تحول مفهومی ناسیونالیسم چینی و تأثیر آن بر تکوین سیاست خارجی توسعه‌‌‌‌گرا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کاندید دریافت درجه دکتری روابط بین‌الملل، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

2 دانشیار روابط بین‌الملل، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده

یکی از مهم‌‌‌‌ترین فاکتورها در تعیین جهت‌‌‌‌ سیاست خارجی کشورها سبک و سیاق ملی‌‌‌‌گرایی در آن کشور است. در گفتمان سیاسی چین همانند بسیاری از کشورها گونه‌‌‌‌های متفاوتی از ملی‌‌‌‌گرایی وجود دارد. اما فقط یک گونه از ملی‌‌‌‌گرایی به جایگاه مسلط در سیاست خارجی چین رسیده است و به عنوان یکی از فاکتورهای تاثیرگذار به تکوین سیاست خارجی توسعه‌گرا عمل کمک کرده است. مقاله پیش‌‌‌‌رو با بررسی انواع ملی‌‌‌‌گرایی در چین در پی پاسخ به این پرسش است که گونه مسلط ملی‌‌‌‌گرایی در چین چگونه به تکوین سیاست خارجی توسعه‌‌‌‌گرا کمک کرده است؟ در قالب نظریه سازه‌‌‌‌انگاری این فرضیه مطرح شده است که «دولت توسعه‌‌‌‌گرای چین ناسیونالیسم را به مسیر عمل‌‌‌‌گرایی سوق داده است و باعث تکوین سیاست خارجی توسعه‌‌‌‌گرا به عنوان یک برساخت سیاسی شده است.» نتایج حاصل از این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که سیاست خارجی توسعه‌گرایانۀ چین هم ابزار و هم محصول تفسیر اقتصادی از ناسیونالیسم است که باعث رشد فزاینده شاخص‌های اقتصادی در چین شده است.

. . . . . . . . .

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Conceptual Developments of Chinese Nationalism and its Impact on the Development-Based Foreign Policy

