تاثیراروپاگرایی و اروپازدایی بر سیاست خارجی ترکیه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

2 دکتری روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه گیلان، گیلان، ایران.

3 دکتری روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده

ارتباط ترکیه و اتحادیه اروپا از سال 1999 تا 2020 را می‌توان به سه دوره آغاز اروپایی‌شدن (2005-1999) کند‌شدن فرآیند اروپایی‌شدن(2011-2005) و اروپازدایی(2020-2011) تقسیم‌بندی کرد. هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر، بررسی تاثیرات این سه دوره برسیاست خارجی ترکیه است. به‌طور مشخص سوال اصلی پژوهش این است که فرآیندهای اروپایی‌‌گرایی و اروپا‌زدایی چه تاثیری بر سیاست خارجی ترکیه داشته است؟ مقاله حاضر استدلال می‌کند که مهم‌ترین تاثیر فرآیند اروپایی‌شدن بر سیاست خارجی ترکیه، افزایش تمایل آنکارا به استفاده از قدرت نرم، روی‌‌آوردن به همکاری‌های اقتصادی، تصمیم‌گیری گروهی در دستگاه سیاست خارجی و اتخاذ رویکرد برد- برد نسبت به روابط منطقه‌ای بود. از سوی دیگر، مهم‌ترین تاثیر اروپازدایی نیز تمایل به استفاده از قدرت سخت(‌نظامی‌گری)، افزایش همکاری‌های امنیتی به‌جای همکاری‌های اقتصادی، تشدید فردی‌شدن روند تصمیم‌گیری(‌اردوغانیسم) و دیدگاه برد- باخت در روابط با کشورهای مختلف منطقه‌ای و جهانی می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of Europeanization and De-Europeanization on Turkey’s Foreign Policy

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saeed Shokoohi 1
  • Asqar Safari 2
  • Saeedeh Moradifar 3
1 Assistant Professor, International Relations, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D. International Relations, Guilan University, Guilan , Iran
3 Ph.D. International Relations, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Extended abstract
Introduction
Since its formation in 1923, the quality of interaction with the Europe has been one of the crucial issues in Turkey’s Foreign Policy. The outlook and perspective of the Turkey’s leaders have influenced this interaction, tremendously. For starters Ataturk, as the founding father of the Modern Republic of Turkey, believed that Turkey’s new establishment should search its role model among the European and Western nations where modern thinking and rationality has brought about wealth to the society. Hence, the impact of the interaction on Turkey’s foreign policy intensified since the “Ankara agreement” between Turkey and European Economic Community in 1963. Since then, the nature of this interaction and its probable impact on Turkey’s foreign policy have been discussed in different occasions and by different observers. Some commentators believe that we should not overstate the impact of the process of Europeanization on Ankara’s foreign policy. It enjoys a historical legacy of the Ottoman Empire, a historical depth, strategic location and a distinct ideology which yields huge impact on its leaders’ worldview and behavior. So, the impact of the Europeanization should not be exaggerated. On the other hand, there are many other wonks which believe that the process yields tangible impacts on Ankara’s foreign policy and, it is crystal clear to discern. The present paper favors the second group and argues that the process of joining to the EU has impacted Turkey’s foreign policy. Having said that, it claims that during the process, three distinct phases can be distinguished. Each of these phases has different impacts on the Foreign Policy of the Turkey. The three phases are: a) Europeanization (1999-2005); b) Weakening of the Europeanization (2005-2011); and c) De-Europeanization. Thus, the paper seeks to find out what are the impacts of these phases on Turkey’s foreign policy. It endeavors to scrutinize these phases and provide a sound answer to the question. Analyzing these different periods and examining their distinct impact on Turkey’s foreign policy would be the main contribution of the paper.     
Methodology
In this paper, descriptive-analytic research method is used to answer the research question. Data gathering procedure is also based on library methods and the use of online resources.
Results and Discussion
The findings of the paper show that the most important impacts of the Europeanization process on Turkey’s foreign policy were: Ankara’s inclination to use soft power, expanding and relying on economic cooperation, collective decision-making in foreign policy apparatus and adopting a win-win approach towards regional relations. On the other hand, the process of De-Europeanization has led to inclination to use hard (military) power, substituting and increasing security cooperation instead of economic ones, intensifying individualistic decision-making process (Erdoganism) and adopting a win-lose approach in relations with other countries. 
Conclusions
The present paper argued that Turkey’s relations with the EU has significant impact on the Ankara’s foreign policy. To scrutinize the impact, the authors divided their relations into three distinct phases: a) Europeanization (1999-2005); b) Weakening of the Europeanization (2005-2011); and c) De-Europeanization. The main question of the research was how these distinct phases impacted the country’s foreign policy. To answer the question, the conceptual framework of Europeanization was explained and its consequences and repercussions were discussed. Using descriptive-analytic methodology, the authors strove to carefully analyze the different impacts of these distinct phases on the foreign policy making of the Turkey. The Findings demonstrate that contrary to the arguments of the deniers of any meaningful impact of the Europeanization process on Turkey’s foreign policy, it has concrete, meaningful, distinct and discernible impacts. Europeanization led to positive impacts and De-Europeanization reversed that path. The main contribution of the paper was to show these clear-cut impacts during different phases.  

