فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک

The Ripple Effect: How Trade Laws Shape Global Alliances and Conflicts

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 Faculty of Law, University Kebangsaan, Malaysia.
2 College of Law, Al-Bayan University, Iraq.
3 College of Law, Al-Mustaqbal University, Iraq
10.22034/igq.2026.547906.2089
چکیده
Trade law is no longer just a tool for regulating markets. It has become a powerful instrument of geopolitical influence. In today’s global environment, legal decisions involving trade agreements, regional partnerships, and economic sanctions often produce ripple effects that influence international alliances and trigger conflicts. This article examines how trade law contributes to both cooperation and tension in the global system. It draws on key examples such as the transformation of the European Union from an economic to a political union, the strategic development of CPTPP and RCEP in the Asia-Pacific, and the formation of negotiating coalitions within the World Trade Organization. These examples show how legal trade frameworks help build lasting international partnerships. The article also explores how trade law has been used to escalate disputes, including the United States and China trade conflict, the economic sanctions imposed on Russia, the trade consequences of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union, and the global divide over the TRIPS waiver proposal during the COVID-19 crisis. These cases illustrate how trade law can shape global outcomes far beyond commerce. The article concludes by emphasizing the need to better understand the political role of trade law and to prepare for the wide-ranging effects that may result from its use in a rapidly changing global order.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

The Ripple Effect: How Trade Laws Shape Global Alliances and Conflicts

نویسندگان English

Albertini Bugat Anak July 1
Syahira Balqis Binti Tarmizi 1
AbdulKareem Hussein 2
Abdulrahman Abbas Adain 3
1 Faculty of Law, University Kebangsaan, Malaysia.
2 College of Law, Al-Bayan University, Iraq.
3 College of Law, Al-Mustaqbal University, Iraq
چکیده English

