China's Reaction to External Threats from the Perspective of Foreign Policy and International Politics Theories

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Associate Professor, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Yazd University,Yazd, Iran

Abstract

China’s increasing power as one of the most important revisionist powers has received different reactions from its neighbors and the dominant powers of the international system. In fact, China as a rising and revisionist power challenges the regional and hegemonic order. In such a situation, the deterrent actions exerted by the United States, as a hegemon of international system, seems to be natural. The present research is an attempt to study China’s reactions to foreign threats from the perspective of theories of International Politics and Foreign Policy Analysis. The paper enjoys a descriptive-analytical design with the application of the theory on the case. The data collection was made through the study of existing literature and virtual data. The findings of this study show that China's reaction to existing or potential threats can carry very different interpretations and analytical results from the perspective of different theoretical perspectives.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Alden, C. (2014). Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. Tehran: Mizan Press. [In Persian]
  2. Chen, J. (2009). The Practice of the Mean: China’s Soft Power Cultivation. In M. Li (Ed), Soft Power China’s Emerging Strategy in International Politics, pp. 83-101, New York: Lexington Books.
  3. “China’s Military Strategy” (2015). The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China, may 2015.
  4. Clark, S.; Hoque, S. (2012). Debating a Post-American World. London: Routledge.
  5. M. L. (1986). Foreign Policy Decision Making: The Influence of Cognition. Boulder: West view Press.
  6. R. (2010). Reintroduction to Foreign Policy Analysis. Tehran: Mokhatab. [In Persian]
  7. Derivera, J. (1968). The Psychological Dimension of Foreign Policy. Columbus: OH Meriil.
  8. George, A. (1994). “The Two Culture of Academia and Policy Making: Bridging the Gap”. Political Psychology, 15: 143-177.
  9. Gill, B. (2006). “Sources and Limits of Chinese Soft Power”. Survival, 48(2): 17–36.
  10. Groom, A. (2007). “Foreign Policy Analysis”, International Studies, 4(3): 195-215.
  11. Holsti, K. J. (1970). National Role Conceptions in the Study Foreign Policy. International Studies, 14 (3), 233-309.
  12. Hudson, V. (2005). “Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 1 (1): 1-30.
  13. Hudson, V. (2010). “The Analysis of Foreign Policy”, in Denmark. Robert. Reintroduction to Foreign Policy Analysis. Tehran: Mokhatab. [In Persian]
  14. Hudson, V.; Ch Vore. (1995). “Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow”, Mershon International Studies Review, 39(2): 209-238.
  15. Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  16. Kubalkova, V. (2001). Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. London: Routledge.
  17. Kurlantzick, J. (2007) Charm Offensive How China’s Soft Power Is Transforming the World. Cambridge University Press.
  18. Lanteigne, M. (2009). Chinese Foreign Policy: An Introduction, London and New York: Routledge.
  19. Lasswell, H. D. (1948). Power and Personality. New York: Norton.
  20. Layne, C. (1993). The Unipolar illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise? International Security, 17 (4): 5-51.
  21. Li, Cheng. (2012). The Battle for China s Top Nine Leadership Posts. Washington Quarterly, 35(1): 131-145
  22. Li, M. (2008). “China Debates Soft Power”. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2(2), 287–308.
  23. Little, R. (2007). The Balance of Power in International Relations Metaphors, Myths and Models. Cambridge University Press.
  24. Mohamadi, H.; Zarghami, E. (2019). Analysis of the reasons for focusing the US strategy towards Asia-Pacific. Geopolitics Quarterly, 15(54): 173-195
  25. Muzalevsky, R. (2015). China's Rise and Reconfiguration of Central Asia's Geopolitics: A Case for US Pivot to Eurasia. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  26. Rasooli Saniabadi, E. (2019). Comparative Analysis of U.S. 2017 National Security Strategy Document towards China and Iran, Geopolitics Quarterly, 14(4): 188-208
  27. Santasombat, Y. (2015). Impact of China's Rise on the Mekong Region. Palgrave Macmillan.
  28. Schweller, R. (2014). China’s Aspirations and the Clash of Nationalisms in East Asia: A Neoclassical Realist Examination. International Journal of Korean Unification Studies. 23(2): 1-40.
  29. Schweller, R. (2011). “Emerging Powers in an Age of Disorder”. Global Governance. 17(3): 285-297.
  30. Shamiri, A; Shekofti, B. Sh. (2018). Explanation of the Position of Smart power in China’s Foreign Policy. !4(3): 31-62.
  31. Shelling, T.C. (1967). What is Game Theory, In James C Charlesworth, Contemporary Political Analysis, pp. 212-239.
  32. M. (1967). The Uses of Game Theory, In James C Charlesworth, Contemporary Political Analysis, pp. 20-30.
  33. R. (1962). Foreign Policy Decision Making: An Approach to the Study of International Politics. New York: Free Press.
  34. Sprout, H.; Sprout, M. (1965). Man. Milieu Hypotheses in the Context of International Politics. Prinston: Prinston University.
  35. “Sustaining US Global Leadership Priorities for 21 centuries” (2012). in www. National Defense Strategy.gov.
  36. Walt, S. (1987). The Origins of Alliances, New York: Cornell University press.
  37. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. London: Addison-Wesley.
  38. D. (2005). Painful Choices: A Theory of Foreign Policy Change. Princeton University Press.
  39. Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
  40. Williamson, J. (2012). Is the Beijing Consensus Now Dominant? Asia policy, 13:1-16.
  41. Xiang, L. (2016). Xi’s Dream and China’s Future, Survival, 58(3): 53-62
  42. Zakaria, F. (2009). The Post American World, New York: Norton.
  43. Ze, S. (2015). One Road & one belt & New Thinking with Regard to Concept and Practice, the international chiller Institute, Available at: http://newparadigm.schillerinstitute.com/media/one-road-and-one-belt-and-new-thinking-with-regard-to-concepts-and-practice/, Accessed on: 2017/08/ 12.
Volume 18, Issue 68
January 2022
Pages 202-225
  • Receive Date: 09 September 2020
  • Revise Date: 04 December 2020
  • Accept Date: 21 December 2020
  • First Publish Date: 21 December 2020