Stabilizing Instances Affecting the Fragility of the Turkish Government from the Time the Justice and Development Party Came To Power Until 2018

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.A. in Political Geography, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Associate Professor Political Geography, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

3 Associate Professor Political Science and International Relations, Azad University, Qom, Iran

4 Associate Professor Political Science and International Relations, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran

Abstract

Extended Abstract     
Introduction
Political stability has always been one of the most important goals and results of political systems. In other words, the sustainable development and security of any country will be achieved under political stability. Hence, the emergence of examples such as civil war, revolution, insurgency, coup, terrorist operations, economic imbalance, social imbalance, etc. is a sign of political instability, the course of which is different in different countries. It is highly dependent on the country's geography, historical transition and political economy. A fragile country is the result of political instability. Fragile states are states that have low degrees in the Charter of Fragility (exercise of authority, provision of services, and legitimacy), which itself includes three types of weak, failed and collapsed. Absolute separation of fragile states from each other is difficult and so far no clear definition has been provided for them, and also assessing the fragility of states is a complex and multidimensional matter.
The destabilizing factors in Turkey depend, in short, on three historical periods: 1) the period before the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, 2) the period of the Kemalist one-party system, and 3) the period of the rise of the Guardian state in action. Also, from the perspective of political geography in the contemporary history of Turkey, three mistakes have occurred in its political structure, which have been the source of many destabilizing factors, which are: 1) Kemalist citizenship law: "Secular Sunni Muslim Turk"  2) Choosing a situation instead of a position from the time of Ataturk to before the AKP's coming to power, which is contrary to national security  3) Violation of zero tension with neighbors and improper use of the region's geopolitical code in the beginning of the Syrian crisis. The effects of the era and the consequences of these mistakes have caused the Republic of Turkey, despite its significant economic growth and increasing geopolitical weight in the region and the world before the Syrian crisis, conflicts and tensions. In addition, since 2014, Turkey, through its coercive action in the region, has led to insecurity, greater instability, and reduced geopolitical prestige in the region and the world. And for this reason, in the ranking of the fragility index of governments, in 2018, it has gained 82 points, which puts this country in the group of weak governments. Accordingly, the present study seeks to answer the following questions:
1) What are the examples of destabilizing factors affecting the fragility of Turkey?
2) What are the most influential destabilizing variables on the fragility of the Turkish government?
Research method
This research is methodologically descriptive-analytic. The data gathering procedure is based on library and panel of experts' findings. Thus, the most important variables and indicators of destabilization in which Turkey has instances of instability were prepared and classified according to the Schwartz model, STEEPVASL. Then a closed-ended questionnaire with multiple-choice ranking scale designed to rank the variables and had provided to the panel of expert on Turkish issues.
Conclusions
Findings show that examples of Turkish instability in the Schwartz classification are:  social (decrease in growth rate, increase in asylum and displacement, increase in middle class exodus, increase in elite flight, increase in ethnic-religious divide), technical (low share of top indigenous technologies in GDP), economical (economic fragility, rising military spending), environmental (ecosystem vitality, environmental health, spatial inequality and hydro-political tensions with neighbors), political (changes in government apparatus in order to consolidation authoritarianism itself, financial corruption, sanction of economic and  institutions of government, AKP's confrontation with the Gulenist  movement, political, economic and logistical support of foreign actors to opposition groups), vales (increase of  power and influence of the Diyanet organization), army (territory affected by conflict), security (widespread group grievance, unsuccessful military coup 2016, extensive terrorist operations), legal (suppression and trial of dissidents, increase in political prisoners, violation of freedom of expression, increasing refugee and refugee issues).
In the next step, based on the opinions of Turkish experts, the effectiveness of the calculated variables in Turkey was ranked. Findings show that increasing ethnic-religious divide, economic fragility, widespread group grievances, spatial inequality, increasing asylum and displacement, political, economic and logistical support of foreign actors from opposition groups, territory affected by conflict, hydro-political tensions with neighbors, financial corruption, and the AKP's confrontation with the Gulenist  movement have the greatest impact on the Turkish government's fragility

