Geopolitics Quarterly

Geopolitics Quarterly

Malaysia, Regional Trade Agreements, International Trade Law, Geopolitics, Multilateral Trading System.

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.
2 Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
3 Al-Mustaqbal University, Iraq.
Abstract
As a developing Southeast Asian state, Malaysia actively engages in Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs), such as ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA), Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), and ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA), to pursue economic and geopolitical goals. However, these agreements present challenges due to legal complexities, geopolitical dynamics, and economic consequences. This research explores Malaysia's strategic involvement in RTAs, focusing on their development, legal frameworks, geopolitical implications, and economic impacts. This study utilizes a doctrinal legal research methodology to analyze primary and secondary sources, including legal documents, treaties, and scholarly publications, with the goal of uncovering significant themes, recurring patterns, and deeper insights. The findings indicate that although Malaysia participates in regional trade agreements (RTAs) to bolster economic resilience and foster regional integration, their effective management is challenged by constantly evolving geopolitical dynamics and uncertainties. This study contributes to ongoing discussions on regionalism and multilateralism within the global trade system.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Abd Aziz, A.J; Baharuddin, N.A; Khalid, R.M; Kamarudin, S.K. (2024). Review of the policies and development programs for renewable energy in Malaysia: Progress, achievements and challenges. Energy Exploration and Exploitation, 42(4), pp. 1472–1501. https://doi-org.eresourcesptsl.ukm. remotexs.co/10.1177/01445987241227509
  2. Adil Kashef Al-Ghetaa, A.; Bow Pei, S.; Jia Hui, C. (2023). A jurisprudential perspective of self-defence. Geopolitics Quarterly, 19 (Special Issue), 59-78. https://journal.iag.ir/article_175317_7572fe46a43034d5568649d1aefa9ff7.pdf
  3. Afzali, R.; Mahmoodi, A.; Bagheri, A. (2023). Explain the ethnic policies of the Islāmic Republic of Iran in popular films using content analysis methods. Geopolitics Quarterly, 19(69), 33-68. https://journal.iag.ir/article_129477_ en. html?lang=fa.
  4. Ahn, D.; Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan, A. (2019). Indonesia–Import Licensing Regimes: GATT Rules for Agricultural Trade? World trade review, 18(2), 19 7-218. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/ content /view/CF64F2A581F41A423B9D5EB1ED55378A/S1474745619000119a.pdf/indonesia-import-licensing-regimes-gatt-rules-for-agricultural-trade.pdf.
  5. Ali, R; Hassan, S.N.A; Fatah, F.A; Harun, M.H. (2023). Empirical Analysis on Import Diversification of Major Livestock Commodities in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 30(1), 1-14. https://journals.hh-publisher.com/index.php/MJAE/article/view/804/504.
  6. Ayub, A.J.; Jalil, I.N. (2018). Recent trends in trade and trade agreements: Global value chains and mega-regional agreements. Malaysia’s trade governance at a crossroads, 75. https://www.krinstitute.org/ assets/contentMS/img/template/editor/Malaysia%20Trade%20Governance%20at%20a%20Crossroads_Full%20Book%20(1).pdf#page=97 .
  7. Azmi, R.; Azmy, A.S.; Mohd Zahir, M.Z.; Al-Dulaimi, A.H.A. (2023). Veto Power: A Legal Debate in the United Nations Security Council. Geopolitics Quarterly, 19 (Special Issue), 37-58. https://journal.iag.ir/article_175316. html?lang=en.
  8. Azrae, A.N. (2020). Reassessing the roles of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Rulers in the making of international treaties. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 11(2), 117-152. https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/ article/view/uumjls.11.2.2020.8006/2575.
  9. Baena-Rojas, J.J; Cardona-Montoya, G; Herrero-Olarte, S. (2023). International trade agreements within the GATT-WTO paradigm: a descriptive study based on sociological reflection approach. Revista Colombiana de Sociología, 46(1), 269-292. http://www.scielo.org.co/php? PID=S0120-159X2023000100269&script=sci_arttext.
  10. Bank, W. (n.d.). Inclusive Growth. World Bank Group. Retrieved May 27, from https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/malaysia/publication/malaysia-inclusive-growth.
  11. Bowles, P. (2015). Regional Trading Agreements, the Geopolitics of China’s Rise, and Development in East Asia. Beyond Free Trade: Alternative Approaches to Trade, Politics and Power, 79-96. https://link.Springer .com/chapter/10.1057/9781137412737_5.
  12. Brooks, D.H.; Hummels, D. (2009). Infrastructure's Role in Lowering Asia's Trade Costs: Building for Trade. Edward Elgar Publishing Incorporated. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=hdno9vnE-mAC.
