Geopolitics Quarterly

Geopolitics Quarterly

Exploring the US National Security Strategy concerning Russia's Geopolitical Conduct throughout the Joe Biden Era (2020-2024)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Relations between Russia and the United States exemplify the geopolitical conflicts among international actors. The United States, guided by its national security strategy, has experienced significant fluctuations in its interactions with Russia across different presidential administrations. In recent decades, numerous governments have published strategic documents to articulate their country's position, role in the contemporary world, and the US government's approach to geopolitical challenges. These documents typically outline objectives, tools, and methods of implementation. The US national security strategy has consistently navigated between isolationist and internationalist perspectives, taking into account stable goals, economic capacity, geographical location, physical security, and the expansion of values. The most recent strategy document, released in 2022, illuminates the complex political, security, commercial, economic, technological, and geopolitical relationships between the US, Russia, and their allies during at least one presidential term. During the Biden administration, the US national security strategy has placed significant emphasis on Russia's geopolitical challenges, its conflict with Ukraine, and the ongoing geopolitical rivalry with the West. This study aims to explore and analyze these geopolitical challenges and competitions between the US and Russia across various dimensions from the perspective of the American national security strategy during the Biden administration. Consequently, the US's heightened concerns regarding Russia's behavior in geostrategic and geopolitical contexts necessitate their inclusion in the national security strategy.
Methodology
This paper tries to analyze the national security strategy of the United States of America during the presidency of Joseph Robin Biden Jr. (known as Joe Biden 2020-2024) with the focus on Russia's geopolitical behavior in the face of geopolitical challenges and competitions in Russia. The research data gathering procedure is based on library findings including American National Security Strategy, 2022, as the focus of research and the American Defense Strategy, 2022, and the NATO Strategy 2022, the Russian National Security Strategy 2021. The method of analysis is based on logic, thinking, and geopolitical arguments. This research benefits from the opinions of experts and experts in the field of geopolitics, national security, and think tanks of the US about strategic documents regarding the geopolitical behavior of this country in the form of the challenger and geopolitical competition of the Russian Federation.
Results and Discussion
The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has underscored the pivotal role of geopolitics in shaping global dynamics. This war, rooted in the strategic imperative of safeguarding Russia's territorial integrity and securing its western borders, has persisted, presenting a formidable geopolitical quandary for both the United States and Russia. The ongoing crisis in Ukraine has not only intensified existing geopolitical tensions but has also eroded Russia's influence over the Central Asian ex-Soviet states. Russia's interventionist foreign policy, characterized by geopolitical maneuvering and power plays, has raised concerns among key global players such as the United States, the European Union, and Asia. Central to Russia's geopolitical strategy is its adept utilization of energy geopolitics as a tool of influence, particularly in the European economic domain. As the world's leading exporter of oil and gas, Russia maintains significant energy ties with various European nations, as well as countries like China, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, and India when considering coal exports. This energy leverage has positioned Russia as a dominant player in the global energy landscape, granting it substantial geopolitical clout. The strategic documents of both the United States and NATO in 2022 unequivocally identify Russia as a primary threat to Western security and advocate for concerted action against Russian encroachment. According to NATO's strategic assessment, Russia poses a grave danger to the security and stability of the Atlantic region, with ambitions to disrupt the Eastern, Southern, and Northern NATO member states. One of the important challenges that have been addressed in the national security strategy of the United States is the interference of Russia and other countries opposed to the United States in the internal affairs of this country. American Democrats believe that Russia and its supporters have interfered in the presidential elections of this country in favor of Trump. In this regard, numerous researches and reports have followed for 4 years until 2020. Finally, this issue became clear to the American Congress, and the fact was that through cyber intrusions and assistance to WikiLeaks and various social networks, the Russians were able to have a negative effect. A part of the American national security strategy that is dedicated to supporting Ukraine in the war and after the warm issues such as aid in the continuation of the war, aid in post-war reconstruction, and cooperation with Ukraine to join the European Union are among them. The US National Security Strategy document puts: while some aspects of our approach will depend on the trajectory of the war in Ukraine, a number of elements are already known. First, the United States will continue to support Ukraine in its struggle for freedom, we will help Ukraine to recover economically, and we will encourage its regional integration with the EU.
