Evaluation of Peace Incentives for Terrorist Group on Deradicalization Programs in Indonesia

Surwandono, Surwandono

doi:10.22034/igq.2025.467247.1919

Evaluation of Peace Incentives for Terrorist Group on Deradicalization Programs in Indonesia

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

Surwandono Surwandono

International Relations, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

10.22034/igq.2025.467247.1919

چکیده

This article evaluates the policy of deradicalization of terrorist groups in Indonesia by using a mix method approach to explore the message structure in terrorism regulation related to the idea of peace incentives. Through a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, this study analyzes how current terrorism regulations communicate and implement peace incentives. The findings of the study show that despite deradicalization efforts, terrorism activities in Indonesia are still ongoing. This is closely related to the lack of institutionalization of the idea of comprehensive peace incentives for families and terrorism networks. The lack of integration of peace incentives in deradicalization programs causes the approach applied to be incremental and partial, not touching the root of the problem holistically. This research highlights the importance of developing more inclusive deradicalization policies, which not only focus on terrorist individuals, but also pay attention to and engage their families and networks. Thus, the deradicalization program can run more effectively and sustainably, support the achievement of a more stable peace and significantly reduce terrorism activities in Indonesia.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Peace Incentive

Indonesian Policy

Terrorist Deradicalization Program

موضوعات

ژئوپلیتیک

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of Peace Incentives for Terrorist Group on Deradicalization Programs in Indonesia

نویسنده English

Surwandono Surwandono

International Relations, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

چکیده English

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Peace Incentive

Indonesian Policy

Terrorist Deradicalization Program

1. Adhityawarman. (2019). BNPT sebut keluarga teroris bisa diselamatkan melalui sentuhan hati. Antaranew.Com. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/ 790833/bnpt-sebut-keluarga-teroris-bisa-diselamatkan-melalui-sentuhan-hati.

2. Ahmadipour, Zahra; Reza Jonidi, F.A. (2017). The Concept of Geopolitical Discourse of Terrorism: Bush Administration’s Geopolitical Imagination of the Middle East. Geopolitics Quarterly, 12(43), 28–53.

3. Alawi, A. (2020). LAZISNU Indramayu Berikan Bantuan Modal untuk Eks Napi Teroris. Nu.o.Id. https://jabar.nu.or.id/daerah/lazisnu-indramayu-berikan-bantuan-modal-untuk-eks-napi-teroris-rZ6cM.

4. Alishahi, A.R; Tajik, H; Forozan, Y. (2017). The reasons of the presence of Isis in Afghanistan based on William Bullitt Domino theory. Geopolitics Quarterly, 13(1), 173–195.

5. Asrori, S; Syauqi, A. (2020). Mutual Aid in Social Reintegration of Former Terrorist Prisoner in Indonesia. EMPATI: Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.15408/empati.v9i1.17 020.

6. Farhad Darvishi, A.H. (2013). The Process of US and EU Confrontation with Terrorism from Different Perceptions to Collaboration. Geopolitics Quarterly, 9(30), 136–160.

7. Hilmy, M. (2014). The politics of retaliation: The backlash of radical Islamists to deradicalization project in Indonesia. Al-Jami’ah, 51(1), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2013.511.129-158.

8. Iqbal Ramadhan, R; Widya Setiabudi Sumadinata; Darmansjah Djumala, W.B.D. (2024). Interpreting the Role of State, Non-State, and International Organization to form Cybersecurity Governance in Southeast Asia. Geopolitics Quarterly, 20(74), 255–278.

9. Ishomuddin, I; Fauzi, A; Arifin, S; Haris, A. (2021). Deradicalization of former terrorists in East Java, Indonesia: the commitment to Islamic religious education. Religación. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 6(30), e210836. https://doi.org/10.46652/rgn.v6i30.836.

10. Kusuma, A.J; Warsito, T; Surwandono, S; Muhammad, A. (2019). Indonesia and the Threat of Terrorism: In the Analysis of the Immaterial Dimension. Sosiohumaniora, 21(3), 333–341.

11. Kusuma, A.J; Warsito, T; Surwandono, S; Muhammad, A; Hidayati, M; Madani, M. (2019). The Construction of the Indonesian Government’s Repressive Counter-Terrorism Policy. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 9(2), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v9i2.1845.

12. Magrie, M.F; Eka Putra, I; Rufaedah, A; Putera, V.S. (2022). An Empowerment Program for Spouses of Convicted Terrorists in Indonesia. New Security Challenges, 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2032-4_7.

13. Maksum, A; Surwandono, S. (2021). Analisis Tata Kelola Keamanan Indonesia Masa Kini: Studi Kasus UU NO. 34/2004, UU NO. 2/2002, UU NO. 7/2012. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 6(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.3 1599/jkn.v6i2.463.

14. Maufur, M. (2017). Narrating Islamism in Indonesia: State, Agency, and Social Resilience. Religió: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 7(2), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.15642/religio.v7i2.761.