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ehsan Fallahi 1
  • Ali Omidi 2
  • Enayatallah Yazdani 2
1 PhD Candidate in International Relations, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran
2 Associate professor International Relations, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Extended abstract
Introduction
After the victory of communist revolution in China, Nationalism had been combined with communist teachings as result of cultural revolution at the Mao era. The outputs of mentioned process caused to formation of ideological and transnational principles in Chinese foreign policy. But after nearly three decades, People's Republic of China has not achieved its foreign goals and faced with turmoil in domestic economy. Therefore, at the late of 1970s Beijing endeavored to improving their relations with the outside world, especially with the United States. Over the 1980s-decade transnationalism ideas replaced with pragmatist nationalism. These developments paved the way for control the nationalism narrative by China development-oriented government. It is important to point out that one of the most important factors which influence states foreign policy is the kind of nationalism narrative. There are different kinds of nationalism in china's political temporary discourse, but only one of them has taken dominant position in China’s foreign policy. The aim of this article is to analyze the conceptual developments of Chinese nationalism and its impact on the development-oriented foreign policy. The research will examine main kinds of nationalistic attitudes in China and try to answer the following question: how do dominant narrative of nationalism contribute to construct the development-oriented foreign policy in china? Developmental outlook of China has directed it to interpret and promulgate nationalism in a pragmatist way as well as along its development-oriented foreign policy.
Methodology
To analyze above mentioned issues the authors used a research desk method; we used various international publications, like monographs, scientific articles, and statistical data. This research has written by descriptive-analytic method and constructivism theory used as analytical framework.
Discussion
Researchers owing to the goal of their research have classified Chinese nationalism from different perspectives. The authors of this article divided Chinese nationalism into three following categories: ethnical nationalism, liberal nationalism and pragmatism nationalism. The first one (ethnic nationalism) is usually defined as “to the process whereby a group or community that shares a common history, culture, language, and territory is persuaded to assert its identity in such a way that it acquires the authority to be in charge of its own affairs, usually through the creation of an independent state.” When ethnic nationalist interests are mobilized to achieve state interests, that is, state nationalism, a more assertive brand of nationalism tends to emerge. The second one (liberal nationalism) was introduced in the early twentieth century as a means to improve China through political and social reforms. It defines the nation as a group of citizens who have a duty to support and defend the rights of their state in the world of nation-states, but also to pursue individual freedoms. The third one (pragmatist nationalism) is a state-led and largely reactive, pragmatist nationalism does not have a fixed, objectified and eternally defined content, nor is it driven by any ideology, religious beliefs or other abstract ideas. This kind of nationalism is a form of nationalism that is more ready to compromise with the outside world for the sake of state interests. After Deng Xiaoping launched the reform pragmatist nationalism has taken significant foreign policy implications. China’s diplomacy began to serve economic development under the guidance of keeping a low profile and accumulating strength quietly. In addition, nationalism is becoming more influential within the government as it begins to overshadow communism and becomes the concept that draws the government and people closer to the economic objectives more effectively.
Conclusion
Facing chronic economic problems and acute political crisis at home and from a relatively weak geopolitical position abroad, the Chinese state took a pragmatic attitude toward nationalism and made sure that China’s foreign policy was not dictated by emotional rhetoric. The results of the article shows that China's development-oriented foreign policy has compelled Chinese ruling party to economic interpretation of nationalism which have led to impressive economic indexes so that will replace the US dominant economic status in third decade of new millennium.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • China
  • nationalism
  • Foreign Policy
  • constructivism
  • Development
  1. Ahmadi, H (2016). Ethnicity and racist in Iran, Tehran: Ney Publication. [In Persian]
  2. Bloodworth, D (1980). The Chinese Looking Glass, New York: Farrar.
  3. Clarke, M (2018). "The Belt and Road Initiative: Exploring Beijing’s Motivations and Challenges for its New Silk Road", Strategic Analysis, Vol. 42, No. 2, PP 48-102, (doi: 10.1080/09700161.2018.1439326).
  4. Coase, R; Wang, N (2012). How China Became Capitalist, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  5. Fallahi, E; Omidi, A (2017). "Change and Continuity in China's Development Oriented Foreign policy in Xi Jinpinp Era", Political and International Approaches, Vol. 9, No. 51, PP 147-178. [In Persian]
  6. Friedman, E (2008). "Where is Chinese nationalism? The political geography of a moving project", National and nationalism, Vol. 14, No. 4, PP 721-738. (doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8129.2008.00336.x).
  7. Gries, P.H; Steiger, D; Wang, T (2016). "Popular nationalism and China’s Japan policy: the Diaoyu Islands protests, 2012–2013", Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 25, No. 98, PP 264-276. (doi: 10.1080/10670564.2015.1075714).
  8. Guo, Y (2004a). Cultural Nationalism in Contemporary China, London & New York: Routledge Curzon.
  9. Guo, Y (2004b). The liberal–nationalist debate on democracy and identity, in Leong H. Liew and Shaoguang Wang (ed), Nationalism, Democracy and National Integration in China, London & New York: Routledge Curzon.
