Press Legal Regime in Iran: Flexibility and Adaptability with New Communication Technologies

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Alalamain Institution for Postgraduate Studies, Najaf, Iraq

2 Associate Prof. of Law Dep. Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

3 Alfarahidi University, Iraq

4 Al-Mustaqbal University College, Iraq

Abstract

This paper argues that Iran needs to review and reform its press legal regime with much greater consideration for new technologies in today’s information society arena. A free press is one of the few, and possibly the only, means to force the government to be held accountable for its actions. The history of press law in the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) dates back to the creation of the first legislation (1930) in this country. Today, with the innovative advances in communication and the needs of “netizens” (a term for citizens who use networks for communication), the IRI Press Law does not have sufficient flexibility with international documents or reflect the impact of new technologies regarding the freedom of expression. Therefore, many of the questions in this era remain unanswered

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Abu Bakar, M; Siti Hajar Mohd, Y. (2010). Information and communication technology law: state, internet and information: legal and regulatory challenges Abu Bakar Munir, Siti Hajar Mohd Yasin. Sweet & Maxwell Asial.
  2. Avasadanond, B. (2010). Globalization and the Media in ASEAN. 3rd International Conference on ‘ASEAN Media Freedom,’ hlm. 7.
  3. Elsaidi, M.H. (2011). Human rights and islamic law: A legal analysis challenging the husband’s authority to punish “rebellious” wives". Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 7(2).
  4. Esmaeeli, M. (2007). An Introduction to Media Law. Govah: Tehran.
  5. Esmaeeli, M. (2018). Press Law and Its Changes in Iran (in Persian). Soroush Press: Tehran.
  6. Gasiorowski, M.J. (2000). The Power Struggle in Iran. Middle East Policy 7(4): 22–40.
  7. Ghamami, M. (2017). Freedom of Speech and Respect of Human Rights. Govah: Tehran.
  8. Hashemi, S.M. (2019). The Analysis of the Press and Political criminals, Legal Research Magazine 10: 549.
  9. Izanloo, M. (2018). Freedom of Speech in Iran Constitution. Comparative Law Institute, Tehran Faculty of Law and Political Sciences 1: 108.
  10. Jackson, P.T.; Stanfield, J.R. (2004). The Role of the Press in a Democracy: Heterodox Economics and the Propaganda Model. The Journal of Economic issues 38(2): 475–482.
  11. Janidi, L. (2013). Criminal Aspects of Freedom of Speech with Concentrating on Press Criminals. Freedom of Speech and Thought, hlm. 210. Tehran University Press: Tehran.
  12. Koprowski, A. (2011). Restrictions on the press under king Mohammed VI and Morocco’s obligations under international and domestic laws on freedom of expression. Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 7(2).
  13. Meftah, M.S. (2019). Media and Right to Easy Access to Information in Iran. Govah: Tehran.
  14. Manoochehr, T.M. (2013). Public Liberties and Human Rights, (in Persian). Tehran University Press: Tehran.
  15. Merat, Z. (1999). Pushing back the limits of the possible: The press in Iran. Middle East Report 29(212): 32–35.
  16. Ministry of Information and Communications Technology | Iran Data Portal. (2023). https://irandataportal.syr.edu/ministry-of-information-and-communica- tions-technology [17 April 2023].
  17. Naser, K. (2019). Fundamentals of Public Law. Dadgostar: Tehran.
  18. Nowak, M. (1993). U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR commentary. N.P. Engel.
  19. Souaiaia, A.E. (2007). Politics of appearances: Religion, law, and the press in Morocco. Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 4(2).
  20. Sussman, L.R. (2000). Censor dot gov: the Internet and press freedom 2000. Journal of Government Information 27(5): 537–545.
  21. Sutton, T. (2003). Six Essays on Press Freedom. WORLD ASSOCIATION OF NEWSPAPERS.
  22. Tarock, A. (2010). The muzzling of the liberal press in Iran. Third World Quarterly 22(4): 585–602.
  23. Tessler, M.; Gao, E. (2005). Gauging Arab Support for Democracy. Journal of Democracy 16(3): 83–97.