Multiplex Network Regionalism; A Theoretical Model for Iran's Multi-Neighborhood Foreign Policy

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor of International Relations, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

With the complexity of the international system and being in a state of transition, the evolution of regional systems and the foreign policy of countries requires structural adaptation to the strategic requirements of such a transition. What springs from these developments is that the classical analytical thinking of regionalism and the linear conception of foreign policy does not meet the complexities of the uncertainty age. Therefore, this fundamental question has been raised as the present study's direct engagement: How will Iran's foreign policy strategy as a multi-neighboring country with diverse and heterogeneous ones be reconstructed in the context of a complex international system? The paper's major reason lies in multiplex networked regionalism that will serve us as a suitable theoretical model so well to go beyond the linear thinking to the region and outline proactive regionalism based on multi-neighborhood foreign policy. Research findings by using the abduction method, show that drawing Iran's multiplex networked regionalism requires putting innovative and adaptive strategic diplomacy on the agenda and drawing a strategic partner’s map based on smart synerg, which emphasizes the equifinality and dynamic equilibrium between Geopolitics, Geo-economics, and Geo-cultural dynamics.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Acharya, A; Buzan, B (2019). The making of global international relations. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Abedi, A (Ed). (2021). Neighborhood policy of Islamic Republic of Iran; Requirements and necessities, Tehran. International Studies & Research Institute. [In Persian]
  3. Ajili, H; Jafari, M; Ghadbeigi, Z (2021). EU Neighborhood Policy towards the Eastern Mediterranean, Foreign policy, 35 (3), 91-128. [In Persian]
  4. Abbasi Khoshkar, A (2022). Neighborhood Policy and Multilateral Geoeconomic Order Making; The Islamic Republic of Iran and the Eurasian Economic Union, Qoarterly of International Organization, 15 (5). [In Persian]
  5. Akabari, M; Ghazi, H; Ghaffarlou, A (2022). Investigation of the Role of Rail Transit in Promoting the Geopolitical Status of Chabahar Port, Geopolitics Quarterly, 18 (67), 70-100. 20.1001.1.17354331. 1401.18.67 .3.3. [In Persian]
  6. Avelino, F; Rotmans, J (2009). Power in transition: an interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. European journal of social theory, 12(4), 543-569.
  7. Bamberger, P.A (2019). On the replicability of abductive research in management and organizations: Internal replication and its alternatives. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(2), 103-108. https://doi.org/ 10.5465/amd.2019.0121
  8. Buldú, J. M; Pablo-Martí, F; Aguirre, J (2019). Taming out-of-equilibrium dynamics on interconnected networks. Nature communications, 10(1), 1-9.
  9. Bagheri, R (2021). Failures and achievements of the EU's neighborhood policy, foreign policy, 35 (3), 151-170. [In Persian]
  10. Conaty, F (2021). Abduction as a methodological approach to case study research in management accounting–an illustrative case. Accounting, Finance, & Governance Review, 27(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/ 10.52399/ 001c.22171.
  11. Corbetta, R (2013). International relations are about relations! The power of networks in the study of international politics. International Studies Review, 15, 637-640. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/24 033000.
  12. D'Agostino, G; Scala, A (Eds.) (2014). Networks of networks: the last frontier of complexity (Vol. 340). Berlin: Springer.
  13. Degterev, D.A; Ramich, M.S; Tsvyk, A.V (2021). US-China: “Power Transition” and the Outlines of “Conflict Bipolarity”. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 21(2), 210-231.
  14. Diaconescu, A; Frey, S; Müller-Schloer, C; Pitt, J; Tomforde, S (2016). Goal-oriented holonics for complex system (self-) integration: Concepts and case studies. In 2016 IEEE 10th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO) (pp. 100-109). IEEE.
  15. Flint, C; Adduci, M; Chen, M; Chi, S.H (2009). Mapping the dynamism of the United States' geopolitical code: The geography of the state of the union speeches, 1988–2008. Geopolitics, 14(4), 604-629.
  16. Ghasemi, F (2011). Theories of international relations and regional studies, Mizan Legal Foundation. [In Persian]
  17. Ghasemi, F (2015). Theories of International Relations: Cybernetics and Foreign Policy, Mizan Legal Foundation. [In Persian]
  18. Ghasemi, F (2018). Complexity and Chaos Theory: New Turning point in Explaining of Regional Network Evolution. Politics Quarterly, 47 (4), 1005-1024. http://doi.org/10.22059/jpq.2017.208731.1006832. [In Persian]
  19. ---------- (2018). Transition in the complex and chaotic international systems: Iran, Political Strategic Studies, 7 (24), 9-38. [In Persian]
  20. ---------- (2019). Complexity-Chaos Theory and War in International Relations, University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]
  21. --------- (2022). A Step Towards the Theoretical Model of Dissipated and Bifurcated Order in the New International Politics, Geopolitics Quarterly, 18 (65), 289-314. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.17354331.1401.18.65.10.6. [In Persian]
  22. Ghasemi, F; Lotfian Akbarabadi, Z (2013). The effect of Iran's strategic nested network on the regional diplomacy of the Islamic Republic. The Iranian Research letter of International Politics, publish in progress, 1 (2), 94-125. [In Persian]
  23. Ghasemi, F; Einollahi, B (2016). The Role and Function of Anti-Systemic Groups in the Order Control System of Western Asia Region (Balance of Power, Deterrence, and Compellence), The Iranian Research letter of International Politics, publish in progress, 4 (2), 119-146. [In Persian]
  24. Goh, E (2022). The Asia–Pacific’s ‘Age of Uncertainty’: Great Power Competition, Globalization and the Economic-Security Nexus. In From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific (pp. 29-52). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.
  25. Goh, E; Prantl, J (2020). COVID-19 is exposing the complexity of connectivity. In East Asia Forum (Vol. 8).
  26. Ghorbani, M (2022). China’s Neighborhood Diplomacy and its Challenges, The Iranian Research letter of International Politics, publish in progress, doi: 10.22067/irlip.2022.68207.1015. [In Persian]
  27. Hafner-Burton, E.M; Kahler, M; Montgomery, A.H (2009). Network analysis for international relations. International organization, 63(3), 559-592.
  28. Hall, W.M; Citrenbaum, G (2009). Intelligence analysis: how to think in complex environments: how to think in complex environments. ABC-CLIO.
  29. Hosseini Taghiabad, S.M; Alizadeh, SH (2020). Public Diplomacy and Neighbourhood Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Relations with the Republic of Azerbaijan; Capacities, Obstacles and Solutions, Jostarha-ye Siyasi-ye Moaser, 10 (4), 34, 1-24. Doi: 10.30465/cps.2020.28380.2377. [In Persian]
  30. Hashemi, M; Ghorbaninejad, R; Yazdanpanah, K (2021). The Impact of the Neighborhood Policy of the Russian Federation on Iran's Regionalist Approach in the Caucasus, Quarterly of New Attitudes in Human Geography, 13 (3), 945-956. [In Persian]
  31. Jervis, R (1997). Complexity and the analysis of political and social life. Political science quarterly, 112(4), 569-593.
  32. Kavalski, E (2007). The fifth debate and the emergence of complex international relations theory: notes on the application of complexity theory to the study of international life. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20(3), 435-454.
  33. Kavalski, E (Ed.). (2015). World politics at the edge of chaos: Reflections on complexity and global life. SUNY Press.
  34. Khalili, M (2018). Neighbor- Crowded Iran and the Multineighboring Foreign Policy, Research political Geography Quarterly, 1(2), 31-54. [In Persian]
  35. Meirambekov, M; Abdkhodaei, M (2022). Kazakhstan and the China’s Silk Road Economic Belt Initiative (SREB); Opportunities and Challenges, Geopolitics Quarterly, 18 (67), 199-227. [In Persian]
  36. Morin, E (1992). From the concept of system to the paradigm of complexity. Journal of social and evolutionary systems, 15(4), 371-385.
  37. Noruzizadeh, F; Goodarzi, M; Masoudnia, H (2022). Geopolitical and Geo-economical Role of Persian Gulf Energy (Oil & Gas) Transit in Implementing Islamic Republic of Iran's Regional Policy, Geopolitics Quarterly, 18 (67), 228-255. 20.1001.1.17354331.1401.18.67.8.8. [In Persian]
  38. Noormohammadi, M (2021). Neighborhood Policy Capacities and Requirements to Neutralize US Unilateral Sanctions, International Security Monthly, 37. [In Persian]
  39. Ohanyan, A (2015). Networked regionalism as conflict management. Stanford University Press.
  40. Orsini, A; Le Prestre, P; Haas, P.M; Brosig, M; Pattberg, P; Widerberg, O; Chandler, D (2020). Complex systems and international governance. International Studies Review, 22(4), 1008-1038.
  41. Prantl, J (2021). Reuniting strategy and diplomacy for 21st century statecraft. Contemporary Politics, 1-19.
  42. Prantl, J; Goh, E (2016). Strategic diplomacy in northeast Asia. Global Asia, 11(4), 8-13.
  43. Punnoose, S.K; Vinodan, C (2019). The Rise of China and Power Transition in Contemporary International Relations. IUP Journal of International Relations, 13(1).
  44. Rosecrance, R; Alan, A; Koehler, W; Kroll, J; Laqueur, Sh; Stocker, J (1977). "Whither interdependence?" International Organization 31, No.3. 425-471. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002645X.
  45. Sabbaghian, A (2020). Normative Power and Europeanization of the Islamic countries of the southern and eastern Mediterranean through the European Neighborhood Policy, Political Studies of Islamic World, 8 (4), 32, 1-22. Doi:10.30479/psiw.2020.11311.2606. [In Persian]
  46. Safari, F; Ahmadi, H; Barzegar, K (2018). A Study of the Sino-Russian Approach to Regional Order in Eurasia, International Studies Journal, 18 (1). doi/10.22034/isj.2021.259549.1305. [In Persian]
  47. Safavi, S.H; Farhadi, F (2020). Neighborhood Policy: An Approach for the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Order of the West Asian Regions, Foregin Policy, 35 (3), 5-34. [In Persian]
  48. Sakwa, R (2011). The clash of regionalisms and Caucasian conflicts. Europe-Asia Studies, 63(3), 467-491. Doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.557 539.
  49. Scartozzi, C. M (2018). A New Taxonomy for International Relations: Rethinking the International System as a Complex Adaptive System.
  50. Shirkhani, M.A; Mahrough, F (2021). The Rise of China in a Transition Era; Global and Regional Dynamics, University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]
  51. Shirgholami, kh (2021). Neighborhood Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Economic Fundamentals, Foreign Policy. 35 (3). 49-64. [In Persian]
  52. Slaughter, A.M (2017). The Chessboard and the web. Yale University Press.
  53. Volosencu, C (Ed.). (2017). System Reliability. BoD–Books on Demand.
  54. Shariatinia, M (2016). The Silk Road Economic Belt: A China-Centered Value Chain. Foreign Relations Quarterly, 8 (2), 86-113. [In Persian]
  55. Tahaei, S.J; Mousavinia, S.R (2014). The neighborhood (A Theory for the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Islamic Politics Research, 1 (4), 165-192. [In Persian]
  56. Waltz, K (1954). N. (1959), Man, the State and War.
  57. ------- (1979). Theory of International Politics, 1979. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  58. Young, O. R (2010). Institutional dynamics: emergent patterns in international environmental governance. mit Press.
  59. --------- (2017a). Beyond regulation: Innovative strategies for governing large complex systems. Sustainability, 9(6), 938.
  60. ---------- (2017b). Governing complex systems: social capital for the anth ropocene. MIT Press.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 18 April 2022
  • Revise Date: 23 June 2022
  • Accept Date: 16 September 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics