Jurisprudence Concerning ‘Fake News’ and Related Concepts in Malaysia

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

2 Professor, Department of Law, Al-Mustaqbal University College, Iraq

Abstract

The development of digital technology encourages the advantages of using digital media as the main information source. However, such development has also been misused by certain individuals or entities to mislead the public by generating fake news. On the Internet, false information travels faster than the truth, and it takes a lot of effort to stop it. This article uses a qualitative approach analysis to evaluate the various strategies used to thwart false news. In the first part, the authors described the notion of false news. In the second part, the authors examined the legislative framework that Malaysian parliaments have adopted to make it illegal to spread and publish false information. In the final part, the authors zoomed through the lens of jurisprudence that can be applied as a counter measure against dissemination of fake news. Hence, the importance of this article is to provide a clear understanding of the jurisprudence analysis of fake news in Malaysia.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Anti-Fake News Act 2018.
  2. ARTICLE 19. (2020). Malaysia: Stop using repressive laws to counter misinformation about coronavirus. https://www.article19.org/resources/ malaysia-stop-using-repressive-laws-to-counter-misinformation-about-coronavirus/.
  3. Bagheri, P.; Althabhawi, N.M.; Moslemzadeh, P. (2021). Legal issues tsunami in the wake of COVID -19 and contractual breach. Geopolitics Quarterly, 17(SI), 123-135.
  4. Baptista, J.P.; Gradim, A. (2020). Understanding Fake News Consumption: A Review. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/10/185.
  5. Bentham, J. (1890). Utilitiarinism. London: Progressive Publishing Company.
  6. (2020). Police open 40 investigation papers over fake news on Covid-19. The New Straits Times.
  7. Chand, H. (1994). Modern Jurisprudence. Petaling Jaya Malaysia: International Law Books Service.
  8. Communications and Multimedia Act 1998.
  9. Retrieved on August 12, 2020 from https://www.article19.org/ resources/malaysiastop-using-repressive-laws-to-counter-misinformation-about-coronavirus/.
  10. Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly. (2018). Legal Challenges related to Hybrid War and Human Rights Obligations. Resolution 2217, 26 April 2018.
  11. Dahlan, N.K.; Md. Said, M.H.; Rajamanickam, R. (2021). Mediation: practice in the corporate world. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 12(2), 51–67.
  12. Daud, M.; Zulhuda, S. (2020). Regulating the spread of false content online in Malaysia: Issues, challenges and the way forward. International Journal of Business and Society, 21(S1), 32–48.
  13. Daud, M. (2016). A Legal Analysis of Digital Expression and Online Content Regulation in Malaysia. PhD diss., International Islamic University Malaysia, 85-87.
  14. Daud, M. (2019). Internet Content Regulation: Contemporary Legal and Regulatory Issues in the Changing Digital Landscape. Gombak: IIUM Press.
  15. Dworkin, G. (1972). Paternalism.
  16. Farmer, L.S.J. (2021). Fake News in Context. London: Routledge.
  17. Hafeznia, M.R; Ghorbaninejad, R; Ahmadipour, Z.; Ghavam, A. (2014). Tension and conflict theories between countries: Review, critique and presenting a theoretical model. Geopolitics Quarterly, 9(4). https://dorl.net/dor/1001.1. 17354331.1392.9.32.1.8.
  18. Harun, N.; Ismail Nawang, N.; Hassim, J.Z. (2015). Land scams involving the power of attorney in land dealings in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23(SpecialIssue11), 97–106.
  19. Helm, R.K. (2021). Regulatory responses to ‘fake news’ and freedom of expression: Normative and empirical evaluation. Human Rights Law Review, 21(2), 302–328.
  20. Human Rights Watch. (2015). Creating a Culture of Fear: The Criminilization of Peaceful Expression in Malaysia. https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/10/27/ creating-culture-fear/criminalization-peaceful-expression-malaysia.
