The policies of Russian Regionalism and the Eurasian Economic Union

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

Associate Professor of Political Geography, Payame Noor University, Department of Human Geography, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده

Regionalism and regional integration are among the central doctrines of states to strengthen and develop themselves in the new age. After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the power vacuum, Russia sought to rebuild the regional order and reshape the regional geopolitical system in Eurasia. From the beginning of the Vladimir Putin era (1999), Eurasianisism became the focus of Russian foreign policy. The most crucial strategy of Russian Eurasianism became Eurasian Regionalism. After several stages of the regionalism process (Eurasian Economic Community, Single Economic Market, Customs Union), Russia finally succeeded in establishing the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) consisting of Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan in early 2015. The EAEU is the most developed institution of regional economic integration among post-Soviet states. The objective of this study is to evaluate Russia’s regionalism policies and explain Russia’s intentions to establish the EAEU in the new era. The research results show that the first priority of Moscow from the establishing of the Eurasian Economic Union is security, political and geopolitical issues. Otherwise, economically, this Union does not have a significant achievement for Russia. The member states of This Union are not an appropriate economic complement to each other.  

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The policies of Russian Regionalism and the Eurasian Economic Union

نویسنده [English]

  • Hadi Veicy
Associate Professor of Political Geography, Payame Noor University, Department of Human Geography, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Regionalism and regional integration are among the central doctrines of states to strengthen and develop themselves in the new age. After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the power vacuum, Russia sought to rebuild the regional order and reshape the regional geopolitical system in Eurasia. From the beginning of the Vladimir Putin era (1999), Eurasianisism became the focus of Russian foreign policy. The most crucial strategy of Russian Eurasianism became Eurasian Regionalism. After several stages of the regionalism process (Eurasian Economic Community, Single Economic Market, Customs Union), Russia finally succeeded in establishing the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) consisting of Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan in early 2015. The EAEU is the most developed institution of regional economic integration among post-Soviet states. The objective of this study is to evaluate Russia’s regionalism policies and explain Russia’s intentions to establish the EAEU in the new era. The research results show that the first priority of Moscow from the establishing of the Eurasian Economic Union is security, political and geopolitical issues. Otherwise, economically, this Union does not have a significant achievement for Russia. The member states of This Union are not an appropriate economic complement to each other.  

