Geopolitics Quarterly

Geopolitics Quarterly

Development of a Framework for Assessing the Potential of Attracting International Freight from Transportation Corridors with a Focus on Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 M.Sc. of Transportation Engineering, Department of Transportation Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor Department of Transportation Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
3 Associate Professor of Transportation Engineering, Department of Transportation Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Iran’s strategic geographical position provides a significant transit advantage, positioning it as a crucial crossing point for multiple international corridors. This location offers substantial opportunities for Iran to generate foreign exchange income and stimulate economic growth. To fully capitalize on this potential, an in-depth examination of trade corridors is essential. This research investigates the potential of international freight and cargo transit through Iran by developing a corridor attractiveness measurement model. The study compares transport corridors passing through Iran with competing corridors for ten commodity groups across 112 origin-destination pairs. Additionally, scenarios are developed to assess how improvements in model criteria can enhance the attractiveness of these corridors. 
Methodology
This study identifies key criteria influencing transit corridor attractiveness, including cost, transit time, reliability, security, CO₂ emissions, the logistics performance index (LPI), and the globalization index. Based on these criteria, a corridor attractiveness model evaluates the appeal of routes between 112 origin-destination pairs for ten categories of goods. The model also examines the impact of parameter improvements through scenario development. 
Findings
The findings are organized into several key insights: 

Main Competitor of the North-South Transport Corridor

The North-South transport corridor faces strong competition from sea routes for cargo transit from India to Europe. A significant disadvantage of Iran’s route compared to sea routes lies in the quality and time required for border crossings. The Iran route increases transit costs by 50% and time by 20% compared to the sea route for connecting India to Eastern Europe.

Impact of Logistics Performance Index (LPI) Improvement

Improving the logistics performance index (LPI) has a more pronounced impact on transport corridors connecting neighboring countries than on other corridors. Iran's logistics performance is higher than some neighboring countries, providing a competitive advantage.

Importance of Economic Factors

Economic factors, particularly time and cost, are the most critical criteria across all product groups. Route attractiveness varies based on the sender's preferences and the type of goods being transported—some prioritize lower shipping rates, while others require faster delivery times. 
 

Effect of Economic Globalization Index Improvement

Enhancing the economic globalization index has a greater impact on regional connections than on broader international trade routes. However, its effect on time-sensitive goods is minimal, indicating limited influence on trade involving goods requiring faster transit. 

Increase in Railway Utilization

Expanding railway use positively impacts safety, reliability, cost, and CO₂ emissions across corridors. Improved security, reliability, and railway costs benefit the shipper, while reduced carbon emissions offer social advantages. 
Analysis
The research underscores that experts in transit and transportation identify border processing costs and time as the primary areas for improvement on routes passing through Iran. Weight analysis reveals that economic factors like time and cost are vital across all product groups. Route attractiveness shifts based on the shipper's preferences and the type of goods. Enhancing each criterion significantly improves the attractiveness of routes through Iran, particularly for connecting regional countries. 
Conclusion
The study concludes that the primary challenges for routes passing through Iran are the costs and time associated with border crossings. However, enhancing the attractiveness criteria can significantly increase the appeal of these routes, especially for time-sensitive goods. Simultaneous improvements across all criteria could boost corridor attractiveness by 5–9%, representing a notable enhancement.
Keywords