  21. Idris, A.; Kurtbag, O.; Salleh, A. (2021). The response of Malaysia and Turkey on COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis. Geopolitics Quarterly, 17(SI), 22-50.
  22. Ismail, S.M.; Yee, T.S.; Hussein, S.M. (2022). Taking and sharing photographs of virtual court proceedings to social media: A critical appraisal on the law of contempt in Malaysia. International Journal for Court Administration, 13(2).
  23. Jowett, G.; O’Donell, V. (2012). Propaganda and Persuasion. Fifth Edition. United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  24. Kalsnes, B. (2018). Fake News. Oxford University Press https://oxfordre.com/communication/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-809;jsessionid=7E98A693769659 AC1 BF 68A6E34CDBB91?fbclid=IwAR2sgsaPZpAujWem5zK3pLccXF_OZaEe173VWynKoGZzxaCZRrJqdWiNO-M#acrefore-9780190228613-e-809-bibItem-0079.
  25. Latham, H. (2020). Fake News and its Implications for Human Rights. Human Rights Pulse. https://www.humanrightspulse.com/mastercontent blog /fake-news-and-its-implications-for-human-rights.
  26. Lim Guan Eng v Public Prosecutor [2000] 2 MLJ 577.
  27. Mill, J. S. (1871). On Liberty. London: Longmans.
  28. Ministry of Communication and Digital. (2022). Don’t Believe Fake News about Covid-19 Vaccines. Official Portal of the Ministry of Communications and Multimedia. https://www.kkmm.gov.my/en/public/news/18938-don-t-believe-fake-news-about-covid-19-vaccines.
  29. Muhammed, I. (2019). Concept of Law and Schools of Jurisprudence. Legal Desire. https://legaldesire.com/concept-of-law-and-schools-of-jurisprudence /#: ~:text=Rosco%20Pound%20defines%20Jurisprudence%20 as, with%20the%20 study%20of%20law.
  30. Mustaffa, M.B.; Said, M.H.M.; Nasrul, M.A.B.D.; Hassan, M.S.; Rajamanickam, R.; Dahlan, N.K. (2022). Criminal profiling then and now: Prospect and challenges in Malaysia. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0007.
  31. (2022). Hoax. https://nordvpn.com/cybersecurity/ glossary/ hoax.
  32. Penal Code (Malaysia) (Act 574).
  33. Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984.
  34. Public Prosecutor v Pung Chen Choon [1994] 1 MLJ 566.
  35. Rajamanickam, R.; Noh, N.I.M.; Harun, A. (2022). Kebolehterimaan keteranganelektronik di Malaysia. JUUM 31, 111-126. https://doi.org/17576/juum-2022-31-09.
  36. Ranalli, R. (2022). Is there a human right to truth? Harvard Kennedy School. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/faculty-research/policy-topics/ hum- an-rights/there-human-right-truth.
  37. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
  38. H. (2023). Moral Teleology: A Theory of Progress. New York: Routledge.
  39. Schopenhauer, A. (1839). On the Freedom of the Will. Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences.
  40. Simpson, J. (2017). Oxford English Dictionary. 3rd Edition. Oxford University Press.
  41. Tariq, Q. (2018). Danish national first to be sentenced under anti-fake news law. The Star Online. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/ nation/2018/04/30/danish-national-first-to-be-sentenced-under-anti-fake-news-law/.
  42. Townend, J. (2016). Freedom of Expression and the Chilling Effect. The University of Sussex. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/67678/1/ Chapter %207%20Townend-chilling%20effects-accepted%20version-1-3-17.pdf.
  43. United States Senate. (2019). Report of the Select Committee on Intelligence on Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election. 116th Congress 1st Session. Report 116-XX, 8 October 2019, vol 2.
  44. Wang, C. (2020). Fake news and related concepts: Definitions and recent research development. Contemporary Management Research, 16(3), 145-174.
  45. Yahya, M.A.; Shariff, A.A.M.; Hashim, F.Y. (2021). Keterangando kum- enelektronik: Proses pengumpulannya di peringkatpraperbicaraan dalamkes Mal Syariah di Malaysia. JUUM 28, 67 - 77. https://doi.org/10.17576/juum-2021-28-07.

Zainul, H. (2020). Malaysia’s Infodemic and Policy Response. ISIS Policy Brief, (2–20), 1–4. https://www.isis.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ POLICY-BRIEF_MALAYSIAINFODEMIC-AND-POLICY-RESPONSE .pdf