Critical Attitude to the Function of Capital in the Urban Space of a Geopolitical Aspect

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Ph. D Candidate of Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Assistant Political Geography, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده

From the geopolitics point of view, the city is considered a geographic space that a variety range of actors competes with each other for achieving power and benefits, and in this proceeding, economy and capital are in the spotlight. It can be said function of capital in urban space is much-expanded that causing the formation of contesting, so capital is studied in urban geopolitics. For this reason, capital is the major issue of this study and authors have tried to show how capital affects the spaces of urban geography with a critical approach. Ontologically, this study is descriptive-analytical research and has used library methodology to achieve the goals. Results demonstrate which, from a critical geopolitics point of view urban space is an important focus for presenting the appearance of spatial political economy, which in its framework a collection of spatial proceedings and functions of capital, is recognizable and displayable.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Critical Attitude to the Function of Capital in the Urban Space of a Geopolitical Aspect

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mojtaba Shoeibi 1
  • Zahra Ahmadipour 2
  • Mohammad Reza Hafeznia 3
  • Morteza Ghourchi 4
1 Ph. D Candidate of Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor Political Geography, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
4 Assistant Political Geography, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

From the geopolitics point of view, the city is considered a geographic space that a variety range of actors competes with each other for achieving power and benefits, and in this proceeding, economy and capital are in the spotlight. It can be said function of capital in urban space is much-expanded that causing the formation of contesting, so capital is studied in urban geopolitics. For this reason, capital is the major issue of this study and authors have tried to show how capital affects the spaces of urban geography with a critical approach. Ontologically, this study is descriptive-analytical research and has used library methodology to achieve the goals. Results demonstrate which, from a critical geopolitics point of view urban space is an important focus for presenting the appearance of spatial political economy, which in its framework a collection of spatial proceedings and functions of capital, is recognizable and displayable.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Urban Space
  • Geopolitics
  • Capital
  • the Political Economy of Space

