: The Longue Durée,” in On History, trans. Sarah Matthews (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980), 27-38.
  20. Foucault, M (1990). The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, translated by R. Hurley, New York: Vintage.
  21. Foucault, M (1995). Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Translated from the French by Alan Sheridan, Vintage.
  22. Foucault, M (2002). The Archaeology of Knowledge, Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith, London, Routledge Classics, Routledge, 2002.
  23. Foucault, M (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976, edited by M. Bertani & A. Fontana and translated by D. Macey, New York: Picador.
  24. Foucault, M. (2006). “The Order of Discourse”, In Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader, Edited by Robert J.C. Young, London and Boston, Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp 51-78.
  25. Gleave, R (ed) (2005). Religion and Society in Qajar Iran, London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
  26. Goetz, K. H.; Mayer-Sahling, J.H (2009). “Political time in the EU: dimensions, perspectives, theories,” Journal of European Public Policy, 16(2): 180–201.
  27. Howlett, M; Klaus, H.G (2014). “Introduction: time, temporality and timescapes in administration and policy”, International Review of Administrative Sciences 80: 477.
  28. Isfahani Najm al-Dawlah, A.G (1974/5). Tashkhis-i Nufus-i Dar al-Khilafah, (Diagnosis of the Population of Dar al-Khalafah), Lithoprint, Tehran 1284 BC (1867), reprinted and edited by Nasir Pakdaman, Tehran: Farhang-i Iran-zamin, 20. [In Persian]
  29. Iʻtimād al-Salṭanah, M. Ḥ.K (1984). Tārīkh-i muntaẓam-i Nāṣirī, Tehran: Dunyā-yi Kitāb. [In Persian]
  30. Iʻtimād al-Salṭanah, M.Ḥ.K (1966). Rūznāmah-ʼi khāṭirāt-i Iʻtimād al-Salṭanah vazīr-i inṭibāʻāt dar avākhir-i davrah-ʼi Nāṣirī, marbūṭ bih sālʹhā-yi 1292 tā 1313 Hijrī Qamarī. Az rū-yi yagānah nuskhah-ʼi mawjūd dar Kitābkhānah-ʼi Āstān-i Quds, Tehrān, Amīr Kabīr. [In Persian]
  31. Kasravi, A (1961). Tarikh-e Mashruteh-e Iran (History of the Iranian Constitution), Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications. [In Persian]
  32. Kasravi, A (1971–72). Tarikh-I hijdah salah-i Azarbayjan, 5th ed, Tehran: Amir Kabir. [In Persian]
  33. Katouzian, H (1981). The Political Economy of Modern Iran, London and New York: Macmillan and New York University Press.
  34. Katouzian, H (2000). State and Society in Iran: The Eclipse of the Qajars and the Rise of the Pahlavis, London and New York: I. B. Tauris.
  35. Katouzian, H (2003). Iranian History and Politics: The Dialectic of State and Society, London and New York: Routledge.
  36. Katouzian, H (2004). “The Short-Term Society: A Study in the Problems of Long-Term Political and Economic Development in Iran”, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 40, No. 1 (Jan.), pp. 1-22.
  37. Kermani, M.M.N.I (2009). Tarikh-e Bidari-ye Iranian (History of the Awakening of Iranians), Volume 1, Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications, Seventh Edition. [In Persian]
  38. Malkum Khan, M (1948). Majmu'a-yi Asar-i Mirza Malkum Khan. Ed. M. Muhit Tabataba'i. Tehran. [In Persian]
  39. Malkum Khan, M (2002). Rasalehaye Mirza Malkum Khan-e Nazemoddoleh (Treaties of Mirza Malkum Khan), edited by Hojjatollah-e Asil, Tehran: Nashr-e Ney. [In Persian]
  40. Martin, V (1996). “An Evaluation of Reform and Development of the State in the Early Qajar Period,” Die Welt des Islams 36 1: 1–24.
  41. Nasir al-Din Shah (1859). Kitabcha-yi Majlis-i Maslahat-khana (Handbook of the Consultative Council) together with Nasir al-Din Shah's rescript, Tehran. [In Persian]
  42. Negri, A (2003). Time for Revolution, Translated by Matteo Mandarini, London: Continuum.
  43. Pierson, P (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  44. Ricoeur, P (1977). "Writing as a Problem for Literary Criticism and Philosophical Hermeneutics," Philosophic Exchange: Vol. 8: No. 1, Article 1.
  45. Schneider, I (2005). “RELIGIOUS AND STATE JURISDICTION DURING NAIIR AL-DIN SHAH’S REIGN”, in Gleave (ed).
  46. Sefatgol, M (2005). “FROM DÅR AL-SAL˝ANA-YI IÍFAHÅN TO DÅR AL-KHILÅFA-YI TIHRAN: Continuity and change in the Safavid model of state–religious administration during the Qajars (1795–1895/1209–1313)”, in Gleave (ed).
  47. Seidel, R (2018). “The Reception of European Philosophy in Qajar Iran”, in Reza Pourjavady (Ed.), Philosophy in Qajar Iran, Brill, 2018, p 313-314.
  48. Shaul, B (1971). “The Evolution of Qajar Bureaucracy: 1779–1879,” Middle Eastern Studies 7 2 (1971): 139–168;
  49. Tabatabaii, S.J (2006). Tabriz School and Foundations of Modernity, Tehran: Sotudeh Publication. [In Persian]
  50. Tabatabaii, S.J (2007). The Theory of Constitutionalism in Iran, Tehran: Sotudeh Publication. [In Persian]
  51. Tavakoli-Targhi, M (2001). Refashioning Iran: Orientalism, Occidentalism, and Historiography, St Antony & Quotes Series.
  52. Tilly, C (1994). “The Time of States”, Social Research, Vol. 61, No. 2 (SUMMER), pp. 269-295.