فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

Secularism: Freedom of Religion or Freedom from Religion?

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
Siti Norhanani Binti Musni 1
Sharifatul Nadiah Binti Sulim 1
Muhamad Helmi Md. Said 1
Fatima Abdel Rahim Ali 2
1 Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
2 Al-Mustaqbal University College, Iraq.
چکیده
Secularism is a political ideology that disintegrates religion from state governance. While secularism may work for countries where the majority professed religion that has no specific legal system viz. Christianity, it begins to exhibit its ineptness in countries that either have a multicultural identity or adopt a systematic religion like Islam as its official religion. To unravel this, secularism acquiesced to embody two divisions of secularism entailing freedom of religion and freedom from religion. The objective of the writing is to resolve the conflicts of the secularism ideology in multicultural state.  The methodology adopted in the research is doctrinal legal research which employed qualitative research. For multicultural counterparts, the absolute disintegration of religion raises difficulties, hence, they opt for the secular concept of freedom of religion. However, from the Islamic perspective, secularism contrasts with Islamic teachings as it is conclusive in every aspect of human life. It has its own foundations and laws that shall be followed at all times. Additionally, the impacts of secularism on the social, educational, and moral aspects have made its germaneness be put in question. Thus, there must be a law to regulate the abovementioned matter in order to ensure the community live with peace and harmony
کلیدواژه‌ها
Multiculturalism
Politics
Islam
Malaysia
موضوعات
  1. Al-Qur’an
  2. Abdul Aziz, B. (1997). Rethinking the Idea and Content of Human Rights: A Response. https://www.cljlaw.com.eresourcesptsl.ukm.remotexs.co/Members/DisplayArticle.aspx?ArticleId=130875411&SearchId=puukm1-99 [9 January 2023].
  3. Abington v Schempp 374 US 203 (1963).
  4. Adibah Binti, A.R (2010). The Impact of Secularism on Religious Beliefs and Practices. Journal of Islam in Asia 7(1): 157-177.
  5. Adrian T.H.K; Chang, H. K (2021). Multiculturalism in Singapore and Malaysia: approaches and outcomes. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 40(3): 290-308.
  6. Ahdar, R. (2013). Is Secularism Natural. International Journal of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law 26(3): 404-429.
  7. Al-Attas, S. M. N (1993). Islam and Secularism. 2nd Edition. Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.
  8. (2002). Explain Does France Really Have a Hijab Ban. The Local France. 30 September. https://www.thelocal.fr/20220930/explained-does-france-really-have-a-hijab-ban/ [12 December 2022].
  9. Anthony, K. (1987). Reason and Religion. London: Basil Blackwell Publishing.
  10. Asyraf Isyraqi B. J. (2022). Country Report: Religious Education in Malaysia. British Journal of Religious Education 44(2): 200-208.
  11. Audi, R. (2000). Religious Commitment and Secular Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Bagheri, P.; Althabhawi, N.M; Moslemzadeh, P. (2021). Legal issues tsunami in the wake of COVID -19 and contractual breach. Geopolitics Quarterly, 17(SI), 123-135.
  13. R.J.; McCleary, R.M. (2003). Religion and Economic Growth Across Countries. American Sociological Review 68(5): 760-781.
  14. Bommai v, S. R. (1994). Union of India [1994] 2 SCR 644.
  15. Brauer, J.R; Tittle, C.R; Antonaccio, O (2013). Does Religion Suppress, Socialize, Soothe or Support? Exploring Religiosity’s Influence on Crime. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52(4): 753-774.
  16. (2012). Time, World and Secularism. In Gorski, Philip, Kyuman Kim, David, Torpey, John and Van Antwerpen, Jonathan, (eds.). The Post-Secular in Question: Religion in Contemporary Society, pp 335-364. New York: New York University Press.
