تبیین چالش‌های ژئوپلیتیکی روابط ایران و فرانسه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

2 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

چکیده

یکی از مهم‌ترین چالش‌های اثرگذار بر مناسبات کشورها با هم چالش‌های ژئوپلیتیکی است که پیشرانه اثرگذاری در شکل‌دهی به تعاملات دو یا چندجانبه قلمداد می­شود. روابط ایران و فرانسه در سطوح مختلف متأثر از استراتژی­های ملی و نیز علائق ژئوپلیتیکی دارای تفاوت‌ها و گاه تعارضاتی می­باشد. این پژوهش با روش توصیفی- تحلیلی، استفاده از منابع کتابخانه‌ای و نظرات متخصصان با استفاده از روش تاپسیس در پی بررسی چالش‌های روابط ژئوپلیتیکی ایران و فرانسه می­باشد. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد متغیرهایی چون حضور گروه منافقین(مجاهدین خلق) در فرانسه و ایدئولوژی سیاسی متفاوت دو کشور، در سطح ملی، متغیرهایی چون سیاست خارجی تجدیدنظر طلب ایران و عدم تمایل به همگرایی و تعامل در سطوح منطقه‌ای و تحولات ژئوپلیتیکی منطقه جنوب‌غرب آسیا در سطح منطقه­ای و متغیرهای مبارزه ایران با تروریسم و افراط‌گرایی و تعلق ژئوپلیتیکی دو کشور به ساختارهای امنیتی متفاوت در سطح جهانی، بیشترین اثرگذاری را دارند

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining the Geopolitical Challenges of Iran-France Relations

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sirus Ahmadi Nohdani 1
  • Mostafa Ghaderi Hajat 1
  • Hamid Reza Yousefi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 M.A in Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Intrduction
Iran and France have different dimensions of geopolitical challenge and are constantly trying to make each other passive and seize opportunities by infiltrating the disputed spaces. The present study tries to address these challenges, which are an obstacle to the advancement of bilateral relations from a geopolitical perspective from 1978 until the signing of the Borjam Agreement in 2015 at the national (Iran and France), regional (Southwest Asia) and global levels
Methodology
This research is descriptive-analytic in terms of method and is applied in terms of its purpose. Depending on the type of subject matter, data gathering procedure is based on library findings such as books, articles, magazines, newspapers, websites, statistics, and also field findings including questionnaire. The sample size was 100 experts in the fields of political geography and geopolitics, international relations and political science.
Results and discussion
3-1- Challenges of Iran-France relations at the national level
The first level of variables affecting the bilateral relations between Iran and France should be considered at the national level, especially the national interests, needs and mental privileges of policymakers of the two countries. At this level, change in national needs, the conditions of the internal environment and the mental environment of policy makers can play a decisive role in bilateral orientations and the type of interactions and challenges of relations between the two countries.
3-2- Challenges of Iran-France relations at the regional level
The Middle East region, and especially the Persian Gulf region, constitutes a level of analysis of the bilateral behaviors of Iran and France, the variables which have been strongly influential in bilateral relations. This region has always been considered by foreign powers and this affects Iran's relations with other countries, including France.
3-3- Challenges of Iran-France relations at the global level
The most important and challenging issue in Iran-France relations at the global level is Iran-US relations and its coercive policies towards Iran.
Conclusions
Since the victory of the Islamic Revolution, the Iran and France relations have gone through many ups and downs, and due to national, regional and global developments, the emergence of new variables and developments in the Middle East and Iran, it is less common that these relations have stability and trend. Iran has historically had relations with France for hundreds of years, and in many historical periods, the process and nature of reciprocal relations between the two governments have played a key role in shaping Iran's internal developments and regional developments and sometimes global relations. Nevertheless, France's position in the international system, as well as Iran's regional and geopolitical position, along with its many capabilities and capacities in creating regional stability and security, energy security, counter-terrorism and counter-narcotics, have led to have relation with Iran. Iran Always have had a vital place and importance for France

