روش شناسی علمی در جغرافیای سیاسی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 مدیر گروه جغرافیای سیاسی دانشگاه تهران

2 گروه جغرافیای سیاسی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

امروزه در جغرافیای سیاسی با نوعی «کثرتگراییِ روش شناختی» که ریشه در دو نگرش کلّیِ «تبیینی» و «تفهّمی» دارند مواجهیم. پیامد این قضیّه، بروز ابهام در جایگاه و هویّتِ علمیِ جغرافیای سیاسی بوده است. در این راستا دو پرسش اساسی مطرح است؛ نخست آنکه روششناسیِ معتبر علمی کدام است؟ دوّم اینکه، چه موضعی در قبال کثرتگراییِ روششناختی در جغرافیای سیاسی میتوان اتّخاذ نمود؟ این مقاله در قالب توصیفی-تحلیلی(منطقی) و معرفت شناختی از موضع عقلانیّت انتقادی نگاشته شده و نتایج آن نشان میدهد، برخلاف تصوّر رایج، روششناسیِ معتبرِ علمی در جغرافیای سیاسی نه منطبق بر روش پوزیتیویستیِ سنّتی است و نه بر اساس روش شناسیهایِ تفهّمی و فراپوزیتیویستی، بلکه روشِ معتبر علمی در این زمینه، روشِ فرضی-استنتاجی به عنوان روشِ نهایی و واحدِ علوم تجربی نظیر جغرافیای سیاسی است. با اینحال، روشهای دیگر بنا بر برخی نکات مثبتِ آنها، صرفاً در مرحلۀ گردآوریِ داده ها مورد استفادۀ جغرافیای سیاسی قرار میگیرند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Scientific methodology in political geography

نویسندگان [English]

  • mahmood vasegh 1
  • ahad mohamadi 2
1 Director of Department of Political Geography, University of Tehran
2 Political Geography Department of University of tehran
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Introduction
In scientific studies, research was conducted based on "rational and explanatory" approaches. The rationalist approach longer history started from Aristotle scientific activities. However, after political and social changes arising from the Renaissance movement in the West, the methodology inspired by the Aristotelian and Church that is "school system" encountered major criticisms and disputes, and ultimately, led to emergence and development of a new approach in science called "empirical approach". It was followed by fundamental changes in research methodology extending naturalism to all science fields including natural and human studies. This approach was also confronted with epistemological problems especially in the humanities. Finally, a new methodology called "interpretive and hermeneutic methodology" was emphasized for the humanities. Political geography, along with these developments, turned into theories and schools that followed the interpretive and humanist approaches, and experienced a kind of "methodological pluralism". As it is clear, the first consequence of methodological pluralism in each discipline was emergence of ambiguity about the scientific status and identity of the field. Now, the political geography is facing this situation. There are two fundamental questions in this regard: first, what is the valid scientific methodology? and second, what position can be taken for methodological pluralism in political geography?
Methodology
Due to its philosophical and rational nature, the present study is a theoretical and fundamental research based on a descriptive-analytic (logical) method using logical reasoning. For this reason, topics and issues of this set are considered as documentary and library research.
Discussions and Findings
Nowadays, in social sciences, including political geography, we are facing a kind of methodological pluralism rooted in two general "explanatory" and "hermeneutics" approaches. The explanatory approach in political geography led to emergence of methodological schools such as environmentalism, spatial school, systemic attitude and school of behaviorism and the hermeneutic approach led to schools such as phenomenology, structuralism, discourse and post-structuralist view, and radical and postmodern attitudes. Competition of these methodological schools has led to the emergence of naturalistic and humanistic methodologies in this field. The important point is that each of these approaches and schools aspire for the monopoly of scientific method and each has its own followers. The results and findings of this study showed that, despite multiple and diverse humanistic and hermeneutic approaches in political geography, these methods and approaches do not have the necessary scientific and epistemological features and credibility, and are ideological and political and social viewpoints more than having a scientific nature. Similarly, the traditional empiricism approach based on traditional inductivism does not have essential features for a comprehensive scientific method like hermeneutics. Therefore, contrary to the popular belief, the empirical sciences including natural and social sciences, e.x. political geography, do not have multiple methodologies, but a common methodology called hypothetical-deductive. The other commonly used methods political geography are only applicable at the data collection stage and lack the characteristics of a full-scale scientific methodology.