  10. Gusterson, H (2017). "From Brexit To Trump: Anthropology And The Rise Of Nationalist Populism", American Ethnologist , Vol. 44, No. 2, PP 209-214. (doi:10. 1111/amet.12469).
  11. Hughes, C (2011). "Reclassifying Chinese Nationalism: the geopolitik turn", Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 20, No. 71, PP 601-620. (doi: 10.1080/10 670564.2011 .587161).
  12. Johnston, A (2018). "Is Chinese Nationalism Rising? Evidence from Beijing", International Security, Vol. 41, No. 3, PP 7-43. (doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_ 00265)
  13. Karatasli, S.S; Kumral, S (2017). " Territorial Contradictions of the Rise of China: Geopolitics, Nationalism and Hegemony in Comparative-Historical Perspective", Journal of World-Systems Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, PP 5-35. (doi:10.5195/ JWSR.2017.591).
  14. Koch, J (2006). Economic Development and Ethnic Separatism in Western China: A New Model of Peripheral Nationalism, Asia Research Centre, Murdoch University Working Paper, No. 134.
  15. Laplam, W (2006). Chinese Politics in the Hu Jintao Era, New York: An East Gate book.
  16. Lawrence, P (2014). Nationalism History and Theory, London and New York: Routledge.
  17. Lijun, Y; Kia, L.C (2010). "Three waves of nationalism in contemporary China: Sources, themes, presentations and consequences", International Journal of China Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2, PP 461-485.
  18. Manicom, J (2010). Growing Nationalism and Maritime Jurisdiction in the East China Sea, China brief, Vol, X, No. 21, PP 9-11.
  19. Meissner, W (2006). China's Search for Cultural and National Identity from the Nineteenth Century to the Present, China perspectives, No. 68, PP 1-19.
  20. Modongal, S (2016). "Development of nationalism in China", Cogent Social Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 1, PP 1-7. (doi: 10.1080/23311886.2016.1235749).
  21. MOFCOM (2016). Statistics of FDI in China in January-October 2016, Ministry of Commerce People’s Republic of China, Available at: http://english.mofcom. gov.cn/ article/statistic/foreigninvestment/, Accessed on: 2018/10/28.
  22. Moshirzadeh, H (2010). Development in International Relations Theories, Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
  23. NBSC (2019). Year book 2018, National bureau of statics of china, Available at: http://www.stats.gov.cn, Accessed on: 2019/06/27.
  24. Oksenberg, M (1986). "China's Confident Nationalism", Foreign Affairs, Vol. 65, No. 3, PP 501-523. (doi: 10.2307/20043078).
  25. Pendlebury, J; Veldpaus, L (2018). "Heritage and Brexit", Planning Theory & Practice, Vol. 19, No. 1, PP 1-6. (doi: 10.1080/14649357.2018.1428337).
  26. Shambaugh, D (1996). "Containment or engagement of China? Calculating Beijing's Response", International Security, Vol. 21, No, 2, pp. 180-209. (doi: 10.1162/isec. 21. 2.180).
  27. Shambaugh, D (2014). Nationalism and Chinese Foreign Policy, George Washington University Sigur Center for Asian Studies, Policy Brief November 2014.
  28. Shen, S (2004). "Nationalism or Nationalist Foreign Policy? Contemporary Chinese Nationalism and its Role in Shaping Chinese Foreign Policy in Response to the Belgrade Embassy Bombing", Politics, Vol. 24, No. 2, PP 122-130. (doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2004.00213.x)
  29. Smith, S (2001). Foreign Policy Is What States Make of It: Social Construction and International Relations Theory, in Vendulka Kubalkova (ed), Foreign Policy in a Constructed World, London and New York: Routledge.
  30. Tan, A; Chen, B (2013). "China’s Competing and Coopting Nationalisms: Implica- tions to Sino–Japanese Relations", Pacific Focus, Vol. 28, No. 3, PP 365-383. (doi: 1111/pafo.12013)
  31. Tang, W; Darr, B (2012). Chinese Nationalism and its Political and Social Origins, Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 21, No. 77, PP 811-826. (doi: 1080/10670564 .2012.684965).
  32. UNCTAD (2018). World Investment Report 2018, Geneva: Printed at United Nations.
  33. Whiting, A.S (1995). "Chinese nationalism and foreign policy after Deng", The China Quarterly, Vol. 142, PP 295-316. (doi: 10.1017/S0305741000034950).
  34. World Bank (2019a). Imports of goods and services (current US$), Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.IMP.GNFS.CD?locations=CN, Access- ed on: 2019/06/30.
  35. World Bank (2019b). Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD? Loc-ations =CL-CN, Accessed on: 2019/06/29.
  36. World Bank (2019c). GDP (current US$), available at: https://data.worldbank. org/ indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD, Accessed on: 2019/06/29.
  37. Xiaolin, D (2017). "Unanswered Questions: Why We may be Wrong about Chinese Nationalism and its Foreign Policy Implications", Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 26, No. 108, PP 886-900, (doi: 10.1080/10670564 .20 17.1337312).
  38. Yu, H (2014). "Glorious Memories of Imperial China and the Rise of Chinese Populist Nationalism", Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 23, No. 90, PP 1174-1187. (Doi: 10.1080/10670564.2014.898907).
  39. Zhao, S (2000). "Chinese Nationalism and Its International Orientations", political Science Quarterly, Vol. 115, No. 1, PP 1-33. (doi: 10.2307/2658031).
  40. Zhao, S (2004). Chinese Foreign Policy Pragmatism and Strategic Behavior, in Suisheng Zhao (ed), Chinese Foreign Policy Pragmatism and Strategic Behavior, London and New York: Routledge.
  41. Zhao, S (2005). "China's pragmatic nationalism: is it manageable?", The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 1, PP 131-144. (doi: 10.1162/01636600577 4859670).
  42. Zhao, S (2013). "Foreign Policy Implications of Chinese Nationalism Revisited: the strident turn", Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 22, No 82, PP 535-553. (doi: 10.1080/10670564.2013.766379).
  43. Zhao, S (2016). "The Ideological Campaign in Xi’s China Rebuilding Regime Legitimacy", Asian Survey, 56, No. 6, PP 1168-1193. (doi: 10.1525/AS.20 16.56. 6.1168).
  44. Zheng, Y (1999). Discovering Chinese Nationalism in China: Modernization, Identity, and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zhimin, C (2005). "Nationalism, Internationalism and Chinese Foreign Policy", Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 14, No. 42, PP 35-53. (doi: 10.1080/10670 56042000300772).