Investigating the Effective Factors on Political Organization and Management of the Space in the World States

Document Type : Original Article


1 Post-doc Student, Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University,Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran


Extended Abstract
Political organization of the space is the process of dividing and demarking of the territory corresponding with geographic, political, administrative, economic, security, social and cultural goals. The main goal of political organization of the space is optimal political management of space with optimal effectiveness and minimal damages. The most valuable section of political organization of the space is the state level which is called province, state, region and etc. Change in the different levels of political organization of the space is in the domain of the governments’ authority which occurs considering their policies, strategies, ideologies, security situations and natural and human potentials. At the first step, this article investigates the process of changes in the first level of political organization of the space in the world states during the period 1960-2020. “Whether these changes have the same pattern or not?” is the research question. At the second step, the paper investigates measurement and the effect of five factors including population, area, GDP, human development index and security in changes in first level of political organization of the space in 191 states of the world.
The research method is descriptive-analytic and data gathering procedure is based on library findings. In statistical section, EXCEL and SPSS will be used.
Result and Discussion
The results of the first sections show three different patterns in the number of provinces of states of the world including increase, decrease and without- change patterns. Periodical investigations of political organization of the space in states of the world show that the most changes in the political organization of the first level in the states of the world were occurred during 1990-2005. The results of the second section show different impacts of fivefold factor in the states. In a way that, the states with lowest changes or without changes in political organization of the space have been more successful in reaching their goals in political management of the space.
The main approach in this research is creation of civil divisions based on geography and territory, because civil political demarking with geographic, security, demographic and etc goals can bring insatiability, increase in the costs, overgrow of the government body and etc


  1. Ahmadipoor, Z; Ghanbari, Gh; Ameli, A (2008). The Analysis of effective ingredient on the preferment, levels of country’s divisions; Case study: Fars province, Tehran, Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume 5, Issue 14.[In Persian]
  2. Ahmadipoor, Z; Ghanbari, Gh; Karami, Gh (2014). The political Organization of Space, Tehran: National Geographical Organization Publication.[In Persian]
  3. Ahmadipoor, Z; Mirshekaran, Y; Bernard, H (2014). Political Organization of Space in Unitary Systems, Tehran, Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume 10, Issue 35, pp 176- 199.[In Persian]
  4. Alimohammadi, A; Ameli, A; Ghanbari, Gh (2008). Feasibility Study of Use of GIS in Determining Administrative-Political Central Units ase study: City of Karaj, Tehran: Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume 4, Issue 11.[In Persian]
  5. Akhbari, M; Yadollahi, M (2005). The decision - making process in division of khorasan province and Its political and social impact, Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 27- 55.[In Persian]
  6. Azami, H; Dabiri, A.A (2011). Analysis of space political divisions system in Iran, Tehran, Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume 7, Issue 22.[In Persian]
  7. Blacksell, M (2006). Political Geography, London and New York: Routledge.
  8. Hafeznia, M.D (2000), The Principles of Sociopolitical Studies; Vol 1, Qom: The Organization of Howza and Islamic Schools.[In Persian]
  9. Hafeznia, M.R; Kavianirad, M (2004). The New Approaches in Political Geography, Tehran: samt .[In Persian]
  10. Hafeznia, M.R; Kavandikateb, A (2017). Raison d'etre of Iran, Tehran: Samt.[In Persian]
  11. Hajdu, Z (1988). Reforms of Administrative Division in Hungary:
  23. Karimipour, Y (2002). An Introduction in Administrative Division of Iran, Vol 1, Tehran: Iranian Geographical Association.[In Persian]
  24. Latif, M. M (2017). Demand for New Provinces in Pakistan, Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Volume 5, No. 2, Pages 104 – 114.
  25. Law, G (1999). Administrative Subdivisions of Countries: A Comprehensive World Reference, 1900 through 1998, McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.
  26. Mirshekaran, Y (2009). Analyzing the impressive factors on the instability of the country division boundries after the islamic revolution, a thesis requirement for the degree of master of art on political geography, Department of Geography, Tarbiat Modares University.[In Persian]
  27. Muir, R (2000). Political Geography: A New Introduction, translated by Dorreh Mirheydar and Seyed Yahya Safavi, Tehran: National Geographical Organization Publication.[In Persian]
  28. Rennie Short, J (2003). An introduction to political geography, London and New York: Routledge.

Strong, S (1998). Distribution of Power in Federal Countries, edited by: D. Brown & Kincaid, McGill-Queens University press

Volume 17, Issue 62
June 2021
Pages 27-61
  • Receive Date: 08 February 2020
  • Revise Date: 16 April 2020
  • Accept Date: 07 June 2020
  • First Publish Date: 23 July 2021