  1. Akabari, M; Ghazi, H; Ghaffarlou, A. (2022). Investigation of Rail Transit in Promoting the Geopolitical Status of Chabahar Port. Geopolitics Quarterly, 18(67), 70-100. [In Persian]
  2. Banomyong, R; Beresford, A. (2000). Multimodal Transport Corridors in South East Asia: a Case Study Approach. University of Wales Cardiff, Wales.
  3. Bennett, M.M. (2016). The Silk Road Goes North: Russia’s Role Within China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Area Development and Policy, 1(3), 341-351.
  4. Beresford, A.K; Dubey, R. (1990). Handbook on the Management and Operation of Dry Ports. UNCTAD.
  5. Boroujeni, K. (2014). Transit, the Lost Ring in the Economy of Iran (Studying the Transit Preformance between 1389-1394). The 10th Conference of Pioneers of Progression. [In Persian]
  6. Ghalibaf, M.B; and et.al. (2014). The Geopolitical explanation of Iran's foreign policy in the Persian Gulf Region Regarding fossil Energies,Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol.10, No.3, Fall, PP.56-75. [In Persian]
  7. Ghanbari, L. (2018). Geo-economics, energy security and energy diplomacy, First edition, Tehran, Ava book Publications. [In Persian]
  8. Casarini, N. (2016). When All Roads Lead to Beijing. Assessing China’s New Silk Road and Its Implications for Europe. The International Spectator, 51(4), 95-108.
  9. Chan, H.K; Yee, R.W; Dai, J; Lim, M.K. (2016). The Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism on Green Product Innovation and Performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 384-391.
  10. Zhang, Z; and et al (2020). Multicriteria intermodal freight network optimal problem with heterogeneous preferences under belt and road initiative. Sustainability, 2020. 12(24): p. 10265.
  11. Chen, D; Yang, Z. (2018). Systematic Optimization of Port Clusters Along the Maritime Silk Road in the Context of Industry Transfer and Production Capacity Constraints. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 109, 174-189..
  12. Chung, S.H; Ma, H.L; Chan, H.K. (2018). Maximizing Recyclability and Reuse of Tertiary Packaging in Production and Distribution Network. Resources. Conservation and Recycling, 128, 259-266.
  13. ESCAP, U. (2006). Integrated International Transport and Logistics System for North-East Asia.
  14. Guo, F.F; Huang, C.F; Wu, X.L (2019). Strategic Analysis on the Construction of New Energy Corridor China–Pakistan–Iran–Turkey. Energy Reports, 5, 828-841.
  15. https://data.worldbank.org. (2010). https://data.worldbank.org.
  16. https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html.
  17. Jiang, Y; Qiao, G; Lu, J. (2020). Impacts of the New International Land–sea Trade Corridor on the Freight Transport Structure in China, Central Asia, the ASEAN Countries and the EU. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 35, 100419.
  18. Kim, H.C; Nicholson, A; Kusumastuti, D. (2017). Analysing Freight Shippers’ Mode Choice Preference Heterogeneity Using Latent Class Modelling. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 1109-1125.
  19. Kunaka, C; Carruthers, R. (2014). Trade and Transport Corridor Management Toolkit. World Bank Publications.
  20. Kundu, T; Sheu, J.B. (2019). Analyzing the Effect of Government Subsidy on Shippers’ Mode Switching Behavior in the Belt and Road Strategic Context. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 129, 175-202.
  21. Ma, Y; Johnson, D; Wang, J.Y; Shi, X. (2021). Competition for Rail Transport Services in Duopoly Market: Case Study of China Railway (CR) Express in Chengdu and Chongqing. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 38, 100529.
  22. Meirambekov, M; Abdkhodaei, M. (2022). Kazakhstan and the China's Silk Road Economic Belt Initiative (SREB); Opportunities and Challenges. Geopolitics Quarterly, 18(67), 199-227. [In Persian]
  23. Min, H; Ko, H.J; Lim, C.S. (2009). Designing the Global Inland Transportation Network. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 5(5), 457-472.
  24. Nasirpour, G. (2019). Iran-India Relations with Future Prospects. Geopolitics Quarterly, 14(52), 165-187. [In Persian]
  25. Noruzizadeh, F; Goodarzi, M; Masoudnia, H. (2022). Geopolitical and Geo-economical Role of Persian Gulf Energy (Oil & Gas) Transit in Implementing Islamic Republic of Iran's Regional Policy. Geopolitics Quarterly, 18(67), 228-255. [In Persian]
  26. Rajkovic, R; Zrnic, N; Stakic, D. (2016). Application of Mathematical Model for Container Transport Flow of Goods: From Far East to Serbia. Tehnički vjesnik, 23(6), 1739-1746.
  27. Reis, V. (2014). Analysis of Mode Choice Variables in Short-distance Intermodal Freight Transport Using an Agent-based Model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 61, 100-120.
  28. Rodrigue, J.P. (2020). The Geography of Transport Systems. Routledge.
  29. Shirazi, H; Azarbaiejani, K; Sameti, M. (2016). Study of Iran's Position in the World Trade: A Network Approach. Economic Research, 4(4), 881-902. [In Persian]
  30. Valigholizadeh, A. (2015). Expounding South Caucasus Geo-economic Importance in the Economic Promotion of Aras Free Zone. Geopolitics Quarterly, 11(37), 135-156. [In Persian]
  31. Veisi, H. (2017). Investigation of the Geopolitical and Geo-economic Competitions of Pakistan and Iran to Create South-North Corridor of Eurasia: Preferences and Threats. Geopolitics Quarterly, 13(45), 101-124. [In Persian]
  32. Wang, Y; Yeo, G.T. (2018). Intermodal Route Selection for Cargo Transportation from Korea to Central Asia by Adopting Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy ELECTRE I Methods. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(1), 3-18.
  33. Kaewfak, K; Ammarapala, V; Huynh, V.N (2021). Multi-objective optimization of freight route choices in multimodal transportation. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2021. 14(1): p. 794-807.
  34. Yang, D; Jiang, L; Ng, A.K (2018). One Belt One Road, but Several Routes: A Case Study of New Emerging Trade Corridors Connecting the Far East to Europe. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117, 190-204.
  35. Yang, X; Low, J.M; Tang, L. C. (2011). Analysis of Intermodal Freight from China to Indian Ocean: A Goal Programming Approach. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 515-527.
  36. Yang, Z; Sun, Y; Lee, P.T.W. (2020). Impact of the Development of the China-Europe Railway Express–A Case on the Chongqing International Logistics Center. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 136, 244-261.
  37. Zeng, Q; Lu, T; Lin, K.C; Yuen, K.F; Li, K.X. (2020). The Competitiveness of Arctic Shipping over Suez Canal and China-Europe Railway, Transport Policy, 86, 34-43.
Volume 21, Issue 1
Spring 2025
Pages 244-270

  • Receive Date 17 August 2024
  • Revise Date 08 November 2024
  • Accept Date 13 November 2024