Geopolitical Power Balancing in Biden’s Strategic Policy Making

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

Postdoctoral in Strategic Policy Making and Full Professor of Political Sciences University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

چکیده

The balance of geopolitical power of the United States during the last decades was changed. Biden tries to examine US security policy in the third decade of the 21st century by providing a “geopolitical balancing”. The geopolitical balance of the main axis of strategic policy-making should be in the regional security approaches. The main axes of the geopolitical balance of strategic policy- making in regional environments should be the power limitation, containment and balancing the power of the China, Russia, and Iran.
Understanding the US security policy in the geopolitical field has generally been accompanied by the signs of change. Barack Obama took advantage of the geopolitical balance of power. Donald Trump policy making was based on the regional and international hegemony. The strategic hegemonic policy system has put regional hegemony on the agenda and need to be addressed in order to make US policy strategic and enforce it. Each US president has adopted a specific form of security policy making in the regional environment.
The main question of the article is “Should a strategic policy making of Joe Biden be in a regional environment?” The hypothesis of the article is based on the view that “Biden uses strategic policy making threat of balancing to counter the various rival actors as so China, Russia and Iran.” Threat balancing theory has been used in compiling the article. Threat balancing theory was a special form of US strategic behavior of the power equation to limit and containing the rise of others as so emerging actors. The methodology of article based on data analysis and content analysis.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Geopolitical Power Balancing in Biden’s Strategic Policy Making

نویسنده [English]

  • Abbas Mossalanejad
Postdoctoral in Strategic Policy Making and Full Professor of Political Sciences University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The balance of geopolitical power of the United States during the last decades was changed. Biden tries to examine US security policy in the third decade of the 21st century by providing a “geopolitical balancing”. The geopolitical balance of the main axis of strategic policy-making should be in the regional security approaches. The main axes of the geopolitical balance of strategic policy- making in regional environments should be the power limitation, containment and balancing the power of the China, Russia, and Iran.
Understanding the US security policy in the geopolitical field has generally been accompanied by the signs of change. Barack Obama took advantage of the geopolitical balance of power. Donald Trump policy making was based on the regional and international hegemony. The strategic hegemonic policy system has put regional hegemony on the agenda and need to be addressed in order to make US policy strategic and enforce it. Each US president has adopted a specific form of security policy making in the regional environment.
The main question of the article is “Should a strategic policy making of Joe Biden be in a regional environment?” The hypothesis of the article is based on the view that “Biden uses strategic policy making threat of balancing to counter the various rival actors as so China, Russia and Iran.” Threat balancing theory has been used in compiling the article. Threat balancing theory was a special form of US strategic behavior of the power equation to limit and containing the rise of others as so emerging actors. The methodology of article based on data analysis and content analysis.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • balance of threat
  • geopolitical balancing
  • Containment
  • Constraint
  • crisis management
  • strategic policy regional balancing
  1. Abingdon, T (2019). “Iran’s Networks of Influence in the Middle east”, London: Rutledge.
  2. Abingdon, T (2021). “NATO and south China”, Brussels: South China of State and Government Participating in the Meeting of the Morning Post.
  3. Andrey, S (2018). “A Russian View on America’s Withdrawal from the Iran Deal”, National Interest, May 15.
  4. Azizi, H.R (2019), “Iran Seeks Economic Benefits from Syria”, The Atlantic Council, 22 February.
  5. Biden, J (2020). “Why America Must Lead Again; Rescuing U.S. Foreign Policy after Trump”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 99, No. 2, March/April.
  6. Bosco, J (2021). “Taiwan and Strategic Security”, London: IISS. PP. 135-52.
  7. Brands, H; Braden, E (2020). “One War Is Not Enough: Strategy and Force Planning for Great-Power Competition”, Texas National Security Review, Vol. 3, No. 2.
  8. Carnegie Moscow, July 8.
  9. Carnelos, M (2019). “Is a New World Order Emerging to Replace US hegemony?” Middle East Eye, April 26.
  10. Churchill, O (2021). “President Biden Described China as the Most Serious Competitor”, London: International Institute for Strategic Survey (IISS).
  11. Coats, D (2019). “Worldwide threat assessment report of US Intelligence Community”, Director of National Intelligence.
  12. Cornelis, E (2020). ‘Alignment Cooperation and Regional Security Architecture in the Indo Pacific”, the International Spectator, Vol. 55, No. 1. PP. 18-33.
  13. Divsallar, A.R; Kurtonov, P (2019). “Moscow’s options in the wake of US military confrontation with Iran”, American Herald Tribune, 27 May.
  14. Divsallar, R (2019). “The    Pillars   of         Iranian-Russian Security Convergence”, the International Spectator, Vol.54, No.3.
  15. Edelstein, David (2020), “How the US-Iran conflict could help China and Russia”,
  16. Elman, C (2011). Realism, in: Security studies: An introduction. Routledge, Williams, P. D. (Ed.). Translated by Alireza Tayeb, Tehran: Amirkabir Publications.
  17. Friedman, G (2019). “The Geopolitics of Iran’s Refinery Attack”, Geopolitical Futures, at: https://geopoliticalfutures.com/the-geopolitics-of-irans- refinery attack.
  18. Gvosdev, N (2019). “Russia is a real winner in any US-Iran conflict”, the Hill, May 9.
  19. Hetahet, S (2019). “Russia and Iran: Economic Influence in Syria”, Chatham House, March.
  20. Hilterman, J (2019). “Russian, the EU, and the struggle over Syria reconstruction”, in Andrey Kortunov, Joost Hilterman, R. Sh Mamedov, T.A Shmeleva, London: Rutledge.
  21. Huisken, R (2021). “America and China: Seeking an Updated Foundation for Enduring Engagement”, Canberra: Council for Security Cooperation in the Asia Pacific press.
  22. Kagan, R. (2020). The jungle grows back: America and our imperiled world, translated by Khalil Shirgholami and Reza Mostafaei, Tehran: Abrar e Moaser.
  23. Katz, M (2018). “Balancing Act: Russia between Iran and Saudi Arabia”, LSE Middle East Center Memo, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mec/ 2018/ 06/26/balancing-act-russia- between-iran-and-saudi- Arabia.
  24. Kortunov, A (2020). “How the Pandemic Will Change EU-Russian Relations”,
  25. Kortunov, A; Joost, Hilterman; Mamedov, R. Sh; Shmeleva, T.A (2019), “Squaring the Circle: Russian and European views on Syrian reconstruction”, Russian international Affair Council (RIAC), Report No 49.
  26. Moghrini, F (2017). “The Iran Nuclear Deal is a Success- and the World is Safer for it”, The Guardian, Jan, 17.
  27. Moore, R (2021). “Human Intelligence in the Digital Age”, London: IISS.
  28. Mosalanejhad, A (2015). Policy-Making on Political Economy of Oil and International Sanctions against Iran. Research Letter of Political Science, 10(3), 171-200.
  29. Mosalanejhad, A (2018), “The Middle East Security and Donald Trump’s grand Strategy”, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 48.
  30. Mosalanejhad, A (2019), “Us Comparative Policy toward Iran and the Middle East”, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 52.
  31. Murphy, F; Hafezi, P; Irish, J (2019). “World Powers Strategy in the Indo-Pacific: Challenges and Prospects”, Pacific Review, Vol. 32, No. 2, PP. 232-44.
  32. Posen, A (2021). “The Price of Nostalgia America’s Self-Defeating Economic Retreat”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. No. May June.
  33. Radin, A; Reach, C (2017). “Russian Views of the International Order”, Washington: Rand Corporation press, P.64.Washington Post, January 15.
  34. Raine, S (2021). “NATO, China and International Security in Asia Pacific Regional Security”, London: Key Developments and Trends.
  35. Sakwa, R (2017). “Russia against the Rest: The Post-Cold War Crisis of World Order”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  36. Sushentsov, A (2018). “A Russian View on America’s Withdrawal from the Iran Deal”, National Interest, https://nationalinterest.org/ feature/russian-view-americas- withdrawal-the-iran- deal-25836.
  37. Thompson, (2021). “A Strategic Compass for US-China Decoupling and its Regional Security and Defense”, London: Rutledge.
  38. Trenin, D (2020). “Moscow’s New Rules”, Carnegie Moscow Center, https://carnegie.ru/commentary/83208?s=09.
  39. Vaez, A; Sadjadpour, K (2013). “Iran’s Nuclear Odyssey: Costs and Risks”, Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.