Trade law is no longer just a tool for regulating markets. It has become a powerful instrument of geopolitical influence. In today’s global environment, legal decisions involving trade agreements, regional partnerships, and economic sanctions often produce ripple effects that influence international alliances and trigger conflicts. This article examines how trade law contributes to both cooperation and tension in the global system. It draws on key examples such as the transformation of the European Union from an economic to a political union, the strategic development of CPTPP and RCEP in the Asia-Pacific, and the formation of negotiating coalitions within the World Trade Organization. These examples show how legal trade frameworks help build lasting international partnerships. The article also explores how trade law has been used to escalate disputes, including the United States and China trade conflict, the economic sanctions imposed on Russia, the trade consequences of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union, and the global divide over the TRIPS waiver proposal during the COVID-19 crisis. These cases illustrate how trade law can shape global outcomes far beyond commerce. The article concludes by emphasizing the need to better understand the political role of trade law and to prepare for the wide-ranging effects that may result from its use in a rapidly changing global order.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Trade Law
Global Alliances
Global Conflicts
1.       Althabhawi, N.M; Zainol, Z.A. (2014). The patent legal system in Iraq: The path to efficiency of its statutes. World Patent Information, 36, 32-35.
2.       Biersteker, T.J; Eckert, S.E; Tourinho, M. (2016). Targeted Sanctions: The Impacts and Effectiveness of United Nations Action. Cambridge University Press.
3.       Chaisse, J; Matsushita, M. (2017). International Economic Law and Governance: Essays in Honour of Mitsuo Matsushita. Oxford University Press.
4.       Craig, P; De Búrca, G. (2020). EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
5.       Elms, D.K; Lim, C.L. (Eds.). (2012). The Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Quest for a Twenty-First-Century Trade Agreement. Cambridge University Press.
6.       Hoekman, B.M; Kostecki, M.M. (2009). The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
7.       Jackson, J.H. (1997). The World Trade Organization: Constitution and Jurisprudence. Royal Institute of International Affairs.
8.       Urata, S. (2020). “The Impact of Mega-FTAs on ASEAN: The Case of RCEP.” In L. Y. Ing and R. Yu (Eds.), East Asian Integration (pp. 113–132). Routledge.
9.       Villareal, M.A; Fergusson, I.F. (2020). USMCA: Overview and Implementation Status. Congressional Research Service.
10.   Alamdar, E; Hafeznia, M.R; Ahmadypoor, Z; Ahmadi Nohdani, S. (2024). “Explaining the Components of Geopolitical Interests in Iran-Turkey Foreign Relations.” f Quarterly, 20(1): 26–56. Available at: https://journal. iag.ir/article_210576.html?lang=en, (Accessed on: 10/5/2024). Doi: 10.220 34/igq.2024.154013.
11.   Bown, C.P. (2020). “US–China Trade War Tariffs: An Up-to-Date Chart.” Peterson Institute for International Economics. Available at: https://www. piie.com/research/piie-charts/us-china-trade-war-tariffs-date-chart, (Access- ed on: 10/5/2024).
12.   European Union. (2023). “Trade: How the EU Shapes Global Commerce.” European Commission. Available at: https://european-union.europa.eu/ priorities-and-actions/actions-topic/trade_en, (Accessed on: 10/5/2024).
13.   Giumelli, F. (2017). “The Effectiveness of EU Sanctions: An Analysis of Iran, Belarus, and Russia.” International Affairs, 92(6): 1327–1341. https:// doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12704.
14.   Ing, L.Y; Yu, R. (2020). “Regionalism and Mega-FTAs in East Asia.” East Asian Integration. Routledge. [Extracted version used in Section 2.0]
15.   Khorshidi, Abbas; Hafeznia, M.R (2024). “Geoeconomic Strategy of China in the South China Sea.” Geopolitics Quarterly, 20(1): 6–25. Available at: https://journal.iag.ir/article_210572.html?lang=en, (Accessed on: 10/5/ 2024). Doi: 10.22034/igq.2024.154011.
16.   Mahdavi, Mojtaba; Parvaneh Khakbaz (2024). “Analyzing the Geopolitical Dimensions of Energy Diplomacy between Iran and Russia.” Geopolitics Quarterly, 20(1): 57–80. Available at: https://journal.iag.ir/article_210 573.html?lang=en, (Accessed on: 10/5/2024). Doi: 10.22034/igq.2024. 154014.
17.   Mohammadi, Hassan; Javad Jahangirzadeh (2024). “The Role of Economic Corridors in Shaping Regional Alliances in West Asia.” Geopolitics Quarterly, 20(1): 81–104. Available at: https://journal.iag.ir/article_ 210573.html?lang=en, (Accessed on: 10/5/2024). Doi: 10.22034/igq.2024. 154015.
18.   Rajabi, Parviz; Zahra Ghanbari (2022). “Evaluating the Impact of Legal Instruments on China's Belt and Road Initiative.” Geopolitics Quarterly, 17(3): 134–158. Available at: https://journal.iag.ir/ article_ 175320. html?lang=en, (Accessed on: 10/5/2024). Doi: 10.22034/igq.2022.175320.
19.   Sell, S.K; Prabhala, A. (2020). “Big Pharma, Intellectual Property, and Pandemic Profiteering: The Fight over the TRIPS Waiver.” Health and Human Rights Journal, 22(2): 109–112. Available at: https://www. hhrjournal.org/2020/12/big-pharma-intellectual-property-and-pandemic-profiteering-the-fight-over-the-trips-waiver/, (Accessed on: 10/5/2024).
20.   The Eurasian Studies Journal. (2023). “Regional Trade Architecture and Strategic Partnerships in Southeast Asia.” The Eurasian Studies, 11(4). Available at: https://euraseans.com/index.php/journal/article/view/671, (Accessed on: 10/5/2024).
21.   WTO. (2023). “Coalitions and Developing Country Alliances in WTO Negotiations.” World Trade Organization. Available at: https://www.wto. org/english/tratop_e/dda_e/negotiating_groups_e.htm, (Accessed on: 10/5/2024).
دوره 21، شماره ویژه
زمستان 1404
صفحه 239-257

  • تاریخ دریافت 15 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 29 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 10 بهمن 1404