Conclusion
Despite variety of research methods in the social sciences, and in particular, political geography, the researcher has no limit to use various methods in accordance with his own goals and objectives. However, it should be noted that the most valid and complete research method in empirical sciences, both natural and social, is hypothetical-deductive, and other methods, such as discursive methods, structuralism, post-structuralism, etc., are used only in data collection as many of the commonly used methods in the social sciences lack the capacity and efficiency to be used in the main stage of scientific research, i.e. understanding and evaluating data. Therefore, it is not possible to fully utilize these methods in social and geography sciences. As a result, the reliable method for social and geographic sciences is hypothetical-deductive method. This method is based on both "logic and experience" in scientific studies and emphasizes the importance of theories and hypotheses before observation, explanation, interpretation, and analysis. Therefore, it is based on the "deductive" method in scientific research.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Experimental science
  • Scientific Methodology
  • Exploratory and hermeneutic Approach
  • Hypothetical-deductive Methodology
  • Political Geography
  1. Asayesh, Hossein and Moshiri, Rahim (2011), Typology and scientific searches techniques in human science with emphasize on geography, fifth edition, Tehran, Gomes.[In Persian]
  2. Afzali, Rasoul and Amiri, Ali (2011), Epistemology Foundations and Methodology of Post-Modern Theories in Political geography and Geopolitics, Human Geography Research, No. 77, pp. 39-60.[In Persian]
  3. Afzali, Rasoul, (2016), Methodology in Political geography and Geopolitics (post-positivism Methods), Tehran, Tehran University Press.[In Persian]
  4. Okasha, Samir, (2014), Philosophy of Science, Translated by Hooman Panahande, Fifth Edition, Tehran, Farhang Contemporary Publishing.[In Persian]
  5. Akbari tokhmashloo, Javad and Zibakalam, Saeed (2011), Rationality in Popper's Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Science quarterly, Research Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, First Year, Second Edition, pp. 25-64.[In Persian]
  6. Akrami, Mosa and Samadi, Hadi (2010), Islamic Medical Philosophy and Critical Rationality, Journal of Traditional Medicine of Islam and Iran, First Year, No. 4, pp. 349-364.[In Persian]
  7. Popper, Karl Raymond (2009), The Logic of Scientific Exploration, Translated by Hossein Kamali, Fourth Edition, Tehran, Scientific and Cultural Publishing.[In Persian]
  8. Tavana, Mohammad Ali (2014), The critical realism paradigm beyond positivism and hermeneutics: towards interdisciplinary methodology, Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, Volume 7, Number 1 , Pp. 27-56.[In Persian]
  9. Toulmin, Stephen. E (2015), Philosophy of Science, Translation by Mohammad Reza Shadro, Tehran, Science Publishing.[In Persian]
  10. Jackson, Roy & et al, (2012), Philosophy of Science; (from Understanding Philosophy book), Translated by Mansur Nasiri, Tehran, Elmifarhangi Publishing Company.[In Persian]
  11. Hafeznia, Mohammad Reza (2008), An Introduction to the Research Method in Humanities, 15th Edition, Tehran, Samt Publishing.[In Persian]
  12. Habibi, Reza (2013), An introduction to Philosophy of Science, Third Edition, Qom, Publication of Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute (RA).[In Persian]
  13. Haghighat Sadegh (2012), Methodology of Political Science, Third Edition, Qom, University of Mofid Publications.[In Persian]
  14. Khorramshahi, Baha'addin (2010), Logical Positivism, Fourth Edition, Tehran, Elmifarhangi Publishing Company.[In Persian]
  15. Rikhtegaran, Mohammad Reza (2010), Phenomenology; Art and Modernity, Second Edition, Tehran, Saghi Publishing. [In Persian]
  16. Saei, Ali (2011), A critical argument about the relation of the theory to experience: the case study of epistemic positivist systems, critical and fuzzy rationality, The Journal of Historical Sociology, period 3, No. 2.[In Persian]
  17. Saei, Ali (2013 a), social science Research Method through Critical reason Approach, Fourth Edition, Tehran, Samt Publishing.[In Persian]