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Turkey
  • European Union
  • Europeanization
  • De-Europeanization
  • Erdogan
  1. Ahmadipour, Z.; Mousavi Shafaee, S. M.; Pourdast, Z. (2019). Studying of Iran andTurkey Rivalry in Syrian Crisis, Geopolitics Quarterly, 15(55), 90-121. [In Persian]
  2. Aras, B. (2019). The Crisis and Change in Turkish Foreign Policy after July 15. Alternatives, 44(1), 6-18.
  3. Aras, B.; Karakaya Polat, R. (2008). From Conflict to Cooperation: Desecuritization of Turkey's Relations with Syria and Iran. Security Dialogue, 39(5), 495-515.
  4. Altuntaş, Y. (2020). The EU politics of AK party between the years 2002-2017 (Master's thesis).
  5. Department of International Relations, Middle East Technical University.
  6. Aydın-Düzgit, S.; Kaliber, A. (2016). Encounters with Europe in an Era of Domestic and International Turmoil: is Turkey a de-Europeanising Candidate Country? South European Society and Politics, 21(1), 1-14.
  7. Barzegar, K.; Mofid Ahmadi, H. (2015). The Effects of Europeanization on Turkey’s Foreign Policy, Foreign Policy Quarterly, 28 (4), 591-610. [In Persian]
  8. Beichelt, T. (2008). Dimensions of Europeanization. L’Européanisation d’Ouest en Est, Paris, Harmattan, 31-53.
  9. Burns, C.; Gravey, V.; Jordan, A.; Zito, A. (2019). De-Europeanising or Disengaging? EU environmental policy and Brexit. Environmental Politics, 28(2), 271-292.
  10. Cop, B.; Zihnioğlu, Ö. (2017). Turkish Foreign Policy Under AKP Rule: Making Sense of the Turbulence. Political Studies Review, 15(1), 28-38.
  11. Copeland, P. (2016). Europeanization and de‐Europeanization in UK Employment Policy: Changing Governments and Shifting Agendas. Public Administration, 94(4), 1124-1139.
  12. Dalacoura, K. (2017). A New Phase in Turkish Foreign Policy: Expediency and AKP Survival. Middle East and North Africa Regional Architecture, Future Note, No.4.
  13. Davutoğlu, A. (2008). Turkey's Foreign Policy Vision: An Assessment of 2007. Insight Turkey, 77-96.
  14. Davutoğlu, A. (2012). Principles of Turkish Foreign Policy and Regional Political Structuring. International Policy and Leadership Institute (IPLI), Turkey Policy Brief Series.
  15. De Flers, N. A.; Müller, P. (2012). Dimensions and Mechanisms of the Europeanization of Member State Foreign Policy: State of the Art and New Research Avenues. Journal of European Integration, 34(1), 19-35.
  16. Dursunoğlu, A. (2016). The impact of July 15 Failed Coup on Turkey’s Foreign Policy, the Tehran Foreign Policy Study Quarterly, Available at: https://tfpsq.net/fa/post.php?id=25.
  17. Elif Rodoplu, U. (2019). Europeanization and de- Europeanization Process of Turkish Foreign Policy, VIADUCT paper series, Policy Paper ii.
  18. Eralp, A. (2009). EU Accession Process and Europeanization in Turkey. Center for European Studies, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  19. Golmohammadi, V.; Sajjadpour, M. K.; Mousavi Shafaee, M. (2016). Erdoganism and Understanding Turkey’s Middle East Policy, Strategic Studies Quarterly, 19 (3), 70-92. [In Persian]
  20. Gürzel, A. (2014). Turkey's Role as a Regional and Global Player and its Power Capacity: Turkey's Engagement with other Emerging States. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 22(50), 95-105.
  21. Haugom, L. (2019). Turkish Foreign Policy under Erdogan: A change in international orientation? Comparative Strategy, 38(3), 206-223.
  22. İçener, E. (2016). Turkey-EU Relations after the Failed July 15 Coup Attempt/15. Bilig, No.79.
  23. Jambrović, D. D.; Marešić, M. (2020). The Subnational Dimension of Europeanization. Review of European and Comparative Law, 42(3), 7-49.
  24. Javadi Arjomand, M.J.; Doulatyari, Y.K. (2012). A Geopolitical Analysis of Iran and Armenia Relationship Based on the Thomas Anderson Theoretical Framework and a Plan for a Regional Integration after the Process of Normalization of Turkey- Armenia Relationship, Geopolitics Quarterly, 8(26), 192-232. [In Persian]]
  25. Kalkan, E. (2015). Europeanisation of change in foreign policy: transformation of Turkish foreign policy in the EU accession process (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kent).
  26. Kaya, A. (2013). Europeanization and tolerance in Turkey: The myth of toleration. Springer.
  27. Keyman, F.; Gumüsçu, S.; Gumuscu, S. (2014). Democracy, identity and foreign policy in Turkey: Hegemony through transformation. Springer.
  28. Kirişçi, K. (2006). Turkey's foreign policy in turbulent times, European Union Institute for Security Studies, (Vol. 92).