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Eurasianism
  • Eurasian Economic Union
  • regionalism
  • Regional Integration
  • Geopolitics
  1. Arakelyan, L. (2020). Russian Foreign Policy in Eurasia National Interests and Regional Integration, London: Routledge.
  2. Bassin, M.; Pozo, G. (2017). the politics of Eurasianism: identity, popular culture and Russia’s foreign policy, Mark Bassin and Gonzalo Pozo (Eds.), Rowman & Littlefield International.
  3. BP (2020). Statistical Review of World Energy, 69th edition. Available at:https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html. (Accessed 20 may 2020).
  4. Dragneva, R.; Wolczuk, K. (2017). “The Eurasian Economic Union. Deals, Rules and the Exercise of Power”, Research Paper, Chatham House, May.
  5. Dugin, A. (1994). Konservativnaja revoljucija [The conservative revolution]. Arktogeya.
  6. Dugin, A. (2009). Chetvertaya politicheskaya teoriya: Rossia i politicheskie idei XXI veka [The fourth political theory: Russia and political ideas in the 21st century]. Amphora.
  7. Dugin, A. (2014). Eurasian Mission: An Introduction to Neo-Eurasianism, Arktos.
  8. EAEU (2014). Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union, Retrieved from https://docs.eaeunion.org. (Accessed 2 October 2020).
  9. EAEU (2020). About the Eurasian Economic Union, Retrieved from https://docs.eaeunion.org. (Accessed 20 June 2020).
  10. Eurasian Development Bank (2019). Eurasian Economic Integration 2019, Report 52, Moscow: Center for Integration Studies Analytical Directorate.
  11. Eurasian Economic Commission (2018). the Eurasian Economic Union Facts and Figures.
  12. Evans, P. (2005). Between Regionalism and Regionalization: Policy Networks and the Nascent East Asian Institutional Identity, In T.J. Pempel (Ed.), Remapping East Asia: The Construction of a Region, Cornell University Press.
  13. Fawcett, L. (2015). Drivers of regional integration: historical and comparative Perspectives, In L. Brennan & P. Murray (Eds.), Drivers of Integration and Regionalism in Europe and Asia, London: Routledge.
  14. Giucci, R. (2018). “The Eurasian Economic Union: Analysis from a Trade Policy Perspective,” Berlin Economics, 29.05.2018.
  15. Hartwell, C. (2016). “Improving Competitiveness in the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Union: A Blueprint for the Next Decade.” Post-Communist Economies, 28 (1), 49–71. doi:10.1080/14631377.2015.1124554.
  16. Hassan Khani, M. (2018). Geopolitics of Regionalism; Moving towards Regional Integration as a Means for Lasting Peace and Stability in the Middle East, Geopolitics Quarterly, 13 (48), pp. 280-293. [In Persian]
  17. International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2020). World Economic Outlook Database, October 2020.
  18. Irkhin, A; Moskalenko, O. (2020). Russia’s Foreign Policy in the Great Mediterranean: Prospects and Constraints, Geopolitics Quarterly, 15 (56), pp. 110-121.
  19. Izotov, V.; Obydenkova, A. (2020). Geopolitical games in Eurasian regionalism: ideational interactions and regional international organizations, Post-Communist Economies, Published online: 08 Sep 2020.
  20. Kerr, D. (1995). the New Eurasianism: The Rise of Geopolitics in Russia's Foreign Policy, Europe-Asia Studies, 47(6), 977-988.
  21. Kirkham, K. (2016). The formation of the Eurasian Economic Union: How successful is the Russian regional hegemony? Journal of Eurasian Studies, 7(2), 111-128.
  22. Knobel, A. (2019). The Eurasian Economic Union: Development Prospects and Possible Obstacles, Russian Social Science Review, 60(2), pp. 137–161.
  23. Koolaee, E.; Abdi, A. (2018). Geopolitical Components of the Russian Foreign Policy, Geopolitics Quarterly, 14 (49), pp. 1-25. [In Persian]
  24. Lukin, A.; Yakunin, V. (2018). Eurasian integration and the development of Asiatic Russia, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9(2), pp. 100–113.
  25. Lynch D. (2000). The Evolution of Foreign Policy towards the ‘Near Abroad’. In: Russian Peacekeeping Strategies in the CIS. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333984215_3.
  26. Mayer, H. (2015). Historical narratives as normative drivers of integration and disintegration in Europe and Asia, In L. Brennan & P. Murray (Eds.), Drivers of Integration and Regionalism in Europe and Asia, London: Routledge.
  27. Molchanov, M.A. (2016). Eurasian Regionalisms and Russian Foreign Policy, Routledge.
  28. Mostafa, G. (2013). The Concept of ‘Eurasia’: Kazakhstan’s Eurasian Policy and its Implications, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 4(2), 160-170. doi: 10.1016/j.euras.2013.03.006.
  29. Mostafa, G.; Mahmood, M. (2018). Eurasian Economic Union: Evolution, challenges and possible future directions, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9(2), 163–172.
  30. Murray, P. (2015). Drivers of Regional Integration: Some Comparative Considerations, In L. Brennan & P. Murray (Eds.), Drivers of Integration and Regionalism in Europe and Asia, London: Routledge.
  31. Perović, J. (2019). Russia’s Eurasian Strategy, in J. Thompson, O. Thränert, In Strategic Trends 2019, Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich.
  32. Popescu, N. (2014). “Eurasian Union: The Real, the Imaginary and the Likely”, Chaillot Papers 132, European Union Institute for Security Studies, Condé-sur-Noireau, September.
  33. Roberts, S. (2017). The Eurasian Economic Union: the geopolitics of authoritarian cooperation, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 58(4), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2017.1415763.
  34. Roberts, S. P.; Moshes, A. (2016). “The Eurasian Economic Union: A Case of Reproductive Integration?” Post-Soviet Affairs, 32(6), 542–565. doi:10.1080/10 60586X.2015.1115198.
  35. Rotaru, V. (2018). The Eurasian Economic Union – a sustainable alternative for the former soviet space? Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(4), 425-442. doi:10.1080/14782804.2018.1519483.
  36. Russell, M. (2017). Eurasian Economic Union The rocky road to integration, European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS).
  37. Ryan, C. (2015). the role of crisis as a driver of regional integration: crisis as opportunity, In L. Brennan & P. Murray (Eds.), Drivers of Integration and Regionalism in Europe and Asia, London: Routledge.
  38. Sadeghlou, S; Hafeznia, M.R. et al. (2020). Role of Regional Integration in MERCOSUR Regional Peace and Development an Approach to Human-Centered Geopolitics, Geopolitics Quarterly, 15, (56), pp. 1-24. [In Persian]
  39. Sakwa, R. (2017). The Age of Eurasia? In M. Bassin & G. Pozo, The politics of Eurasianism: identity, popular culture and Russia’s foreign policy, London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
  40. Sergi, B.S. (2018). Putin's and Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union: A hybrid half-economics and half-political “Janus Bifrons”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9(1), 52–60.
  41. Shlapentokh, D. (2005). “Russia’s Foreign Policy and Eurasianism”, Retrieved from https://eurasianet.org/russias-foreign-policy-and-eurasianism. (Accessed 20 July 2020).
  42. Sisu Vicari, M. (2016). The Eurasian Economic Union- Approaching the Economic Integration in the Post-Soviet Space by EU-Emulated Elements, Revue Interventions économiques, 55, 1-16.
  43. Slocum, N.; Van Langenhove, L. (2005). Identity and Regional Integration, In M. Farrell., B. Hettne & L. Van Langenhove, Global politics of Regionalism: an introduction, London: Pluto Press.
  44. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2020). International Trade Statistics Yearbook, Retrieved from https://comtrade.un.org. (Accessed 20 August 2020).
  45. Vinokurov, E. (2018). Introduction to the Eurasian Economic Union, Palgrave Macmillan.
  46. Vinokurov, E.; Demidenko, M.; Korshunov, D.; Mihaly, K., (2017). Customs unions, currency crises, and monetary policy coordination: The case of the Eurasian Economic Union, Russian Journal of Economics, 3, 280–295.
  47. World Bank (2020). data 2019, retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org. (Accessed 25 July 2020).

48.Yazdani, E; Toiserkani, M; Moradi, S. (2007). Geopolitical Elaboration of Power Rivalry: The Case of Central Eurasia in New Great Game, Geopolitics Quarterly, 3 (9), pp. 120-158. [In Persian]