  13. Chase, K. (2006). Multilateralism compromised: the mysterious origins of GATT Article XXIV. World Trade Review, 5(1), 1-30. https://peeps.unetedu/~chase/research/wtr06.pdf.
  14. Chong, W.Y. (2021). Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)–The Geopolitical and Economic Implications on Malaysia. International Conference on Economics, Business, Social, and Humanities (ICEBSH 2021).
  15. Choong, P.W.; Khalifah, N.A.; Nor, A.H.S.M.; Ismail, M.A. (2018). Free Trade Agreements and Production Sharing in Malaysian Manufacturing Industries. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 52(3). https://doi.org/10.17576/jem-2018-5203-7.
  16. Cimino-Isaacs, C.D.; Dolven, B.; Sutherland, M.D. (2022). Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). C. R. Service. https:// crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11891.
  17. Daniel, T. (2023). Leveraging on trade as geopolitical strategy. Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS) Malaysia. Retrieved June 10, from https://www.isis.org.my/2023/01/05/leveraging-on-trade-as-geopolitical-strategy/.
  18. Doan, T. (2024). Panel data analysis of foreign direct investment, control of corruption, and economic growth: Evidence from ASEAN-6 countries. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(2), 723-732. https://m.growingscience.com/beta/ijds/6658-panel-data-analysis-of-foreign-direct-investment-control-of-corruption-and-economic-growth-evidence-from-asean-6-countries.html.
  19. Greenwald, A. (2006). The ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA): A Legal Response to China's Economic Rise? Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L., 16, 193. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/ djcil16 & section=11.
  20. Hamsaruddin, S.N. (2010). Free Trade Agreeement (FTA) in developing and developed countries: in the case of Malaysia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (MJEPA) and Malaysia-Pakistan Closer Economic Partnership Agreement (MPCEPA). https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31234/ .
  21. Haron, M.H. (2023). Legal Review on CPTPP and its Implication on Bumiputera’s Policies in Malaysia Government Procurement. Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions, 2(3), 543-556. https://www.jcli-bi.org/index.php/jcli/article/view/179.
  22. Hasani Mohd, A, Simic, V; Zaidi Hassim, C.S.J; Muhamad Helmi M.S; Rasyikah, M.K; Grace, E.K; Rozmi, I (2023). Exploring Public Perceptions and Disposal Procedures in the Development of a Comprehensive End-of-Life Vehicle Regulation in Malaysia: A Pilot Study. Sustainability 2023, 15(6), 4786.
  23. Hassan, M.S.; Hed, N.M.; Kamilan, I.H. (2022). Parliamentary reforms and Sustainable Development Goals (SDG): the way forward for an inclusive and sustainable parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 28(4), 578-605. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13572334.2021.1893983.
  24. Hsieh, P.L. (2012). The Roadmap for a Prospective US-ASEAN FTA: Legal and Geopolitical Considerations. Journal of World Trade, 46(2). https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+World+Trade/46.2/TRAD2012012.
  25. Imada, P.; Naya, S. (1992). AFTA: the way ahead. Institute of Southeast Asian. https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=en&lr=&id=KoTSuQxFqXs C&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=AFTA:+the+way+ahead&ots=CH6azFNNYQ&sig=Mwp-t88iX7dtC_u00iiKMlUPllo&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=AFTA%3A %20the%20way%20ahead&f=false.
  26. (2012). Malaysia’s New FTAs: How Businesses Benefit? I. o. S. a. I. Studies. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep13562.5.pdf.
  27. (2024). Malaysia- Country Commercial Guide: Trade Agreements. U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved May 30, 2024 from https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/malaysia-trade-agreements
  28. Jamaluddin, F; Saibani, N; Mohd Pisal, S.M; Sajuri, Z; Khalid, R.M. (2022). End-of-Life Vehicle Management Systems in Major Automotive Production Bases in Southeast Asia: A Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14 (21) 14317.
  29. Karupiah, R. (2022). The Impact of Regional Cooperation on the Development of Philippines-Malaysia Bilateral Relations, 1957-2010. Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics & Strategy, 49(2). https:// journal article.ukm.my/20305/1/57347-189461-1-SM.pdf.
  30. Kaukab, R.S. (2014). The Changing Landscape of RTAs and PTAs: Analysis and Implications. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 19, 411. https:// lahoreschoolofeconomics.edu.pk/assets/uploads/lje/Volume19/18_Rashid_Kaukab_Final.pdf.
  31. Khalid, R.M.; Kadhim, S.A.; Dahalan, W.S.A.W. (2020). Revisiting the human right to water in contemporary international law. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 11(1), 37-49. https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/ article/view/uumjls.11.1.2020.686.
  32. Khalid, R.M; See, E; Rajasegaran, P; Ab Rahman, S; Hamzah, A.G. (2023). To Vote or Not to Vote: The Rights and Liberties of Voters in The Electoral System. Geopolitics Quarterly, 19 (Special Issue), 1-21. https://journal.iag.ir/pdf.
  33. La, M. (2017). Regional comprehensive economic partnership (RCEP): Progress and challenges. KIEP Research Paper. World Economy Brief, 17-12. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2990867.
  34. Lee, W. (2022). Do Exports from Developing Economies Still Matter in Global Value Chains? Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 39(3), 291-312. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27193071.
  35. Lobanova, J. (2024). Institutions and Investment as Growth Drivers. Republic of Servia: Institute of Social Science. http://iriss.idn.org.rs/2409/1/JZL%20 Monografija-Lobanova-Institutions-and-investment-ei.pdf.
  36. Masron, T.A.; Fujikawa, T; Azman, N.; Hadiyan, N. (2014). Malaysian Exports to Middle Eastern Asian Countries: Trends and the Role of Trade Agreements. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 19(2). https://www. researchgate.net/profile/Nik-Nik-Azman-2/publication/283506548_ Malays- ian_exports_to_middle_Eastern_Asian_countries_Trends_and_the_role_of_trade_agreements/links/563c1b4208ae34e98c47e1ad/Malaysian-exports-to-middle-Eastern-Asian-countries-Trends-and-the-role-of-trade-agreements.pdf
  37. Mathis, J.H. (2000). WTO, Turkey–Restrictions on Imports of Textile and Clothing Products. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 27(1). https://kluwerlawonline.com/api/Product/CitationPDFURL?file=Journals\LEIE\262184.pdf.
  38. (n.d.). Free Trade Agreements. Retrieved May 30, 2024 from https://www.matrade.gov.my/en/export-to-the-world/getting-started-page/ free -trade-agreements.
  39. McConville, M.; Chui, W.H. (2017). Research Methods for Law. Edinburgh University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1g0b16.
  40. (n.d.). Revitalising Trade and Investment: Unleashing the Power of Malaysia’s Free Trade Agreements. Retrieved May 30 2024 from https:// www.mida.gov.my/revitalising-trade-and-investment-unleashing-the-power-of-malaysias-free-trade-agreements./
  41. (2015). Free Trade Agreement. Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry. Retrieved June 5 from https://www.miti.gov. my/index.php/ pages/ view/1844.
  42. (n.d.-a). Malaysia's Free Trade Agreements. Ministry of International Trade and Industry. Retrieved June 24 from https://fta.miti.gov .my/index .php/pages/view/4.
  43. (n.d.-b). RCEP. Ministry of International Trade and Industry. Retrieved 30 May from https://fta.miti.gov.my/index.php/pages/view/rcep.
  44. Mohamad, J. (2023). Free Trade Agreements from the Perspective of ASEAN and Malaysia. Perry World House. Retrieved 5 June from https://global. upenn.edu/perryworldhouse/news/free-trade-agreements-perspective-asean-and –malaysia.
  45. Nixon, S.; Asada, H.; Koen, V. (2017). Fostering inclusive growth in Malaysia. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/fostering-inclusive-growth -in-malaysia_24837aed-en.
  46. Okabe, M.; Urata, S. (2014). The impact of AFTA on intra-AFTA trade. Journal of Asian Economics, 35, 12-31. https://www.sciencedirect. Com/ science/article/abs/pii/S1049007814000712.
  47. Pangestu, M.; Ing, L.Y. (2016). ASEAN: Regional integration and reforms. Asian Economic Papers, 15(2), 44-60. https://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2015-69.pdf.
  48. Park, C.Y.; Petri, P.A.; Plummer, M.G. (2021). Economic Implications of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership for Asia and the Pacific. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/246716/1/ewp-639.pdf.
  49. Pero, S.D.M; Norman, M.A.R. (2023). Malaysian Perspective to RCEP: A SWOT Analysis. China and WTO Review, 9(1). http://cwto.net/index. php/CWR/article/view/38.
  50. Qtaishat, A.K. (2017). WTO Framework on Regional Trade Agreements: A Legal Analysis. Business Law Review, 38(4), 163-168. https://kluwerlawcom/journalarticle/Business+Law+Review/38.4/BULA2017024.
  51. Radhi, N.A.; Abdulhadi, A.; Muhtar, M.A. (2018). Introduction to Malaysia’s trade policies. In P. Sauvé (Ed.), Malaysia’s trade governance at a crossroads (pp. 45-74). Khazanah Research Institute. https://www.krinstitute.org/ assets/contentMS/img/template/editor/Malaysia%20Trade%20Governance%20at%20a%20Crossroads_Full%20Book%20(1).pdf .
