نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه مطالعات منطقه‌ای دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
4 استادیار گروه روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Intrduction
Japan’s defeat in World War II, the loss of military power, and the ban on independent military actions after that era made this country a dependent and passive government in terms of security. Although in the years after the Second World War, the US security umbrella has been able to protect Japan from the Cold War and post- Cold War security crisis, the feeling of insecurity in recent years has created strategic dynamics in the country's grand strategies; and it can be substantiated that in recent years Japan, as a middle power, has moved towards increasing its military capabilities and has shifted from passive foreign policies. What is deduced from Japan's post-Cold War foreign and defense policy and strategy is that regional variables have been one of the main drivers and effective factors for these changes. In the same vein, this research analyzes the impact of regional variables on Japan's security developments and its change towards a normal state. According to this, this research considers that what environmental variables have made Japan aware of these threats and what has been Japan's response to these threats?
Methodology
The research method in this research will be in the form of descriptive-analytic approaches using the mixed method (a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods). In the descriptive-analytic approach that the researcher seeks to answer why and how to establish a causal relationship between independent and dependent variables, it is attempted to describe a process and develop a concept. With this definition, this research seeks to examine the process of change in Japanese security policies, to develop the concept of a "normal state" with an impact of regional variables. The data collection method is based on library findings.
Results and discussion
A review of theoretical approaches to international relations indicates that each of these approaches can provide significant help to Japanese security's researchers in answering the questions of "what regional threats and why regional variables are threatening" but these approaches have two weaknesses. First, each of them focuses only on one aspect of the analysis. Second, they ignore Japan responds to security threats. Contrary to these two disadvantages, Stephen Walt's balance of threat theory has two advantages that can be used to analyze this research. On the one hand, this theory has simultaneously taken into account both material and semantic perspectives, which in turn make the analysis comprehensible. On the other hand, it is possible to outline Japan's response to security changes in the form of "internal and external balancing".
This research concluded that China and North Korea are defined as threat to Japan's national security, regarding the four threat defining components (overall capability, geographic proximity, offensive capabilities, aggressive intentions), which have been raised in Stephen Walt's Balance of threat Theory. Comparison of the threat level of China and North Korea indicates that although North Korea is generally less understood than China in terms of overall power sources due to lack of power components (such as economic power, population, size, etc.), as Walt believes, powerful countries are not necessarily threatening and there could be some countries that, while lacking key components of power, pose a serious threat to international security while alliances may be formed against powerless countries. Therefore, North Korea is a serious threat against Japan's national security as well as stability and peace in East Asia.
According to research's results, regional threats have pushed Japan into a counterbalance of both internal (statutory and institutional) and foreign (deeper coalition with the US and security networking in East Asia and beyond) balanced threats. Also, it was concluded that the Japanese security environment was moving towards unpredictability and complexity, deepening Japan's security integration with the US and security networking as a strategy has been on the agenda of Japanese policymakers. It has to be mentioned that the role of Japanese leaders and politicians is important. According to the findings of this study, the political security strategies and behaviors of these countries change as the security environment of states becomes more strategic and in parallel with reformist and transformational leaders in these countries. With regard to Japan, while its foreign security environment at the same time imposed special requirements on its security and foreign policy behaviors and a transformative individual had come to power, the country experienced significant changes in its strategic calculations and foreign policy.
Conclusion
Japan's behavioral analysis indicates that the complex security environment, and in particular the perception of the threat of China and North Korea have been the main drivers of Japan's strategic change in practiced and announced policies. The reasons for this perception of China and Korea as threat, as well as Japan response to these security concerns were described in the context of Stephen Walt's balance of threat theory. The outlook for the balancing strategy points to many internal and external challenges and opportunities for Japan and other countries, such as: increasing Japan's deterrence over China and North Korea, boosting Japan's national security, strengthening the US hegemony in Northeast Asia, expanding arms race in the East Asia, increasing tensions in border disputes, increasing misunderstanding and misapprehension among regional actor.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
10.Brown,William(2018).North Korea’s Shackled Economy, The National Committee on North Korea (NCNK), Special Report.
11.CIA World Fact book (2019). China, available at https://www.cia.gov/library/ publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ch.htm.
12.Cliff,Roger (2015). Japan's security roll and capabilities in the 2020,The Atlantic Council, Retrieved from https://espas.secure.europarl.europa.eu/orbis/sites/ defau -lt/files/generated/document/en/Japan_s_Security_Role.pdf.
13.Cooper,Barry (2016). The Evolution of Japanese Security Policy, Canadian Global Affairs Institute, Retrieved from https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/cdfai/ pages/1400/attachments/original/1482203686/The_Evolution_of_Japanese_Security_Policy.pdf?1482203686.
14.Costa, Anna (2017). The China-Japan Conflict over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands: Useful Rivalry, London: Routledge.
15.Countryeconomy (2019). Country comparison Japan vs China, available at https ://countryeconomy.com/countries/compare/japan/china?sc=XE23.
16.Dehghani Firouzabadi, Jalal; Nori, vahid (2013). An Analysis of Interaction between Islamic Republic of Iran and Persian Gulf Cooperation Council (2005-2011), International Relations Research Quarterly Volume 2, Issue 5, Winter 2013, Page 9-52.[In Persian]
17.Ghafary,Asghar ; Pyrhady , Mohsen (2017). Replacing US influence instead of Britain in Iran (1953-1979), international relations research Quarterly , Volume 6, Issue 22 - Serial Number 1, Autumn 2017, Page 59-100.[In Persian]
18.Glosserman, Brad (2016). "Peak Japan and its implications for regional security, special report", The Australian Strategic Policy(ASPI), Policy Institute, March 13, Retrieved from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/196438/Peak%20Japan%20and %20 its%20implications%20for%20regional%20securit.pdf.
19.Gray, Gavan P (2013). Japan's Defence Build-up and its Meaning for Asia, European Institute for Asian Studies, Briefing Paper 2013/3, Retrieved from.http://www.eias.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/04/EIAS_Briefing_Paper_2013-3_Gray.pdf.
20.Goh, Evelyn (2011). How Japan matters in the evolving East Asian security order, International Affairs, Volume 87, Issue 4, July 2011, Pages 887–902,
21.Hay, David (2014)."Japan's strategic re-posture: Prime Minister Abe and the implications for the japan-us alliance and regional Security", The Centre for Defense and Strategic Studies (CDSS), December, Retrieved from http://www.defence.gov.au/ADC/Publications/IndoPac/Hay%20final%20paper%20(2).pdf.
22.Hayes, Peter, Cavazos, Roger (2015)."North Korea in 2014: A Fresh Leap Forward Into Thin Air? NAPSNet Special Reports, March 09, 2015, https://nautilus.org/ napsnet/napsnet-specia--reports/north-korea-in-2014-a-fresh-leap-forward-into-thin-air/.
23.Hosoya, Yuichi (2015). Japan’s New Security Legislation: What Does This Mean to East Asian Security? American Foreign Policy Interests, 37:296–302.
24.Joyce,Colin and Gedye, Robin (2003). “Japan Threatens First Strike at North Korea in Missile Crisis, The Guardian, February 14, 2003.
25.Japan Ministry of Defense (2004). National Defense Program Guidelines, available at https://www.mod.go.jp/e/d_act/d_policy/national.html.
26.Japan Ministry of Defense (2005). Defense Annual Paper, available at https://www.mod.go.jp/e/publ/w_paper/index.html.
27.Japan Ministry of Defense (2015). Defense Annual Paper, available at https://www.mod.go.jp/e/publ/w_paper/index.html.
28.Japan Ministry of Defense (2018). National Defense Program Guidelines, available at https://www.mod.go.jp/e/d_act/d_policy/national.html.
29.Japan Ministry of Defense(2018). Medium Term Defense Program, available at https://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/agenda/guideline/2019/.../chuki_seibi31-35_e.pdf.
30.Kaseda, Yoshinori(2012). Japan’s Security Policy towards East Asia, Perceptions,Volume XVII, Number 4, pp. 27-48.
31.koohkan, A., mohammadinasab, A. (2016). 'Disputed Islands Crisis in the East Asia and its Impact on Regional Stability', 8(27), pp. 126-150.
32.Khorshidi, Naser; Yousefijouybari, Mohammad; mohammadi,farshid (2018). Explanatory of stability and Enlargement of NATO from the prospective of Threat Balance TheoryStephan Walt's, Political and International Relations research quarterly, Volume 9, Issue 34, Winter 2018, Page 290-306.[In Persian]
33.Lee,Seung Hyok (2016). Japanese Society and the Politics of the North Korean Threat,Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
34.Lind, Jennifer (2016). “Japan’s Security Evolution”, Policy Analysis No. 788.
35.Miyajima &Akio & Swenson-Wright, John(2014). Japan’s ‘Proactive Contribution to Peace’: Implications for Regional Security, chatham House, Asia Programme Meeting Summary, Retrieved fromhttps://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/ default /files/field/field_document/20140605JapansProactiveContributionPeace.pdf.
36.Maxie, Jeremy(2017). The uncertainty over U.S.Philippine relations presents Tokyo with an opportunity to exercise leadership, The diplomat,Retrieved from :https://thediplomat.com/2017/01/how-japan-plans-to-counter-china-in-southeast-asia/.
37.Matton, Richard (2009). Strategic Implication Of Japan Amending its Constitution Strategy Research Project, U.S. Army War College.
38.Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (2013). National Security Strategy, available athttps://www.cas.go.jp/jp/siryou/131217anzenhoshou/nss-e.pdf.
39.MGM Research(2019). China vs Japan – GDP Indicators Comparison, available at https://mgmresearch.com/china-vs-japan-gdp-indicators-comparison/.
40.Monavari, Ali; Rostami, Banafshe (2017). Rebuilding the Arab-American Alliance to Confront the Gulf Security Threats. World Politics, 6(2), 185-210. doi: 10.22124/wp.2017.2489.[In Persian]
41.Masroor, M., khani, M. (2018). Geopolitical Rearrangement in the South China Sea. Geopolitics Quarterly, 14(50), 168-196.