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Acemoglu, D; Robinson, J (2014). Why Nations fail? Translated by Mirdamamdi Mohsen, Naieemi Pour, Mohammad Hossein, Tehran, Rozaneh Publications. [In Persian]
  2. Ajorlou, M; Safavi, S.Y; Kaffash Jamshid, M.R (2017). Increasing Turkey's regional power and its security implications for Iran's national interests in the eastern Mediterranean in the period from 2002 to 2014, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 2. [In Persian]
  3. Akhbari, M (2004). Geography of neighboring countries, Tehran, Publications of the Geographical Organization of the Armed Forces. [In Persian]
  4. Alvani, S.M (1999). Reflection of the effects of disorder theory in management, Improvement and Transformation Management Studies, No. 21 and 22. [In Persian]
  5. Anadolu Agency (2018). The European Parliament supports the PKK terrorist group. [In Persian]
  6. Azimi Dowlat Abadi, A (2008). Conflicts of political elites and political stability in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Islamic Revolution Documentation Center Publications. [In Persian]
  7. Bahikesh, M.M (2007). Deductive in the development of Iran and Turkey, Donya-e-Eghtesad Newspaper. [In Persian]
  8. Bakinz, O (2014).The reason for the dispute between Erdogan and Gulen is economic and political interests, Mashreq Newspaper. [In Persian]
  9. Bercher, M; Wilkenfeld, J (2003). Crisis, Conflict and Instability, Translated By, Sobhdel, Ali. Tehran, Publications of the Research Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  10. Carment, D. (2010). Indicators of State Failure. Canada Ministary of National Defense. Toronto: Defense R&D Canada.
  11. Copour , B (2015). Turkey: On the Way to Becoming a Failed State, online published available at: ?
  12. Ebadi, F (2010). Examining the experiences of selected countries (EU, USA, Japan, China, Turkey) in the field of promotion, innovation with emphasis on small industries, Institute for Planning, Agricultural Economics and Rural Development Research. [In Persian]
  13. Farahmand, S; Samiei Esfahany, A.R (2016). Explaining the AKP's approaches to the Kurds from national reconciliation to the policy of repression (2002-2015), International Political Research Quarterly,Islamic Azad Universities branches Shahreza, No.34. [In Persian]
  14. FFP (2014). Conflict Assessment Indicators, Washington D.C.: The Fund for Peace Publication.
  15. Fund For Peace (2006-2018). The Failed States Index, .http://www.fund forpe- ace .org
  16. General Explanations on Wellbeing Index for Provinces, Turkstat., 2015.
  17. Gurr, R (1971). Why men Rebels, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University press
  18. Hafeznia, M.R (2013). Political Geography of Iran, Tehran, SAMT Publication. [In Persian]
  19. Hosseini Taqi Ababi, M (2015). The AKP dreams of reviving the Ottoman Empire, Iranian Diplomacy Agency. [In Persian]
  20. Http://data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm.
  21. Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurdish-Turkish_conflict_(1978-present).
  22. Http://tradingeconomics.com/turkey/military-expenditure-percent-of-gdp-wb-data.html.
  23. Http://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/, 2018.
  24. Http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21689879-what-does-it-mean proud]-be-turk.
  25. Http://hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/turkey.
  26. Http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/map/turkey-map.htm.
  27. Https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/01/06/why-turkeys-mother-of-all-corruption-scandals-refuses-to-go-away/.
  28. Karimipour, Y (2001). Introduction to Iran and its Neighbors (Sources of Tension and Threat), Tehran, Jahad Daneshgahi Publications. [In Persian]
  29. Karimipour, Y; Rabiee, H; Bezleh, A (2017). Explaining the Geographical Foundations of Peace in the Middle East (Case Study, Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia), Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3. [In Persian]
