Between Geography and International Relations: Explaining the Neighborhood

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor of International Relations, Department of Political Science at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Geographical distance has always been one of the factors affecting relations between states. This has highlighted the position of neighbors in the foreign policy of countries and they have often adopted special strategies towards them. However, a glance at theories of International Relations (IR) shows that there is no specific theory about the neighborhood. Therefore, the main question is how to achieve a plan to explain the neighborhood in international politics? It seems that a hybrid theoretical approach can be presented by means of an eclectic approach and relying on the capacity and relevance of IR theories with geographical proximity and neighborhood. Therefore, the four approaches of Regionalism, Economic Interdependence, the English School and the Copenhagen School have been selected from different theories in the discipline of IR. Then, by collecting the scattered statements of the theorists of the mentioned approaches about the relations of states in close geographical distances, an attempt has been made to formulate a theoretical framework for explaining the neighborhood in international politics. This scheme not only explains the neighborhood in international politics but also introduces the link between Geography and IR.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Ahmadipour, Z; Mousavi Shafaei, S. M; Purdast, Z. (2019). Analysis of Iran-Turkey rivalry in the Syrian crisis. Geopolitics Quarterly, 15 (3), 90-121. [In Persian]
  2. Ali, S. (2020). ‘India in its Neighb orhood: Hegemonic Behavior?’. CISS Insight, VII (2), pp. 89-113.
  3. Avdan, N. (2014). ‘Controlling Access to Territory: Economic Interdependence, Transnational Terrorism, and Visa Policies.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(4), 592–624.
  4. Bandara, J. S. (2004). What do quantitative evaluations tell us about Regionalism in South Asia? A survey, Asian Studies Review, 28:1, 57-73.
  5. Barbieri, K. (1996). ‘Economic interdependence: A path to peace or a source of interstate conflict?’ Journal of Peace Research; Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 29-49.
  6. Barbieri, K; Levy, J. S. (1999). ‘Sleeping with the Enemy: The Impact of War on Trade.’ Journal of Peace Research 36:463-79.
  7. Barthwal-Datta, M; Basu, S. (2017). ‘Reconceptualizing regional security in South Asia: A critical security approach.’ Security Dialogue, 48(5), 393–409.
  8. Bozan, B. (2012). The logic of regional security in the post-Cold War world. In: B. Hetne, A. Inotay and O. Sunkel. New Regionalism, the future of security and development. Translated by Alireza Tayeb. Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publishing Office. pp. 47-85. [In Persian]
  9. Bull, H; A. Watson, E.D.S. (1985). The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.
  11. Buzan, B.; Weaver, O. (2009). Regions and Powers. Translated by Rahman Ghahramanpour. Tehran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  12. Buzan, B. (2009). “The Middle East through English School Theory”. In: Barry Buzan and Ana Gonzalez-Pelaez (eds.). International Society and the Middle East: English School Theory at the Regional Level. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 24-45.
  13. Buzan, B. (2009). From International to world society. Translated by Mohammad Ali Ghasemi. Tehran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  14. Buzan, B. (2010). People, States and Fear. Translation of Strategic Studies Research Institute. Tehran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  15. Buzan, B. (2011). ‘The South Asian Security Complex in a Decentering World Order: Reconsidering Regions and Powers Ten Years On.’ International Studies, 48(1), 1–19.
  16. Buzan, B.; Gonzalez-Pelaez,E.D.SA. (2009). International Society and the Middle East: English School Theory at the Regional Level. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Buzan, B; Weaver, O.; Wilde, P.D.E (2013). A New Framework for Security Analysis. Translated by Alireza Tayeb. Tehran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  18. Chung, C. (2009). The “Good Neighbour Policy” in the Context of China’s Foreign Relations. China: an International Journal, 7 (1), pp. 107-123.
  19. Cooper, A. F; Christopher W; Hughes, P; Lombaerde, D.E (2008). ‘Introduction: regionalisation and the taming of globalisation?’ In, Cooper, Andrew F., Christopher W. Hughes and P. De Lombaerde (eds.) Regionalisation and Global Governance: The taming of globalisation? London and New York: Routledge. pp.1-15.
