An Assessment and Critique of the Theories of Seapower: Towards a Theoretical Model

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor Political Geography, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran.

Abstract

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Strategists and researchers have devoted more attention to the sea and oceanic environments than to the other types due to former’s environmental properties and the vast area they cover. The differing nature of land and sea has been brought to bear upon the opinion of political leaders and scholars over years. Seas, land, air, space and electromagnetic spectrum constitute crucial dimensions of geopolitics. Theories of seapower have always been debated in the academia and the military. The end of the twentieth century and the early twenty-first century witnessed remarkable transformations in the military, maritime, and national strategies of states, the geopolitics of seas, and the international and economic orders. The seapower of states should therefore be in tandem with these developments. Nowadays, a purely military approach to seapower is not considered consonant with the multiple purposes of states and the national and maritime strategies thereof. A review of the propounded theories of seapower indicates the fact that they were mostly framed as a description of the nature of seapower, as the elements and factors involved, or as a model.
Methodology
Adopting a descriptive-analytical approach and using meta-analysis, this study attempts to devise a theoretical model that contains the factors and elements involved in a seapower. It will put forth a critique and assessment of the theories in the light of their structure and content. The aim of the present research is foundational and applied. The literature, both old and new, of the maritime has been extensively assessed. Also, the structure and content of theories and models devised in this scope have been reappraised to fit them into today’s development and circumstances. The research will therefore strive to compile and expand the theoretical foundations of seapower, i.e., the elements and factors, and then propose a theoretical and conceptual model through appraising the theories. The data are analyzed by using a deductive and qualitative method. The resulting model can be applied to evaluating and assessing the seapower of states and various geographical areas.
 
Findings and Discussion
Following an appraisal of the models and theories of seapower, a model of seapower consisting of seven main elements is proposed. They include economic and industrial, military, political and institutional (be it domestic or international), human and societal, geographical and territorial, geopolitical, technological, maritime infrastructure and IT—each one of which further divides into sub-elements. Informed by both subjective and objective factors, these seven elements do interact with each other, which renders isolating them almost impossible; that is to say, seapower is the output of indiscrete items.
 
