تبیین ادراک ژئواکونومی کشورهای همجوار نسبت به دولت منطقه‌ای کردستان عراق

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیای سیاسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

2 استاد جغرافیای سیاسی، گروه جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار جغرافیای سیاسی ،گروه جغرافیا، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

فضاها و مناطق با دارا بودن ارزش‌ها و منابع سیاسی ماهیت ژئوپلیتیکی پیدا می‌کنند و بر تصور(ادراک) ژئوپلیتیکی بازیگران سیاسی تاثیرگذارند و عامل شکل‌گیری الگوهای ژئوپلیتیکی در روابط هستند. دولت منطقه‌ای کردستان مصداق فضاها و مناطق جغرافیایی می‌باشد  که  امروزه به عنوان عنصری فعال و پیش‌رو در معادلات منطقه‌ای  بر ادراک ژئوپلیتیکی کشورها و بازیگران همجوار تاثیرگذار بوده و متقابلاً از آنها تاثیر می‌پذیرد. متغیرهای اقتصادی(ژئواکونومیکی) متداول‌ترین مبانی ادراک ژئوپلیتیکی در مراودات  کشورها و بازیگران سیاسی در ارتباط با مناطق و فضاهای ژئوپلیتیکی محسوب می‌شوند. در این پژوهش به روش توصیفی- تحلیلی با استناد به گزاره‌های معتبر کتابخانه با رویکرد اقتصادی 21 متغیر ژئوپلیتیکی در ارتباط با تبیین ادراک ژئوپلیتیکی بازیگران سیاسی و کشورهای همجوار شناسایی شده‌اند. بر اساس مقایسه تطبیقی مولفه‌ها و شناسه‌های یافت‌شده می‌توان گفت با وجود برخی تفاوت‌های اساسی در علایق و دغدغه‌های ژئوپلیتیکی میزان اشتراک و مشابهت در علایق و دغدغه‌ها نمود بیشتری دارد. پس با وجود رقابت و ناسازگاری در پاره‌ای از زمینه‌ها در فضای ژئوپلیتیکی منطقه کردستان میان بازیگران همجوار، زمینه‌های اتحاد و همکاری استراتژیک فراهم بوده و در نهایت نوع الگوهای رفتاری در روابط ژئوپلیتیکی مبتنی بر تعامل و همگرایی می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining Geo-Economic Perception of Neighboring Countries towards the Kurdistan Regional Government

نویسندگان [English]

