Geopolitics Quarterly

Geopolitics Quarterly

Voices of Tribal Residents on the Merger of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas- FATA with Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Farooq Hasnat 1
Shehzadi Zamurrad Awan 2
1 Professor of Political Science and International Relations and former Head of the Political Science Department at the University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
2 Associate Professor in the Political Science Department at Forman Christian College (A Chartered University), Lahore, Pakistan.
10.22034/igq.2025.489903.1979
Abstract
In a federation, decentralized power is crucial in alleviating ethnic conflicts and addressing sentiments of deprivation among marginalized communities. The historic merger of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) with the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) in May 2018, under the 25th Amendment of Pakistan's 1973 constitution, aimed to address the grievances of this area’s residents and promote peace and development. Despite its strategic significance, the tribal agencies (bordering Afghanistan) have long suffered from socio-economic and political neglect and enduring insurgency since 2002. Consequently, the merger was widely welcomed by residents and political stakeholders in the area. This study presents a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the sentiments of young residents in ex-FATA regarding socio-economic and political changes following the merger with KPK. A survey, interviews, and focus-group discussion were conducted with residents of these tribal agencies. Research findings indicate that while most former FATA inhabitants appreciate the merger, substantial progress in improving their quality of life has yet to be witnessed in practice. 
Keywords
Pakistan, FATA Merger, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Federalism, Decentralization

Subjects

1.       Ayaz, E. (2012). Peace and development in FATA through economic transformation. TIGAH: A Journal of Peace and Development, 1(2), 74-95. http ://frc.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Peace-and-Development-in-FATA-through-Economic-Transformation.pdf.
2.       Bari, F. (2010). Gendered perceptions and impact of terrorism: Talibanization in Pakistan. Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung. https://www.boell.de/sites/default/ files/ farzana_barifinal_report.pdf.
3.       Boyes, W; Melvin, M. (2012). Microeconomics. Cengage Learning.
4.       Cassidy, R.M. (2012). War, will, and warlords: Counterinsurgency in Afghanistan and Pakistan, 2001-2011. Virginia: Marine Corps University Press.
5.       Center for Research and Security Studies – CRSS. (2014). The cost of conflict in Pakistan (pp. 1-37). https://www.humanitarianlibrary.org/sites/default/ files/2014/02/Cost-of-Conflict-in-Pakistan.pdf.
6.       Chandler, D. (2008). Review essay: Human security: The dog that didn’t bark. Security Dialogue, 39(4), 427-438. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26299801.
7.       Clandinin, D. J; Connelly, F.M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
8.       Creswell, J.W; Plano Clark, V.L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
9.       Directorate of Education, FATA Secretariat. (2013). Education sector analysis of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) of Pakistan. https://www.academia.edu/6052729/Education_Sector_Analysis_Report_FATA_Education_Sector_Analysis_of_the_Federally_Administered_Tribal_Areas_FATA_of_Pakistan_Directorate_of_Education_FATA_FATA_Secretariat.
10.   Grossoehme, D; Lipstein, E. (2016). Analyzing longitudinal qualitative data: The application of trajectory and recurrent cross-sectional approaches. BMC Research Notes, 9, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1954-1.
11.   Hilali, A.Z. (2010). FATA: The strategic depth of Pakistan. Margalla Papers, 3(1), 18-50. https://margallapapers.ndu.edu.pk/site/issue/download/5/205.
12.   Johnson, T.H; Mason, M.C. (2008). No sign until the burst of fire: Understanding the Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier. International Security, 32(4), 41-77. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2008.32.4.41.
13.   Khan, F; Haider, B; Jameel, S. (2017). Genesis, causes, and ramifications of militancy in FATA in the post-9/11 scenario. Global Political Review, 2(1), 61-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2017(II-I).07.
14.   Khan, O.A; Siddiqui, A. (n.d.). Multidimensional poverty index (MPI) report for FATA. Government of Sindh Planning & Development Department. https://rtw.sindh.gov.pk/storage/tenders/l8AyCNrrFtle0BKKjRjssKR34NxrYvgljgrn3bk1.pdf.
15.   Khan, S; Faheem, M; Gul, S. (2019). Understanding Pashtunwali and the manifestation of Pashtun nationalism in Pakistan: A conceptual analysis. Global Social Sciences Review, 4(1), 264-270. http://doi.org/10.31703/gssr. 2019(IV-I).35.
16.   Malik, M.A. (2013). Role of Malik in tribal society: A dynamic change after 9/11. Pakistan Annual Research Journal, 49, 103-112. http://www.pscpesh.org/ PDFs/PJ/Volume_49/07-Paper%20by%20M.%20Akbar%20Malik.pdf.
17.   Merton, R.K. (1968). On sociological theories of the middle range [1949]. American Sociological Review, 33(4), 449-459. http://www.csun.edu/~snk 1966/Robert%20K%20Merton%20-%20On%20Sociological%20Theories %20of%20the%20Middle%20Range.pdf.
18.   Morgan, D.L; Spanish, M.T. (1984). Focus groups: A new tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 7(3), 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF 00987314.
19.   Muhammad, N; Khan, M.M.A. (2020). Understanding economic potential of erstwhile FATA and the challenges ahead. Orient Research Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 81-93. https://www.gcwus.edu.pk/wp-content/uploads/2021 /04/8.-Understanding-Economic-Potential-of-Erstwhile-FATA-v1.pdf.
20.   Nawaz, S; De Borchgrave, A. (2009). FATA—A most dangerous place. Center for Strategic and International Studies, 15. https://csis-website-prod.s3. Amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/media/csis/pubs/081218_Na waz_fata_web.pdf.
21.   Orakzi, A.M.J. (2009). Situation in FATA: Causes, consequences, and the way forward. Policy Perspectives, 27-45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/429 09223.pdf.
22.   Presser, S. (1985). The use of survey data in basic research in the social sciences. In C. Turner & E. Martin (Eds.), Surveying subjective phenomena (Vol. 2, pp. 93-114). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23.   Richmond, O.P. (2012). Human security and its subjects. International Journal, 68(1), 205-225. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42704968.
24.   Rubin, H.J; Rubin, I.S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.
25.   Schulze, M; Krätschmer-Hahn, R. (2014). Relative deprivation theory. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6650-6653). Springer Netherlands.
26.   Sirkin, R.M. (2006). Statistics for the social sciences. Sage.
27.   Terry, G; Hayfield, N; Clarke, V; Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 17-37). Sage.
28.   Thomas, C. (2001). Global governance, development, and human security: Exploring the links. Third World Quarterly, 22(2), 159–175. http://www. jstor.org/stable/3993404.
29.   Tongco, M.D.C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147-158. http://hdl.handle.net/ 10125/227.
30.   Umer, Z; Ali, A; Shakoor, A; Khan, S.A; Ahmad, S; Amin, F. (2021). A sociological investigation of post-merger educational reforms in ex-FATA. Webology, 18(4), 2834-2846. https://www.webology.org.
31.   United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Accelerated implementation programme: Findings from the baseline survey. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/ files/zskgke326/files/migration/pk/AIP-Baseline-Report-April2021.pdf.
32.   Zahid, F. (2015). The successes and failures of Pakistan’s operation Zarb-e-Azb. Terrorism Monitor, 13(14), 1-6. https://jamestown.org/program/the-successes-and-failures-of-pakistans-operation-zarb-e-azb/.
Geopolitics Quarterly
Volume 21, Issue 4
Winter 2025
Pages 276-305

  • Receive Date 21 November 2024
  • Revise Date 01 June 2025
  • Accept Date 12 June 2025