فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

Economic Leverage: The Role of Sanctions in Shaping International Relations

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 Faculty of Law, University Kebangsaan, Malaysia.
2 College of Law, Al-Bayan University, Iraq.
3 College of Law, Al-Mustaqbal University, Iraq.
10.22034/igq.2025.544207.2072
چکیده
Economic sanctions have evolved into a pivotal instrument of foreign policy, enabling states to exert pressure without direct military confrontation. Traditionally viewed as tools for punishment or coercion, their strategic function as instruments of economic leverage is receiving growing scholarly and policy attention. However, a conceptual gap persists in understanding how sanctions operate not only as punitive measures but as proactive mechanisms for shaping global behavior and diplomacy. This study aims to bridge this gap by critically examining sanctions as instruments of economic statecraft, focusing on their ability to influence state behavior, uphold international norms, and serve long-term strategic interests. Adopting a qualitative, doctrinal methodology, the article analyzes key international legal frameworks, sanctions regimes, and historical case studies involving major powers such as the U.S., EU, and China. The findings reveal that while sanctions are often framed within legal and moral justifications, their effectiveness depends heavily on multilateral coordination, economic integration levels, and the credibility of enforcement. Ultimately, the study concludes that sanctions, when strategically designed and legally grounded, can serve as effective tools of economic leverage, but their overuse or misuse risks undermining their legitimacy and the broader international legal order.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Economic Leverage: The Role of Sanctions in Shaping International Relations

نویسندگان English

Teh Teik Kuan 1
Lau Jia Ying 1
Sameer Dawood Abed 2
Taha Kadhem Hassan 3
Aminurasyed Mahpop 1
1 Faculty of Law, University Kebangsaan, Malaysia.
2 College of Law, Al-Bayan University, Iraq.
3 College of Law, Al-Mustaqbal University, Iraq.
چکیده English

Economic sanctions have evolved into a pivotal instrument of foreign policy, enabling states to exert pressure without direct military confrontation. Traditionally viewed as tools for punishment or coercion, their strategic function as instruments of economic leverage is receiving growing scholarly and policy attention. However, a conceptual gap persists in understanding how sanctions operate not only as punitive measures but as proactive mechanisms for shaping global behavior and diplomacy. This study aims to bridge this gap by critically examining sanctions as instruments of economic statecraft, focusing on their ability to influence state behavior, uphold international norms, and serve long-term strategic interests. Adopting a qualitative, doctrinal methodology, the article analyzes key international legal frameworks, sanctions regimes, and historical case studies involving major powers such as the U.S., EU, and China. The findings reveal that while sanctions are often framed within legal and moral justifications, their effectiveness depends heavily on multilateral coordination, economic integration levels, and the credibility of enforcement. Ultimately, the study concludes that sanctions, when strategically designed and legally grounded, can serve as effective tools of economic leverage, but their overuse or misuse risks undermining their legitimacy and the broader international legal order.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Economic sanctions
international relations
United Nations
European Union
1.       Abdullah, M.F; Mohd Noor, A; Tan C.S; Wan Ibrahim, W.K. (2024). The Water War between Kedah- Penang in Malaysia: The Relation in the Management of Sungai Muda Raw Water, 1965–1985. Geopolitics Quarterly, 20(2): 151-170. https://doi.org/10.22034/igq.2024.180173.
2.       Abughris, N. (2021). A brief history of economic sanctions. Carter-Ruck. Available at: https://www.carter-ruck.com/insight/a-brief-history-of-econ- omic-sanctions/. (Accessed on: 31/5/2025).
3.       Ahmadian H; Mohseni S. (2023). Geopolitical feasibility of the second wave of Arab revolutions in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Geopolitics Quarterly, 19(72): 67-92. https://doi.org/10.22034/igq.2023. 144304.
4.       Al Jazeera. (2003). Libya Accepts Lockerbie Blame. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2003/8/16/libya-accepts-lockerbie-blame, (Accessed on: 30/5/2025).
5.       Alabdalrahman, G.A; Ahamat H; Althabhawi, N.M. (2023). Foreign Direct Investment: A Comparative Analysis between Iraq and the UAE. Sriwijaya Law Review, 7(2): 262-286. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7. Iss2. 2773. pp262-286.
6.       Alexander, K. (2009). The Origins and Use of Economic Sanctions, in Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks, 8–29, Available at:  https://doi.org/10. 1057/97802302 27286_2, (Accessed on: 27/5/2025).
7.       Althabhawi N.M; Al-Ghetaa A.A.K. (2023). The COVID-19 vaccine patent: a right without rationale. Medical Humanities, 49(1), 128-133. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/medhum-2022-012386.
8.       Althabhawi, N.M; Cheng, J.H; Hew, M.M; Li, X; Bagheri P; Al-Jubouri O.S.A. (2024). An Analysis of the Impact of China's Belt and Road Initiative towards Malaysia. Geopolitics Quarterly, 20: 183-209. https://doi.org/10.220 34/igq.2024.474017.1934.
9.       Althabhawi, N.M; Zainol, Z.A (2013). Patentable Novelty in Nanotechnology Inventions: a Legal Study in Iraq and Malaysia. Nanoethics 7, 121–133 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-013-017.
10.   B. Bull; A. Tostensen. (2001). Bolstering Human Rights by Means of ‘Smart’ Sanctions? In Human Rights in Development. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004208193_004 , (Accessed on: 28/5/2025).
11.   Babar, S.I; Mirza, M.N; Qaisrani, I.H. (2021). Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (Jcpoa): Prospects and Challenges for the Global Security. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 9(1): 126–32, Available at: https://doi.org/10.18510/ hssr.2021.9113, (Accessed on: 20/5/2025).
12.   Barber, J. (1979). Economic Sanctions as a Policy Instrument, International Affairs, 55(3): 367–84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2615145, (Accessed on: 22/5/2025).
13.   BBC News. (2014). US Imposes Travel Ban on Venezuelan Officials. July 30. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-28569936, (Accessed on: 26/5/2025).
14.   Carter, B.E. (1987). International Economic Sanctions: Improving the Haphazard U.S. Legal Regime. California Law Review, 75(4): 1159–1207. Available at:  https://doi.org/10.2307/3480594, (Accessed on: 27/5/2025).
15.   Congressional Research Service. (2023). Sanctions Primer: How the United States Uses Restrictive Mechanisms to Advance Foreign Policy or National Security Objectives.  Available at: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/R47829.pdf, (Accessed on: 1/6/2025).
16.   Council of Europe. Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism. Targeted financial sanctions. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/moneyval/implemen- tation/targeted-financial-sanctions. (Accessed on: 31/5/2025).
17.   Council of the European Union. (2014). Ukrainian Crisis: EU Broadens Remit of Sanctions. Press release, July 18, 2014. Available at: https://www.consilium. europa.eu/press. (Accessed on: 2/6/2025).
18.   Council on Foreign Relations. (2022). What to Know About Sanctions on North Korea. Council on Foreign Relations, July 27. Available at: https:// www.cfr.org/backgrounder/north-korea-sanctions-un-nuclear-weapons, (Accessed on: 29/5/2025).
19.   Dai, M; Felbermayr, G.J; Kirilakha, A; Syropoulos, C; Yalcin, E; Yotov, Y. V. (2021).  Timing the Impact of Sanctions on Trade. In Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/ 978183910 2721.00031, (Accessed on: 27/5/2025).
20.   Dastgerdi, H.G; Yusof Z; Shahbaz, M. (2018). Nexus between Economic Sanctions and Inflation: A Case Study in Iran. Applied Economics, 50(49): 5316–5334. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1486988.
21.   Department for Business and Trade. (2012). Trade Sanctions, Arms Embargoes, and Other Trade Restrictions. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/ current-arms-embargoes-and-other-restrictions, (Accessed on: 10/6/2025).
22.   Dyson, T; Cetorelli, V. (2017). Changing Views on Child Mortality and Economic Sanctions in Iraq: A History of Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics. BMJ Global Health, 2 (2): e000311. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjgh-2017-000311.
23.   Elliott, A. (2010). Assessing UN Sanctions after the Cold War: New and Evolving Standards of Measurement.  International Journal, 65(1) (2010): 85–97. 10.1177/002070201006500106.
24.   EUR-Lex. (2024). EU Restrictive Measures in View of Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine. December 20, 2024. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=legissum:25_2, (Accessed on: 6/6/2025).
25.   European Council. (2024). How The EU Adopts and Reviews Sanctions. Accessed June 1, 2025. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/ sanctions-adoption-review-procedure.
26.   European Council. (2025). Sanctions Against Human Rights Violations. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions-human-rights-abuses. (Accessed on: 2/6/2025).
27.   Far, T.S. (2019). “Maximum Pressure” US Economic Sanctions Harm Iranians’ Right to Health. Human Rights Watch.  October 29, 2019. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/report/2019/10/29/maximum-pressure/us-economic-sanctions-harm-iranians-right-health, (Accessed on: 3/6/2025).
28.   Financial Crime Academy. (2025). History of Sanctions: The Sanction Origin and Fundamentals. Available at: https://financialcrimeacademy.org/ history-of-sanctions-the-sanction-origin/, (Accessed on: 31/5/2025).
29.   Financial Crime Academy. (2025). Investigating Various Categories of Sanction. Available at: https://financialcrimeacademy.org/investigating-various-categories-of-sanctions/, (Accessed on: 10/6/2025).
30.   Galtung, J. (1967). On the Effects of International Economic Sanctions: With Examples from the Case of Rhodesia. World Politics, 19(3): 378–416, Available at:  https://doi.org/10.2307/2009785, (Accessed on: 27/5/2025).
31.   Gordon, J. (2011). Smart Sanctions Revisited. Ethics & International Affairs, 25(3): 315–335, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0892679411000323. (Accessed on: 31/5/2025).
32.   Griffiths, A; Barnes C. (2008). Powers of persuasion: Incentives, sanctions and conditionality in peacemaking, Conciliation Resources, Accord 19. Available at: https://www.c-r.org/accord/incentives-sanctions-and-condition- ality/international-isolation-and-pressure-change-south. (Accessed on: 1/6/ 2025).
33.   Hörbelt, C. (2017). A Comparative Study: Where and Why Does the EU Impose Sanctions? UNISCI Journal, 43: 53-71. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/ 10.5209/RUNI.54780, (Accessed on: 27/5/2025).
34.   Hufbauer, G.C; Schott, J.J; Elliot, K.A. (2009). Economic Sanctions Reconsidered, 3rd Edition (Paper), Peterson Institute for International Economics, Available at: https://dl1.cuni.cz/pluginfile.php/863435/mod_ resource/content/0/Gary%20Clyde%20Hufbauer%2C%20Jeffrey%20J.%20Schott%2C%20Kimberly%20Ann%20Elliott%2C%20Barbara%20Oegg-Economic %20Sanctions%20Reconsidered%20%282008%29.pdf, (Accessed on: 1/6/2025).
35.   International Committee of the Red Cross. Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention). (1949). https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949.
36.   Jahangir, A. (2012). Economic Crisis in Iran. Carnegie. Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2012/05/economic-crisis-in-iran?lang= en, (Accessed on: 6/6/2025).
37.   Jazairy, I. (2018). Civilians Suffering Due to Sanctions Must Be Spared ‘Collective Punishment’ Urges UN Rights Expert. United Nations News. Available at:    https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/11/1025201, (Accessed on: 27/ 5/2025).
38.   Joshi, S; Mahmud, A.S. (2018). Unilateral and Multilateral Sanctions: A Network Approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 145: 52–65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.10.010, (Accessed on: 2/6/ 2025).
39.   Kaempfer, W.H; Lowenberg, A.D. (2007). The Political Economy of Economic Sanctions.” In Handbook of Defense Economics, 867–911. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1574-0013 (06)02027-8, (Accessed on: 4/6/2025).
40.   Katzman, K. (2019). Iran Sanctions. Congressional Research Service. Available at: https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20191115_RS20871_84b40bd275f6 ce5988354065f35bb900c1b17c9c.pdf, (Accessed on: 8/6/2025).
41.   Kazantsev, S.V. (2019). Evaluation of the Sanctions Impact on Sanctioning Countries’ Trade with Russia. Finance: Theory and Practice, 23(3): 6–15, Available at: https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2019-23-3-6-15, (Accessed on: 27/5/2025).
42.   Kelly, B. (2024). US, UK and EU Announce New Measures Against Iran and Russia - Global Sanctions and Export Controls Blog. Global Sanctions and Export Controls Blog. Available at: https://sanctionsnews. Bakermckenzie .com/us-uk-and-eu-announce-new-measures-against-iran-and-russia/, (Accessed on: 27/5/2025).
43.   Kholodilin, K; Netšunajev, A. (2018). Crimea and Punishment: The Impact of Sanctions on Russian Economy and Economies of the Euro Area. Baltic Journal of Economics, 19(1): 39–51, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1406099x.2018.1547566, (Accessed on: 31/5/2025).
44.   Kline, A; Hwang, T. (2021). From Cold War Sanctions to Weaponized Interdependence: An Annotated Bibliography on Competition and Control over Emerging Technologies. Centre for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) Data Brief, Available at: https://cset.georgetown.edu/wp-content/ uploads/From-Cold-War-Sanctions-to-Weaponized-Interdependence.pdf, (Accessed on: 2/6/2025).
45.   Kobayashi, Y. (2017). Economic Sanction as Foreign Policy. In The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Foreign Policy Analysis, Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.477, (Accessed on: 1/6/2025).
46.   Krulikowski, S. (2024). Economic Sanctions: An Overview. U.S. International Trade Commission. Available at: https://www.usitc.gov/ publications/332/ executive_briefings/ebot_economic_sanctions_overview.pdf, (Accessed on: 31/5/2025).
47.   Kunz, J.L. (1960). Sanctions in International Law. American Journal of International Law 54(2): 324–347, Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.2307/ 2195251, (Accessed on: 31/5/2025).
48.   Lachica, A. (2020). Revisiting the Rwandan Genocide: Reflections on the French-led Humanitarian Intervention. Geopolitics Quarterly, 16(60), 101-115. Available at: https://doi.org/20.1001.1.17354331.1399.16.60.5.7, (Accessed on: 1/6/2025).
49.   Maha, A.M; Yusli, A.H.L; Zukafli, A.L; Hasman, I.M; Hassim, J.Z; Wan Abd Rahman, W.F.I; Al-Janabi, A.M.S. (2024). The Implication of International Disputes on the International Trade: Malaysia as a Case Study. Geopolitics Quarterly, 20: 117-139. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22034/ igq.2024. 475845.1944. (Accessed on: 3/6/2025).
50.   Majidi, A.F; Zarouni Z. (2016). The Impact of Sanctions on the Economy of Iran. International Journal of Resistive Economics, Toroudshomal Research-Industrial Company, 4(1): 84–99. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/ a/trd/journl/v4y2016i1p84-99.html, (Accessed on: 3/6/2025).
51.   Mallard, G; Sabet, F; Sun, J. (2020). The Humanitarian Gap in the Global Sanctions Regime. Brill. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02601003. (Accessed on: 22/5/2025).
52.   Masters, J. (2024). What Are Economic Sanctions? Council on Foreign Relations. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-are-economic-sanctions, (Accessed on: 10/6/2025).
53.   Mat Basir, S. (2008). Trade Agreements under WTO: Issues Leading to Injustice among OIC Member States. Journal of Law and Society 15: 119–134. Available at: https://ejournal.ukm.my/juum/article/view/7507/3029. (Accessed on: 2/6/ 2025).
54.   Moghadam S.B; Gadai A. (2024). Comparative Study of the Concept of Look East in the Foreign Policy of Iran and India. Geopolitics Quarterly, 20(2): 134-150, Available at: https://doi.org/10.22034/igq.2024.179391.
55.   Morgan, T.C; Constantinos, S; Yotov Y.V. (2023). Economic Sanctions: Evolution, Consequences, and Challenges. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(1): 3–29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.37.1.3, (Accessed on: 10/6/2025).
56.   Nephew, R. (2019). Economic Sanctions in International Law and Practice. Routledge, Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429052989-8, (Accessed on: 1/6/2025).
57.   Neuenkirch, M; Neumeier, F. (2015). The Impact of UN and US Economic Sanctions on GDP Growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 40 (PA): 110–125, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.09.001, (Accessed on: 27/5/2025).
58.   Nordin, R. (2008). Malaysian Perspective on Human Rights. Journal of Law and Society, 14: 17–33. Available at: http://ejournal.ukm.my/ juum/article /view/ 7506, (Accessed on: 28/5/2025).
