تبیین جایگاه توصیه‌های کاربردی در نظریه‌های ژئوپلیتیکی دوره کلاسیک

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 جغرافیای سیاسی، علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

2 استاد جغرافیای سیاسی و ژئوپلیتیک، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 استاد جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

4 استاد جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه کالیفرنیا، لس‌آنجلس، ایالات متحده آمریکا

چکیده

چکیده
ژئوپلیتیک در اواخر قرن نوزدهم و نیمه اول قرن بیستم با نظریه‌های متعددی توسعه یافت بگونه‌ای که، امروزه این نظریه‌ها بخش مهمی از تاریخچه و ادبیات مربوط به ژئوپلیتیک را تشکیل می‌دهند. از این روی مطالعه، بررسی، تجزیه‌‌و‌‌تحلیل و نقد این نظریه‌ها به جزئی جدایی‌ناپذیر از مطالعه علم ژئوپلیتیک تبدیل شده است. در همین راستا، پژوهش حاضر که از نوع بنیادی - نظری بوده و به روش توصیفی - تحلیل محتوا با بهره‌گیری از منابع کتابخانه‌ای دست اول انجام پذیرفته است، در پی پاسخ به این سئوال است که؛ توصیه‌های کاربردی در نظریه‌های ژئوپلیتیکی دوره کلاسیک از چه جایگاهی برخوردار می‌باشد؟ برای پاسخ به این سئوال، چهار مورد از مهم‌ترین و شناخته‌شده‌ترین نظریه‌های ژئوپلیتیکی دوره کلاسیک – نظریه‌های "قدرت دریایی"، "کشور به‌‌مثابه یک موجود زنده"، "محور جغرافیایی تاریخ" و "ریملند" - مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که؛ این نظریه‌ها ضمن دارا بودن ماهیت بنیادی - نظری، از ماهیت کاربردی نیز برخوردارند چرا که نظریه‌پردازان این دوره، به وجه کارکردی و سودمندی نظریه‌های خود نیز توجه داشته و با ارائه توصیه‌های متعدد، به نظریه‌های خود ماهیت کاربردی نیز بخشیده‌اند بگونه‌ای که ارائه توصیه‌های کاربردی به مسئولیت و وظیفه‌ای ذاتی برای این نظریه‌ها تبدیل شده است. بنابراین؛ توصیه‌های کاربردی از جایگاه ویژه‌ای در نظریه‌های ژئوپلیتیکی دوره کلاسیک برخوردار بوده و جزو شاخصه‌های مهم این نظریه‌ها محسوب می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Determining the Status of Applied Recommendations in Geopolitical Theories of Classical Period

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hassan Rahimi 1
  • Mohammad Reza Hafeznia 2
  • Ezzatollah Ezzati 3
  • John Agnew 4
1 Political Geography,Faculy of Literature and Human Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor in Political Geography and Geopolitics, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor in Political Geography –Islamic Azad University (SRBIAU), Tehran, Iran
4 Professor in Political Geography, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), USA
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Geopolitics developed in the late of 19th century and the first half of 20th century with some theories that focused mainly on the role of geographic space in world power and strategies, so today these theories form an important part of geopolitical history and literature, and accurate study and recognition of geopolitics is not possible without the exact study and recognition of these theories. Therefore, study, evaluation, analysis and critique of geopolitical theories have become an integral part of geopolitical studies. In this regard, the present research evaluates and explains the status of applied recommendations in classic geopolitical theories (1875 to 1945).
Theoretical framework
Geopolitics of classic era started from the late of 19th century and ended by the end Second World War, namely the years between 1875 and 1945. In this period, two trends emerged: one originated from the common social Darwinism in this period, with the German Friedrich Ratzel being as its forerunner. In his article titled “The Laws of the Spatial Growth of States” (1896) and the book “Political Geography” (1897) and in his other works, he proposed the theory of “Organic State” and claimed that “In the state we are dealing with an organic nature. And nothing contradicts the nature of the organic more than does rigid circumscription.” Another trend was based more on geographic facts and the policies affected by the geographical conditions that were often called geostrategy. Theories of “Sea Power,” “The Geographical Pivot of History,” and “Rimland” are also related to this trend. The American “Alfred Thayer Mahan” in 1890 published the book “The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660-1783” and presented the theory of “sea power,” claiming that “the use and control of the sea is and has been a great factor in the history of the world.” Following this and with the advent of the transcontinental railroad age, British “Sir Halford J. Mackinder” in 1904 presented the theory of “the geographical pivot of history.” In 1919, having added a large part of  Eastern Europe to the “Pivot Area,” he called it “Heartland”, claiming that “Who controls eastern Europe rules the Heartland; who rules the Heartland rules the World Island; and who rules the World Island rules the World.” Following Mackinder, American Nicholas J. Spykman presented the Rimland theory in 1943 in “The Geography of the Peace.” Unlike Mackinder, he stressed the important role of surrounding countries around the Heartland. Spykman named these countries “Rimland” and claimed that “Who controls the rimland rules Eurasia; who rules Eurasia controls the destinies of the world.” This period of geopolitics ended with the end of World War II, and a new era emerged in geopolitics that is known as the Cold War geopolitics.
 
Methodology
The present research is a fundamental-theoretical method, through descriptive-content analysis using the first-hand library resources, evaluates and determines the status of applied recommendations in four of the most important and most well-known classic geopolitical theories - theories of "Sea Power", "Organic State", "The Geographical Pivot of History" and "Rimland".
 
Results and Discussion
Based on research findings and their analysis, Mahan in his “Sea Power” theory provides the statesmen of his country with a number of applied recommendations for restoration of the US military and commercial fleet and the transformation of the country into a superior sea power. He recommends the US statesmen to strengthen naval power, dig the Panama Canal, acquire numerous colonies across the world, capture stations around and near the Strait (Panama Canal), control shipping routes, and maintain a powerful naval force during the war. These applied recommendations influenced the thoughts and policies of two US presidents (McKinley and Roosevelt) to strengthen the navy and end America's isolation policy. So, several bases and islands in the Pacific and the Atlantic were conquered by the United States and the Panama Canal was dug, thereby transforming the United States into one of the greatest powers of the world and eventually replacing British naval power after World War II. Ratzel, in the theory of “Organic State” under the influence of social Darwinism, proposes a series of presuppositions to provide applied recommendation to German statesmen. For Ratzel, the German Empire as an organism requires space to survive, and the statesmen of this empire must seek to obtain a vital space in line with the growth of their growing population and think of colonial occupation. He also recommends and encourages his statesmen to adopt a realistic policy (territorial development policy) and to reach more space, which will require Germany to become a superpower, otherwise Germany will be marginalized. Being interested in preserving the hegemony of the British Empire, Mackinder also offers the most important and applied recommendation to the leaders of the British Empire in the “Geopolitical Pivot of History” theory. According to Mackinder, the leaders of the British Empire should prevent the unification of the German and Russian land powers to not let them reach the “Pivot Area” and prevent the formation of unity between these two countries. To this end, Germany and the Soviet Union should be separated by the buffer countries from each other, otherwise the two countries would dominate Eastern Europe, consequently conquering the “Heartland” and dominating the whole world. In “Rimland” theory, Spykman advocates strengthening the nation's sea power, emphasizing the value and position of sea power in domination of the world. By emphasizing that: who controls the “rimland” controls the destinies of the world,” he recommends the US statesmen to control the “rimland” area in order to dominate the world.
 
Conclusion
To sum up, it can be argued that the classic geopolitical theories, while having the fundamental-theoretical nature also have an applied nature as theoreticians of this period are of a geopolitical nature in terms of the function, efficiency and usefulness of their theories, and by presenting several recommendations have added an applied nature to their theories, so that presentation of functional recommendations has become an inherent responsibility for these theories. Therefore, applied recommendations are among the important features of classic geopolitical theories and had a special place among these theories.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Geopolitical Theories
  • sea power
  • Organic State
  • the Geographical Pivot of History
  • Rimland
  1. Agnew, J., (1999), “Geopolitics: re-visioning World Politics”, London, Routledge
  2. Allahverdizadeh, R., & Hafeznia, M. R., & Pourtaheri, M., (2017), “Developing a Global Index for Maritime Location of Countries”, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, Pp. 25-54 [In Persian]
  3. Bassin, M., (1987), “Imperialism and the Nation State in Fredrich Ratzels Political Geography”, Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 11, No. 4, Pp. 473-495
  4. Blacksell, M., (2010), “Political Geography”, Tehran, Mirbagheri Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  5. Cohen, S. B., (1991) “Global and Geopolitical Change in the post – cold war Era” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, (81), Pp. 551-580.
  6. Cohen, S. B., (2008), “Geopolitics of the World System”, Translated by: Kardan, A., Tehran, Tehran International Studies & Research Institute Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  7. Collins, J. M., (2000), “Military Geography”, Translated by: Togha, A. R., Tehran, Aryan Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  8. Etaat, J., (1997), “Geopolitics and Irans Foreign Policy”, Tehran, Safeer Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  9. Ezzati, E., (1998), “Geopolitics”, Tehran, Samt Publication, 3rd edition, [In Persian]
  10. Gilbert, W, Edmund, (1972) “British Pioneers in Geography”, Published by David & Charles, 1st edition
  11. Glassner, M. I., (1993), “Political Geography”, New York, John Wiley & sons Inc
  12. Hafeznia, M. R., (2000), “Foundations of Political- Social Studies”, Qom, Organisation of Howzeh Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  13. Hafeznia, M. R., (2005), “Geopolitics, a Philosophical Study”, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 1, Pp. 18-35 [In Persian]
  14. Hafeznia, M. R., (2006), “Principles and Concepts of Geopolitics”, Mashhad, Papoli Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  15. Hafeznia, M. R., (2008), “Power and National Interests”, Tehran, Mirbagheri Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  16. Hafeznia, M. R., (2015), “A New Approach to the History of Political Geography in the World”, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 1, Pp. 1-36 [In Persian]
  17. Jonse, M. & Jonse, R. & Woods, M., (2007), “An Introduction to Political Geography: Space, Place and Politics”, Translated by: Pishgahifard, Z. and Akbari, R., Tehran, University of Tehran Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  18. Kaplan, R. D., (2014), “The revenge of Geography”, Translated by: Khezri. M. H. & Nikfarjam. M., Tehran, Entekhab Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  19. Kasperson, R. E., & Minghi, J. V., (2011), “The Structure of Political Geography”, Aldine Transaction, A Division of transaction Publishers, Pp. 17-28
  20. Kavianirad, M., & Booye, Ch., (2012), “Role of Lebensraum as a Concept in forming Iraq Foreign Political Behavior”, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 1, Pp. 112-134 [In Persian]
  21. Lacoste, Y., & Giblin, B., (2000), “Facteurs ET Opinions En Geopolitique”, Translated by: Farasati, A., Tehran, Amen Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  22. Mackinder, H. J., (1904), “the Geographical Pivot of History”, Geographical Journal, Vol. 23, Pp. 421-437
  23. Mackinder, H. J., (1919), “Democratic Ideals and Reality”, London, Constable Co, Penguin Books
  24. Mackinder, H. J., (1943), “The Round world and the Winning of the Peace”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 21, No. 4, (1942/1943), Pp. 595-605
  25. Mahan, A. T., (1890), “The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660-1783”, scanned and proofread by A E Warren, 2004, http://www.blackmask.com
  26. Mirheydar, D. & Rasti, O. & Mirahmadi, F., (2013), “The Basic Themes In Political Geography”, Tehran, Samt Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  27. Mirheydar, D., (1975), “Principles and Foundations of Political Geography”, Tehran, AmirKabir Publication, 3rd edition, [In Persian]
  28. Mirheydar, D., (2010), “Tracing Readings of a Political Geographer during the Past Five Decades”, Mashhad, Papoli Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  29. Mojtahedzadeh, P., (2002), “Political Geography and Geopolitics”, Tehran, Samt Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  30. Mojtahedzadeh, P., (2013), “Geopolitics Philosophy & Application”, Tehran, Samt Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  31. Muir, R., (2000), “Political Geography: A new introduction”, Translated by: Mirheydar, D., and Safavi, S. Y., Tehran, Geographical Organisation of Armed Forces Publication, 1st edition, [In Persian]
  32. O’Tuathail, G., & Dalby, S., & Routledge, P., (1998), “the Geopolitics Reader”, London and New York, Routledge
  33. Parker, G., (1985), “Western Geopolitical Thought in the Twentieth Century”, London, Croom Helm
  34. Pounds, J .G. Norman, (1972), “Political Geography”, McGraw-Hill Education, 2nd edition
  35. Ratzel, F., (1901), “Der Lebensraum”, Eine biogeographische Studie, In Bucher, K. et al. editors, Festgaben fur Albert Schaffle zur siebenzigsten Wiederkehr seines Geburtstags am 24 Februar 1901, Tubingen: Verlag der Laupp’schen Buchhandlung, 101-189
  36. Ratzel, F., (1923), “Politische Geographie”, Oder die Geographie der Staaten, des Verkehrs, und des Krieges, third edition. Munich and Berlin: Oldenbourg
  37. Shakui, H., (1985), “Applied Geography”, Mashhad, The Astane Quds Publication, 3rd edition, [In Persian]
38. Spykman, N. J., (1944), “The Geography of the Peace”, edited by Helen R. Nicholl, New York, Harcourt, Brace and Company.