Conclusions
How states with seapower behave in the maritime environment during war and peace, either military or non-military, they go on indicate their seapower. Such a capability in the sea should lead to a change in the way the actors in both sea and land behave. The state with seapower can therefore exercise its political will through the sea on other parties involved, which requires both military and non-military instruments. The latter include geographical and geopolitical elements, and political and economic ones, among others.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Agnew, J. (1998). Geopolitics: re-visioning world politics. London, Routledge Publication.
  2. Allahverdizadeh, R. (2019). Explaining the role of geographic and territorial factors in sea power of the States. Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol 15, No 3, pp 122-155. [In Persian]
  3. Allahverdizadeh, R. Hafeznia, M. Pourtaheri, M. (2017). Developing a Global Index for Maritime Location of Countries. Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol 13, No 47, pp 25-54. [In Persian]
  4. Allahverdizadeh, R. Karimi, M. (2023). A New Approach to the Theory of Seapower in the 21st Century (In Times of War and Peace), Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol 18, No 4, pp 383-411. DOI:20.1001.1.17354331.1401.18.68.17.9
  5. Booth, K. (1977). Navies and Foreign Policy. New York, Routledge Publication.
  6. Booth, K. (2014). Law, Force and Diplomacy at Sea. New York, Routledge Publication.
  7. Bradford, J. C. (2016). America, Sea Power, and the World. Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell Publication.
  8. British Ministry of Defence. (2017a). British Maritime Doctrine: JDP 0-10. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/ system/uploads/attachment_data/file/649518/archive_doctrine_uk_maritime_jdp_0_10.pdf (Last access 29/5/2021).
  9. British Ministry of Defence. (2017b). UK Maritime power: JDP 0-10. (Fifth edition). Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/ uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/662000/doctrine_uk_maritime_power_jdp_0_10.pdf (Last access 29/5/2021).
  10. Bruce B. Stubbs and Scott C. Truver. (2011). Towards a new understanding of maritime power. In Tan, A. T. H. (Ed.). The Politics of Maritime Power, A Survey (pp 3-28). London, Routledge Publication.
  11. Cable, J. (1985). Diplomacy at Sea. London, Macmillan Press LTD.
  12. Collins, J. M. (1998). Military Geography for Professionals and the Public. Washington, D.C., National Defense University Press.
  13. Corbett, J. S. (1911). Some Principles of Maritime Strategy. London, Longman- Green and Co.
  14. Cuyvers, L. (1993). Sea power: a global journey. Annapolis, Maryland. Naval Institute Press.
  15. Fiske, B. A. (1916). Navy as a Fighting Machine. Newport, U. S. naval war college press.
  16. Friedman, G. (2009). The next 100 years: a forecast for the 21st century. New York, Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
  17. Gamble, J. K. (1977). Marine policy: A comparative approach (Studies in marine affairs). Lexington, Lexington Books.
  18. Germond, B. (2014). “Small Navies in Perspective: Deconstructing the Hierarchy of Naval Forces”. In Mulqueen, M. Sanders, D. Speller, I. (Eds.). Small Navies: Strategy and Policy for Small Navies in War and Peace (pp. 33-50). Surrey, Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
  19. Germond, B. (2015). The Maritime Dimension of European Security: Seapower and the European Union. London, Palgrave Macmillan Publication.
  20. Goldrick, J. McCaffrie, J. (2013). Navies of South-East Asia: A Comparative Study. London, Routledge Publication.
  21. Gorshkov, S. G. (1979). Sea power of the state. London, Pergamon press (first published in Russia, 1976).
  22. Gray, C. S. (1992). The Leverage of Sea Power: The Strategic Advantage of Navies in War. New York, The Free Press.
  23. Gresh, G. F. (2020). To Rule Eurasia’s Waves: The New Great Power Competition at Sea. New Haven, Yale University Press.
  24. Grove, E. (1990). The Future of Sea Power. London, Routledge Publication.
  25. Grygiel, J. J. (2012). “Geography and Seapower”. In Dutton, P. Ross, R. and Tunsjø, Ø. (Eds.). Twenty-First Century Seapower: Cooperation and Conflict at Sea (pp 18-41). London and New York, Routledge Publication.
  26. Hattendorf, J. B. (1989). “Recent Thinking on the Theory of Naval Strategy”. In Hattendorf, J. B. Jordan, R. S. (Eds.). Maritime Strategy and the Balance of Power: Britain and America in the Twentieth Century (pp 136-161). New York, Palgrave Macmillan Publication.
  27. Hattendorf, J. B. (2016). Statesmen and Sea Power -Reflections on Aspects of Admiral Sir Herbert Richmond's Thinking. Tidskrifti Sjöväsendet (TiS), No 2, pp 151- 164.
  28. Haydon, P. T. (2011). “Naval Diplomacy: Is It Relevant in the 21st Century?” In Tan, A. T. H. (Ed.). The Politics of Maritime Power, A Survey (pp. 62-79). London, Routledge Publication.
  29. Hill, J. R. (1986). Maritime Strategy for Medium Powers. London, Croom Helm Ltd Publication.
  30. Hunt, B. D. (1989). The Strategic Thought of Sir Julian S. Corbett. In Hattendorf, J. B. Jordan, R. S. (Eds.). Maritime Strategy and the Balance of Power: Britain and America in the Twentieth Century (pp 110-135). New York, Palgrave Macmillan Publication.
  31. Kearsley, H. J. (1990). A theory on maritime power for the not-aligned not-nuclear naval powers: with Sweden and Ireland as case studies. PhD Thesis. Aberdeen, University of Aberdeen.
  32. Kearsley, H. J. (1992). Rethinking maritime power theory. Comparative Strategy, Vol 11, No 2, pp 195-211. DOI:10.1080/01495939208402871
  33. Kennedy, P. M. (1988). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. London, Unwin Hyman Limited.
  34. Kirchberger, S. (2015). Assessing China's Naval Power: Technological Innovation, Economic Constraints, and Strategic Implications. Heidelberg, Springer Publication.
  35. Klein, J. J. (2004a). Corbett in Orbit: A Maritime Model for Strategic Space Theory. Naval War College Review, Vol 57, No 1, pp 59-74.
  36. Klein, J. J. (2004b). Space warfare: a maritime-inspired spaces strategy. Astropolitics: The International Journal of Space Politics & Policy, Vol 2, No 1, pp 33-61. DOI: 10.1080/14777620490444740
  37. Lambert, A. (2018). Seapower States: Maritime Culture, Continental Empires and the Conflict That Made the Modern. New Haven and London, Yale University Press.
  38. Lindberg, M. S. (1998). Geographical Impact on Coastal Defence Navies: The Entwining of Force Structure, Technology and Operational Environment. London, Macmillan Press LTD.
  39. Mahan, A. T. (1898). The Influence of Sea Power upon History 1660-1783. Boston, Dover Publications.
  40. McLennan, B. C. (2006). Contemporary maritime pressures and their implications for naval force structure planning. PhD Thesis. Centre for Maritime Policy, University of Wollongong. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses /604 (Last access 29/5/2021).
  41. Menon, K. R. (1998). Maritime Strategy and Continental Wars. London, Frank Cass Publication.
  42. Modelski, G. Thompson, W. R. (1988). Seapower in Global Politics, 1494-1993. London, Macmillan Press LTD.
  43. Morris, M. A. (1987). Expansion of Third World Navies. London, Macmillan Press LTD.
  44. Polmar, N. (1999). “The Measurement of Naval Strength in the Twenty-First Century”. In Dorman, A. Smith, M. L. Uttley, M. R. H. (Eds.). The Changing Face of Maritime Power (pp 126-136). New York, Palgrave MacMillan.
  45. Richmond, H. W. (1947). Statesmen and Sea Power. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  46. Sakhuja, V. (2011). Asian Maritime Power in the 21st Century: Strategic Transactions China, India and Southeast Asia. Singapore, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS) Press.
  47. Sekine, D. (2011). Seapower and Japan's maritime coalition building. PhD thesis. Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security (ANCORS), University of Wollongong.
  48. Stevens, W. O. Westcott, A. (1920). A history of sea power. New York, George H. Doran Company Publication.
  49. Sumida, J. (1999). “Alfred Thayer Mahan, Geopolitician”. In Gray, C. S. and Sloan, G. (Eds.). Geopolitics, Geography and Strategy (pp 39-62). New York, Routledge Publication.
  50. Till, G. (1984). Maritime Strategy and the Nuclear Age (Second edition). London and Basingstoke, Macmillan Press LTD.
  51. Till, G. (2004). Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-first Century. London, Frank Cass Publication.
  52. Till, G. (2009). Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-first Century (second edition). London and New York, Routledge Publication.
  53. Todd, D. Lindberg, M. (1996). Navies and Shipbuilding Industries: The Strained Symbiosis. London, Praeger Publication.
  54. Wegener, W. (1989). The Naval Strategy of the World War. Annapolis, Naval Institute Press