تبیین سیاست‌های قومی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در فیلم‌های عامه‌پسند با استفاده از روش تحلیل محتوا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه جغرافیای سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشجوی مقطع دکتری جغرافیای سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

3 کارشناسی ارشد رشته جغرافیای سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

توجه به تنوع قومی و سیاست‌های مدیریت اقوام از مسائل مهم در مدیریت سیاسی فضایی- جغرافیایی ایران است. از آنجایی که ضرورت این مساله بر کسی پوشیده نیست، شناخت این سیاست‌ها و نحوه اعمال آنها می‌تواند یکی از اهداف پژوهشی باشد. در این بین یکی از ابزارهای دولت برای اعمال سیاست‌های قومی رسانه‌های جمعی است. تلویزیون عامه‌پسندترین جلوه فرهنگ در قرن 21 است؛ و لذا تحلیل محتوای برنامه‌های تلویزیونی در خصوص اقوام روش مناسبی برای شناخت سیاست‌های قومی دولت‌هاست. در این مقاله تبیین سیاست‌های قومی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در رسانه ملی با تاکید بر فیلم‌های عامه‌پسند تلویزیونی با استفاده از روش تحلیل محتوا هدف مقاله بوده است. نتایج به دست آمده نشان می‌دهد، بین بازنمایی فیلم‌های عامه‌پسند رسانه ملی و واقعیات قومی در جامعه تفاوت زیادی وجود دارد و سیاست تکثرگرایی در بُعد فرهنگی در فیلم‌های عامه‌پسند رسانه ملی بازنمایی شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Explain the Ethnic Policies of the Islāmic Republic of Iran in Popular Films using Content Analysis Methods

نویسندگان [English]

  • Rasoul Afzali 1
  • Abolghasem Mahmoodi 2
  • Ali Bagheri 3
1 Associate Professor at the Department of Political Geography and a Faculty Member of the University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Ph.D. Student Political Geography at the University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Master of Political Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Intrduction
Among the tools of ethnic political management of a political system, the media, through the images they present of ethnic groups and the representations they make of them, show how people view ethnic groups and how they are constructed. Community identities have had the greatest impact. Among these media, television is one of the first of these media. In the Islāmic Republic of Iran, different policies are applied to ethnicities; all studies in this area have often examined the government's ethnic policies by setting written criteria such as documents, reports, rules, and regulations. Given the governmental and governance nature of the media and the Islāmic Republic of Iran's Radio and Television is a tool to show government policies in various fields, it is possible to study and explain ethnic policies in Iran by analyzing the content of media programs. It addressed the policies pursued by the political system with the tools of the national media, with the aim of regulating the relations between the small groups of identity and national identity. The main issue in this study is to check the ethnic policies of the Islāmic Republic of Iran towards ethnicities and to understand the approaches of ethnic representation through the analysis of the content of popular films broadcast on television.
 
 Methodology
In this paper, the content analysis method is used to collect and analyze data. In the analysis of the content of TV films, the sample unit was popular films; the recording unit, ethnic themes, and symbols; Statistical analysis of ethnic policy items have also been provided separately to answer research questions as a unit of analysis in research counting units that are film sequences.
 
Result and Discussion
The research findings are analyzed in the form of 24 categories: first category: film genre, second category: film subject, third category: threat and humiliation of ethnic groups, fourth category: adherence of ethnic culture to the dominant culture, Fifth and sixth categories: repression and imprisonment of ethnic figures, seventh category: local language, eighth category: local language in the school environment or government offices, ninth category: school access to Persian language, Tenth category: social participation of ethnic groups, eleventh category: independent political organization, twelfth category: loyalty of ethnic groups to sovereignty, thirteenth category: ethnic disputes, fourteenth and fifteenth category: ethnic killing or expulsion and separation of ethnic groups from the land, sixteenth category: national unity, Seventeenth category: local protests, Eighteenth category: ethnic coöperation with local groups, nineteenth category: local clothing, twentieth category: Persians, twenty-first category: homogeneity of greatest and minority, twenty-second category: ethnic politics, twenty-third category: peaceful coexistence, last category : Which people? The findings show that the highest frequency is related to pluralism, but in the cultural dimension, not in the structural dimension. That is to say, attention to cultural differences such as customs, local dress, the local language, as well as peaceful living between subcultures, or local tribes and groups has been given more emphasis.
 
Conclusion
In popular Iranian national media films, the politics of pluralism in the cultural dimension are represented more often, And in the second priority, ethnic replication policies and some of its dialects have also had significant frequency in the sequences. Representation of the demands and demands (social, cultural, economic, and political) of the ethnic groups also shows that these structural and political demands of the ethnic groups have been completely ignored And there have been negative and passive reactions to them from the central government. Finally, there is a big difference between representing popular films in the national media and ethnic realities in society; Because if we consider the content and genre of films, a small number of films are based on a historical genre made by national media agents, and as a result, many of them have been shown with an unrealistic theme of the history of ethnic groups and ethnic groups.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Ethnicity
  • Iran
  • Media
  • Content Analysis
  • Representation
  1. Abdi, A; Rahimi, R; Eivazi, M (2014). Explaining ethnic approaches in the election slogans of presidential candidates, Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume 10, Number 35, Fall, pp. 95-121. [In Persian]
  2. Chapman, J (2013). Comparative media history: an introduction: 1789 to the present, Translator: Dariush Del Ara, Publisher: Saqi. [In Persian]
  3. Ahmadi, B (1998). From visual cues to text, Markaz Publications.[In Persian]
  4. Ahmadipour, Z; Rashidi, Y (2018). Geopolitical Analysis; Representation of Spaces of Fear in Cinema, Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume 14, Number 50, Summer, pp. 21-55. [In Persian]
  5. Alan, B (1996). Culture of Social Sciences, translated by Baqer Sarukhani, Tehran, Kayhan Publishing. [In Persian]
  6. Atton, C (2008). Alternative media theory and journalism practice. Digital media and democracy: Tactics in hard times, 213-228.
  7. Azami, H; Heidari, J (2015). Modeling Symptoms of Convergent and Divergent Ethnic Policies in Iran, Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume 11, Number 37, Spring, pp. 71-100. [In Persian]
  8. Baudrillard, J (2010). Consumer society of Pirooz Izadi translation. Tehran. [In Persian]
  9. Calloway ,T (2008 ). Framing The Black Community: A Content Analysis Of The Plain, Dealer, Akron Beacon Journal And The Vindicator, Kent State University
  10. Castells, M (2009). Communication Power. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
  11. Currie, G (2009). Image and Mind: Film, Philosophy, and Cognitive Sciences, translated by Dr. Mohammad Shahba, Mehr Newsha Publications, Tehran. [In Persian]
  12. Debrix, F (2009). Horror of Image: International Relations and the Global Orbit of Image, translated by Sobhan Rezaei, Collection of Articles on New Frontiers in International Relations, translated by Hassan Bashir, Tehran: Imam Sadegh (AS) University Press.
  13. Dodds, K (2000). Geopolitics, A very short introduction , oxford.
  14. Dodds, K (2007). Geopolitics in a Changing World, Translators: Ataullah Abdi, Zahra Ahmadipour,Balegh danesh Publications, Tehran. [In Persian]
  15. Dyer, R (2005). White, In Film Theory: Critical Concept In Media And Cultural Studies, Volume 3, Routledge.
  16. Ferasti, M (2012). Dialectic of Criticism, Saghi Publications. [In Persian]
  17. Ghaffari, M; Zarrin Kaviani, B (2011). A Study of the Process of Participation of Citizens of Kurdistan Province in the Presidential Elections of 1997-2005, Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume 7, Number 21, Spring, pp. 88-110. [In Persian]
  18. Gibbons, J (2002). Postmodern Politics, translated by Mansour Ansari, Tehran: Gam No Publications. [In Persian]
  19. Goodarzi, H (2006). Fundamental Concepts in Ethnic Studies, Tehran: Iranian Civilization Publications. [In Persian]
  20. Gregory, D (1994). Geographical Imaginations. Cambridge,MA: Blackwell.
  21. Hafizian, M.H (2009). Government, Elites and Development in the Middle East, Tehran: Expediency Council Publications. [In Persian]
  22. Hajiani, E (2001). Ethnic Policy Pattern in Iran, Strategic Studies Quarterly, Fourth Year, First and Second Issues, Spring and Summer. [In Persian]
  23. Hajiani, E (2002). Inter-Cultural Dialogue and National Cohesion with Emphasis on Habermas Theory, National Studies Quarterly, No. 12, pp. 89-75. [In Persian].
  24. Hall, S (2008). Excerpts from Representation. Translated by Ehsan Shaghasemi, under the supervision of Saeed Reza Ameli, Collection of Communication Theories, Volume III. Tehran: Research Institute for Cultural and Social Studies, Ministry of Science. [In Persian]
  25. Harley, J.B. (1988). Maps, Knowledge, and Power. In: Cosgrove, Denis and Daniels, S (Editors). The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the symbolic representation, Design and Use of Past Environments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Heidari, J (2012). The role of political management in the convergence and divergence of ethnicities (Case study: Kurdish people); Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, M.Sc. Thesis. [In Persian]
  27. Hesabi, A (2017). A Study of the Relationship between National Solidarity with the Discourse of Ethnic Policies and Its Impact on Different Ethnicities in Khuzestan (Reform Period); Shushtar Azad University Social Sciences Quarterly, Volume 11, Number 37, pp. 373-394.[In Persian]
  28. Hill, J; Gibson, P (2017). Critical Approaches to Film Studies, Translated by Ali Ameri Mahabadi, Publisher of Surah Mehr. [In Persian]
  29. Jahangirzadeh, J (2011). Review and Analysis of Ethnic Policy in the Islamic Republic of Iran and its Comparison with the Second Pahlavi Course of Allameh Tabatabai University, Faculty of Social Sciences, PhD Thesis. [In Persian]
  30. Jeffers, A (2008). Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373-393.
  31. Johnson .A (2002). African-Americans in Television News: From Description to Explanation. The Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 189-205.
  32. King, A. (2003). Cultures and Spaces of Postcolonial Knowledge; Handbook of cultural geography, edited by Kay Anderson, Mona Domosh, Steve Pile and NigelThrif.
  33. Lal, J (2000). Media, Communication and Culture, translated by Majid Nekoudoust, Tehran: Iran Publications.
  34. Lashkari Tafreshi, E; Ahmadi, S.A (2016). Theoretical-Philosophical Explanation of the Effects of Mass Media on Geographical Space, Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning, Volume 27, Number 4 (64); Pages 117 to 130. [In Persian]
  35. Lewis, A. (1997). Democracy and free press: are they incompatible? Bulletin, the American academy of arts and science (March 1997), no6.
  36. Maghsoudi, M (2003). Ethnicities and Their Role in the Political Developments of the Kingdom of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Tehran: Islamic Revolutionary Documentation Center, First Edition. [In Persian]
  37. Marger, M (1998). "Ethnic Politics" translated by Asghar Eftekhari, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies, First Issue, Spring Period. [In Persian]
  38. McKenzie, W. (1994). Virtual Geography: Living with Global Media Events, Indiana University Press, 220 page.
  39. Mir Haidar; D; Gholami, B; Mirahmadi, F.S (2013). Critical Analysis of Ethnic Maps in Iran, Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume 9, Number 31, Pages 1-30. [In Persian]
  40. Mohsenianrad, M (2003). Communication, Third Edition, Tehran: Samat Publications.
  41. Molana, H (2005). Global Information and Communication: New Frontiers in International Relations, translated by Assadollah Azad and Mohammad Hassanzadeh, Tehran: Librarian Publishing. [In Persian]
  42. Morley, D (2000). Home Territories: Media, mobility and identity. London: Routledge.
  43. Otuathail, G (1996). critical geopolitics, London , Routledge.
  44. Palu, H (2011). The politics of visual representation: Security, the US and the ‘war on terrorism’. In Stocchetti, Matteo and Kukkonen, Karin (Eds). Images in Use: Towards the critical analysis of visual communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  45. Peter; L (2013). Meditation on Film, translated by Hamidreza Ahmadi Lari; Publishing Saghi.[In Persian]
  46. Petersen, W (1980). Concepts of Ethnicity’, inS.Ternstrom(ed.)Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
  47. Said, E (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books
  48. Salehi Amiri, S.R (2006); Management of Ethnic Diversity based on Social Capital Theories, Strategy Quarterly, No. 40. [In Persian]
  49. Shapiro, M.J. (2009). Cinematic Geopolitics. London: Routledge.
  50. S (2004). Animated Children’s Programs, Louisiana :Xavier University Of Louisiana.
  51. Stevenson, N (1995). Understanding media culture, London: sagepress, 245 page.
  52. Taft, R (1963). The Assimilation Orientation of Immigrants And Australians, Human Relations,Vol 16,Nol 3, pp 276-93.
  53. Tavanbkhsh, M (2007). Media Diplomacy as a Foreign Policy Tool, Strategic Research Institute, Research Journal, No. 10, 78 p. [In Persian]
  54. Williams, Q (2007). Understanding Media Theory, Saghi Publications. [In Persian]
  55. Williams, R (1977). Mutual Accommodation: Ethnic Conflict and Cooperation, inneapolis,University of Minnesota Press.
  56. Zandi, E (2001). Ethnic Crisis and National Unity: Ethnic Policy Model in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Journal: Andisheh Culture, First Year of Autumn and Winter, No. 3 and 4. [In Persian]