59.   Nordin, S.I; Mohd Kamal, M.H. (2023). Role of the International Humanitarian Law Committee of Malaysia in the Implementation of International Humanitarian Law. Journal of Law and Society 33: 39–48, https://doi.org/10.17576/juum-2023-33-04, (Accessed on: 27/5/2025).
60.   Peksen, D; Son, B. (2015). Economic Coercion and Currency Crises in Target Countries. Journal of Peace Research, 52 (4): 448–62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314563636, (Accessed on: 1/6/2025).
61.   Popal, G.R. (1999). Impact of sanctions on the population of Iraq. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 6(4): 791-795.  Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.26719/2000.6.4.791. (Accessed on: 2/6/2025).
62.   Rohimi, A.H.M; Norulhelmi, M.F.A; Mahyudin, N; Apurushothaman, R; Fadzil, R.M; Arif, M.I.A.M; Kadhim, A.A. (2024). Malaysia, Regional Trade Agreements, International Trade Law, Geopolitics, Multilateral Trading System. Geopolitics Quarterly, 20: 87-116, Available at: https://doi.org/10. 22034/igq.2024.475350.1941, (Accessed on: 20/5/2025).
63.   Sanction Scanner. (2025). Sanctions: Financial and Trade Restrictions. April 28, 2025, Available at: https://www.sanctionscanner.com/knowledge-base/what-are-sanctions-financial-and-trade-restrictions-1039, (Accessed on: 27/5/2025).
64.   Selden, Zachary A. (1999). Economic Sanctions as Instruments of American Foreign Policy. Praeger.
65.   Sipress, A; Mintz, J. (2003). Libya Accepts Responsibility for Bombing Over Lockerbie. The Washington Post, April 30. Available at: https://www. washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2003/05/01/libya-accepts-responsibility for bombing-over-lockerbie/7865ce94-c723-4458-beff-f1841bc5cdaa/, (Accessed on : 27/5/2025).
66.   Smagin, N. (2022). Comrades-in-Sanctions: Can Iran Help Russia Weather the Economic Storm? Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/ politika/ 2022/ 10/comrades-in-sanctions-can-iran-help-russia-weather-the-economic-storm? Lang=en, (Accessed on: 10/6/2025).
67.   Spagat, M. (2010). Truth and Death in Iraq under Sanctions. Significance 7 (3): 116–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2010.00437.x, (Accessed on: 3/6/2025).
68.   The Guardian. (2003). UN Lifts Sanctions against Libya. December 22, 2003. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/sep/12/ lockerbie. Libya, (Accessed on: 27/5/2025).
69.   United Nations General Assembly. International Covenant on Economic, (1966). Social and Cultural Rights. Adopted December 16, 1966. Entered into force January 3, 1976. 993 U.N.T.S. 3. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/ instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international -covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights, (Accessed on: 25/5/2025).
70.United Nations Security Council. (1990). Resolution 661 (1990), adopted by the Security Council at its 2933rd meeting, on 6 August 1990. S/RES/661(1990). New York: United Nations, 1990. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/  record/94221? Ln=en&v=pdf, (Accessed on: 25/5/2025).
71.       United Nations Security Council. (1992). Resolution 748 (1992), adopted by the Security Council at its 3063rd meeting, on 31 March 1992. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196976?ln=en&v=pdf, (Accessed on: 25/5/2025).
72.       United Nations. (2003). Security Council Lifts Sanctions Imposed On Libya After Terrorist Bombings Of Pan Am 103, UTA 772. Available at: https://media.un.org/photo/en/asset/oun7/oun7775808, (Accessed on: 25/5/2025).
73.       United States Department of State. (2025). Cuba Sanctions United States Department of State. February 3, 2025. Available at: https://www.state. gov/ cuba-sanctions/#:~:text=In%20February%201962%2C %20President %20 John,which%20remains%20in%20place%20today, (Accessed on: 26/5/ 2025)
74.Valkadinova, V. (2018). The principle of proportionality in the application of sanctions and other measures of state coercion according to Bulgarian legislation and European Union law. Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta Nis, 57(79): 181–196. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfni1879181v, (Accessed on: 25/5/2025).
دوره 21، شماره ویژه
زمستان 1404
صفحه 90-115

  • تاریخ دریافت 18 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 22 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 24 مهر 1404