Geopolitics Quarterly

Geopolitics Quarterly

EU-Israel Relations in the International Order: From Normative Principles to Geopolitical Considerations (2009-2024)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Political Sciences, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Sciences, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
3 Ph D Candidate in Political Sciences, Department of Political Sciences, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract
Extended Abstract     
Introduction
EU-Israel relations are one of the most complex and yet important issues in EU foreign policy and international relations analysis. Since its establishment, the EU has tried to play an effective role in resolving the conflicts in the Middle East, especially the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. However, while the EU has officially supported the two-state solution and the rights of the Palestinians, its operational policies towards Israel have always faced numerous challenges. This contradiction between the EU's declarative and operational policies is particularly noticeable in the economic, military, and diplomatic fields. Despite the EU's normative positions, at the same time, its economic and security relations with Israel have strengthened in recent decades. This research examines the main question: "How have the structural requirements of the international system, geopolitical interests, and economic dependencies shaped EU policies towards Israel from 2009 to 2024 and led to a gap between its declarative and operational policies?" In this regard, the main hypothesis of the research is that despite the European Union's declared commitments to international law and the two-state solution, the structural pressures of the international system, economic and security interdependencies, and the influence of the United States have caused the Union to in practice strengthen Israel's strategic position and weaken its diplomatic role in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
 
Methodology
In this study, the descriptive-analytical research method has been chosen as a rigorous and systematic framework to provide the necessary context for an accurate and comprehensive representation of the processes, developments, and political and institutional transformations in the complex and multidimensional relations between the European Union and Israel in the period 2009-2024, while also enabling a deep and critical exploration of the structural and functional mechanisms of this relationship. The descriptive component of this method relies on the precise collection, organization, and classification of qualitative data extracted from numerous and diverse sources, such as official documents, policy statements, international reports, and strategic analyses. Through a systematic approach, it outlines key trends and events within a specified time frame. The analytical section, relying on the theory of neorealism and using critical analysis tools, examines the anarchic structure of the international system, the asymmetric distribution of power, and complex security and economic dependencies; In such a way that the determinants and inherent limitations on the independence of the EU's normative policies in the field of foreign policy are analyzed in detail and the challenges of the conflict between declarative principles and objective performance in the field of policy implementation are explained. This methodology, through the integration of theoretical arguments and documented evidence, enables the analysis of dynamic political and institutional processes. By explaining the causal relationships between structural and behavioral variables, it has a high ability to discover the behavioral patterns and strategic orientations of multilateral actors. In this way, the descriptive-analytical approach not only maintains descriptive accuracy and richness but also serves as a powerful analytical tool in explaining the systematic complexities of international relations, providing a coherent framework for extracting theoretical and practical insights in foreign policy studies.
 
Results and Discussion
In this study, EU-Israel relations are analyzed by focusing on two key dimensions: economic and security; on the one hand, the EU's increasing dependence on Israeli advanced technologies and defense exports, and the other hand, security overlaps in the face of common regional threats, have paved the way for the continuation and consolidation of bilateral relations. This article demonstrates that the structure of the international system, particularly the hegemonic role of the United States, has led the EU to prioritize its strategic interests over normative principles and support for the Palestinian issue in critical moments. As a result, the EU, while strengthening Israel's regional position, has, in practice, taken steps that create a conflict between its declared policies and its executive actions and has failed to play an effective role in the region's geopolitical balance.
The findings of this study emphasize that despite the EU's stated commitments to support Palestinian rights and the two-state solution, in practice, the EU's economic and security relations with Israel have been steadily strengthening. This contradiction between the EU's stated and implemented policies reflects the structural realities of the international system, in which actors are compelled to adopt policies that ultimately serve to preserve their power and security. In summary, this study emphasizes that to understand EU-Israel relations fully, attention must be paid to the complex and reciprocal economic, security, and political interactions between the two parties. These relations are constantly influenced, in particular, by the need to maintain the balance of power at both the global and regional levels. Future developments in this relationship necessitate a greater focus on structural changes in the international system and global politics.
 
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that, in practice, the European Union, under the structural pressures of the international system and its economic and security needs, particularly in the areas of defense and trade cooperation, cannot adopt completely independent policies based on normative principles. This reality is in contrast to the declared positions of the European Union, which emphasize the protection of human rights and the resolution of the Palestine-Israel conflict in a manner based on justice and international law. However, in practice, the European Union, due to its economic and security dependencies, has not only been unable to exert intense pressure on Israel in many cases but has also, at times, preferred its strategic interests over normative principles. Ultimately, this study demonstrates that EU-Israel relations, particularly in recent years, are a direct consequence of structural realities and international pressures. Geopolitical and security imperatives have shaped this relationship, and the European Union faces many limitations in adopting policies independent of Israel. In the current circumstances, especially with geopolitical changes and new threats in the region, the EU is in a difficult position to easily adopt policies based on normative and legal principles towards Israel. This situation may lead to a decrease in the EU's diplomatic influence in the Palestinian-Israeli crisis and, in the future, the EU becoming a more passive actor in Middle East politics.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Agnew, J. (2024). The language of intractability and the Gaza War: Conflating anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism is historically problematic and misses how much contemporary Israel has become a role model for ethno-nationalists worldwide. Human Geography, 17(2), 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786231220046.
  2. Ahmed, M; Abed, T; Hussain, K. (2022). Israeli-Palestinian struggle. International journal of health sciences. https://doi.org/10.53730/ ijhs. v6ns8.12928.
  3. Akgül-Açıkmeşe, S; Özel, S. (2024). EU Policy towards the Israel-Palestine Conflict: The Limitations of Mitigation Strategies. The International Spectator, 59(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2024.2309664
  4. Apor, P; Kende, T; Lônčíková, M; Săndulescu, V. (2019). Post-World War II anti-Semitic pogroms in East and East Central Europe: collective violence and popular culture. European Review of History: Revue Européenne d’histoire, 26(6), 913–927. https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2019. 1611744.
  5. Axinte, T.N; Bolborici, A.M. (2021). Overview on the Relations between European Union and the State of Israel. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov. Series VII: Social Sciences• Law, 47-54. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2021.14.63.1.5.
  6. Berenskötter, F; Mitrani, M. (2022). Is It Friendship? An Analysis of Contemporary German–Israeli Relations. International Studies Quarterly, 66(1), sqac001. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqac001.
  7. Bilmes, L. J; Hartung, W.D; Semler, S. (2024). United States spending on Israel’s military operations and related U.S. operations in the region, October 7, 2023 – September 30, 2024. Costs of War Project, Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs. Brown University. Retrieved from https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/papers/2024/united-states-spending-israel-s-military-operations-and-related-us-operations-region.
  8. Boer, C. (1983). The Polls: Attitudes Toward the Arab-Israeli Conflict. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1086/268773.
  9. Cavari, A. (2021). Trump, Israel, and the Shifting Pattern of Support for a Traditional Ally. In: Renshon, S.A., Suedfeld, P. (eds) The Trump Doctrine and the Emerging International System. The Evolving American Presidency. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45050-2_12
  10. Cohen-Almagor, R. (2021). Stockholm and the Israeli-Palestinian peace process: interview with State Secretary for Foreign Affairs Annika Söder. Israel Affairs, 27(4), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121. 2021. 1940562.
  11. De Olazábal, I. (2023). The European Union’s Policies in Historic Palestine: Two-Step Securitisation, Differentiation and Its Discontents. Middle East Critique, 32, 5 - 25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2023.2169979.
  12. Del Sarto, R.A. (2019). Stuck in the Logic of Oslo: Europe and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Middle East Journal, 73(3), 376-396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3751/73.3.12.
  13.  Edinger, H. (2022). Offensive ideas: structural realism, classical realism and Putin's war on Ukraine. International Affairs, 98(6), 1873-1893. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac217.
  14. Enserink, M. (2013). Research funding. Diplomatic flap threatens E.U.-Israeli research ties. Science, 341,828-829 https://DOI:10.1126/science.341. 6148.828.
  15. European Union. (2003). A secure Europe in a better world: European security strategy. European Council. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=LEGISSUM:r00004
  16. European Union. (2016). Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe. A global strategy for the EU’s foreign and security policy. European External Action Service. Retrieved from https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf
  17. Falah, G.W. (2021). The (Im)possibility of Achieving a Peaceful Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Human Geography, 14(3), 333-345. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786211019014.
  18. Fraser, R. (2022). British Trade Unions, the Labour Party, and Israel’s Histadrut. Springer Nature.
  19. Gianniou, M. (2016). Promoting Cohesion and Consistency in EU Foreign Policy: The European Parliament and the Israel-Palestine Conflict. Mediterranean Quarterly, 27, 61 - 80. https://doi.org/10.1215/10474552-3817321.
  20. Gordon, N; Pardo, S. (2015). The European Union and Israel's occupation: Using technical customs rules as instruments of foreign policy. The Middle East Journal, 69(1), 74-90.
  21. Hallward, M; Guidero, A. (2016). Decision-Making Meets Negotiation: The Palestinian Bid for un Recognition. International Negotiation, 21, 409-439. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-12341337.
  22. Harpaz, G. (2014). Approximation of Laws Under the European Neighbourhood Policy: The Challenges That Lie Ahead. European Foreign Affairs Review, 19(3), 429-452. https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2014033.
  23. Harpaz, G. (2017). The EU's New Approach To the Two-State Solution in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: A Paradigm Shift or PR Exercise?. Leiden Journal of International Law, 30, 603 - 628. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0922156517000218.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.341.6148.828.

  1. Juncos, A. E; Joseph, J. (2020). Resilient Peace: Exploring the Theory and Practice of Resilience in Peacebuilding Interventions. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 14(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17502977.2020.1745445.
  2. Kalhousová, I. (2019). Our Jews, our Israel! Origins of the foreign policy of Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary towards Israel (Doctoral dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science). http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/3954.
  3. Keukeleire, S; Delreux, T. (2022). The foreign policy of the European Union. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  4. Khan, K; Khurshid, A; Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2023). Investigating the relationship between geopolitical risks and economic security: Empirical evidence from central and Eastern European countries. Resources Policy, 85, 103872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103872.
  5. Koukakis, G. (2023). The 9th Trilateral Summit of Cyprus, Greece and Israel.
  6. Krell, G. (2024). Germany, Israel’s Security, and the Fight Against Anti-Semitism: Shadows from the Past and Current Tensions. Analyse & Kritik, 46(1), 141-164. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2024-2002.
  7. Kuhn, T. S. (1986). The Structure of Scienticc Revolutions.
  8. Lovatt, H; Toaldo, M. (2015). EU DIFFERENTIATION AND ISRAELI TTLEMENTS. European Council on Foreign Relations. http://www. jstor.org/stable/resrep21602.
  9. Makaradze, E; Makaradze, B. (2023). Foreign Policy Issues of the Republic of Turkey and the United States in the Period after the End of the Cold War until the 2020. Historia I Polityka, (46 (53), 121–147. https://doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2023.034.
  10. Malcontent, P. (2022). The Netherlands, the EU and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: Why The Hague Continues to be One of Israel’s Most Faithful European Allies. European Review of International Studies, 9(2), 270-299.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/21967415-09020005.
  11. Martins, B. O. (2016). Interpreting EU–Israel relations: a contextual analysis of the EU’s Special Privileged Partnership proposal. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(1), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09557571. 2015.1117921.
  12. Medina, B. (2020). Unintended consequences of prohibiting advocacy of hatred and regulating campaign finance: The weakening status of freedom of speech in Israel. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 18, 804-820. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa056.
  13. Meibauer, G. (2023). Neorealism, neoclassical realism and the problem (s) of history. International Relations, 37(2), 348-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 00471178211033943.
  14. Müller, P. (2012). The Europeanization of France’s foreign policy towards the Middle East conflict – from leadership to EU-accommodation. European Security, 22(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2012.698266.
  15. Munin, N. (2021). Israel's Trade Alliances Strategy: Enjoying the Best of All Worlds. International Journal of Law and Public Administration. 4(2), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijlpa.v4i2.5409.
  16. Munin, N; Sitbon, O. (2021). Between Normative Power and Soft Power: The Psagot Case. Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies, 13(1), 18-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30722/anzjes.vol13.iss1.15478.
  17. Nye, J.S. (1988). Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics, 40(2), 235–251. https://doi:10.2307/2010363.
  18. Olesker, R. (2022). Diasporas as Audiences of Securitization: Jewish American Diaspora and BDS. Israel Studies Review, 37(3), 1-27. Retrieved Nov 26, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.3167/isr.2022.370302.
  19. Oppenheim, B. (2020). Can Europe overcome its paralysis on Israel and Palestine?. CER policy brief.
  20. Oxford Analytica (2021). "E3-US relations will be crucial for JCPOA survival", Expert Briefings. https://doi.org/10.1108/OXAN-DB258803
  21. Pardo, S. (2015). Normative power Europe meets Israel: perceptions and realities. Lexington Books.
  22. Pardo, S; Peters, J. (2010). Uneasy Neighbors: Israel and the European Union. Lexington Books.
  23. Pardo, S; Zahavi, H. (2024). Israel and the European Union. In Routledge Handbook on Israel's Foreign Relations (pp. 278-289). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003048398.
  24. Press, U.N. (2012). General Assembly Votes Overwhelmingly to Accord Palestine ‘Non-Member Observer State’Status in United Nations.(27.03. 2019).
  25. Press, U.N. (2017). General Assembly Overwhelmingly Adopts Resolution Asking Nations Not to Locate Diplomatic Missions in Jerusalem.
  26. Reich, A. (2015). The European neighbourhood policy and Israel: Achievements and disappointments. Journal of World Trade, 49(4), 619-642. https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2015024.
  27. Reuters. (2016). Far-right Austrian leader visits Israel’s Holocaust memorial. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/world/ far-right-austrian-leader-visits-israels-holocaust-memorial-idUSKCN0X91 -UO.
  28. Risse, T. (2011). A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Cornell University Press. p. 245.
  29. Ryngaert, C. (2020). Indications of Settlement Provenance and the Duty of Non-recognition Under International Law., 4, 791-799.https://doi.org/10.15 166/2499-8249/342.
  30. Safdar, M. (2024). ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR IN GAZA: REARRAN- GEMENT OF REGIONAL POWERS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE MIDDLE EAST. Margalla Papers, 28(1), 161–179. https://doi.org/10 .54690/margallapapers.28.1.246.
  31. Sakran, S. (2017). The Creation of the Non-Member Observer State of Palestine: A Legal Analysis of Un General Assembly Resolution 67/19. , 9, 131-135. https://doi.org/10.37974/ALF.298.
  32. Salah, M. (2024). Corporate Responses to Private Regulatory Initiatives: The Case of the BDS Movement (Dissertation). Retrieved from https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-533358.
  33. Samoudi Pilehroud, A; Mahmoudi, M.S. (2024). Examining the European Union's pivotal normative approach towards Iran from 1993 to 2024. Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs, 15(1), Doi: 10.22034/ irfa.2025.495691.1269.
  34. Seidner M. (2023). The Role of the European Union in Palestinian State-Building. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 19 (5), 16. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2023.v19n5p16.
  35.  Sigmar Gabriel (2018). “Speech to 11th INSS Annual International Conference,” INSS, 31 January 2018, http://www.inss.org.il/sigmar-gabriel-german-foreign-minister/.
  36. Singh, K.R. (2024). Iran as a Regional Power: More Constraints Than Flexibility. Strategic Analysis, 48(3), 291–295. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/ 09700161.2024.2372754.
  37. Steele, P.E. (2019). Rediscovering the Dream: A Proposal for a “Pivot” in Polish–Israeli Relations. Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs, 13(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/23739770.2019.1638137.
  38. Telespazio. (2017). Optsat-3000 Earth observation satellite for Italy's Ministry of Defence is ready to be launched. Retrieved from https://www.telespazio.com.
  39. United Nations. (2024). Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People hears update on developments in Israel and State of Palestine. UN Press. Retrieved December 1, 2024, from https://press.un.org/en/2024/gapal1469.doc.htm.
  40. Veuthey, A. (2023). EU Foreign Policy via Sectoral Cooperation. In The European Union in International Affairs (pp. 123-202). Palgrave Macmillan.
  41. Voltolini, B. (2015). Non-state actors and framing processes in EU foreign policy: the case of EU–Israel relations. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(10), 1502–1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763. 2015. 1085429.
  42. Waltz, K.N. (1990). Realist thought and neorealist theory. Journal of International Affairs, 21-37.
  43. Waltz, K.N. (1979). Theory of international politics. United Kingdom: McGraw-Hill.
  44. Wayne, C; Damann, T.J; Fachter, S. (2023). The Holocaust, the Socialization of Victimhood and Outgroup Political Attitudes in Israel. Comparative Political Studies, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/001041 40231194068.
  45.  Yann Le Guernigou (2011). “Sarkozy Tells Obama Netanyahu Is A ‘liar’,” Reuters, November 8, 2011, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-netanyahu-sarkozy/sarkozy-tells-obama-netanyahu-is-a-liar-idUSTRE7A720120111108.
  46. Yitzhak, R. (2021). Introduction. Middle Eastern Studies, 57(3), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2021.1898387.
Volume 21, Issue 3
Summer 2025
Pages 204-239

  • Receive Date 19 April 2025
  • Revise Date 10 June 2025
  • Accept Date 11 June 2025