15. Medcom.id. (2023). Ali Fauzi, Mantan Narapidana Teroris Raih Doktor di UMM. Medcom.Id. https://www.umm.ac.id/id/arsip-koran/medcom/ali-fauzi-mantan-narapidana-teroris-raih-doktor-di-umm.html

16. Mubaraq, Z; Arifin, S; Abdullah, I; Jubba, H; Indiyanto, A. (2022). Return of the Lost Son: Disengagement and social reintegration of former terrorists in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/ 23311 886.2022.2135235.

17. Muhammad, A. (2014). Indonesia’s Way to Counter Terrorism 2002—2009: Lesson Learned. Journal of Government and Politics, 5(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2014.0018.

18. Muhammad, A; Hiariej, E. (2021). Deradicalization program in Indonesia radicalizing the radicals. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10. 1080/23311886.2021.1905219.

19. Nucare-Laziznu. (2020). NU Care-LAZISNU Indramayu salurkan Bantuan Modal Bergilir dari Program Zakat Produktif kepada Mantan Napi Teroris yang telah berikrar kembali kepada NKRI. Nucare-Laziznu. https://www. instagram.com/p/CJShOeFMGeu/.

20. Nuswanto, H.S. (2019). Terrorism as Socially Constructed Crime in Indonesia. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 266–286. https://doi.org/ 10.22304/pjih.v6n2.a4.

21. Phillips, B.J. (2015). Enemies with benefits? Violent rivalry and terrorist group longevity. Journal of Peace Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234 3314550538.

22. Polo, S.M.T. (2020). The quality of terrorist violence: Explaining the logic of terrorist target choice. Journal of Peace Research, 57(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319829799.

23. Pujiyono; Rukmono, B.S. (2020). Ex-terrorist deradicalization in Indonesia through economic empowerment. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(3), 5019–5025.

24. Setpres, B. (2020). Penyerahan Kompensasi bagi Korban Terorisme Masa Lalu Bentuk Kehadiran dan Perlindungan Negara. Presidenri.Go.Id. https:// www.presidenri.go.id/siaran-pers/penyerahan-kompensasi-bagi-korban-terorisme-masa-lalu-bentuk-kehadiran-dan-perlindungan-negara/#:~:text= PP tersebut menegaskan bahwa korban tindak pidana terorisme,ahli waris%2C atau kuasanya kepada LPSK%2C” kata P.

25. Sila, M.A; Fealy, G. (2022). Counterterrorism, Civil Society Organisations and Peacebuilding: The Role of Non-State Actors in Deradicalisation in Bima, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 23(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2022.2041076.

26. Simbar, R. (2005). Analyzing Different Approaches toward Terrorist Operations against the West. Geopolitics Quarterly, 1(2), 96–120.

27. Stout, M. (2009). In search of Salafi jihadist strategic thought: Mining the words of the terrorists. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 32(10), 876–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100903185578.

28. Sukabdi, Z.A. (2022). Treatment procedures for ideology-based terrorist offenders in Indonesia. Kriminologija & Socijalna Integracija, 30(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.31299/ksi.30.1.1.

29. Sukmana, Y. (2018). Pemerintah Siapkan Program Sosial untuk Keluarga Eks Napi Terorisme. Kompas.Com.

30. Sumarlan, S. (2016). Implementation of Deradicalization Policy for Terrorism Prisoners: An Indonesian Case. Jurnal Pertahanan, 2(1), 23–52. http://jurnal.idu.ac.id/index.php/DefenseJournal/article/view/253/pdf4.

31. Sumpter, C; Wardhani, Y.K; Priyanto, S. (2021). Testing Transitions: Extremist Prisoners Re-Entering Indonesian Society. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 44(6), 473–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1560 666.

32. Taufiqurahman, M. (2018). Pemerintah Akan Berikan Bansos ke Keluarga Mantan Terpidana Teroris. Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3850155/pemerintah-akan-berikan-bansos-ke-keluarga-mantan-terpidana-teroris.

33. Theconversation.com. (2022). Bagaimana agar residivis kasus terorisme tidak lagi melakukan aksi teror setelah bebas dari penjara? Theconver- sation.Com. https://theconversation.com/bagaimana-agar-residivis-kasus-ter -orisme-tidak-lagi-melakukan-aksi-teror-setelah-bebas-dari-penjara-196214.

34. Toyibah, D. (2022). Partner in Jihad: Marriage, Women and Deradicalised Terrorists in Indonesia. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya, 6(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.15575/jw.v6i2.17185.

35. Wibisono, A.A; Maulana, I. (2022). Indonesia’s response to returning foreign fighters: network affiliation as basis for risk assessment. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335 330.2022.2037690.

36. Wirandari, N; Qodir, Z. (2022). Women as Terrorists: a Motivational Factor Becomes a Terrorist In Indonesia. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.56087/substantivejustice.v5i1.162.

37. Zaumm. (2023). LAZISMU Akan Dilibatkan oleh Pemerintah Dalam Penguatan Kerjasama Antar Lembaga Guna Reintegrasi Sosial Klien Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Jawa Timur. ZAUMM. https:/ /info. lazismujatim.org/lazismu-akan-dilibatkan-oleh-pemerintah-dalam-penguatan-kerjasama-antar-lembaga-guna-reintegrasi-sosial-klien-tindak-pidana-terorisme-di-jawa-timur/.