Geopolitics Quarterly

Geopolitics Quarterly

Spatial Analysis of Sustainable Development of Makran Geopolitical Region Based on the WEF Nexus Approach Using System Simulation (Case Study: Minab City)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 M.A, Department of Geography and Land Use Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Land Use Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Extended Abstract     
Introduction
The Makran region, located at the southeastern coast of Iran along the Oman Sea, is recognized as one of the country’s most strategically sensitive areas. It possesses significant potential for development and national security. However, despite its importance, studies reveal a critical gap in the application of the Water-Energy-Food (WEF) nexus approach in Iran, particularly in the context of comprehensive policymaking and system simulation. This gap underscores the novelty of the WEF nexus concept within the country and highlights the lack of effective research aimed at integrating this approach into holistic policy frameworks.  This article addresses this gap by offering innovative solutions and insights. A key concern for the long-term sustainable development of the Makran region is the neglect of the WEF nexus approach in regional policies, particularly the oversight of water resources, which is poised to become the most critical future crisis in the area. Without foresight and a sustainable development strategy grounded in the WEF nexus perspective, the economic, social, and environmental structures of the region are at risk of severe disruption. To address this challenge and advance the goals of sustainable development, this study focuses on Minab city, the gateway to the Makran region. It employs spatial analysis and system simulation based on the WEF nexus approach to assess the sustainability of water resources up to the year 2050.
 
Methodology
The methodology employed in this article is analytical and relies on the application of simulation models. Central to this approach is the use of systems dynamics, a powerful tool for evaluating the evolution of processes over time. Systems dynamics is a methodological framework designed to develop and test mathematical models and computer simulations of complex, nonlinear, and dynamic systems (Sterman, 2000:6). This method enables the exploration of interactions and feedback loops within systems, providing insights into their behavior and potential outcomes under various scenarios. 
The implementation of system simulation in this study is carried out using Vensim software, following a structured sequence of steps. These steps include the creation of causal and feedback loops, the development of stock and flow diagrams, and the execution of simulations. Additionally, the process involves drawing system structures, defining model boundaries, and designing subsystem diagrams. Causal and feedback diagrams are constructed to visualize relationships within the system, while policy structure diagrams are developed to assess the impact of potential interventions. The simulation model is then built, rigorously tested, and refined to ensure accuracy and reliability. Finally, policies are designed and evaluated based on the model’s outputs (Forrester, 1994:247). 
 
Results and Discussion
This article presents a comprehensive analysis of the interactions among total water supply certainty, population dynamics, and regional GDP within the context of the Water-Energy-Food (WEF) nexus, specifically focusing on the Makran region. The model explores the impact of implementing a nuclear water softener across four nominal capacities—700, 1000, 1200, and 1500 megawatts—while considering a control scenario that maintains the existing situation. The analysis of the simulation results, based on the WEF nexus approach and the "linked triangle" of the WEF nexus, considers the geopolitical positioning and geostrategic importance of the Makran region.
 
Conclusion
According to the simulation results, establishing a nuclear desalination plant in Minab city along the shores of Makran is projected to enhance water resources, leading to sustainability across economic, social, and environmental dimensions. This development will contribute to achieving the goals of sustainable development. Consequently, both hypotheses of the article are confirmed: Sustainable development in the Makran region (specifically Minab city) until 2050, in line with theories of growth limitation and sustainable development, will not be feasible without the evaluation and implementation of effective policies supporting water resource sustainability. Spatial evaluation of sustainable development in the Makran region, focusing on the correlation among water, food, and energy, can be conducted using a systems dynamics approach. This assessment process will involve evaluating the energy-based water resource development policy outlined in the relevant upstream documents through system simulation.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Akhbari, M; Chopani, R.M; Mear, A.A. (2012). Regional cooperation model in the horizon of outlook plan.
  2. Akinsete, E; Koundouri, P; Landis, C. (2021). Integrated Approach for Sustainable WEF Nexus Management: An African Case.
  3. Albrecht, T.R; Crootof, A; Scott, C.A. (2018). The Water-Energy-Food Nexus: A systematic review of methods for nexus assessment. Environmental Research Letters, 13(4), 043002.
  4. Alijani, B. (2015). Spatial analysis in geography studies. Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental hazarts, 2(3), 1-14. [In Persian]
  5. Arabi Yazdi, A; Niknia, N; Majidi, N; Emami, H. (2014). Water Security Assessment in Arid Climates Based on Water Footprnt Concept (case study; south khorasan province). Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 8(4), 735-746. [In Persian]
  6. Artioli, F; Acuto, M; McArthur, J. (2017). The water-energy-food nexus: An integration agenda and implications for urban governance. Political Geography, 61, 215-223.
  7. Biggs, E.M; Bruce, E; Boruff, B; Duncan, J.M; Horsley, J; Pauli, N; McNeill, K; Neef, A; Van Ogtrop, F; Curnow, J. (2015). Sustainable development and the water–energy–food nexus: A perspective on livelihoods. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 389-397.
  8. Chai, J; Shi, H; Lu, Q; Hu, Y. (2020). Quantifying and predicting the Water-Energy-Food-Economy-Society-Environment Nexus based on Bayesian networks-a case study of China. Journal of Cleaner production, 256, 120266.
  9. Chen, Y; Chen, W. (2020). Simulation study on the different policies of Jiangsu Province for a dynamic balance of water resources under the water–energy–food nexus.Water, 12(6), 1666.
  10. Couclelis, H. (1992). Location, place, region, and space. Geography's inner worlds, 2, 15-233.
  11. Davoudi, S; Strange, I. (2009). Conceptions of space and place in strategic spatial planning. Routledge London.
  12. Enders, J.C; Remig, M. (2014). Theories of sustainable development: An introduction. In Theories of sustainable development (pp. 1-5). Routledge.
  13. Esfandiari-Baiat, M; Barzegar, Z; Yousefi, L; Maheshwari, B. (2014). Urbanisation and its effects on water, food security and energy needs in Iran: a case study of city of shiraz. The Security of Water, Food, Energy and Liveability of Cities: Challenges and Opportunities for Peri-Urban Futures, 101-112. [In Persian]
  14. Fang, K; Heijungs, R; De Snoo, G.R. (2014). Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: Overview of a footprint family. Ecological Indicators, 36, 508-518.
  15. Feizolahi, Z; Shahbazbegian, M; Hashemi, S.A; Shayan, S. (2019). The Minab plain water-related spatial planning; a system dynamics approach. Environmental Sciences, 17(4), 231-248. [In Persian]
  16. Forrester, J.W. (1994). System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. System dynamics review, 10(2‐3), 245-256.
  17. Gholami, Z; Ebrahimian, H; Noory, H. (2018). Prioritization of major agricultural crops cultivation considering the energy and water costs in Qazvin plain. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 41(1), 17-30. [In Persian]
  18. Hafeznia, M.R. (2016). Active Geostrategic Faults in the World. Geopolitics Quarterly, 12(44), 1-12.
  19. Hafeznia, M.R; Ahmadi, S; Hourcad, B. (2013). Explanation of the Structural and Functional Characteristics of Geographical Buffer Spaces.
  20. Hafeznia, M; Alamdar, E; Ravani, R.S. (2020). The Role of Developing the Makran Coast and Iran's Marine Orienteering Strategy on the Development of the Eastern Axis of the Country. Political Spatial Planning, 2(2), 81-94. [In Persian]
  21. Hang, M.Y.L.P; Martinez-Hernandez, E; Leach, M; Yang, A. (2016). Designing integrated local production systems: a study on the food-energy-water nexus. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1065-1084.
  22. Hoff, H. (2011). Understanding the nexus.
  23. Iranian Land use Planning Document. (2017). Plnaning and budget organiztion of Iran.
  24. Jahantigh, R; Farajirad, A; Sayyari, H; Sarvar, R (2016). Investigate the Potential Geopolitical Mokran Coasts and its Role in Sustainable  Security in the IRAN’S South East Region. [In Persian] 
  25. Kaddoura, S; El Khatib, S. (2017). Review of water-energy-food Nexus tools to improve the Nexus modelling approach for integrated policy making. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 114-121.
  26. Keskinen, M; Guillaume, J.H; Kattelus, M; Porkka, M; Räsänen, T.A; Varis, O. (2016). The water-energy-food nexus and the transboundary context: insights from large Asian rivers. Water, 8(5), 193.
  27. Keyhanpour, M.J; Musavi Jahromi, S.H; Ebrahimi, H. (2021). System dynamics model of sustainable water resources management using the Nexus Water-Food-Energy approach.12(2), 1267-1281.
  28. McLoughlin, J.B; Webster, J.N. (1970). Development Control in Britain. University of Manchester, Centre for Urban and Regional Research.
  29. Mokhtari Hashi, H. (2020). Interstate Rivalries within Regional Organizations Case study: Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO). Geopolitics Quarterly, 16(60), 334-350.
  30. Richmond, B. (1993). Systems thinking: critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. System dynamics review, 9(2), 113-133.
  31. Sadeghi, M; Rabiee, H; Ghourchi, M; Abdi, A. (2020). Explaining the Role of Capitalist Economics and Space of Flow in the Emergence and Role-Playing of Global Cities. Geopolitics Quarterly, 16(57), 110-137. [In Persian]
  32. Sadeghlou, S; Hafeznia, M; Safavi, S.Y; Roumina, E. (2019). Role of Regional Integration in MERCOSUR Regional Peace and Development An Approach to Human-Centered Geopolitics. Geopolitics Quarterly, 15(56), 1-24.
  33. Sadoff, C; Grey, D; Borgomeo, E. (2020). Water security. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science.
  34. Scholvin, S; Wigell, M. (2018). Power politics by economic means: Geoeconomics as an analytical approach and foreign policy practice. Comparative Strategy, 37(1), 73-84.
  35. Shahbazbegian, M. (2023). Morphology of transition pathway matters: System dynamics to assess alternative livelihood policy towards groundwater sustainability. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 21, 100928.
  36. Sterman, J. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World Irwin McGraw-Hill Boston MA.
Volume 21, Issue 1
Spring 2025
Pages 143-176

  • Receive Date 14 March 2024
  • Revise Date 15 June 2024
  • Accept Date 15 September 2024