  29. Knill, C.; Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: Three Europeanization mechanisms. European Journal of Political Research, 41(2), 255-280.
  30. Kuru, A. T. (2015). Turkey's Failed Policy toward the Arab Spring: Three Levels of Analysis. Mediterranean Quarterly, 26(3), 94-116.
  31. Ladrech, R. (1994). Europeanization of domestic politics and institutions: The case of France. J. Common Mkt. Stud., 32, 69.
  32. Lecha, E. S. (2019). EU-Turkey relations: Mapping landmines and exploring alternative pathways. Foundation for European progressive studies, FEPS Policy Paper, No.695, 1-23.
  33. Mofid Ahmadi, H. (2016). Turkey’s Relations with the European Union in the Context of Re-Securitizaion of Political Discourse, Center for Strategic Studies, Available at: http://css.ir/udawsc. [In Persian]
  34. Mofid Ahmadi, H.; Zakerian, M. (2015). Europeanization and Change of Security Discourse in Turkey (Case Study of of Normalization of Relations with Armenia), Central Eurasia Studies, 8(1), 107-126. [In Persian]
  35. Müftüler Baç, M. (2005). Turkey's political reforms and the impact of the European Union. South European Society and Politics, 10(1), 17-31.
  36. Müftüler‐Baç, M.; Gürsoy, Y. (2010). Is there a Europeanization of Turkish foreign policy? An addendum to the literature on EU candidates. Turkish Studies, 11(3), 405-427.
  37. Öniş, Z.; Yilmaz, Ş. (2009). Between Europeanization and Euro‐Asianism: Foreign policy activism in Turkey during the AKP era. Turkish Studies, 10(1), 7-24.
  38. Müller, P.; Pomorska, K.; Tonra, B. (2021). The Domestic Challenge to EU Foreign Policy-Making: From Europeanisation to de-Europeanisation?. Journal of European Integration, 43(5), 519-534.
  39. Özpek, B. B.; Demirağ, Y. (2014). Turkish foreign policy after the ‘Arab Spring’: from agenda-setter state to agenda-entrepreneur state. Israel Affairs, 20(3), 328-346.
  40. Rouhi Dehboneh, M. (2018). Geopolitical Analysis of Iranian-Turkish Competitions Affected by the Middle East Developments Since 2011, Geopolitics Quarterly, 14(49), 113-147. [In Persian]
  41. Saatçioğlu, B. (2016). De-Europeanisation in Turkey: the case of the rule of law. South European Society and Politics, 21(1), 133-146.
  42. Şahin, M. (2020). Theorizing the Change: A Neoclassical Realist Approach to Turkish Foreign Policy, Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 1–19.
  43. Sepos, A. (2008). The Europeanization of Cyprus: Polity, policies and politics. Springer.
  44. Sipahioğlu, B. Ö. (2017). Shifting from Europeanization to De-Europeanization in Turkey: how AKP instrumentalized EU negotiations. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, 48, 51-67.
  45. H. (2017), Manifestation of Islam in Turkey’s Foreign Policy: Islamic Internationalism and Turkish Islam, The coperncicus Journal of Political Studies, No. 1.
  46. Terzi, Ö. (2005). Europeanisation of foreign policy and candidate countries: a comparative study of Greek and Turkish cases. Politique européenne, (3), 113-136.
  47. Terzi, Ö. (2008). Is an Europeanised Turkish Foreign Policy Possible? The Role of the Contested EU Perspective in Bringing about a Transformation in Turkish Foreign Policy. The Institute for European Studies (IES).
  48. Thomas, D. C. (2021). The Return of Intergovernmentalism? De-Europeanisation and EU Foreign Policy Decision-making. Journal of European Integration, 43(5), 619-635.
  49. Walker, J. (2009). Turkey's imperial legacy: Understanding contemporary Turkey through its Ottoman past. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 8(2-3), 494-508.
  50. Walker, J. W. (2011). Turkey's global strategy: introduction: the sources of Turkish grand strategy-‘strategic depth’and ‘zero-problems’ in context. IDEAS reports - special reports, Kitchen, Nicholas (ed.) SR007. LSE IDEAS, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
  51. Yilmaz, G. (2019). Post-truth politics in the 2017 Euro-Turkish crisis. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 27(2), 237-24
  52. Yilmaz, G. (2019). From Eu-phoria to Eu-phobia? Changing Turkish narratives in Eu–turkey relations. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 9(1), 20-32.
  53. Yilmaz, Z. (2020). Erdoğan’s presidential regime and strategic legalism: Turkish democracy in the twilight zone. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 1-23.
  54. Zaki, Y.; Yazdanpanah, K.; Mostafavi, G. (2017). Examining Turkey’s Grand National Parliament Elections: 2000-2011, Quarterly of Political Geography Researches, 2 (1), 31-57. [In Persian]
  55. Zandstra, L. (2019). A Path Dependency for Turkey’s European Union Membership (Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University).