  30. Khalej Monfared, A.H (2016). Erdogan's authoritarianism and the AKP and its consequences in Turkey, Contemporary Political Research, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Vol. 7, No. 4. [In Persian]
  31. Khani, H (2016). Turkish foreign policy; from (Depth Strategic) return to (Zero Tension), Aftab Agency. [In Persian]
  32. Koulaiee, E, Goudarzi, M (2014). The Impact of Developments in Armenia-Turkey Relations on Armenia-Iran Relations, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 1. [In Persian]
  33. Loveridge, D (2002). The Steepv Acronym and Process: A Clarification, Ideas In Progress, No. 29. PREST, University of Manchester.
  34. Markazi Press Agency (2017). Revelation of US support for ISIS and PKK in Syria. [In Persian]
  35. Mohammadi Lard, A.M (2015). Future Studies of Iran Political Stability, Tehran, Research Institute for Strategic Studies Publication. [In Persian]
  36. Motahharnia, M (2016). ABC of Applied Futurism, Futurology workshop.
  37. Oktem, K (2016). Turkey angry nation: since 1989, translated by Vosoughi, Ahmad and Alizadeh, Shiva,،Tehran, World Economy Publications. [In Persian]
  38. Ordou, S (2017). Construction of Ilisu Dam in Turkey in violation of international law, online interview of Iranian diplomacy agency. [In Persian]
  39. Panahi, M.A (2004). An Introduction to Political Stability: Towards Cognition of Species and Indices, Strategic quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 1. [In Persian]
  40. Rice, S.E.; Patrick, S. (2008). Index of State Weakness in the Developing World, Global Economy and Development, Washington DC: The Brookings Instituation.
  41. Rosena, J (2005). Chaos in World Politics: A Theory of Transformation and Cohesion, Translated by Tayyeb, Ali Reza, Tehran, Rozaneh Publication. [In Persian]
  42. Safavi, S.H (2015). Turkey; Collection of Islamic countries, Tehran, Jahad Daneshgahi Publications. [In Persian]
  43. Samiei Esfahany, A.R; Farahmand, S (2016). The 2016 coup and the political futurism of the Islamist Justice and Development Party; With emphasis on the Scenario Planning method, International and political approaches quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 45. [In Persian]
  44. Sanders, D (2003). Political Instability Pattern, Tehran, Publications of the Research Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  45. Shams, A.H (2004), sustainability of system. Modares journal, vol 33.
  46. Sirkeci, I (2003). Migration, Ethnicity and Conflict (the Environment of Insecurity and Turkish Kurdish International Migration),PhD dissertation of Social Sciences Faculty, Sheffield University
  47. Sirkeci, I; Dilara Secer, B; Caglar, A (2015). Turkish Migration, Identity and Integration, Transnational press.
  48. Taleban, M.R (2006). Sociological explanation of political instability (inter-country study), PhD dissertation of Human Sciences Faculty, Tarbiat Modarres University. [In Persian]
  49. Technical Appendix, (2018). Environmental Performance Index.
  50. The Results of Address Based Population Registration System, turkstat, (2018).
  51. Turkey`s Statistical Yearbook (2017). The Results of Address Based Population Registration System.
  52. Yazdanfam, M (2013). Fragile States and Human Security, Tehran, Research Institute for Strategic Studies Publication. [In Persian]
  53. Zarghani, S.H; Aazami, H; Ahmadi, R (2014). Investigating and identifying the variables affecting the instability of the political system, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 3. [In Persian]
  54. Zasztowt, K. (2016). The Consequences of the Failed Military Coup in Turkey, Bulletin, No. 44 (894).
  55. Zeng, L.; Land, K., (2001). A Sensitivity Analysis of the Bongaarts-Feeney Method for Adjusting Bias in Observed Period Total Fertility Rates, Demography 38, 17-28.

World Fact book report, CIA. (2020) page:1.56.

Volume 18, Issue 67
December 2022
Pages 289-327
  • Receive Date: 28 November 2020
  • Revise Date: 09 January 2022
  • Accept Date: 24 December 2021
  • First Publish Date: 24 December 2021