Geopolitics Quarterly

Geopolitics Quarterly

Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) as Geopolitical Strategy

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Muhammad Aiman Farhan Bin Mohd Fadzili 1
Hafiz Hafizi Bin Norependi 2
Adliesyamil Yasin Bin Azman 3
Wong Yuki 3
Muhamad Sayuti Hassan 4
Fatima Abdel Rahim Ali 5
1 Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia.
2 Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia
3 - Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
4 Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
5 Al-Mustaqbal University, Iraq
10.22034/igq.2024.476068.1946
Abstract
The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is a ground-breaking free trade agreement that encompasses fifteen Asia-Pacific nations, including significant economies such as China, Japan, South Korea, and Australia. The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), which was signed in 2020, is one of the most significant free trade agreements in the world. It is comprised of 15 nations, including the ASEAN countries. The primary objective of the paper is to investigate the RCEP as a geopolitical strategy, examining its formation and significance, as well as elucidate on the issues and challenges associated with its implementation in order to effectively promote global trade and regional stability. This article also examines the strategic benefits that are crucial to RCEP member’s interests and the motivations that underlie their participation. The paper employs a doctrinal legal approach to analyse the strategic significance, implications, and formulation of the RCEP. The results indicate that the RCEP substantially improves regional economic integration, reduces economic dependencies, and decreases susceptibility to external trade conflicts. China’s leadership in RCEP, which establishes it as a central participant in regional trade and counters Western influence, supports the Belt and Road Initiative. The agreement enhances intra-regional trade, reduces Western leverage, and cultivates a collaborative framework that transforms the geopolitical landscape of the Asia-Pacific region.
Keywords
Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)
Geopolitical Dynamics
Economic Integration
Counterbalance
Trade