  17. Cambridge Dictionary. Secularism. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/ dictionary/english/secularism [10 December 2022].
  18. David, N. (1994). Secularism, Art and Freedom. Utopian Studies 5(2): 168-170.
  19. Engel v Vitale 8 L.Ed. 2d 601(1962).
  20. Everson v. Board of Education 330 U.S. 1(1947).
  21. Fish, S. (2007). Liberalism and Secularism: One and the Same. https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/02/liberalism-and-secularism-one-and-the-same/ [15 January 2023].
  22. Hak, A. N.; Said, M. H.; Hashim, N.; Soh, C. R. (2017). Cross-border marriages: Socio-legal knowledge among muslims in malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(October), 135-144
  23. Hamilton, M.B. (1995). The Sociology of Religion. 2nd Edition. New York: Routledge Publications.
  24. Hans, K. (1990). Does God Exists? An Answer for Today. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company.
  25. Hasrizal, A.J. (2021). Erti Beragama Yang Hilang. 3rd Edition. Kajang: Iman Publication.
  26. Holyoke, J. (1986). The Origin and Nature of Secularism. London: Oxford Publication Press.
  27. Idris, A; Kurtbag, O.; Salleh, A. (2021). The response of Malaysia and Turkey on COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis. Geopolitics Quarterly, 17(SI), 22-50.
  28. Jamaluddin, F.M; Hashim, F. Y; Md Said, M. H. (2021). Proposed improvement for divorce resolution in aceh and malaysia: A comparative study. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(1), 193-203. doi:10.36941/ajis-2021-0017.
  29. Kamath, M.V. (1989). Role of Religion in Secular State. ESS 37 (9).
  30. Kesharwani, G.P. (2018). “S.R. Bommai v Union of India”. http:// www. penacclaims.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Gyan1.pdf [22 May 2023].
  31. Khalif Muammar, A.H(2021). Secularization of Ethics and Contemporary Moral Crisis. Afkar: Journal of Aqidah & Islamic Thought 23(2): 121-170.
  32. Kuru, A.T. (2009). Secularism and State Policies toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Kymlicka, W (2015). Revisiting Multiculturalism in Canada. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  34. Lægaard, S. (2017). Multiculturalism and secularism: Theoretical understandings and possible conflicts. Ethnicities 17(2), 154-171.
  35. Lozano, F.A. (2017). The Rise of Secularism and Its Economic Consequences. https://wol.iza.org/articles/the-rise-of-secularism-and-its-economic-consequences/long [6 January 2022].
  36. Madan, T.N. (1994). Secularism & Intellectuals. Economic and Political Weekly 29(18): 89.
  37. McCollum v Board of Education 333 U.S. 203(1948).
  38. Mishkat al-Masabih.
  39. Modood, T (1994). Establishment, Multiculturalism and British Citizenship. Political Quarterly 65(1): 53-73.
  40. Mohamed Suffian, H (1962). The Relationship between Islam and the State in Malaya. Intisari 1(1): 8.
  41. Mohd Zin, N; Md Hashim, N; Hak, N. A.; Che Soh, R; Ibrahim, K.; Md Said, M. H. (2015). A baseline study of the enforcement of nafkah orders in the selangor syariah court. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23(SpecialIssue11), 327-336.
  42. Muh, T (2017). Glocalization on The Concept of Islamic Education. International Seminar on Islamic Education: 251.
  43. Nasrul, M. A. B. D.; Said, M. H. M.; Hakand, N. A.; Salim, W. N. M. (2019). Family disputes in administration of estates: Analysis on mediation as effective dispute resolution mechanism in malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family Economics, 23(Special Issue 1), 15-32
  44. National Secular Society. What is Secularism? https://www.secularism.org.uk /what-is-secularism.html [10 December 2022].
  45. Nehaluddin, A. (2009). The Modern Concept of Secularism and Islamic Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law 15(1): 75-105.
  46. Nik Ahmad, H. I; Mustafa, T. (2016). The Relations between Islam and Secularism: The Impact on Social Behavior in Turkey. International Education Studies 9(8): 66-74.
