Technological Geopolitics and the Transformation of Defense Discourse in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Amirzadeh, Mohammadreza

doi:10.22034/igq.2026.562686.2153

Technological Geopolitics and the Transformation of Defense Discourse in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Mohammadreza Amirzadeh

Ph.D. Graduate in Political Science, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

10.22034/igq.2026.562686.2153

Abstract

Extended Abstract
Introduction
The accelerating convergence of emerging technologies with strategic and military domains has fundamentally challenged classical conceptions of power, security, and deterrence. The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), characterized by the integration of artificial intelligence, big data, autonomous systems, cyber technologies, quantum computing, and digital infrastructures, has transformed the nature of geopolitical competition beyond traditional territorial boundaries. Rather than representing a gradual technological evolution, the 4IR constitutes a paradigmatic shift that reconstructs military logic, strategic competition, and defense policymaking. This study examines how the Fourth Industrial Revolution is reshaping geopolitical structures and transforming military-defense discourse from a territorially based framework toward a technology-centered geopolitical paradigm. Drawing upon the concept of chronopolitics, the research argues that technological competition increasingly revolves around the politics of time, speed, and innovation, making technological capabilities a decisive source of strategic power in the emerging international order.

Methodology
This research adopts a descriptive-analytical approach with an applied-developmental objective. Data were collected through an extensive review of the relevant literature and semi-structured interviews with ten experts specializing in political science, geopolitics, defense studies, and emerging technologies. The study employs chronopolitical theory as its principal analytical framework. By emphasizing the politics of time alongside the politics of space, chronopolitics provides a conceptual foundation for analyzing how emerging technologies reorganize temporal and spatial dimensions of power. The qualitative findings from documentary sources and expert interviews were synthesized to evaluate the proposed hypothesis concerning the relationship between technological geopolitics and the transformation of military-defense discourse in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

Results and Discussion
The research findings confirm the central hypothesis that the Fourth Industrial Revolution is challenging the foundations of classical military-defense discourse and facilitating the transition from conventional geopolitics to technological or GeoTech geopolitics. The study demonstrates that the infrastructure of power is progressively shifting from territorial control toward technological superiority, digital infrastructures, and data-driven capabilities. Consequently, military power is increasingly determined by control over artificial intelligence, cyber capabilities, autonomous systems, satellite technologies, advanced algorithms, and strategic data rather than by geographical dominance alone.
Within the chronopolitical framework, geopolitical competition extends beyond territorial disputes to encompass competition over time, innovation cycles, technological acceleration, and the capacity to shape future developments. These transformations contribute to the emergence of a post-Westphalian security environment in which deterrence, security, and strategic competition are increasingly defined through technological capabilities.
The findings further indicate that technological alliances are replacing many traditional geopolitical alignments, resulting in the formation of technology-centered blocs organized around artificial intelligence, digital infrastructures, and data governance. At the operational level, advances in autonomous weapons, cyber warfare, unmanned systems, satellite surveillance, and intelligent military technologies have reduced the strategic utility of large-scale conventional warfare while increasing the importance of cyber operations, precision strikes, asymmetric warfare, and highly deniable technology-enabled conflicts. Nevertheless, the study argues that although these developments significantly reshape global power relations, they do not yet constitute a fully consolidated international order. Rather, the international system is currently undergoing an accelerated transitional phase characterized by rapid technological transformation.

Conclusion
The Fourth Industrial Revolution is fundamentally transforming the concepts of power, security, deterrence, and military strategy by replacing territory-centered security paradigms with technology-centered strategic competition. This transformation requires a comprehensive reconsideration of the theoretical foundations of geopolitics, international security, and defense policymaking. The emergence of GeoTech geopolitics highlights the growing strategic significance of technological infrastructures, artificial intelligence, data, and digital ecosystems as the principal determinants of national power. While emerging technologies create opportunities and constraints for all states, technological leadership is likely to reinforce the strategic advantages of technologically advanced powers. At the same time, China's rapidly expanding technological capabilities are narrowing the gap with the United States, potentially reshaping future global power balances. Accordingly, national defense strategies and military institutions must adapt to this evolving technological environment through structural, conceptual, and institutional reforms. Failure to recognize and respond to these transformations may result in strategic vulnerability and long-term geopolitical marginalization.

Keywords

Fourth Industrial Revolution

Emerging Technologies

Defense Policymaking

United States

Chronopolitics

Subjects

Geopolitics

1. Abousi, Assist; Al-Ghazali, Ali. (2023). Asymmetric Wars: A Study of the Concept, Characteristics, Features, and Causes. The International and Political Journal.(56), 253-276. 10.31272/ipj. i56.253.

2. Amirzadeh, M.R; Pirani, S; Behestani, M. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of American Foreign Policy. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 11(2), 101-117. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2025.102509. [In Persian]

3. Amirzadeh, M; Pirani, S; Ashtarian, K. (2026). Examining the Impact of Emerging Technologies on the Transformation of the Concept of State. Political Quarterly, 56(1), 56-29. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2026.388566.1008275.[In Persian]

4. Amoah, Macdonald; Bazzilian, Morgan; Jahara Maisek, Lieutenant (2026). Over 11000 munitions in 16 Days of the Iran War: command of the reload Governs endurance. (RUSI).

5. Araya, Daniel; King, Meg. (2022). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Military Defence and Security, Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI). Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/299735/1/cigi-paper263.pdf (Accessed on: 1/2/2026).

6. Ashtrian, Kiomers. (2020). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Transformation in Governance: Forming a Datamining and Intelligent Planning Organization in the 7th Development Plan. Interdisciplinary studies in the humanities, 15 (1), 269-208. https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2022.436. [In Persian]

7. Aurangzeb, Muneeb. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in the foreign policy of usa and china (journal for current sign). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392142301_the_role_of_artificial_Intelligence_in_the_foreign_policy_of_usa_and_china. 10.6084/m9.figshare. 29155895.v1. (Accessed on: 08/11/2025).

8. Brasioli, Diego; Guercio, Laura; Landini, Giovanna; De Giorgio, Andrea. (2025). The Routledge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence and International Relations. 10.4324/9781003518495.

9. Chainalysis. (2024). Crypto Compliance Report. Available at: http:https://go. chainalysis.com/crypto-crime-2024.html. (Accessed on: 10/11/2025).

10. Defense Budget overview united states department of defense fiscal year 2025 (2024). office of the under secretary of defense, chief financial officer, https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/FY2025/FY2025_Budget_Request.pdf. (Accessed on: 9/11/2025).

11. Dehghani Firoozabadi, S.J; Chehrazad, S. (2024). Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence; Theoretical Roadmap for Algorithmic Competitions of World Actors. Geopolitics Quarterly, 20(3), 270-313. https://doi.org/10.22034/igq. 2024.143237. [In Persian]

12. Esposito, F; Amp Becker, T. (2023). The time of politics, the politics of time, and politicized time: An introduction to chronopolitics. History and Theory, 62(4), 3–23.

13. Farajirad, A; Abdi, M. (2015). Scientific and Technological Development and its Impact on the Rising of Regional Power (Comparative Study: I.R. Iran and India). Geopolitics Quarterly, 11(39), 59-83. [In Persian]

14. Ferguson, Y.H; Mansbach, R.W. (1999). Technology and the transformation of global politics. Geopolitics, 4(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1465004 9908407653

15. Forsyth, S.B. (2023). Chronopolitics and “Time Wars”. Available at:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371939020_Chronopolitics_and_%27Time_Wars%27. (Accessed on: 09/11/2025).

16. Fukuyama, Francis (2002). Our Posthuman Future. (translated by habibollah faghihinejad); Tehran: entesharatiran.

17. Greene, Tristan. (2019). Report: Palantir took over Project Maven, the military AI program too unethical for Google. https://thenextweb.com/news/report-palantir-took-over-project-maven-the-military-ai-program-too-unethical-for-google. . (Accessed on: 10/11/2025).

18. Hasan, Mir; Islam, Md. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Military Systems: Impacts on National Security and Citizen Perception. 10.20944/preprints202409.2328.v1.

19. Horowitz, M.C. (2018). Artificial Intelligence, International Competition, and the Balance of Power. Texas National Security Review. https://tnsr.org/2018/05/artificial-intelligence-international-competition-and-the-balance-of-power/.(Accessed on: 12/7/2025).

20. Kaiser, M. (2021). Reactions to the future: The chronopolitics of prevention and preemption. Nanoethics, 9, 165–177.

21. Kissinger, Henry; Schmidt, E; Huttenlocher, Daniel (2021), The Age of AI: And Our Human Future Hardcover, John Murray publisher, Translated by Ali Alipanahy, zehnaviz publisher. [In Persian]

22. Mahrough, F; Mozdkhah, E. (2025). Geopolitical Transformation in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Step Toward Redefining Power in the Era of Geodata. Geopolitics Quarterly, 21(3), 144-176. https://doi.org/10.22034/igq.2025. 482767.1960. [In Persian]

23. Meleouni, Christina; Efthymiou, Iris-Panagiota. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its Impact in International Relations. Journal of Politics and Ethics in New Technologies and AI. 2. 35803. 10.12681/jpentai.35803.

24. Memorandum of deputy secretary of defense (2017). Establishment of an Algorithmic Warfare Cross-Functional Team (Project Maven).

25. Mossalanejad, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Policymaking and the Power Equation Priorities. Geopolitics Quarterly, 21(3), 13-42. https://doi.org/10. 22034/igq.2025.511096.2023. [In Persian]

26. Mousavi Zare, S.J; Zarghani, S.H; Azami, H. (2017). Analysis of the Position of Science and Technology in the Realm of Hard, Soft and Smart Power. Geopolitics Quarterly, 13(47), 103-138. [In Persian]

27. Mujkic, S. (2025). Chronopolitics: The chronopolitical experience and uncertainty of migrant lives (BA thesis). University of Iceland.

28. Natioanl Defense strategy (2022). U.S. department of state, secretery of defense. https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY-NPR-MDR.pdf. (Accessed on: 11/09/ 2025).

29. National security strategy, (2022). the white house, Washington.

30. National security strategy, (2025). the white house, Washington.

31. NDAA (2019). H.R.5515 - John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, 115th Congress (2017-2018). https://www.congress. gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5515/text. (Accessed on: 10/11/2025).

32. NDAA (2024). H.R.2670 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, 118th Congress (2023-2024). https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/2670/text. (Accessed on: 10/11/2025).

33. Nye, Jr; Joseph S. (2005). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs Books. http://www.publicaffairsbooks.com/publicaffairsbooks-cgi-bin/display?book=1586482254.

34. Polito, Carolina; Pupillo, Lorenzo. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity. Intereconomics. 59. 10-13. 10.2478/ie-2024-0004.

35. Ralph, Thiele (2021). Hybrid Warfare: future and technologies, springer.

36. Rosenau, James (2005). Turbulence in World Politics. (translated by alireza tayyeb); Tehran: rozane. [In Persian]

37. Rosenau, James and others (2018). Information Technologies and Global Politics. (translated by Ahmad soltaninejad); Tehran: imam sadegh university. [In Persian]

38. Sajduk, B. (2019). Theoretical premises of the impact of artificial intelligence on the international relations and security. The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies, 157-180.

39. Saleem, Armaan. (2024). The Effects of AI on U.S. Foreign Policy Defense and Cyber Departments and Possible Future Regulatory Predictions.

40. Schwab, Klaus. (2017). the fourth industrian revolution, translated by iraj nabipour, bushehr, bushehr university of medical sciences and health services press. [In Persian]

41. Syifa, (2024). artificial intelligence in warfare: comprehensive solutions for modern defense STRATEGIES. https://totalmilitaryinsight.com/best-artifical-intelligence-in-warfare/.(Accessed on: 9/10/2025).

42. The New York Times (2026). how irans cheap, lowtech drones have cost the U.S. Washington. Available at: nytimes.com.

43. The Washington Post (2026). Israel targets iran’s leaders with lethal expertise using new AI platform, Washington, available at: washingtonpost.com.

44. Totalmilitaryinsight, (2024). The Role of AI in Asymmetric Warfare: Transforming Strategies. Available at: https://totalmilitaryinsight.com/ai-in-asymmetric-warfare/.

45. TRTWORLD (2026). A numbers game in the sky: irna’s missile waves are testing defence limits. In: www.TRT.com. (Accessed on: 8/11/2025).

46. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2021). New Technologies for Sustainable Development: Perspectives On Integrity, Trust and Anti-Corruption, New York.

47. World Economic Forum (2024). Top 10 Emerging Technologies of 2024, center for the fourth industrial revolution (world emonomic forum).

48. Worldwide Threat Assessmen (2025). defense intelligence agency. https://armedservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/2025_dia_statement_for_the_record.pdf.

49. WSJ (2026). America Downs Cheap Drones with Million-Dollar missiles. A Fix Is in The Works. In: www.WSJ.com. (Accessed on: 9/10/2025).

50. Zagaynov, Mikhail. (2025). Approaches to the Study of the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence in Various Theoretical Paradigms of International Relations. Sociopolitical Sciences. 15. 135-145. 10.33693/2223-0092-2025-15-2-135-145.

51. Zhavoronkov, Alex. (2023). “U.S. Updates National AI Strategy and Calls for Public Input.” Forbes, October 5, 2023. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/ sites/alexzhavoronkov/2023/05/29/us-updates-national-ai-strategy-and-calls-for-public-input/.