  • Jamal Ahmadi Silve 1
  • Mohammad Reza Hafeznia 2
  • Rebaz Ghorbaninejad 3
1 PhD Student in Political Geography, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor in Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of Political Geography, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Spaces and regions, with their values and political resources, acquire a geopolitical nature and affect the geopolitical perception of political actors and are the cause of the formation of geopolitical patterns in relations. The Kurdistan Regional Government is an example of spaces and geographical areas that today, as an active and leading element in regional equations, affect the geopolitical perception of neighboring countries and actors and is reciprocally influenced by them. Economic variables (geo-economic) are the most common principles of geopolitical perception in the relations of countries and political actors in relation to geopolitical regions and spaces. In this research, 21 geopolitical variables related to explaining the geopolitical perception of political actors and neighboring countries are identified using descriptive-analytic method based on valid library propositions with economic approach. Based on a comparative study of the components, it can be said that despite some fundamental differences in geopolitical interests and concerns, the degree of commonality and similarity in interests and concerns is more pronounced. Thus, despite the competition and incompatibility in some areas in the geopolitical space of Kurdistan region between neighboring actors, the grounds for strategic alliance and cooperation are provided and finally the type of behavioral patterns in geopolitical relations is based on interaction and convergence.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Geopolitics
  • Geopolitical Perception
  • Economic Foundation
  • Threat
  • Geopolitical Interests and Concerns
  1. Afshordi, M.H.(2002). Geopolitics of the Caucasus and Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran Command and Staff College of the Revolutionary Guards, Vice President for Research .[In Persian]
  2. Ahmadi, k.(2006). Iraq after the fall of Baghdad, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publications,Tehran.[In Persian]
  3. Ahmadian , G.; Samira, A.; Masoud, A. (2019). Arab spring and the position of the Kurdish Regional Government of Iraq in the Middle Easte, Iranian Research Letter of International Politics,Vol.7 Autumn and winter. (2019). No . 1.[In Persian]
  4. Bahmanabadi, S .(2015). The potentials and subtleties of the relations between Iran and the Iraqi Kurdistan region, Journal of Regional Studies. No  Pp 149-186.[In Persian]
  5. Collins, J (1998). MilitaryGeography.Washington:Brassey.
  6. Darvishi, F; Mohammadian, A. (2014). Investigating the Foreign Political Impact of Turkey in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region on the National Interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran 1991-2013, Defense Political Journal, Year 22, Issue 85, Winter 2014.[In Persian]
  7. Dastmali, M.A .(2017). Turkey and the Kurdish Challenge, Strategic Studies Quarterly, Nineteenth Year, No. 71, pp. 176-171 .[In Persian]
  8. Evin, A; and et al. (2010). Getting to Zero: Turkey, Its Neighbors and the West, Washington D.C: Transatlantic Academy.
  9. Farajirad, A.R; Ghorbaninejad, R. (2017). Study and analysis of the geopolitical situation of Iraqi Kurdistan,
  10. Ghalibaf, M.B; Shegefti, A.Y; Ramezanzadeh Lasboei, M . (2008). Impacts Dimensions of Social Capital on Border Security, Geopolitics Quarterly, 4 Year, No 2.[In Persian]
  11. Ghasemi, A. (2006). Ethnic crisis management in Turkey with emphasis on PKK, Research report, Tehran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies.[In Persian]
  12. Ghorbaninejad, R. (2014). Finding Pattern of Tension Geopolitical Resources in Nation Relations, Case Study: Southwest Asia, Dissertation in Modaress Training University by Guidance Mohammad Reza Hafez Nia.[In Persian]
  13. Gunes, C (2019). The Kurds in a New Middle East, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Hafeznia, M.R. (2018). Principles and concepts of Geopolitics with New Edition and Revision, Mashhad papole.[In Persian]
  15. Hafeznia, M.R; Kaviani Rad, M. (2015). Phylosophy of Political Geography , First Edition, Tehran, Research Institute of Strategic Studies.[In Persian]
  16. Hatami, M.R; Sanyar, M. (2018). Kurdistan Region referendum; Resources and bottlenecks in the formation of a national government, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies,No 76,summer2018,pp 85-111.[In Persian]
  17. Katzman, K. (2013). Iraq: Politic, Governance, and Human Rights. Congressional Research Service(CRS) Report for Congress. August 22, 2013. RS.21968.
  18. Kavianirad, M. (2009). Geopolitical analysis of Iraqi Kurdistan, Defense Strategy Quarterly,6 year,No 20 .[In Persian]
  19. Larzief, M.C. (2002). Kurdistan and Kurd and The Causes of Crisis, Translated by Behzad Khoshhali, Sanandaj: Midia Pub .[In Persian]