  47. Niles, C.L. (N.d). Epistemological Nonsense -The Secular/Religious Disti- nction. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 17(2): 561-592.
  48. Nursi, S. (1999). Sualar Büyük Boy (The Rays). Istanbul: Söz Basim Yayin.
  49. Ong, G. B.; Zuhair, B.R(2021). An Analysis and Commentary on Riddah in Malaysia. (2021) 29 JUUM 59 – 68. https://doi.org/10.17576/juum-2021-29-06
  50. Pratiwi, T. (2022). Raising Religious Inherency: The Role of Interreligious Competence in Achieving Religious Education Equality in Multireligious Public Schools in Indonesia. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9(1): 271-284.
  51. Rajput, V.S. (2022). Analytical Study on Secularism: Concept, Origin and Its Importance in India. Journal of Positive School Psychology 6(3): 7698-7715.
  52. Rawls, J. (1997). The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. University of Chicago Law Review 64(3): 765-807.
  53. Riyad al-Salihin, S.L. (2008). Galeotti on Recognition as Inclusion. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11(3): 291–314.
  54. Saba Mahmood. (2006). Secularism, Hermeneutics, and Empire: The Politics of Islamic Reformation. Public Culture 18(2): 326.
  55. Sahih Al-Bukhari; Sahih Muslim; Sayyed Hossein, N. (1981). Islamic Life and Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  56. Said, M. H. M.; Hashim, N. M.; Hak, N. A.; Wok, S.; Soh, R. C. (2019). Socio -legal implications of cross-border marriage among Muslims in Malaysia: An empirical study. Al-Shajarah, 24(1), 67-96.
  57. Said, M. H. M.; Kaka, G. E.; Nasrul, M. A. B. D.; Cahyani, T. D. (2022). Synd -icate marriage or trafficking? the travails of Asian migrant women. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 12(1), 106-118. doi:10.36941/jesr-2022-0010
  58. A (1983). How Should We Then Live? The Rise and Decline of Western Thought and Culture. Wheaton: Crossway Books Publishing.
  59. Shad Saleem, F. (2008). Document of Destiny: The Constitution of the Federation of Malaysia. Petaling Jaya: Star Publications Malaysia Berhad.
  60. Shad Saleem, F. (2021). Vision of a Shared Destiny. The Star. 26 August. https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/columnists/reflecting-on-the-law/2021/ 08/26/vision-of-a-shared-destiny [25 December 2022].
  61. Sharma, R. (2020). The Study of Secularism in India: With regard to the Constitution, Constitutionalism in India and Society. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3610649 [22 May 2023].
  62. Simpson, G.G (1966). The Meaning of Evolution and Its Significance for Man. New Heavan: Yale University Press.
  63. Spencer, K. (2022). CDC estimates 1.7 million gay and bisexual men face highest risk from monkeypox. CNBC. 4 August. https://www. cnbc.com/ 2022/08/04/cdc-estimates-1point7-million-gay-and-bisexual-men-face-highest-risk-from-monkeypox-.html [15 January 2023].
  64. Šprocha.; Tišliar, P (2019). Fertility and Religious Belief: Old and New Relationships in Slovakia. Journal for the Study of Religion and Ideologies 18(52): 63-79.
  65. Syed Naquib, AL.A. (1993). Islam and Secularism. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC): 18-19.
  66. Tariq Modood. (2007). Multiculturalism. Cambridge: Polity.
  67. Tijani A.A. (2022). Islam and Secularism: Compatible or Incompatible. International Journal of Social Science Research 4(1): 46-57.
  68. Wilson, E.K. (2017). ‘Power Differences’ and ‘The Power of Difference’: The Dominance of Secularism as Ontological Injustice. Globalizations 14(7): 1076-1093.

Woudenberg, R.V (2018). An Epistemological Critique of Scientism. In Jeroen De Ridder, Peels, R. & Woudenberg, R.V. (eds.). Scientism: Prospects and Problems, pp 167-189. New York: Oxford University Press

فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک
دوره 19، شماره ویژه
تابستان 1402
صفحه 145-166

  • تاریخ دریافت 31 فروردین 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 10 خرداد 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 27 خرداد 1402