42.Okano-Heijmans, Maaike (2012), Japan’s Security Posture in Asia: Changing tactics or strategy?ISPI – Analysis No. 125.
43.Pollock, John (2016). The Return of Japan’s Ambition: Shinzo Abe’s Assertive Foreign Policy,Available at .http://natoassociation.ca/the-return-of-japans-ambition-shinzo-abes-assertive-foreign-policy./
44.Prosser, David L (2017). Analysis of key factors driving Japan’s military normalizati,Master’s thesis, naval postgraduate school Monterey, California.
45.Sakaki, Alexandra (2015). Japan’s Security Policy: A Shift in Direction under Abe? SWP Research Paper, March.
46.Saltzman, Ilai Z(2014). Japan’s Pivot to Normalcy: Interpreting Tokyo’s Security Policy Revolution, the FLACSO-ISA Joint International Conference, Buenos Aires, July 23-25.
47.Schweller,Randall (1994). Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In,International Security, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 72-107.
48.Simbar,Reza؛ Esmaeili,Ali (2013).The Formation and Durability of Iran-Syria Alliance(1979-2000), World Politics, 2(2), 7-28.[In Persian]
49.Singh, Bhubhindar (2002). Japan's Post-Cold War Security Policy: Bringing Back the Normal State, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 82-105.
50.Singh, Piyush (2016). "The Architect: How Abe Redesigned Japan’s Foreign Policy", The National interest,March 17, Retrieved from https://nationalinterest. org/blog/the-buzz/the-architect-how-abe-redesigned-japans-foreign-policy-15522.
51.Soderberg, Marie (2005). Changes in japans foreign and security policy, European Institute of Japanese Studies,Working Paper No 211.
52.Statista (2019).The 15 countries with the highest military spending worldwide in 2017 (in billion U.S. dollars), Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics /262742/countries-with-the-highest-military-spending/.
53.SIPRI (2019). Trends in world military expenditure 2018, SIPRI Fact Sheet. April 2019, available at https://www.sipri.org/publications/2019/sipri-fact-sheets/trends-world-military-expenditure-2018.
54.Shamiri Shekofti, A., Shahandeh, B. (2018). Explanation of the Position of Smart Power in China's Foreign Policy. Geopolitics Quarterly, 14(51), 31-62.
55.The Advisory Panel on Reconstruction of the Legal Basis for Security (2014). Report of the Advisory Panel on Reconstruction of the Legal Basis for Security.
56.The Tokyo Foundation (2008). New Security Strategy of Japan: Multilayered and Cooperative Security Strategy, Policy Recommendations, Retrieved from http://www.tokyofoundation.org/en/additional_info/New%20Security%20Strategy%20of%20Japan.pdf.
57.The Heritage Foundation(2019). North korea, available athttps://www.heritage. org/index/country/northkorea.
58.The World Bank (2019). The World Bank In China, available athttps://www.worldbank.org/en/country/china/overview#1.
59.Trading Economics(2019). North Korea GDP Annual Growth Rate, available at https://tradingeconomics.com/north-korea/gdp-annual-growth-rate.
60.Trading Economics (2019). Japan Military Expenditure, available at https://tradingeconomics.com/japan/military-expenditure.
61.Tatsumi, Yuki (2014). Can Japan’s National Security Strategy outlive Abe? East Asia Forum, Retrieved from:http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2014/11/18/can-japans-national-security-strategy-outlive-abe/.
62.Tokuchi, Hideshi (2016). Japan’s New Defense Policy and Its Implication for the Regional Security, GRIPS Forum Speech, Retrieved from http://www.grips.ac.jp /cms/wpcontent/uploads/2016/04/160418GRIPSForum_web_EN.pdf.
63.Twining, Daniel (2014). Is Japan’s Grand Security Strategy the Key to Preserving U.S. Power in Asia? Foreign Policy, September 2, Retrieved from http:// foreignpolicy.com/2014/09/02/is-japans-grand-security-strategy-the-key-to-preserving-u-s-power-in-asia/.
64.U.S. Energy Information Administration (2012). Territorial disputes hamper exploration and production of resources in the East China Sea, available at https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=8270.
65.Walt, Stephen (1987). The Origins of Alliances. New York, Cornell University Press.
66.Walt, Stephen M (1985). Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power, International Security, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 3-43.
67.Watanabe, Tsuneo (2015). Japan’s Security Strategy toward the Rise of China From a Friendship Paradigm to a Mix of Engagement and Hedging, available at http://www.tokyofoundation.org/en/articles/2015/security-strategy-toward-rise-of-china.
68.World Atlas(2018). Which Countries Border Japan?Available at https://www. worldatlas.com/articles/which-countries-border-japan.html.
69.You, Chaekwang (2015). Explaining Japan’s Shift to Foreign Policy Activism: Security Challenges and Perverse Political Accountability", International Relations and Diplomacy, Vol. 3, No. 5, May, pp 313-328.
70.…... (2018). Japan defense plan calls for aircraft carriers at sea and vigilance in space and cyberspace, Japan times 18 December, available at https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/12/18/national/japan-eyes-aircraft-carrier-deployment-cyberdefense-boost-10-years/#.XTMnOXtS82x.
)
