عنوان مقاله [English]
Access and lack of access the countries to open sea, formating the geographical location of coastal peninsula, island or landlocked for the country. Marine and ocean environment compared with dry environments have different characteristics. Area of ocean is three times the land. Water bodies are spherical cohesion while the land suffered the fragmentation of space. Water bodies, have environmental position and dry Area have peripheral position. The controling of water bodies in the world will be have initiative and challenging the dry area. Sea power is one most important facets of states’ national power. Sea power is not considered properly in evaluating national power, because it includes different factors. Sea power is the only facet of national powers that can be presented in different water bodies, and do not suffer from land and air powers limitations. This article investigates the role of geographic and territorial situation in states sea power.
Materials and Methods
This research is fundamental and in terms of nature is descriptive - analytical and ecological research among geographical sciences rather than lie. The data analysis procedure is based on qualitative method. The data collection tools by visiting the library, papers, documents and information portals specialized organizations.
Results and discussion
Sea power is formed from different factors like geographic-territorial, social, economic, political, diplomatic and military.Geographic and territorial situation of sea states is the most important factor in their sea power, and all of the other factors depends on this factor. Geographic and territorial situation of sea states includes the length (up to 200 nautical miles) of shore and some other territorial features. Sea access, the nature of the coastal zone (properties of the coastal zone), territorial scope and area of the country, maritime zones, connection to Sea lines of communication (straits, channels etc.) islands (residential and non-residential), are the most important factors related to the geographic and territorial factor.
These factors are investigated in this article. Beside of the importance of each factor, the nature of the coastal zone is important than other geographic and territorial factors. In other words, the nature of the coastal zone characterizes the abilities and limitations of the states’ sea power.
11. Falk, K. L. (2000). Why Nations Put to Sea: Technology and the Changing Character of Sea Power in the Twenty-First Century (Studies on Industrial Productivity). London and New York, Routledge Publication.
14. Glassner, M. I. Fahrer, C. (2004). Political Geography (Third Edition). New York, John Wiley & Sons Publication.
15. Grygiel, J. J. (2012). Geography and Seapower. In Dutton, P. Ross, R. and Tunsjø, Ø. (Eds.). Twenty-First Century Seapower: Cooperation and Conflict at Sea, London and New York, Routledge Publication.
16. Hayashi, M. (2005). Military and intelligence gathering activities in the EEZ: definition of key terms. Marine Policy, Vol 29, No 2, pp 123-137.
17. Hoffmann, J. Kumar, Sh. (2010). Globalization- The Maritime Nexus, In Costas Th. Grammenos (Ed.). The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business (The Grammenos Library), (pp 35-65). London, Routledge publication.
18. International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2006). International Shipping and World Trade Facts and figures, Retrieved from http://treeofideas.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/books-international-shipping-and-world-trade-facts-and-figures.pdf (Last access: 5/23/2014).
19. International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2012). International Shipping Facts and Figures – Information Resources on Trade, Safety, Security, Environment, Maritime Knowledge Centre, Retrieved from http://www.imo.org/KnowledgeCentre/ShipsAndShippingFactsAndFigures/TheRoleandImportanceofInternationalShipping/Documents/International%20Shipping%20-%20Facts%20and%20Figures.pdf (Last access 5/23/2014).
20. Kamenskii, A. B. (1997). The Russian Empire in the Eighteenth Century: Searching for a Place in the World. Translated and Edited by: Griffiths, D. NewYork, Sharpe, M. E. Inc.
23. Kraska, J. (2011). Maritime power and the law of the sea: expeditionary operations in world politics. New York, Oxford University Press.
24. Kraska, J. Pedrozo. R. (2013). International Maritime Security Law. Leiden and Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
25. López Martín, A. G. (2010). International Straits: Concept, Classification and Rules of Passage, New York, Springer Publication.
26. Mahan, A. T. (1889). The Influence of Sea Power upon History 1660-1783. Boston, Dover Publications.
27. McComas, L. A. (1988). Some Principles of Maritime Strategy (Classics of Sea Power Series). Maryland, Naval Institute Press.
28. Modelski, G. (1978). The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the nation-State. Comparative Studies in Society and History. Vol 20, No 2, pp. 214-235, DOI: 10.1017/S0010417500008914
29. Modelski, G. (2000). The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the nation-State. In Linklater, A. (Eds.). International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science (Vol 3, pp 1340-1360), Routledge Press.
30. Modelski, G. Thompson, W. R. (1996). Leading Sectors and World Powers: The Coevolution of Global Economics and Politics (Studies in International Relations). Columbia, University of South Carolina Press.
31. Pirtle, C. E. (2000). Military Uses of Ocean Space and the Law of the Sea in the New Millennium. Ocean Development & International Law, Vol 31, No 1-2, pp 7- 45, DOI: 10.1080/009083200276058
32. Rodrigue, J. P. (2013). The Geography of Transport Systems. (Third Edition). London and New York, Routledge Publication.
33. Rodrigue, J. P. (2015). The Geography of Transport Systems. Retrieved from http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/gallery/Map_Maritime%20Circulation.pdf (Last access: 2/5/2015).
34. Sakhuja, V. (2011). Asian Maritime Power in the 21st Century: Strategic Transactions China, India and Southeast Asia. Singapore, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS) Press.
37. Spykman, N. J. (1938). Geography and Foreign Policy II. The American Political Science Review, Vol 32, No 2, pp 213-236, DOI: 10.2307/1948667
39. The World Factbook -CIA, (2014). Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/ (Last access: 7/7/2014).
40. Till, G. (1984). Maritime Strategy and the Nuclear Age (second edition). London and Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan Publication.
41. Till, G. (2004). Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-first Century. London, FRANK CASS Publishers.
42. Till, G. (2005). Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-first Century. Taylor & Francis e-Library.
43. Till, G. (2009). Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-first Century (second edition). Londan and New York, Routledge Publication.
44. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2012). World Oil Transit Chokepoints (Last Updated: August 22, 2012). Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov/countries/regions-topics.cfm?fips=wotc&trk=p3 (Last access: 17/3/2014).
45. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2017). World Oil Transit Chokepoints (Last Updated: July 25, 2017). Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/regions-topics.php?RegionTopicID=WOTC (Last access: 29/05/2019).
46. Valencia, M. J. Garmendia, J. M. Ship & Ocean Foundation (SOF) and the East-West Center (EWC). (2003). the Regime of the Exclusive Economic Zone: Issues and Reponses A Report of the Tokyo Meeting. Honolulu: East-West Center.
47. Van Dyke, J. M. (2004). Military ships and planes operating in the exclusive economic zone of another country. Maritime Policy, Vol 28, No 1, pp 29–39, Doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2003.10.009
48. Weigert, H. W. Brodie, H. Donerty, E. W. Fernstrom, J. R. Fischer, E. and Kirk, D. (1956). Principles of Political Geography. New York, Appleton- Century-Crofts Inc.
49. Widen, J. J. (2012). Theorist of Maritime Strategy: Sir Julian Corbett and His Contribution to Military and Naval Thought (Corbett Centre for Maritime Policy Studies). Farnham and Burlington, Ashgate Publication Co.