  20. Crenson, M. A. (1983). Neighbourhood Politics. New York: Harvard University Press.
  21. Crescenzi, M. J. C. (2003). ‘Economic Exit, Interdependence, and Conflict.’ The Journal of Politics, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 809-832.
  22. Crescenzi, M. J. C. (2005). Economic Interdependence and Conflict in World Politics. New York, Toronto & Oxford: Lexington Box.
  23. Dash, K. C. (2008). Regionalism in South Asia: Negotiating Cooperation, Institutional Structures; London & New York: Routledge.
  24. Dehghani Firoozabadi, J; Nouri, V. (2012). ‘An Analysis of the Interactions between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council’. Quarterly Journal of International Relations Research. Vol. 1, No. 5. pp. 51-9. [In Persian]
  25. Ethier, W. J. (1998). ‘The New Regionalism.’ The Economic Journal, Vol. 108, No. 449, pp. 1149-1161.
  26. Faizal, Y. (2004). ‘Pakistan, SAARC and ASEAN Relations.’ Contemporary Southeast Asia; 26, 2; pp. 346-75.
  27. Falkner, R; Buzan, B. (2019). ‘The emergence of environmental stewardship as a primary institution of global international society.’ European Journal of International Relations; 25, 1; pp. 131-155.
  28. Fatemi Nejad, S. A.; Mohammadzadeh, A. (2015). Study of the position of the new Afghanistan in the security complexes of regions from Central Asia to South Asia. Central Eurasian Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 416-399. [In Persian]
  29. Fatemi Nejad, S. A.; Hashemi, M. R. (2016). Regionalism in Iran and Central Asia in the Light of Globalization: A Plan for a Regional International society". Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies of Public Policy. Vol. 6, No. 21, pp. 144-123. [In Persian]
  30. Filep, B. (2018). The Politics of Good Neighborhood: State, civil society and the enhancement of cultural capital in East Central Europe. London: Routledge.
  31. Gartzke, E. (2003). The "Neighborhood Effect" in International Politics. International Studies Review, 5(3), 371-373.
  32. Gartzke, E.; Westerwinter, O. (2016). ‘The complex structure of commercial peace contrasting trade interdependence, asymmetry, and multipolarity.’ Journal of Peace Research, 53(3), 325–343.
  33. Gartzke, E; Li, Q.; Boehmer, C. (2001). ‘Investing in the Peace: Economic Interdependence and International Conflict.’ International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 391-438.
  34. Gasiorowski, M. J. (1986). ‘Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: Some Cross-National Evidence.’ International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 23-38.
  35. Ghavam, A.; Fatemi Nejad, S. A. (2008). The English School as a Pluralist Theory: Explaining the Concepts of the International System, the International Society and the World Society. Encyclopedia of Law and Politics. No. 8. pp. 206-179. [In Persian]
  36. Gordon, S. (2014). India's Rise as an Asian Power: Nation, Neighborhood, and Region. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  37. Graham, K. (2008). ‘Regionalisation and responses to armed conflict, with special focus on conflict prevention and peacekeeping.’ In, Cooper, Andrew F., Christopher W. Hughes and P. De Lombaerde (eds.) Regionalisation and Global Governance: The taming of globalisation? London and New York: Routledge. pp.159-187.
  38. Haas, E. B. (1970). ‘The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing.’ International Organization, Vol. 24, No. 4, Regional Integration: Theory and Research, pp. 607-646.
  39. Haas, E. B. (1976). ‘Turbulent Fields and the Theory of Regional Integration.’ International Organization, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 173-212.
  40. Hatneh, B. (2012). Globalization and New Regionalism: The Second Great Transformation. In: B. Hetne, A. Inotay and O. Sunkel. New globalism and Regionalism. Translated by Alireza Tayeb. Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publishing Office. pp. 47-83. [In Persian]
  41. Hetne, B.; Soderbaum, F. (2008). ‘The future of Regionalism: old divides, new frontiers.’ In, Cooper, Andrew F., Christopher W. Hughes and Philippe De Lombaerde (eds.) Regionalisation and Global Governance: The taming of globalisation? London and New York: Routledge. pp.61-80.
  42. Hoekman, B. (2007). ‘Regionalism and Development. The European Neighborhood Policy and Integration à la carte’. The Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy, 1 (1), pp.1-55.
  43. Jackson, R. (2000). The Global Covenant. New York: Oxford University Press.
  44. Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy; New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  45. Kolaei, E; Hariri, R; Asadi Kia, B. (2016). The Kurdish issue in Iran-Turkey relations. Geopolitics Quarterly. 12 (3), pp.1-27. [In Persian]
  46. Lambert, P. (2016). ‘The Myth of the Good Neighbour: Paraguay’s Uneasy Relationship with Brazil’. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 35 (1), pp. 34–48.
  47. Linklater, A. (2012). The English School. In: Scott Burchill et al. Theories of International Relations. Translated by H. Moshirzadeh and R. Talebi Arani. Tehran: Mizan Publishing. pp. 127-163. [In Persian]
  48. Little, R. (2014). The contribution of the English School in the study of International Relations, in: A. Ghavam, S. A. Fatemi Nejad, S. Shokouhi. Theory of International Relations: Background and Perspective. Tehran: Qoms Publishing. pp. 151-170. [In Persian]
  49. MacDonald, M. (2013). Construction. In: Paul D. Williams, An Introduction to Security Studies. Translated by Alireza Tayeb. Tehran: Amirkabir. pp. 115-137. [In Persian]
  50. McMillan, S. M. (1997). ‘Interdependence and Conflict.’ Mershon International Studies Review, Vol. 41, No. 1; pp. 33-58.
  51. Powell, J.; Chacha, M. (2016). ‘Investing in stability: Economic interdependence, coups d’état, and the capitalist peace.’ Journal of Peace Research, 53(4), 525–538.
  52. Renda, K. K. (2011). ‘Turkey's neighborhood policy: An emerging complex interdependence?’. Insight Turkey, 13(1), pp. 89-108.
  53. Robst, J.; Polachek, S.; Chang, Y. (2007). ‘Geographic Proximity, Trade, and International Conflict/Cooperation.’ Conflict Management and Peace Science, 24: pp.1-24.
  54. Røren, P. (2019). ‘Status seeking in the friendly Nordic neighborhood’. Cooperation and Conflict, 54(4), pp. 562-579.
  55. Rosamond, B. (2008). ‘Rethinking classical integration theory.’ In, Cooper, Andrew F., Christopher W. Hughes and Philippe De Lombaerde (eds.) Regionalisation and Global Governance: The taming of globalisation? London and New York: Routledge. pp.80-97.
  56. Russett, B.;. Oneal, J. R (2001). Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence and international organizations. New York: Norton.
  57. Sazmand, B.; Jokar, M. (2020). Study of the role of regional powers in shaping the security order of the Middle East (2003 to 2011). Geopolitics Quarterly. Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 171-148. [In Persian]
  58. Sazmand, B.; Jokar, M. (2016). Regional Security Collection, Dynamics and Patterns of Relations between the Persian Gulf Countries. Geopolitics Quarterly. Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 177-151. [In Persian]
  59. Souleimanov, E.; Ditrych, O. (2007). ‘Iran and Azerbaijan: A Contested Neighborhood’. Middle East Policy, 14 (2), pp. 101-116.
  60. Takahara, A. (2012). ‘The Rise of China and Its Neighborhood Diplomacy: Implications for Japanese Foreign Policy’. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 1(1), pp. 47-71.
  61. Talebi Arani, R. (2017). The Concept of International Society from the Perspective of the English School: A Critical Analysis. Journal of Political Science. Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 136-105. [In Persian]
  62. Vayrynen, R. (2003). ‘Regionalism: Old and New.’ International Studies Review; 5, 25–51.
  63. Wight, M. (1979). Power Politics. Edited by Hedley Bull & Carsten Holbread. London: Pelican Books.
  64. Zhang, Y. (2016). ‘China and its neighborhood: transformation, challenges and grand strategy’. International Affairs, 92(4), pp. 835–848.
  65. Zhukov, Y. M.; Stewart, B. M. (2013). ‘Choosing Your Neighbors: Networks of Diffusion in International Relations.’ International Studies Quarterly; 57, 271–287.