  20. Mandel, R. (2000).The changing face of national security, Translation of Strategic Studies Research Institute Tehran: Strategic Publications.[In Persian]
  21. Mehrabi , A.R; Ghamparvar, A .(2012). Effective Geopolitical factors of Kurdish divergence and Crisis in Turkey's Kurdistan,Geopolitics Quarterly, Year 7, Issue 2, Summer 2012, pp. 183 – 213.[In Persian]
  22. Mohammad, T.(2012).(Orsam.blogfa.com) .[In Persian]
  23. Mohammadi, A (2016). The geopolitical bottlenecks and potentials of the political independence of Iraqi Kurdistan, Kani katib.[In Persian]
  24. Mohammadi, H.R; Khaledi, H.(2012). Geopolitics of Iraqi Kurdistan,Tehran: Eentekhab.[In Persian]
  25. Mohammadi, H.R; Khaledi, H; Salimnejad,N. (2011). Orthern Iraq Autonomy and Its Impacts for the Neighboring Ethnocentric Movements, Geopolitics Quarterly, Year 6, Issue 1, Spring 2011, pp. 112-148.[In Persian]
  26. Nasri, Gh; Rezai, D. (2014). The Feasibility study of the Iraqi Kurdish region independence and its impacts on Irans national security, Research Security, volume 12,winter 2014,No 44, PP 29-56.[In Persian]
  27. Nikfar, J; Mahidashti, M.(2016). Analysis of Iraqi Kurdistan's Oil Strategy, Goals and Approaches, Strategic Policy Research: Fall 2015 No. 14, PP 167- 197.[In Persian]
  28. Noer, J. (1996). Maritime Interestsin southeast Asia. ashington,DC:National Defense.University
  29. Olson, R. (2006). Relations among Turkey, Iraq, Kurdistan-Iraq, the Wider Middle East, and Iran, Mediterranean Quarterly <http://muse.jhu.edu.
  30. Omar Dabbagh, N. (2012). Investigating the trade relations between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Iraqi Kurdistan region, http://nazimdabbagh.com/fa /index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=83&Itemid=1.[In Persian]
  31. Paasche, T.F; Mansuurbeg. (2014). "Kurdistan Regional Government- Turkish energy relations: a complex partnership" Accessed July 17, 2014. http://dx. doi.org.
  32. Paz Amit, (2011). "Oil and Political Authority: An Analysis of Relations Between the Government of Iraq and the Kurdistan Regional Government", MIMEP Insight,retrievedfromhttp:// www.tuftsgloballeadership.org.
  33. Peshgahefard, Z; Karimi, H. (2019). Investigating the Consequences of the Regional Referendum in Iraqi Kurdistan, Journal of Human Geography Research, Volume 50, No 4, Winter 2019, pp1029-1047.[In Persian]
  34. Philips, D.L. (2009). Confidence Building between Turks and Iraqi Kurds, Atlantic Council of the United States,https://cdn.atlanticcouncil.org/ wpcontent/uploads/2009/06/ConfidenceBuildingBetweenTurksandIraqiKurds.pdf.
  35. Pourkhosravi, A. (2009). Turkey and the Whirlpool of Iraqi Transformation, Journal of Political-Economic Information, Vol. 22,No.248.[In Persian]
  36. Qorbani, A. (2012). Strategic study of us foreign policy in Iraqi Kurdistan and national security of the Islamic republic of iran, Strategy Quarterly, No. 62. .[In Persian]
  37. Romina, I; Bidar, M.T. (2019). The Impact of U.S Strategy on Iraqi Kurdistan from 1971 to 2014, Geopolitics Quarterly, Fourteenth year, second issue, summer 2019, pp. 1-20.[In Persian]
  38. Stansfield, G. (2013). The unraveling of the post first world war state system? The Kurdistan region of Iraq and the transformation of the Middle East, International Affairs, No 89.
  39. The World Bank (2015). THE KURDISTAN REGION OF IRAQ, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/579451468305943474/pdf/958080PUB0Apri0PUBLIC09781464805486.pdf.
  40. Tourism Strategic Plan for Kurdistan Region (2013). Kurdistan Regional Government Ministry of Municipalities and Tourism, General Board of Tourism:http://bot.gov.krd/sites/default/files/Documents/TOURISM%20STR- ATEGIC%20PLAN_compressed.pdf.
  41. Valencia, M. (1995). China and the South China Sea DisPutes ,Adelphi paper 298 .London :International Institute for Strategic Studies.
  42. Zibakalam, S; Abdullahpour, M.R. (2012). Fragile geopolitics ,convergence factor in Approaching of Iraqi Kurds  to Israel, Politics Quarterly, Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, Volume 41, No 4, pp. 59-   [In Persian]
  43. خبرگزاری الجزیره (http://www.aljazireh.com).
  44. خبرگزاری ایرنا (https://www.irna.ir).
  45. خبرگزاری ایسنا (https://www.isna.ir).
  46. خبرگزاری آنا (https://ana.ir).
  47. خبرگزاری آناتولی (https://www.aa.com.tr)
  48. خبرگزاری رویترز ((https://www.reuters.com
  49. خبرگزاری کردستان 24 ((https://www.kurdistan24.net
  50. خبرگزاری مهر (https://www.mehrnews.com
  51. روزنامۀ دیلی صباح چاپ ترکیه به تاریخ 9/6/2018؛ (https://www.dailysabah.com)
  52. سایت خبری- تحلیلی تابناک (https://www.tabnak.ir)
  53. خبرگزاری سانا: خبرگزاری جمهوری عربی سوریه (https://www.sana.sy)
  54. تی‌آرتی: سازمان رادیو و تلویزیون دولتی ترکیه (https://www.trt.net.tr) 
  55. خبرگزاری فرانس 24 (https://www.france24.com).
  56. خبرگزاری فارس (https://farsnews.ir).
  57. kurd.us
  58. com :Kurdistan Regional Government area of control (Chapman,2008)