Geopolitics Quarterly

Geopolitics Quarterly

Comparative Study of the Concept of Look East in the Foreign Policy of Iran and India

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor of International Relations, Political Science Department, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
2 M.A in International Relations, Political Science Department, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
Abstract
Abstract
During the post-Cold War era, while western countries continued to exert their influence on the world stage, Indian and Iranian officials turned their focus to the East. They introduced the Look East Policy and Look to the East Policy respectively, with the aim of leveraging the political, economic, cultural, geographical, and security opportunities available in that region. By adopting these policies, both India and Iran sought to deepen their engagement with countries in East and Southeast Asia, diversify their trade and investment portfolios, and reduce their dependence on western nations. The objective of this article is to analyze India and Iran's Look East Policy and Look to the East Policy, with a focus on their outcomes for national well-being, security, and the potential in the economic, political, and security domains with respect to Eastern countries. To do so, researchers primarily discuss the importance of the Look East Policy in the foreign policy of both India and Iran and discuss why this region comes to the center with full-fledged attention. Furthermore, they scrutinize the accomplishments of India and Iran as well as the structural barriers they encounter in the region, along with their approaches to pursuing their objectives and interests in the area. This article presents an analysis of the constraints, difficulties, and successes of the Look East policy.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Adhikari, S; Krishna Sinha, A. R; Kamle, M (2007). India is changing geopolitical code: An attempt at analysis. Geopolitics Quarterly, 3(10), 4-32.
  2. Aliyeva, K (2018). India joins Ashgabat agreement on transport corridor. Azer News. Retrieved from https://www.azernews.az/region/126504.html.
  3. Ansari Fard, M; Haji-Yousefi, A. M (2023). Challenges of Iran Deterrence Strategy in the Middle East: From Alliance to Gray Zone Politics. Geopolitics Quarterly, 19(69), 96-130. [In Persian]
  4. Bajpaee, C (2007). India rediscovers East Asia. Asia Times. Retrieved fromhttps://web.archive.org/web/20080517035426/http:/www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/IJ31Df01.html.
  5. China signs deal to provide Iran with 10bn in loans, Press TV (2017). Retrieved from https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2017/09/15/535211/ China-signs-deal-to-provide-Iran-with-10bn-in-loans.
  6. Embassy of India (2022). Brief on India-Korea Economic and Commercial Relations. Retrieved from https://www.indembassyseoul.gov.in/india-rok-trade-and-economic-relations.
  7. Gray, S; Sloan, G (1999). Geopolitics, geography and strategy. Routledge.
  8. India- ASEAN Relations (2018). ASEAN Main Portal Retrieved from https://www.mea.gov.in/Portal/ForeignRelation/India-ASEAN-Relations-August-2018.pdf.
  9. India- Singapore relations (2015). Singapore Ministry of External Affairs Website, Retrieved from https://mea.gov.in/Portal/ForeignRelation/Singa- pore _2015_07_02.pdf.
  10. India’s Act East Policy (2021). Retrieved from https://www.drishtiias. Com/daily-updates/daily-news-analysis/india-s-act-east-policy-1.
  11. India-Republic of Korea Bilateral Relations (2017). Retrieved from https://mea.gov.in/Portal/ForeignRelation/Republic_of_Korea_October_2017.pdf.
  12. IRNA (2021). Presence in SCO enhancing Iran's Look to East Policy. Retrieved fromhttps://en.irna.ir/news/84472848/Presence-in-SCO-enhancing -Iran-s-Look-to-East-Policy.
  13. Japanese investment in Indian IT and start-up ecosystem grows four times since 2016 (2021). The Hindu Business Line, Retrieved from https://www. thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/japanese-investment-in-indian-it-and-start-up-ecosystem-grows-four-times-since-2016-report/article37280915.ece.
  14. Luttwak, E. N (1990). From geopolitics to geo-economics: Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The national interest, (20), 17-23.
  15. Mehrabi, A; Safavi, S.Y; Mahdian, H (2013). Investigation Geopolitical Position of Energy in Supplying Iran's National Security from the Prospect of Three National Security Approaches (Pivot expansion, Maintenance and Development). Geopolitics Quarterly, 9(29), 32-59. [In Persian]
  16. Noori, A. R; Masoudi, H (2021). Re-Focusing on Iran-Russia Cooperation in the Syrian Crisis; A ‘broader ’Strategic Stability on Agenda. Geopolitics Quarterly, 17(64), 156-185. [In Persian]
  17. Nye J. (2011). The future of the power. Public Affairs
  18. Owens, M. (2015). Japanese investment in Indian IT and start-up ecosystem grows four times since 2016: Report. Retrieved. https://www.fpri. Org/article/2015/03/geopolitics-con-and-pro/.
  19. Owens, M.T (2015). Geopolitics, Con and Pro. Foreign Policy Research Institute. URL: http://www. Fpri. Org/articles/2015/03/geopolitics-con-and-pro. (Дата обращения.
  20. (2018). India to offer $3-4 billion development plan for giant Iran gas field. Retrieved from https://in.reuters.com/article/india-iran-energy/india-to-offer-3-4-billion-development-plan-for-giant-iran-gas-field-sources-idINKCN1HB21M.
  21. Sanaei, M; Karami, J (2021). Iran’s Eastern policy: potential and Challenges. Russia in Global Affairs, 19(3) (75), 25-49. [In Persian]
  22. Shahla, A; Ratcliffe (2019). “CNPC Quits Flagship Iran Gas Project as Sanctions Bite,” Bloomberg Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/ news/articles/2019-10-06/iran-says-china-s-cnpc-is-no-longer-part-of-giant-gas-project.

 

Volume 20, Issue 2
Spring 2024
Pages 134-150

  • Receive Date 22 March 2023
  • Revise Date 01 September 2023
  • Accept Date 19 September 2023