  52. Rahman, K.M.; Molla, R.I.; Murad, M.W. (2008). Japan-Malaysia free trade agreement: expectations and achievements. Journal of Comparative International Management, 11(1), 29-42. https://www.erudit. org/en/ journals /jcim/2008-v11-n1-jcim_11_1/jcim11_1art03/ .
  53. Rasiah, R.; Thangiah, G. (2017). Government policies, regional trading agreements and the economic performance of local electronics component producing SMEs in Malaysia. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 302-321. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44684965 .
  54. Remali, M.; Harun, M. (2018). Malaysia National Single Window: The Enforcement Royal Malaysia Custom and Miti Liabilities on Trade System and Logistic Sector. Advances in Transportation and Logistics Research, 1, 935-947. https://proceedings.itltrisakti.ac.id/index.php/ATLR/article/ down- load/ 85/89.
  55. Romainoor, M.A.H.B.; Mohamad Khairi, A.M.A.F.B.; Hassan, M.S.; Al Marzog, Z.K.M. (2023). Jurisprudence and ITS Relation to Malaysia Political Scene. Geopolitics Quarterly, 19 (Special Issue), 22-36. https:// journal.iag.ir/article_175315_b6fe6ba6b83f2c0453d49742895d063a.pdf.
  56. Said, R.; Ismail, N.W. (2018). The impacts of Malaysian free trade agreements on margins of trade. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 52(1), 169-178. https://www.ukm.my/jem/article/the-impacts-of-malaysian-free-trade-agreem- ents-on-margins-of-trade/ .
  57. Sauvé, P.; Institute, K.R. (2018). Malaysia's Trade Governance at a Crossroads. Khazanah Research Institute. https://books.google.com.my/ books?id =xaa-zgEACAAJ.
  58. Seman, D.A.L.H.A; Bahari, S. (2020). International Regulatory Cooperation in Malaysia–Regulatory Interoperability through Regional and Multilateral Linkages. Interconnected Government: International Regulatory Cooperation in ASEAN, 133. https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/Books/2020-Inter- connected-Government-IRC/Interconnected-Government-IRC-in-ASEAN .pdf#page=153.
  59. Shield, P. (n.d.). Malaysia - Trade Agreements. International Trade Administration. Retrieved 20 May from https://www. Privacyshield. gov/ps/article?id=Malaysia-Trade-Agreements.
  60. Stubbs, R. (2000). Signing on to liberalization: AFTA and the politics of regional economic cooperation. The Pacific Review, 13(2), 297-318. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/095127400363604.
  61. Sukumaran, S.; Chin, Y.H.; Rahman, R.; Kadhim, A.A. (2023). Jurisprudence Concerning ‘Fake News’ and Related Concepts in Malaysia. Geopolitics Quarterly, 19 (Special Issue), 79-99. https://journal.iag.ir/article_175318_pdf.
  62. Tobing, F.B.; Aristama, F. (2023). ASEAN'S Role and Future Economic Cooperation under the US-China Rivalry: The Quest for Effective Democratic Leadership. SINERGI: Journal of Strategic Studies & International Affairs, 3(2), 27-45. https://sinergiukm.my/jou/index.php/sei/article/view/72.
  63. (n.d.). Inclusive Growth and Prosperity. United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved May 30 from https://www.undp.org/ malaysia/ inclusive-growth.
  64. Verico, K. (2016). The key factors of economic integration in Southeast Asia: case of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Journal of ASEAN Studies, 4(2), 107-126. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/63224.
  65. Wang, J. (2004). China's regional trade agreements: The law, geopolitics, and impact on the multilateral trading system. SYBIL, 8, 119. https:// hein online.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/singa8&section =11.
  66. Whalley, J. (1998). Why do countries seek regional trade agreements? In The regionalization of the world economy (pp. 63-90). University of Chicago Press. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c7820/c7820.pdf.
  67. Woei, T.J.; Chin, L.; Azali, M.; Ismail, N.W. (2018). The Impact of Various Trade Arrangements on Malaysia’s Bilateral Trade Costs. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 52(2), 69-80. https://www.ukm.my/jem/article/the-impact-of-various-trade-arrangements-on-malaysias-bilateral-trade-costs./
  68. Wu, M. (2017). Digital trade-related provisions in regional trade agreements: Existing models and lessons for the multilateral trade system. In Digital trade-related provisions in regional trade agreements: existing models and lessons for the multilateral trade system: Wu, Mark. Geneva, Switzerland: ICTSD. https://www.zbw.eu/econis-archiv/bitstream/11159/1643/1/rta_exchange-digital_trade-mark_wu-final-1.pdf.
Volume 20, Special Issue
Autumn 2024
Pages 87-116

  • Receive Date 01 September 2024
  • Revise Date 23 October 2024
  • Accept Date 02 December 2024