Conclusions
The American National Security Strategy document presents Russia as an important geopolitical threat that is engaged in the geopolitical challenge, competition, and conflict with the Western bloc led by the United States and seeks to disrupt the international order and rules based on the realization of its geopolitical interests. According to different geopolitics experts, specialists in international relations, and regional studies, Russia's geopolitical behavior in Europe, Eurasia, Central Asia, the Caucasus, and in many geopolitical regions of the world depends on how the Russia’s war in Ukraine ends. This war and its end can shape the structure of the global and regional geopolitical system for coming decades and bring the geopolitical competition of the transitioning world closer to relative geopolitical stability. In this document, America's deep concern about Russia's geopolitical behavior in geostrategic territories and geopolitical regions of the world, especially in Europe and Eurasia, is evident. “The geopolitical imperative to reduce our collective dependence on countries like Russia that seek to use energy to threaten and coerce is intensifying,” this document states. The document argues that America and its allies have experienced a global energy crisis caused by the politicization of oil and gas resources controlled by Russia, which has been exacerbated by OPEC. In this strategic document, Russia is considered an immediate and continuous threat and challenge to the regional security order in Europe and is a source of disruption and instability in the geopolitics of the world system. The US national security strategy document and NATO Strategic document and the US defense security document which were written in 2022, Russia is considered a serious threat, challenge, and competitor for the Western bloc and the need to fight against Russia is inevitable.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Abdi, M; and et al (2020). Explanation of geopolitical components affecting the formation of strategic relations. Geopolitics Quarterly, 16th year, First Issue, Spring.
  2. Agnew, J (1998). Geopolitics. Encyclopedia, Encarta, C.D.
  3. Agnew, J (2004). Geopolitics: Re-Visioning World Politics, London: Routledge.
  4. Analyzing US National Security strategies regarding Russia's geopolitical behavior during Joe Biden's era (2020-2024).
  5. Avenue, A (2022). Foreign Affairs Institute. N0 4.
  6. Ayres, A (2019). The US Indo-Pacific Strategy Needs More Indian Ocean. Council on Foreign Relations.
  7. Biden, J (2021). Interim National Security Strategic United States of America Guidance, The White House.
  8. Blackwell, M (2006). Political Geography, Routledge Press.
  9. Bloomberg (2023). War in Ukraine.
  10. Bluet Brian (2001). Geopolitics and Globalization in the Twentieth Century, London: Reaction Books.
  11. Brzezinski, Z (2003). "living with China," The national interest.- https://www.bp. com
  12. Chen, T; Nance, A; Sumner, H. (2022). Water wars: AUKUS goes hypersonic https://www.lawfareblog.com/water-wars-aukus-goes-hypersonic.
  13. Claps, K (2006). Man, The State and War. New York: Columbia University Press.
  14. Climate Temps. Com 2019.
  15. Cohen S.B (2014). Geopolitics in new world Era, USA: west view press.
  16. Cohen S.B (2015). Geopolitics: The Geography of International Relations. 3ir ed. Publishers: Rowman & Littlefield.
  17. Cohen, S.B (2003). Geopolitics of the world System. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  18. Cohen, S.B (2003). Geopolitics of the World System, translator: Abbas Kardan, Tehran: Abrar Moaaser. [In Persian]
  19. Cowie, A.P (1989). Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary. UK, oxford University press.
  20. Dalby, S; Ó Tuathail, G; Routledge, P. (1998). The Geopolitics Reader. London: Routledge
  21. Dehghani Firouzabadi, S.J (2017). Theories of International Relations, Tehran: Samt Publications, Volume 1. [In Persian]
  22. Dibbam, P (2022). The Geopolitical Impaction of Russia Sinuation of Ukraine , Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
  23. Dodds, C (2000). Geopolitical Traditions, A century of Geopolitical thought, Routledge Publication.
  24. Dodds, K (2000). Geopolitics in a Changing World, England, Person Education Limited.
  25. Farringdon, H (1989). Strategic Geography. London, Rutledge.
  26. Flint, C (2016). An Introduction to Geopolitics, translators: ghalibaf, Mohammad Bagher and Pour Mousavi, Seyed Moussa, Tehran: Qomes Publications. [In Persian]
  27. Freidman, M (1982). Capitalism and Freedom, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
  28. Friedman, G; Shapiro, J.L. (2017). The Geopolitics of 2017 in 4 Map.
  29. Gray, C.S (1977). The Geopolitics of the Nuclear Era. New York, Russak & Company. Inc.
  30. Hafeznia, M.R (2017). Principles and Concepts of Geopolitics, Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications. [In Persian]
  31. Hafeznia, M.R (2022). The future scenarios of the world in the light of Haran Ukraine. Geopolitics Quarterly, 18th year, number 1, February 1.
