سیاستگذاری ایران در برابر گروه‌های تروریستی و بحران‌های منطقه‌ای

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی


Post doctorate on Strategic Policy making and Full Professor of Tehran University; Faculty of law & Political Science


سیاستگذاری راهبردی به‌مثابه روش تجزیه و تحلیل سیاست خارجی محسوب می‌شود. سیاست خارجی و راهبردی ایران در راستای همکاری‌های چندجانبه در بحران‌های منطقه‌ای بوده است. شاخص‌های اصلی سیاست خارجی ایران را سازوکارهای کنش هویتی و انقلابی در روابط بین‌الملل و محیط منطقه‌ای تشکیل می‌دهد. سیاستگذاری راهبردی ایران عموما بر مبنای همکاری‌های چندجانبه با کشورهای منطقه‌ای و در راستای وحدت جهان اسلام شکل گرفته است.
ایران بسیاری از قواعد نظم وستفالیایی را مورد پذیرش قرار داده و بر این اساس جهت‌گیری سیاستگذاری راهبردی خود را بر مبنای رهنامه تطبیق‌پذیری با نظم جهانی قرار داده است. سیاستگذاری مدیریت بحران‌های منطقه‌ای ایران عموما مبتنی بر انگاره‌های فرهنگی، تجارب تاریخی و پیامدهای ساختاری بوده است. هر یک از مولفه‌های یاد شده در انگاره نظم وستفالیایی ایران برای حفظ حوزه‌های سرزمینی کشورها نقش تعیین‌کننده‌ای داشته است.
تجارب ایران از دفاع مقدس و پذیرش قطعنامه 598 شورای امنیت سازمان ملل بیانگر آن است که ایران از سازوکارهای عملگرایانه در ارتباط با کشورهای محافظه کار منطقه‌ای بهره گرفته است. دیپلماسی هسته‌ای را می‌توان یکی دیگر از نشانه‌های کنش ساختاری ایران دانست که معطوف به کنترل تهدیدات و مدیریت بحران بوده است. پذیرش برنامه جامع اقدام مشترک و تلاش برای صلح‌سازی در نظم منطقه‌ای خلیج‌فارس و خاورمیانه را می‌توان در زمره اقدامات ایران در مقابله با گروه‌های تروریستی و سازماندهی نظم منطقه‌ای در شرایط خشونت، بحران و آشوب دانست.



عنوان مقاله [English]

Iran’s Policy Toward Terrorist Groups and Regional Crises

نویسنده [English]

  • Abbas Mossalanejad
Post doctorate on Strategic Policy making and Full Professor of Tehran University; Faculty of law & Political Science
چکیده [English]

Strategic policy is tantamount to a method for foreign policy analysis. The foreign and strategic policies of Iran have been in line with multilateral cooperation in regional crises. The key indicators of Iran’s policy comprise mechanisms of identity and revolutionary actions in international and regional relations. Iran’s strategic policy has generally been formed on the pillars of multilateral cooperation with regional countries and in line with the unity of the Muslim world.
Iran has accepted many of the rules of the Westphalian system, and has therefore based its strategic policy orientation on the doctrine of adaptability to the world order. Iran’s policy of managing regional crises has generally been based on cultural tenets, historical experiences and structural consequences. Each of the latter components has played a crucial role in Iran’s Westphalian order paradigm for protecting the territories of other countries.
The experiences gained by Iran during the Holy Defense [Iran-Iraq War] and its acceptance of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 598 are indicative of the fact that Iran has employed pragmatic mechanisms with regard to regional conservative countries. Iran’s nuclear diplomacy can be regarded as another sign of its structural action which aims to deter threats and manage crises. The acceptance of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and Iran’s efforts toward peacemaking in the regional order of the Persian Gulf and Middle East can be considered as actions taken by Iran toward confronting terrorist groups and organizing regional order under such circumstances as violence, crises and chaos.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Identity
  • Policy
  • Violence
  • Conflict
  • Regional Security
  • Tenets
  • Values
  • Foreign Policy and Terrorism
  1. Alsis, Peter, Marissa Allison, and Anthony H. Cordesman, (2012), “U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition in the Gulf States and Yemen”, Washington, D.C.: CSIS, March 16.
  2. Bakhash, Shaul, (1990), The Reign of the Ayatollahs: Iran and the Islamic Revolution, Revised Edition, New York: Basic Books, p. 230.
  3. Beckley, Michael (2020), “Why This Could Be an Illiberal American Century; Rogue Superpower”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 99, No. 6, November/December.
  4. Beeman, W. O. (2008). “The Great Satan” vs. the “Mad Mullahs”: How the United States and Iran Demonize Each Other”, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  5. Bell, Theodore, Patrick Martin, and ISW Regional Crisis Team, (2015), “Regional Crisis Situation Report: July 09–10, 2015,” Institute for the Study of War, July 10.
  6. Blatt man, Christopher & Edward Miguel, (2010), “Civil War,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 3-57.
  7. Brennan, Rick, (2014), “Withdrawal Symptoms,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 93, No. 6, November/December.
  8. Byman, D., Chubin, S., Ehteshami, A., and Green, J. D. (2001). Iran's Security Policy in the Post-Revolutionary Era. Rand Corporation.
  9. Clinton, Hillary (2020), “How Washington Should Think About Power; A National Security Reckoning”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 99, No. 6, November/December.
  10. Djalili, Mohammad Reza (2002), “Iran and the Caucasus: Maintaining Some Policy Making”, The Quarterly Journal, No.3, September. [In Persian]

11. Furman, Jason (2021), “What It Will Take to Build Back a Better Economy”, Foreign Affairs, Vol.100, No. 1, January-February.

12. Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, (2007), “Transnational Dimensions of Civil Wars,” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 44, no. 3, May.

13. Hafezi, Parisa; Tulay Karadeniz, (2014), “Iran's Says Tackling ‘Terrorism’ a Priority,” Reuters, June 9.

14. Halliday, F. (2002). Revolution and foreign policy: the case of South Yemen 1967-1987.Cambridge University press.

15. Kahn, Jeremy, (2014), “Iran Lures Investors Seeing Nuclear Deal End Sanctions,” Bloomberg, 18 August.

16. Katzman, Kenneth (2011), “Issues for U.S. Policy”, Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service (CRS), December 2011 (CRS Report for Congress RS21852), 13-14.

17. Khalilzad, Zalmay; Kenneth M. Pollack, (2014), “How to Save Regional Crisis,” The New Republic, July 22.

18. Lakmak, C. (2013). Evolution and Change in Iranian Foreign Policy: From Ideology- Oriented ness to Images. Wise Man Centre for strategic Studies, Bilgesam, Turkey.

19. Luft, Gal, (2014), “Don’t Get Used to Cheap Oil,” The Journal of Energy Security.

20. Lynch, Marc (2021), “The Enduring Struggle to Remake the Middle East”, The Arab Uprisings Never Ended, Foreign Affairs, Vol.100, No. 1, January-February.

21. Malekzadeh, Shervin, (2015), “Where Iran’s hard-liners diverge from the moderates”, Middle East Political Science, Pomeps Studies, No. 13, April 29. [In Persian]

22. Maloney, Suzanne, (2014), “Iran Report Card: A Year of Economic Stabilization and Suspense”, Brookings Institution, 19 August.

23. Mead, Walter Russell (2021), “Why Liberal Internationalism Failed; The End of the Wilsonian Era”, Foreign Affairs, Vol.100, No. 1, January-February.

24. Mohns, Erik and André Bank, (2012), “Syrian Revolt Fallout: End of the Resistance Axis?”, MiddleEastPolicy, vol. 19, no. 3, Autumn.

  1. 25.  Mosalanejhad, A. (2018). The Middle East Security and Donald Trump’s Grand Strategy. Geopolitics Quarterly, 13(48), 20-52. [In Persian]

26. Nia, M. M. (2011). A Holistic Constructivist Approach to Iran's Foreign Policy. InternationalJournalof Business and Social Science, 2(4), 282-283.

27. Obama, Barak, (2015), “UN: Leaders’ Summit to Counter ISIL and Violent Extremism”, Washington DC: US department of State Publication, September 29.

28. Paik, George(2015), “Foreign Policy Management: A Role for Diplomats ?”,http://foreignpolicyblogs.com,  August 27.

29. Perry, Tom, (2015), “Islamic State Takes Ground from Syrian Kurds After Air Strikes”, Reuters, July 6.

30. Pollack, Kenneth M., (2014), “An Army to Defeat Assad: How to Turn Syria’s Opposition into a Real Fighting Force,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 93, no. 5 September/October, pp. 110-124.

31. Powe, Samantha (2021), “America’s Advantage and Biden’s Chance”, Foreign Affairs, Vol.100, No. 1, January-February.

32. Ramazani, R. (2004), “Ideology and Policy Making in Iran's Foreign Policy”, The Middle East Journal, Autumn. [In Persian]

33. Regan, Patrick M., (2001), “Civil Wars and Foreign Powers: Outside Intervention in Intrastate Conflict”, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, February 28.

34. Reuter, Christopher, (2015), “The Terror Strategist: Secret Files Reveal the Structure of the Islamic State”, Spiegel Online, April 18.

35. Rezaian, Jason, (2014), “Iran's Leader Says Tehran and Washington Not Aligned on Regional Crisis”, WashingtonPost, 22 June.

36. Salehzadeh, A. (2013), “Iran's Domestic and Foreign Policies”, Working Papers, National Defense University, Department of Strategic and Defense Studies Series. No 49. [In Persian]



37. Scoblic, Peter and Philip Tetlock (2020), “The Right Way to Think About the Future; A Better Crystal Ball”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 99, No. 6, November/December.

38. Tarzi, A. (Ed.). (2011), “Iranian Puzzle Piece: Understanding Iran in the Global Context”, DIANE Publishing.

39. Teachout, Zephyr (2021), “How to End a Gilded Age; Monopoly Versus Democracy”, Foreign Affairs, Vol.100, No. 1, January-February.

40. Walter, Barbara F, (2002), “Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars”, Princeton: University Press.

41. Walter, Barbara F., (1997), “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement,” International Organization, Vol. 51, no. 3, Summer

42. Weber, Elke (2020), “Why We Fail to Foresee and Contain Catastrophe; Heads in the Sand”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 99, No. 6, November/December.

43. Whiteside, Craig, (2014), “War, Interrupted, Part I: The Roots of the Jihadist Resurgence in Regional Crisis”, War on the Rocks, November 5.