Subjects

  1. Acharya, A. (2012). Foundations of Collective Action in Asia: Theory and practice of regional cooperation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/2139/ssrn.2005473.
  2. Acharya, A. (2021). India’s absence from RCEP: Implications and opportunities. Institute of South Asian Studies.
  3. Ahmadian, H; Mohseni, S. (2024). Geopolitical Feasibility of the Second Wave of Arab Revolutions in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume: 19, No 4, Winter (2024). pp 67-92. https://doi.org/10.22034/igq.2023.144304.
  4. Akbari, H. (2023). Geopolitical Challenges in the Formation of Nations in Central Asia and the Caucasus; A Comparative Study. Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume: 19, No 2, Summer 2023. pp. 156-193. https://doi.org/1001. 1.17354331.1402.19.70.8.1.
  5. Akhbari, M; Mohsen, C.R; Aboozar, M.A. (2011). Regional Cooperation Model in the Horizon of Outlook Plan. Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume: 7, No. 4 Winter 2011.
  6. Al Jazeera. (2020). RCEP: Asia-Pacific nations sign world’s biggest trade pact. https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2020/11/15/rcep-15-asia-pacific-nations-set-worlds-biggest-trade-pact.
  7. Althabhawi, N. M; Wei Zhe, C; Zainal Abidin, N. S. B; Al Imari, M. H. O. (2023). Personal Media Restrictions on Freedom of Speech: A Social Contract Theory Behind It. Geopolitics Quarterly, 19 (Special Issue), pp. 119–144.
  8. Althabhawi, N. M; Zainol, Z. A; Bagherib, P. (2022). Society 5.0: A new challenge to legal norms. Sriwijaya Law Review, 6(1), 41-54.
  9. Ardakani, A.E. (2024). A Critical Geopolitical Analysis of the Representation of Africa in International Relations: Andrew Linklater’s Approach. Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume: 20, No 2, Summer 2024. pp. 231-254. https://doi.org/10.22034/igq.2024.183277.
  10. Armstrong, S. and P. Drysdale (2022). 'The Implications of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership for Asian Regional Architecture', in Kimura, F., S. Thangavelu, and D. Narjoko (eds.), RCEP: Implications, Challenges, and Future Growth of East Asia and ASEAN. Jakarta: ERIA, pp.247-267.
  11. ASEAN (2020). Summary of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ summary -of-the-RCEP-Agreement.pdf.
  12. Azmi, R; Azmy, A. S; Zamre, M. Z. M; Al-Dulaimi, A.H.A. (2023). Veto power: a legal debate in the United Nations Security Council. https://journal.iag.ir/article_175316.html?lang=en.
  13. Banh, T.H; Xu, N; Tan, F. (2024). Evaluating Tariff Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of RCEP and Pre-Existing Preferential Trade Agreements in ASEAN, Research Paper #13- 2024, Asia Competitiveness Institute Research Paper Series.
  14. Bank, A.D. (2022). The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement a new paradigm in Asian Regional Cooperation. Asian Development Bank Institute.
  15. Bartelson, J; Scholte, J.A. (2002). Globalization: a Critical Introduction. Contemporary Sociology a Journal of Reviews, 31(5), 586. https://doi.org/2307/3090066.
  16. Bayat, M. (2009). The geopolitical role of Caucasus in specifying the identity boundaries, the Journal of Geopolitics, fifth year, No. 1, spring and summer.
  17. Bown, C. P. (2020). The 2018 US-China Trade Conflict after Forty Years of Special Protection. Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  18. Cao, H; Gao, J; Wang, W; Zhao, X. (2023). The construction of international trade dispute settlement mechanism in the context of RCEP and China’s positioning. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 6(1), 844–852. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/6/20220825.
  19. Capannelli, G. (2021). The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP): Challenges and opportunities for East Asia. Asian Development Bank Institute.
  20. Capie, D; Narine, S. (2003). Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism in Southeast Asia. International Journal Canada S Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 58(3), 472. https://doi.org/10.2307/40203877.
  21. Dazulhisham, R. S. S. B; Jelani, N. R. B; Kamaruddin, H; Jasim, M.A.N. (2023). Balancing free market value and social justice in employment contract. https://journal.iag.ir/article_175319.html?lang=en.
  22. Entin, M.L; Entina, E.G; Galushko, D.V. (2022). The Platform Economy: Designing a Supranational Legal Framework.
  23. Flach, L; Hildenbrand, H; Teti, F. (2021). The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement and Its Expected Effects on World Trade. Volume 56, 2021, Number 2. pp. 92–98. https://www.intereconomics.eu/ contents/year/2021/number/2/article/the-regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership-agreement-and-its-expected-effects-on-world-trade.html.
  24. Francois, J; Elsig, M. (2021). Short Overview of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), European Parliament, Directorate-General for External Relations Policy Department. Briefing. Retrieved at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/ 653625/EXPO_BRI(2021)653625_EN.pdf.