  32. Hagget, P (1983). Geography: A Modern Syntheses. New York: Publisher: HarperCollins College Div.
  33. Haggett, P (2001). Geography: A Global Synthesis. Publisher: Prentice Hall.
  34. Hogget, P (2012). New Hybrid Geography, translator: Shapour Gudarzinejad, Tehran: Samet Publications. [In Persian]
  35. Hollis, M; Steve, S (1991). Explaining and Understanding International Relations (Clarendon Paperbacks) 1st Edition, Clarendon Press.
  36. Https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room
  37. Ikenberry, J (2008). "The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive?" Foreland Affairs, January/February 2008
  38. Kabir Research Institute. [In Persian]
  39. Kaplan, R.D (2012). The Revenge of Geography: What the Map Tells Us About Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate. Published: Random House, Inc.
  40. Kaplan, R.D (2014). The coming Anarchy Book, ResearchGate.
  41. Karami, J (2021). Leviathan security strategy: reflection of the geopolitical environment in Russian governance thought. Geopolitics Quarterly, 18th year, Number 3, Autumn.
  42. Kardan, A (2011). Soft War, Democratization of the United States of America and the theory of cultural imperialism, Culture Strategy Quarterly, Winter Edition. [In Persian]
  43. Kellner, P (2021). Beyond” Indo-Pacific”: Understanding Small Pacific Powers on Their Own Terms.
  44. Kemp, G; Harkavy, R (1997). Strategic Geography and the Changing, Publisher: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Middle East.
  45. Kessinger, H.A (2016). China, translator: Hossein Rasi, Tehran: Negah Moaaser Publications. [In Persian]
  46. Kissinger, H.A (2007). Says China's rise could lead to conflict Japan today.com (2007/03/23) – Ikenberry.
  47. Kissinger, H.A (2022). It’s time for a negotiated peace in Ukraine, Kissinger says, EUROPE POLITICS. PUBLISHED SUN, DEC 18, 2022.
  48. Kissinger, H.A (2022). Leadership: Six Studies in World Strategy, Publisher Penguin Audio.
  49. Kumar Shahi, D (2022). War in Ukraine A Geopolitical Analysis Research Gate.
  50. Lacoste, Y (2012). From Geopolitics to Vision, translated by Siros Sahami, Tehran: Amir
  51. Mearsheimer, J.J (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. London: W.W.W. Norton & Company.
  52. Mearsheimer, J.J (2006). China's Unpeaceful Rise. Current History, Vol. 105, No. 690.
  53. Mearsheimer, J.J (2021). The Inevitable Rivalry America, China, and the Tragedy of Great-Power Politics, Foreign Affairs, November/December.
  54. Merriam Webster Dictionary (2022). Springfield, Massachusetts, United.
  55. Mojtahedzadeh, P (2012). Geopolitical philosophy and function, Tehran: Samit Publications. [In Persian]
  56. Moshirzadeh, H (2016). Evolution in theories of international relations, Tehran, Samt Publications. [In Persian]
  57. Mossalanejad, A (2023) Geopolitical Power Balancing in Biden’s Strategic Policy Making. Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume: 18, No 4, Winter.
  58. Muir, R (2000). A new approach to political geography, Tehran: Publications of the Armed Forces Geographical Organization. [In Persian]