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Geopolitics
  • Geopolitical challenge
  • Power
  • France
  • Iran
  1. Ahmadi Nohdani, S (2019). Geopolitical view of French geographers and thinkers on Iran, Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume 15, Number 55, Autumn Volume, pp. 221-270. [In Persian]
  2. Ahmadi Nohdani, S (2018). "Geopolitical issues concerning the bilateral relations between Iran and France", a speech delivered at the meeting of the Iran-France Geopolitical Dialogue Group, Tehran, Tarbiat Modares University. [In Persian]
  3. Ahmadi, S.A; Badiee, M; Heidari Mosello, T (2017). “The Theoretical Explanation of the Nature of the Geopolitical Regions in Competition of the Powers”. Geopolitics Quarterly. Vol 13. Issue 47. PP 55-78. [In Persian]
  4. Ahmadi, S.Abbas; et al. (2018). A Theoretical Explanation of the Formations of the Formation of Geopolitical Competitions, Research  Human Geography,  Volume 50. [In Persian]
  5. Aqil, H (2016). Investigating Geopolitical Factors Affecting the Formation of Radical Forces in Southwest Asia (Case Study: ISIL Group), Birjand University Master Thesis. [In Persian]
  6. Azghandi, A.R (2009). Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic, Tehran, Qoms Publications.
  7. Barzegar, K (2015). Iran and Strategic Stability in West Asia, Azar. [In Persian]
  8. Bayat, H.R; Ahmadi, A; Zaki, Y; Etaat, J (2020). Explaining the Pattern of Regional Power Relations in the Syrian Geopolitical Crisis, Geopolitics Quarterly, Year 16, Issue 1, Spring, pp. 74 – 37. [In Persian]
  9. Buzan, B; Waver, O. (2003). Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Collins. J.M (1998). Military Geography : For Professionals and the Public. [In Persian]
  11. Conrad، J (1995). Environmental Considerations in Army Operational Doctrine، a White Paper.Fort Leonard Wood: U.S. Army Engineer School.
  12. Darabi, A (2009); For Consciousness and Sustainability, Zamaneh Quarterly, No. 78. [In Persian]
  13. Dehshiri, M.R (2001). Challenges of the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Journal of the Thought of the Islamic Revolution, (0) 1, pp. 74-55. [In Persian]
  14. Eyre ،J.D (1968). Japanese- Soviet territorial Issues in the Southern Kurile Islands. Prof، Geography. No:20. Pp:11-15
  15. Fazelinia, N (2007). Causes of Western Concern over the Islamic Revolution (with Emphasis on the Shiite Geopolitical Element), Quarterly Journal of Political Science, No. 36. [In Persian]
  16. Flint, C. (2006). Introduction to Geopolitics, First published. London and New York: Routledge.
  17. Gallaher، C; others (2009). Key Concepts in Political Geography.London and California: Sage Publication Ltd.
  18. Hafeznia, M. R;  Shams Dolatabadi, M; Hossein Afshardi, M (2007). Iran's Geopolitical Interests in Central Asia and Opportunities Ahead, Geopolitics Quarterly, No. 3, 9. [In Persian]
  19. Hafeznia, M.R (2017). Principles and Concepts of Geopolitics, Amirkabir Research Institute (Papli Publications), Mashhad. [In Persian]
  20. Hatami, M. R (2011). Developments and Structure of the Middle East Region, Foreign Relations Quarterly, Year 3, Issue Four, Winter. [In Persian]
  21. Izadi, P (2016). "French Foreign Policy Towards the Middle East and North Africa", Foreign Relations Quarterly, Year 8, Issue 4, pp. 186-157. [In Persian]
  22. Mohammadi, M (2009). The Clash of Civilizations or the Clash of Dominance (New Paradigm in International Relations), Journal of Islamic Government, No. 48. [In Persian]
  23. Mojtahedzadeh, P (2016). Political Geography and Geographical Politics, Samat Publications. [In Persian]
  24. Muir،R  (1975). Modern political Geography.london. the macmilan press Ltd
  25. Noer، J (1996). Maritime Interests in Southeast Asia. Washington، DC: National Defense. University Press.
  26. Prescott، J.R.V (1978). The Geography of frountiers and boundaries. New Jersey. Pub: Taylor & Francis
  27. Rasoolinejad, E (2011). Intersubjective Foundations of the Identity of the Islamic Republic of Iran ,Iran, Tehran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  28. Sajjadpour, M. K (2009). Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Office of Political Studies, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, No. 21, Spring. [In Persian]
  29. Seyednejad, S.B (2009). Analytical and Comparative Study of the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran with the Theory of Constructivism, Journal of Political Science, No. 49, Spring. [In Persian]
  30. Taylor, P. J (1989). Political Geography: World Economy, Nation-State, and Locality, Longman Scintfic & Technical, U. K. London.
  31. Valencia، M (1995). China and the South China Sea Disputes، Adelphi Paper 298 .London:International Institute for Strategic Studies.
  32. Valigolizadeh, A (2016). Explaining the effective factors in the formation of different behavioral patterns in the Nagorno-Karabakh crisis, Geopolitics Quarterly of the Twelfth Autumn, No. 3, 43. [In Persian]
  33. Yazdan Fam, M (2014). Scientific Conference of Extremist Currents in the Islamic World, Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution Research Institute, Tehran. [In Persian]
  34. Zibakalam, Sadegh (2012) Western Opposition to Iran's Nuclear Case, Journal of Political Science, No. 48, Spring. [In Persian]
  35. Zumrodbakhsh Azad, Sh (2013). "The Mediterranean Union, the Eastern French Dream: Goals and Obstacles", International Relations Studies, No. 26, pp. 90-74. [In Persian]