  25. Hamanaka, S. (2014). Trans-Pacific Partnership versus Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Control of Membership and Agenda Setting, ADB Working Papers on Regional. Econ. Integration, 146.
  26. Herzer, D; D, F. N. (2006). What does export diversification do for growth? An econometric analysis. Applied Economics, 38(15), 1825–1838. https://doi.org/1080/00036840500426983.
  27. Islam, R. (2021). The geopolitical impact of RCEP- another feather to the Chinese crown? Afronomicslaw.org. https://www.afronomicslaw.org/ category/ analysis/geopolitical-impact-rcep-another-feather-chinese-crown.
  28. Khan, H. U; Ali, S. (2022). The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP): An analysis of its potential benefits for China. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 6(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/47264/idea.lassij/6.2.10.
  29. Kimura, F; Thangavelu, S; Narjoko, D (2022). RCEP and East Asian Regional Integration. In Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Implications, Challenges, and Future Growth of East Asia and ASEAN. https://www.eria.org/ uploads/media/Books/2022-RCEP-Book1/RCEP-Implications-Challenges-Future-Growth.pdf.
  30. Kuo, M.A. (2020). RCEP: The Future of Trade in Asia. The Diplomat. Retrieved June 25, 2024, from https://thediplomat.com/2020/12/rcep-the-future-of-trade-in-asia/.
  31. Lee, J. (2020). RCEP: A geopolitical and economic analysis. Council on Foreign Relations.
  32. Lin, J.Y. (2011). From Flying Geese to Leading Dragons: New Opportunities and Strategies for Structural Transformation in Developing Countries. Global Policy, 2(3), 329–341.
  33. Mohamad, J; Cheng, C. (2020). The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP): What this means for ASEAN and Malaysia. https:// isis.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/RCEP-POLICY-BRIEF-REV -3.pdf.
  34. Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  35. Najafzadeh, R; Talebian, A. (2024). The Right to War and Katechon in the Geopolitics of Crisis. Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume: 20, No 2, Summer 2024. pp. 86-113. https://doi.org/10.22034/igq.2024.175761.
  36. Omidi, A. (2006). The effect of geopolitics on the facilitation of ECO convergence and pride of ASEAN, The Journal of Geopolitics, Second Year, No.1, spring.
  37. Panda, R. (2020). Is the RCEP China’s gain and India’s loss? The Jamestown Foundation. https://jamestown.org/program/is-the-rcep-chinas-gain-and-indias-loss./
  38. Park, D. (2011). The Global Financial Crisis: Economic Impact and Recovery in the East Asia and Pacific Region. Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series, No. 253.
  39. Park, J. (2023). Rethinking Geopolitics: Geography as an Aid to Statecraft (Fall 2023). https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/items/b1ea311d-41d6-4e53-af83-d9f01a19c39c.
  40. Petri, P.A; Plummer, M.G. (2020). RCEP: A new trade agreement that will shape global economics and politics. Brookings Institution.
  41. Pomfret, R. (2021). "Regionalism and the Global Trading System" World Economy. 44 (9): 2496–2514.
  42. Razzaq, A. (2023). Regional Trade Deal with China for a New Digital Economy. Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, 132.
  43. Shoeibi, M; Ahmadipour, Z; Hafeznia, M.R; Ghourchi, M. (2023). Critical Attitude to the Function of Capital in the Urban Space of a Geopolitical Aspect. Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume: 19, No 2, Summer 2023. pp. 22-40. DOR: 20.1001.1.17354331.1402.19.70.2.5.
  44. Soltani Nejad, A (2006). The Effective Geopolitical Factors in the Establishment of Foreign Policy, the Geoolitics Journal, Second Year, No 2.
  45. Tan, W; Soong, J. J. (2021). The Political Economy of China’s Rising Role in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP): Strategies and Instruments of Chinese Way. The Chinese Economy, 55(4), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2021.1972547.
  46. Wei, K. (2024). The Impact of RCEP Tariff Concessions on Intra-Regional Trade: An Analysis of Trade Creation and Diversion. VOL. 31 (2024): 3rd International Conference on Finance, Investment and Business Analysis (FIBA 2024), Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 31, 145-155. https://doi.org/10.54097/9fpgy060.
  47. Wen, L.J (2022). The Role of China in the RCEP Agreement: To Lead or Counterbalance. Government and International Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University. Available online: https://libproject.hkbu.edu.hk/trsimage/hp/ 20214286.pdf.
  48. Wilson, J.D. (2020). Competing trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific: RCEP, CPTPP, and beyond. Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada.
  49. World Economic Forum. (2021). An expert explains: What is RCEP, the world’s biggest trade deal? https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/05/rcep-world-biggest-trade-deal/ (Accessed on 3 November 2024).
  50. Yu, P.K. (2019). The RCEP Negotiations and Asian Intellectual Property Norm Setters, London: Hart Publishing, 91–107.
Geopolitics Quarterly
Volume 20, Special Issue
Autumn 2024
Pages 1-22

  • Receive Date 26 September 2024
  • Revise Date 05 November 2024
  • Accept Date 02 December 2024