  59. National Defense Strategy (2022). United States Department of Defense, CSIS.
  60. National Security Strategy Russia. (2021). Institute Montaigne.
  61. NATO (2022). Strategic Concept, Adopted Head of State and Government Submit in Madrid, 29 June 2022.
  62. NNS (National Security Strategy of the United States of America) (1991). 27.
  63. NNS (National Security Strategy of the United States of America) (1993). 28.
  64. NNS (National Security Strategy of the United States of America) (1996). 29.
  65. NNS (National Security Strategy of the United States of America) (1997). 30.
  66. NNS (National Security Strategy of the United States of America) (2006). 31.
  67. NNS (National Security Strategy of the United States of America) (2010). 32.
  68. NNS (National Security Strategy of the United States of America) (2015). 33.
  69. NNS (National Security Strategy of the United States of America) (2017). 34.
  70. NNS (National Security Strategy of the United States of America) (2022). 23.
  71. Office of Political Studies of the Islamic Council (2019). Changing the position of West Asia in the American strategic documents and its consequences on Iran's national security. Bureau of Political Studies, serial number: 16478. [In Persian]
  72. Pacione, M (1985). Progress in Political Geography, Australia, Croom Helm.
  73. Petsinger, M (2016). Geoeconomics Fellow in the US and Americas Programmed at Chatham House
  74. Prescott, J.R.V (1978). The geography of frontiers and boundaries. New Jersey. Pub:President Trump Donald and International Relations', Stiftung Disenchant und Politic (SWP).
  75. Ratten, V (2022). The Ukraine Russia conflict Geopolitical and Intractional, Thunder Brid- Wily.
  76. Richardson, L.F (1960). Statistics of Deadly Quarrels. Boxwood Press, Pittsburgh Pa.; Quadrangle Books, Chicago cagou, Ill Science 30 December 1960: Vol. 132 No. 3444 pp. 1931-1932 DOI: 10.1126/science.132.3444.1931-a.
  77. Sariolqhalam, M (2022). What is Russia's role in America's alternative plan instead of the JCPOA, Jamaran Information and News Database. Date 10/27/2022. [In Persian]
  78. Sariolqhalam, M (2023). The Country's Future Depends on Financial Resources and Wealth Production. Jamaran Information and News Base, 4/3/2023. [In Persian]
  79. Strategic Studies Think Tank (2017). National Security Strategy of the United States of America. [In Persian]
  80. Strategy, Atlantic Monthly (2017). Strategy Security National Formulating, (M, Dalton., & J, Schaus., M, Cancian-. (CSIS (Studies International and Strategic for Center. Choices at Available”, Step First, Small If, Good a Is Guidance Security, 18 November; Available athttps://www.swpberlin.org/en/point-of-view/ president -trump- 289, No. 1 and Experience Past:
  81. Taylor, P (1994). Political Geography, Longman Scientific and Technical: U.K.
  82. Taylor, P; Francis (1995). Political Geography and Geopolitics, London Press.
  83. Times, H (2022). In its new Indo-Pacific strategy, US Commits to supporting India’s Rise. February 13. https://cset.georgetown.edu/article/in-its-new-indo-pacificstrategy-us-commits-to-supporting-indias.
  84. Trump, D (2017). Strategy Hinges on Russia”, The Foreign Policy Magazine, August 8. 38. Perthes, Volker at: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-saudi-asiachinaidUSKBN16N0G9 37. Rough.
  85. UN Documents for Iran Security Council Resolution 1737 (2006).
  86. UN Documents for Iran Security Council Resolution 1747 (2007).
  87. UN Documents for Iran Security Council Resolution 1803 (2008).
  88. UN Documents for Iran Security Council Resolution 1929 (2010).
  89. UN Documents for Iran United Nations Security Council Sanctions (2006-2010).
  90. Vasegh, M; and et al (2017). Epistemological explanation of the concept of geopolitics, Political Geography Research Quarterly, No. 10. [In Persian]
  91. Walt, S.M (2023). Foreign Affairs, FEBRUARY 13, 2023, what the war in Ukraine has revealed about alliances. Professor of International Affairs at the Harvard Kennedy School.
  92. Walt, S.M (2023). Looking Ahead to 2023 Looking Back. January 4, A Columnist at Foreign Policy and International Relations in Harvard University.
  93. Westphal, K (2013). Unconventional Oil and Gas-Global Consequences.
  94. Zakaria, F (2023). War in Ukraine. GPS takes a comprehensive look at foreign affairs and global policies through in-depth, one-on-one interviews, May 7, 2023, Mar 5, 2023.
  95. Zarei, B (2022). A Novel at Iran's Development, Tehran: Tehran University Press.
  96. Zarei, B (2022). Geopolitical Challenges and National Development of Russia, Majles and Strategy Quarterly, No. 24. [In Persian]
Volume 20, Issue 3
Summer 2024
Pages 58-97

  • Receive Date 14 August 2023
  • Revise Date 02 March 2024
  • Accept Date 14 March 2024