Interpretive-Structural Modeling of the Affecting Factors on the Spatial Injustice in Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Full Professor, Dept. of Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Dept. of Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Ph.D. Dept. of Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Spatial justice as a new term focuses more on cities, so it is important to address the national scale. Spatial injustice refers to the imbalanced distribution of valuable political, social and economic power, wealth, infrastructures and opportunity resources. From a political geography point of view, spatial injustice can be a threat to the national integrity, national & domestic security and creation of critical areas in the state. The main goal of this paper is Identification and categorization of factors affecting the spatial injustice in Iran. This paper tries to find an answer to the research main question: What are the most important factors affecting spatial injustice in Iran? This study is practical regarding its purpose and in terms of data collection is survey descriptive. Moreover, its data collection is from the questionnaire. First, the dimensions and spatial injustice indicators are distinguished based on the review of the literature, content and comparative analysis of related researches, and interviews with experts. Then using the methodology of modern analytical-interpretive structural modeling (ISM), the relationship between the indicators is determined and analyzed. Finally, the type of variables according to their influence and reception on other variables was identified using MICMAC analysis. Results show that the most important foundations of spatial injustice in Iran based on Interpretive-Structural Modeling Are Inequality in the distribution of power, wealth and opportunities and Theoretical weakness about the spatial justice domain of knowledge

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Attri, R.; Dev, N.; Sharma, V. (2013). Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) approach: An Overview, Research Journal of Management Sciences Vol. 2(2), 3-8, February.
  2. Chellappan, C.; Natarajan, M. (2010). Fuzzy rule-based model for the perishable collection-production-inventory system. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 6(3):183–190.
  3. Dadashpoor, H.; Alvandipoor, N (2016). Spatial Justice in Urban Scale in Iran; Meta- Study of Selected Articles’ Theoretical Famework. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 21(3), 67-80. doi: 10.22059/jfaup.2016. 61103. [In Persian]
  4. David, W.M. (1975). "An Introduction to the Application of Interpretive Structural Modelling". Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 397-404.
  5. Dikeç, M. (2001). Justice and the Spatial Imagination. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 33(10), 1785–1805. https://doi.org/10.10 68/ a3467.
  6. Dufaux F. (2008). Birth announcement, justice spatial/spatial justice, www.jssj.org.
  7. Fainstein S. (2000). New directions in planning theory, Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 35, pp. 1-44.
  8. Fran, T; Greasley, S; McGlynn, C; Reiser, M (2010). Book Reviews, Local Government Studies, 36:4, 587-593, DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2010.494114.
  9. Hafeznia, M.; Ghaderi Hajat, M.; Ahmadipor, Z.; Eftekhari, R.; Gohari, M. (2015). Designing a Pattern of Measuring Spatial Justice: Case Study of Iran. Spatial Planning Journal, Vol. 19, No. [In Persian]
  10. Hafeznia, M.; Ghaderi Hajat, M. (2016). Conceptualization of Spatial Justice in Political Geography, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 4.
  11. Harvey, D (1973). Social Justice and the City, London, Edward Arnold.
  12. Javan J; Abodollahi A. (2008). Spatial justice in dual-urban areas, Geopolitical explanation of Inequality patterns in the Mashhad metropolitan fringe, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 2, pp. 131-156. [In Persian]
  13. Lawshe, CH. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 1975, 28, 563-575.
  14. Nicholls S. (2001). Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks: a case study using GIS, Managing Leisure, Vol. 6, pp. 201-219.
  15. Omer I. (2006). Evaluating accessibility using house-level data: A spatial equity Perspective, Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems, Vol. 30, pp. 254-274.
  16. Pandey, V.C.; Suresh, G.; Ravi, S., (2005). Interpretive structural modeling of enabler variables for integration in supply chain management. Productivity, 46 (1), 93–108.
  17. Pirie, G. H. (1983). On Spatial Justice. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 15(4), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1068/a150465. [
  18. Prange, J (2009). Spatial Justice: A new frontier in planning for just, sustainable communities, Tufts University, Massachusetts, USA.248.
  19. Rafieian, M.; Alizadeh, A. (2017). An Integrated Approach of Spatial Justice and Structure to Detect Spatial Conflicts in Yazd City. Int. J. Architect. Eng. Urban Plan, 27(2): 105-114, December. [In Persian]
  20. Rajesh, K.S.; Suresh, K.G.; Deshmukh, S.G., (2007). Interpretive structural modeling of factors for improving the competitiveness of SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 2 (4), 423–440.
  21. Sharma, H. D.; Gupta, A. D. (1995). The objectives of waste management in India: a futures inquiry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 48(3), 285-309.
  22. Soja, E. (2009). The city and spatial justice. Justice Spatiale/Spatial Justice, 1(1), 1-5.
  23. Soja, E. (2010). Seeking Spatial Justice. USA: University of Minnesota Press.
  24. Stavrides, S. (2010). The December 2008 youth uprising in Athens: Spatial justice in an emergent ‘City of Thresholds’. Spatial Justice, 2, 1-10.
  25. Tsou, K-W.; Hung, Y. T.; Chang, Y. L. (2005). An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities, 22(6), 424-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.07.004.
  26. Williams, J. (2018). Spatial Justice as Analytic Framework, a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) in the University of Michigan 2018, avail -ableathttps: // deepblue.lib.umich.edu/ bitstream/ handle/ 2027.42/143999/ justwill_1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Volume 18, Issue 68
January 2022
Pages 1-25
  • Receive Date: 20 May 2021
  • Revise Date: 15 September 2021
  • Accept Date: 23 September 2021
  • First Publish Date: 23 September 2021