  18. Saei, Ali, (2013 b), The Rationality of Scientific Knowledge: A Critical approach on social science Methodology, Tehran, Agah Publishing.[In Persian]
  19. Soroush, Abdolkarim (1995), Lessons in the Philosophy of Social Sciences (Method of Interpretation in the Social Sciences), Tehran, Ney Publishing.[In Persian]
  20. Soroush, Abdolkarim, (2014 a), Tafarooj-e  Sune, Ninth Edition, Tehran, Serat Cultural Institute.[In Persian]
  21. Soroush, Abdolkarim, (2014 b), What is science, what is philosophy?, Eighteen edition, Tehran, Serat Cultural Institute.[In Persian]
  22. Sherratt, Yvonne (2014), Continental Philosophy of Social Sciences: Hermeneutics; Genealogy and theory from Greece to the critical twenty-firstcentury; Hadi Jalili Translation; Fourth Edition; Tehran; Ney Publishing.[In Persian]
  23. Shakouei, Hossein, (2010), Applied Geography and Geographic Schools, Eighth Edition, Mashhad, Behnashr Publishing.[In Persian]
  24. Shiroudi, Morteza (2013), Validation of Hermeneutic Methodology in the Humanities and Islamic Sciences, Islamic Politics research, First Year, No. 1, pp. 37-53.[In Persian]
  25. Sadeghi, Reza (2015), An Introduction to Contemporary Science Philosophy, Tehran, Samt Publishing.[In Persian]
  26. Ali tabar Firouzjaei, Ramazan (2016), The Methodology of Islamic Human Sciences (Coordinates, Obligations, and Characteristics), Mind Quarterly, No. 68, pp. 147-176.[In Persian]
  27. Follesdal, Dagfinn (2000), Hermeneutics and hypothetico -deductive method, translated by Ahmad Reza Jalili, Quarterly Journal of Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities (MSSH), No. 22, pp. 130-155.[In Persian]
  28. Ghaeminia, Ali Reza (2003), Two types of Realism: naive and Critical, Mind quarterly, No. 14, pp. 27-40.[In Persian]
  29. Ghahramani, Mohammadamin and Abdollahi, Bijan (2013), Philosophical foundations and the study of relationship between ontology and epistemology of interpretive paradigms, critical and scientific, Criterion of research in the humanities, Year 4, No. 1 , pp. 51-70.[In Persian]
  30. Kazemi, Ali-Asghar (2007), Methods and Insights in Politics (Philosophical, Scientific and Methodology), Third Edition, Tehran, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publications.[In Persian]
  31. Kamran, Hasan and Vasegh, Mahmoud (2007), Logic and Scientific Method in Political Geography, Geography and Development Quarterly, No. 10, pp. 73-88.[In Persian]
  32. Gandomi Nasrabadi, Reza, (2010), Philosophical Methodology of Wolfson (hypothetical-deductive Method), Quarterly Journal of Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities (MSSH), 16, 64 and 65, pp. 191-209.[In Persian]
  33. Gillies, Donald, (2012), Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century, Translation by Hassan Myandari, Fifth Edition, Tehran, Samt Publishing.[In Persian]
  34. Little, Daniel (2009), Explanation in the Social Sciences; An introduction to the Philosophy of Social Science, Translated by Abdolkarim Soroush, Fifth Edition, Tehran, Saraat Publications.[In Persian]
  35. Laydman, James (2014), Philosophy of Science, Translation by Hossein Karami, Third Edition, Tehran, Hekmat Publishing.[In Persian]
  36. Modarresi, Mohammad Taghi (1999), Islamic Logic, translation by Mohammad Hossein Rouhani, Tehran, Mohanb al-Hussein (AS) publishing.[In Persian]
  37. Moeini Alamdari, Jahangir (2013), Methodology of New Theories in Politics (Positivism and post- positivism), Fourth Edition, Tehran, University of Tehran Press.[In Persian]
  38. Nabavi, Lotfollah (2010), the elements of Logic and Methodology, Second Edition, Tehran, Tarbiat Modarres University Press.[In Persian]
  39. Navali, Mahmoud (1990), what is phenomenology? The Quarterly Journal of Philosophical Investigations, University of Tabriz-Iran, No. 135 and 136, pp. 96-125.[In Persian]
  40. vaseq, Mahmoud & et al (2016), Political Geography as an Experimental Science, Human Geography Research, No 2, pp. 389-405.[In Persian]
  41. vaseq, Mahmoud & et al (2018), A Reflections on the subject of geography, Geopolitics Quarterly, 14, No 1, pp. 176-221.[In Persian]
Lacy, A. R (1996) A Dictionary Of Philosophy, 3rd  ed, Routledge.42