مراجع

  1. Adele, M (2001). Urban and Regional Political Economy. (F. Raisdana, Trans.) Tehran, Tehran, Iran: Qatreh. [In Persian]
  2. Aghaei, S; Akbarian, A (2011). Political Economy of Multi-National Companies & Developing Based Goverment. Political Quarterly, 41(1), 1-20. [In Persian]
  3. Ahmadipour, Z; Ghaderi Hajat, M. (2015). Political Organizing and Planning of Urban Space. Tehran, Tehran, Iran: Samt. [In Persian]
  4. Ahmadipour, Z; Ghaderi Hajat, M. (2017). Political Organizing and Planning of Urban Space. Tehran, Tehran, Iran: Samt. [In Persian]
  5. Beck, N; N. Katz, J (1995). What to do (and not to do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review, 9(3), 634-647. doi:10.2307/2082979.
  6. Beck, N.; N. Katz, J. (1996). Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models. Political Analysis, 6, 1-36. doi:10.1093/pan/6.1.1.
  7. Beck, N; Skrede Gleditsch, K; Beardsley, K (2006). Space Is More than Geography: Using Spatial Econometrics in the Study of Political Economy. International Studies Quarterly, 50(1), 27-44. doi:10.1111/J.1468-2478.2006. 00391.X.
  8. Blacksell, M (2010). Political Geography. (M. Hafeznia, A. Ahmadi, A. Abdi, & H. Rabiei, Trans.) Tehran, Tehran, Iran: Entekhab. [In Persian]
  9. Boulding, K. E (2018). capital and interest. Retrieved July, 22, 2018., from https://www.britannica.com/topic/capital-economics.
  10. Cloke, P; Philo, C; Sadler, D (1991). Approaching Human Geography: An Introduction to Contemporary Theoretical Debates. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  11. Ehteshami, A (2007). Globalization and Geopolitics in the Middle East: Old Games, New Rules. London and New York: Routledge.
  12. Gilpin, R (1999). The Nature of Political Economy. (M. Taghavi, Ed.) Political and Economic Information, 134 & 144, 200-207.
  13. Gleditsch, K. S (2002 a). All International Politics is Local: The Diffusion of Conflict, Integration, and Democratization. University of Michigan Press; Illustrated edition (August 7, 2002).
  14. Gleditsch, K. S (2002 b). Expanded Trade and GDP Data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(5), 712-724. doi:10.1177/0022002702046005006.
  15. Habibi, S. M (2020). From City to City: Historical Analysis of Concept City and its Physical Form. Tehran, Iran: Tehran University. [In Persian]
  16. Hafeznia, M. R; Ahmadipour, Z; Ghaderi Hajat, M (2015). Polotics and Space. Mashhad, North Khorasan, Iran: Papoli. [In Persian]
  17. Hafeznia, M; Kaviani Rad, M (2020). Philosophy of Political Geography. Tehran, Tehran, Iran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
  18. Hafeznia, M; Mokhtari Hashi, H; Roknaldin Eftekhari, A (2012). Geopolitical Challenges of Regional Integration Case study: Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO). Geopolitics Quarterly, 8(25), 1-41. doi:20.1001.1.17354331.1391.8.25.1.7 [In Persian]
  19. Haggerty, S; Webster, A; White, N (2009). Retrieved from Reviews in History: https://reviews.history.ac.uk/review/737.
  20. Hall, T; Hubbard, P (1998). The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regime and Representation. Chichester, England; New York: Wiley.
  21. Hansen, N, Higgins, B, Savoie, D (1997). Regional Policy in a Changing World. (Translators Group (Under-the-supervision: Parviz-Ejlali), Trans.) Program and Budget Organization, Center for Socio-Economic Documents and Publications. [In Persian]
  22. Harvey, D (2001). Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography. Published, 2001 by. Edinburgh, England: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
  23. Harvey, D (2009). Social Justice and the City. University of Georgia Press.
  24. Harvey, D (2019). The Enigma of Capital: And the Crises of Capitalism. (M. Amini, Trans.) Tehran: Kalagh. [In Persian]
  25. Held, D; McGrew, A (2003). Globalization/ Anti-Globalization. (M. Karbasian, Trans.) Tehran, Tehran, Iran: Ghoqnoos. [In Persian]
  26. Hodos, J (2007). Globalization and the Concept of the Second City. City & Community, 6(4), 315-333. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6040.2007. 00230.x.
  27. Kamanroudi Kajouri, M; Karami, T; Abdi, A (2010). Philosophical-Conceptual Explanation of Political Geography of City. Geopolitics Quarterly, 6(19), 9-44. doi:20.1001.1.17354331.1389.6.19.7.7. [In Persian]
  28. Katozian, M. A (2020). Iran's Political Economy: from Constitutionalism to the end of the Pahlavi Dynasty. (M. Nafisi and K. Azizi, Trans.) Tehran, Tehran, Iran: Ney. [In Persian]
  29. Keating, M (1991). Comparative Urban Politics: Power and the City in the United States, Canada, Britain and France. USA: Edward Elgar Pub.
  30. Khalilabadi, H (2011). Urban Geopolitics. Tehran, Tehran, Iran: Noavaran Sharif. [In Persian]
  31. Kresl, P; Gappert, G (1395). North American Cities and the Global Economy: Challenges and Opportunities. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  32. Marx, K (2020). Capital: Critique of Political Economy, Volume 2 (Vol. 4). (H. Mortazavi, Trans.) Tehran, Tehran, Iran: Lahita. [In Persian]
  33. Mazúr, E; Urbánek, J (1983). Space in geography. GeoJournal, 7(2), 139-143. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00185159.
  34. Mir Emadi, T. (1995). Political Economy Structural Adjustment Programs and the Latest Developments in Theories of Development Economics. Political and Economic Information, 95 and 96, 117-121. [In Persian]
  35. Online Etymology Dictionary. (2018). Retrieved 2018, from https://www.etymonline.com/.
  36. Pacione, M (2009). Urban Geography: A Global Perspective. New York, USA: Routledge.
  37. Peet, R (2007). Geography of Power: Making Global Economic Policy. London: Zed Books.
  38. Pike, A; Rodriguez-Pose, A; Tomaney, J (2016). Local and Regional Development (2 ed.). Routledge.
  39. Pilger, J (2021). The New Rulers of the World (4 ed.). (M. Shahabi, & M. Shahabi, Trans.) Tehran, Tehran, Iran: Akhtaran. [In Persian]
  40. Relph, E (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.
  41. Ritzer, G (2019). The McDonaldization of Society: Into the Digital Age (9 ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  42. Robertson, R (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. Sage Publications, Inc.
  43. Salbuchi, A (2011). The Coming World Government: Tragedy and Hope? Buenos Aires, Argentina: Second Republic Project.
  44. Samuelson, P; Nordhaus, W (2009). Economics (Vol. 19). McGraw-Hill Education.
  45. Sarrafi, M (1998). The Fundamentals of Regional Development Planning. Tehran: Regional planning Group. [In Persian]
  46. Sassen, S (2017). Losing Control? Sovereignty in the Age of Globalization. (M. Irani Fard, Trans.) Tehran, Tehran, Iran: Ghasideh Sara. [In Persian]
  47. Seamon, D; Sowers, J (2008). Place and Placelessness, Edward Relph. Key Texts in Human Geography, 43-51. doi:10.4135/9781446213742.n5.
  48. Timberlake, M; Sanderson, M. R; Ma, X; Derudder, B; Winitzky, J; Witlox, F (2012). Testing a Global City Hypothesis: An Assessment of Polarization across US Cities. City & Community, 11(1), 74-93. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6040.2011.01394. x.
  49. Tonkiss, F (2006). Space, the City and Social Theory: Social Relations and Urban Forms (Vol. 1st edition). London, England: Polity.
  50. Tuan, Y. F (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. London: Univ of Minnesota Press.
  51. Wang, J. H (2004). World City Formation, Geopolitics and Local Political Process: Taipei's Ambiguous Development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(2), 384-400. doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004. 00525.x.

Ziaei, M (2004). Regional Planning Analysis in Iran. Ph. D Thesis. Tehran, Iran: Tehran University. [In Persian]

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 17 اردیبهشت 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 06 آذر 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 11 آذر 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار